Integration of cognitive conflict in generative learning model to enhancing students’ creative thinking skills
Full Text (PDF)
Akmam Akmam 1 * , Renol Afrizon 2 , Irwan Koto 3 , David Setiawan 4 , Rahmat Hidayat 1 , Fuja Novitra 1
More Detail
1 Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang, INDONESIA2 Sultan Idris Education University, Tanjung Malim, MALAYSIA3 Universitas Bengkulu, Bengkulu, INDONESIA4 Universitas Lancang Kuning, Pekanbaru, INDONESIA* Corresponding Author
Abstract
In the complexity of the Fourth Industrial Revolution era, the importance of creative thinking is increasingly emphasized in the context of learning computing and algorithms. These skills are instrumental in inspiring innovative solutions, addressing complex challenges, and fostering the development of advanced technologies that characterize the transformative landscape of Industrial Revolution 4.0. This study aims to determine the effectiveness of the generative learning model based on cognitive conflict in improving the creative thinking skills (CTS) and learning outcomes of students in the computational physics and algorithms & programming courses. This research used mixed methods consisting of pretest-posttest control group design and snowballing technique. The research instruments consist of cognitive tests, psychomotor tests, affective tests, CTS tests, observation questionnaires, and interviews. The research sample consisted of 138 students taking computational physics and algorithms & programming courses. Quantitative data were analyzed using multivariate analysis of variance and qualitative data were analyzed using narrative analysis. The findings indicate that this model effectively improves students’ CTS and learning outcomes. Furthermore, the cognitive conflict aspect encourages students to be creative in analyzing and solving problems. This model has the potential to be used to optimize students’ potential in facing the demands of the fourth industrial revolution.
License
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Article Type: Research Article
EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, Volume 20, Issue 9, September 2024, Article No: em2504
https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15026
Publication date: 02 Sep 2024
Article Views: 590
Article Downloads: 342
Open Access References How to cite this articleReferences
- Abegglen, S., Burns, T., & Sinfield, S. (2021). Editorial: Collaboration in higher education: Partnering with students, colleagues and external stakeholders. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 18(7), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.18.7.01
- Aderibigbe, S., Colucci-Gray, L., & Gray, D. S. (2016). Conceptions and expectations of mentoring relationships in a teacher education reform context. Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 24(1), 8-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2016.1163636
- Adeyemi, S. B., & Awolere, M. A. (2016). Effects of experiential and generative learning strategies on students’ academic achievement in environmental concepts. Journal of Human Ecology, 56(3), 251-262. https://doi.org/10.1080/09709274.2016.11907062
- Akmam, A., Anshari, R., Jalinus, N., & Amran, A. (2019). Factors influencing the critical and creative thinking skills of college students in computational physics courses. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1317, Article 012172. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1317/1/012172
- Akmam, A., Hidayat, R., Mufit, F., Jalinus, N., & Amran, A. (2021). Problems of students in following the online learning process in the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1876, 012083. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1876/1/012083
- Akmam, A., Hidayat, R., Mufit, F., Jalinus, N., & Amran, A. (2022). Factor analysis affecting the implementation of the generative learning model with a cognitive conflict strategy in the computational physics course during the COVID-19 pandemic era. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 28(01), 64-74. https://doi.org/10.17762/kuey.v28i01.324
- Alabidi, S., Alarabi, K., Tairab, H., Alamassi, S., & Alsalhi, N. R. (2023). The effect of computer simulations on students’ conceptual and procedural understanding of Newton’s second law of motion. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(5), Article em2259. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13140
- Albar, S. B., & Southcott, J. E. (2021). Problem and project-based learning through an investigation lesson: Significant gains in creative thinking behaviour within the Australian foundation (preparatory) classroom. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, Article 100853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100853
- Andres, H. P. (2019). Active teaching to manage course difficulty and learning motivation. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 43(2), 220-235. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2017.1357073
- Angraini, E., Zubaidah, S., Susanto, H., & Omar, N. (2022). Enhancing creativity in genetics using three teaching strategies-based TPACK model. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(12), Article em2196. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12697
- Atweh, B., Bleicher, R. E., & Cooper, T. J. (1998). The construction of the social context of mathematics classrooms: A sociolinguistic analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(1), 63-82. https://doi.org/10.2307/749718
- Azwar, S. (2019). Reabilitas dan validitas [Reliability and validity]. Pustaka Pelajar.
- Ball, A., Joyce, H. D., & Anderson-Butcher, D. (2016). Exploring 21st century skills and learning environments for middle school youth. International Journal of School Social Work, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.4148/2161-4148.1012
- Baroutsis, A., White, S., Ferdinands, E., Goldsmith, W., & Lambert, E. (2019). Computational thinking as a foundation for coding: Developing student engagement and learning. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 24(2), 11-15.
- Bedford, D. S., Bisbe, J., & Sweeney, B. (2019). Performance measurement systems as generators of cognitive conflict in ambidextrous firms. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 72, 21-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2018.05.010
- Bektiarso, S., Dewi, D. R., & Subiki. (2021). Effect of problem based learning models with 3D thinking maps on creative thinking abilities and physics learning outcomes in high school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1832, Article 012027. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1832/1/012027
- Berestova, A., Ermakov, D., Aitbayeva, A., Gromov, E., & Vanina, E. (2021). Social networks to improve the creative thinking of students: How does it works? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, Article 100912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100912
- Berie, Z., Damtie, D., & Bogale, Y. N. (2022). Inquiry-based learning in science education: A content analysis of research papers in Ethiopia (2010-2021). Education Research International. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6329643
- Breitwieser, J., & Brod, G. (2021). Cognitive prerequisites for generative learning: Why some learning strategies are more effective than others. Child Development, 92(1), 258-272. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13393
- Brod, G. (2021). Generative learning: Which strategies for what age? Educational Psychology Review, 33(4), 1295-1318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09571-9
- Buchner, J. (2022). Generative learning strategies do not diminish primary students’ attitudes towards augmented reality. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 701-717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10445-y
- Calabretta, G., Gemser, G., & Wijnberg, N. M. (2017). The interplay between intuition and rationality in strategic decision making: A paradox perspective. Organization Studies, 38(3-4), 365-401. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616655483
- Calavia, M. B., Blanco, T., & Casas, R. (2021). Fostering creativity as a problem-solving competence through design: Think-create-learn, a tool for teachers. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, Article 100761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100761
- Calvo, G. G., & Álvarez, L. M. (2018). Embodied teaching journals as an instrument for reflection and self-evaluation during the teaching practicum. Estudios Pedagogicos, 44(2). https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07052018000200185
- Chen, J., Wang, M., Grotzer, T. A., & Dede, C. (2018). Using a three-dimensional thinking graph to support inquiry learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(9), 1239-1263. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21450
- Cikmaz, A., Fulmer, G., Yaman, F., & Hand, B. (2021). Examining the interdependence in the growth of students’ language and argument competencies in replicative and generative learning environments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(10), 1457-1488. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21715
- Couto Zoltowski, A. P., & Pereira Teixeira, M. A. (2020). Development of self-regulated learning in college students: A qualitative study. Psicologia em Estudo, 25. https://doi.org/10.4025/psicolestud.v25i0.47501
- Creswell, J. W., & Guetterman, T. C. (2019). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating qualitative and quantitative research. Pearson.
- Cummings, J. B., & Blatherwick, M. L. (2017). Creative dimensions of teaching and learning in the 21st century. Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-047-9
- Davis, A., & McDonald, D. (2019). Teachers’ reflections of instructional effectiveness: Self-assessment through a standards-based appraisal process. Reflective Practice, 20(1), 125-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2019.1569508
- Detel, W. (2015). Social constructivism. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (pp. 228-234). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.63081-7
- Dilekçi, A., & Karatay, H. (2023). The effects of the 21st century skills curriculum on the development of students’ creative thinking skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 47, Article 101229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101229
- Dominguez, H., Crespo, S., del Valle, T., Adams, M., Coupe, M., Gonzalez, G., & Ormazabal, Y. (2020). Learning to transform, transforming to learn: Children’s creative thinking with fractions. Journal of Humanistic Mathematics, 10(2), 76-101. https://doi.org/10.5642/jhummath.202002.06
- Eranova, M., & Prashantham, S. (2017). Paradoxical cognition and decision quality: The moderating effects of flexibility and rationality. Academy of Management Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2017.14282abstract
- Fauziah, E. W., Hobri, Yuliati, N., & Indrawanti, D. (2019). Student’s creative thinking skills in mathematical problem posing based on lesson study for learning community. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 243, Article 012142. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/243/1/012142
- Fiorella, L. (2023). Making sense of generative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 35(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09769-7
- Fisher, D. (2022). Mathematics mobile blended learning development: Student-oriented high order thinking skill learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(1), 69-81. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.1.69
- FitzGerald, L., & Garrison, K. L. (2016). Investigating the guided inquiry process. In Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Information Literacy: Key to an Inclusive Society (pp. 667-677). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52162-6
- Fleer, M. (2022). The genesis of design: Learning about design, learning through design to learning design in play. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(3), 1441-1468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09670-w
- Flick, L. B. (1996). Understanding a generative learning model of instruction: A case study of elementary teacher planning. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 7(2), 95-122. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00114121
- Gafour, O. W. A., & Gafour, W. A. S. (2021). Creative thinking skills–A review article. Journal of Education and E-Learning, 4, 44-58.
- Gibson, C. B. (2017). Elaboration, generalization, triangulation, and interpretation: On enhancing the value of mixed method research. Organizational Research Methods, 20(2), 193-223. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116639133
- Goldstein, I., & Yang, L. (2019). Good disclosure, bad disclosure. Journal of Financial Economics, 131(1), 118-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.08.004
- Gu, X., Ritter, S. M., Koksma, J., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2021). The influence of school type and perceived teaching style on students’ creativity. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 71, Article 101084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101084
- Hall, D. M., Čustović, I., Sriram, R., & Chen, Q. (2022). Teaching generative construction scheduling: Proposed curriculum design and analysis of student learning for the tri-constraint method. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 51, Article 101455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2021.101455
- Hao, N., Ku, Y., Liu, M., Hu, Y., Bodner, M., Grabner, R. H., & Fink, A. (2016). Reflection enhances creativity: Beneficial effects of idea evaluation on idea generation. Brain and Cognition, 103, 30-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2016.01.005
- Heitzmann, N., Stadler, M., Richters, C., Radkowitsch, A., Schmidmaier, R., Weidenbusch, M., & Fischer, M. R. (2023). Learners’ adjustment strategies following impasses in simulations–Effects of prior knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 83, Article 101632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101632
- Hendri, S., & Setiawan, W. (2016). The development of earth quake teaching material for junior high school by four step teaching materials development method. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 12(1), 65-76.
- Hernandez Sibo, I. P., Gomez Celis, D. A., Liou, S., Koh, B., & Leung, A. K. Y. (2023). The role of argumentation on high- and low-creative performing groups: A structuration analysis of undergraduate students’ group discussion. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 47, Article 101217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101217
- Heryadi, D., & Sundari, R. S. (2020). Expository learning model. International Journal of Education and Research, 8(1), 207-216.
- Hidayati, D., Novianti, H., Khansa, M., Slamet, J., & Suryati, N. (2023). Effectiveness project-based learning in ESP class: Viewed from Indonesian students’ learning outcomes. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 13(3), 558-565. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.3.1839
- Hinck, A., & Tighe, J. (2020). From the other side of the desk: Students’ discourses of teaching and learning. Communication Education, 69(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2019.1657157
- Hürsen, Ç., Kaplan, A., & Özdal, H. (2014). Assessment of creative thinking studies in terms of content analysis. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143, 1177-1185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.574
- Ikävalko, M., Sointu, E., Lambert, M. C., & Viljaranta, J. (2023). Students’ self-efficacy in self-regulation together with behavioural and emotional strengths: Investigating their self-perceptions. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 38(4), 558-572. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2022.2127083
- James, A. J., Douglas, T. A., Earwaker, L. A., & Mather, C. A. (2022). Student experiences of facilitated asynchronous online discussion boards: Lessons learned and implications for teaching practice. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 19(5), Article 10. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.19.5.9
- Jia, X., Li, W., & Cao, L. (2019). The role of metacognitive components in creative thinking. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02404
- Jiang, T., Wang, S., Wang, J., & Ma, Y. (2018). Effect of different instructional methods on students’ conceptual change regarding electrical resistance as viewed from a synthesized theoretical framework. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(7), 2771-2786. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/90592
- John, P. (2018). Constructivism: Its implications for language teaching and second-language acquisition. In Education and development (pp. 217-230).
- Kafai, Y., Proctor, C., & Lui, D. (2019). From theory bias to theory dialogue: Embracing cognitive, situated, and critical framings of computational thinking in K-12 Cs education. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3291279.3339400
- Kapanadze, M., Javakhishvili, N., & Dzagania, L. (2023). Investigating the relationship between students’ interest in physics and environmental attitudes in Georgia. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(8), Article em2308. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13429
- Krähmer, D. (2020). Information disclosure and full surplus extraction in mechanism design. Journal of Economic Theory, 187, Article 105020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2020.105020
- Kunis, F., Ilchev, K., Stoyanova, M., Dimova, V., Genova, T., Markovski, A., & Andreeva, C. (2023). Computer-assisted school experiments as a method for improvement of students’ knowledge in mechanics and atomic/molecular physics in secondary school. Proceedings of Science, 427. https://doi.org/10.22323/1.427.0249
- Kusairi, K., Syaiful, S., & Haryanto, H. (2020). Generative learning model in mathematics: A solution to improve problem solving and creative thinking skill. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(3), 254-261. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v3i2.6378
- Lan, G., Xiao, S., Yang, J., Wen, J., Lu, W., & Gao, X. (2024). Active learning inspired method in generative models. Expert Systems with Applications, 249(PB), Article 123582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.123582
- Li, W., Huang, J. Y., Liu, C. Y., Tseng, J. C. R., & Wang, S. P. (2023). A study on the relationship between student’ learning engagements and higher-order thinking skills in programming learning. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 49, Article 101369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101369
- Ligeza, T. S., & Wyczesany, M. (2017). Cognitive conflict increases processing of negative, task-irrelevant stimuli. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 120, 126-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2017.07.013
- Madu, B. C., & Orji, E. (2015). Effects of cognitive conflict instructional strategy on students’ conceptual change in temperature and heat. SAGE Open, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015594662
- Makhanya, F. M., Qwabe, L., & Bryant, K. (2021). Characterising collaboration: Reflecting on a partnership between academic support staff and lecturers to help university students learn how to write for the discipline of chemistry. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 18(7), 41-55. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.18.7.4
- Maknun, J. (2015). The implementation of generative learning model on physics lesson to increase mastery concepts and generic science skills of vocational students. American Journal of Educational Research, 3, 742-748.
- Maknun, J. (2020). Implementation of guided inquiry learning model to improve understanding physics concepts and critical thinking skill of vocational high school students. International Education Studies, 13(6), Article 117. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v13n6p117
- Mao, S., Wang, D., Tang, C., & Dong, P. (2022). Students’ online information searching strategies and their creative question generation: The moderating effect of their need for cognitive closure. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.877061
- Montag-Smit, T., & Maertz, C. P. (2017). Searching outside the box in creative problem solving: The role of creative thinking skills and domain knowledge. Journal of Business Research, 81, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.07.021
- Murillo Egurrola, J. D., & Flórez García, I. D. (2023). Exploring the effects of implementing Hilary Janks’ critical literacy model in a university EFL classroom. Lenguaje, 51(1). https://doi.org/10.25100/lenguaje.v51i1.12092
- Ndawo, G. (2019). A model to facilitate authentic learning in nursing education. Global Journal of Health Science, 11(9). https://doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v11n9p1
- Odunayo Victor, A., & Theodora Olufunke, B. (2021). Effects of 5e-cyclic and mental models instructional strategies on junior secondary school students’ learning outcomes in basic science in Ondo State, Nigeria. Asian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports, 15(11). https://doi.org/10.9734/ajarr/2021/v15i1130437
- OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results: Combined executive summaries: Volume I, II & III. OECD.
- Osborne, R. J., & Wittrock, M. C. (1983). Learning science: A generative process. Science Education, 67(4), 489-508. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730670406
- Pi, Z., Yang, J., Hu, W., & Hong, J. (2019). The relation between openness and creativity is moderated by attention to peers’ ideas in electronic brainstorming. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(2), 344-352. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1655458
- Pietikäinen, P. S., & Mauno, A. M. (2012). Conceptual knowledge and learning as a reflection of students’ motivation. In Proceedings of the 40th SEFI Annual Conference 2012–Engineering Education 2020: Meet the Future.
- Pilegard, C., & Fiorella, L. (2016). Helping students help themselves: Generative learning strategies improve middle school students’ self-regulation in a cognitive tutor. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 121-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.020
- Prawita, W., Prayitno, B. A., & Sugiyarto. (2019). Effectiveness of a generative learning-based biology module to improve the analytical thinking skills of the students with high and low reading motivation. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 1459-1476. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12193a
- Rahim, R. A., Noor, N. M., & Zaid, N. M. (2015). Meta-analysis on element of cognitive conflict strategies with a focus on multimedia learning material development. International Education Studies, 8(13), 73-78. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n13p73
- Rokhmat, J., Gunada, I. W., Ayub, S., Hikmawati, & Wulandari, T. (2022). The use of causalitic learning model to encourage abilities of problem solving and creative thinking in momentum and impulse. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2165, 012052. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2165/1/012052
- Rosdianto, H. (2017). Students’ comprehension about the concept of light through generative learning model. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 6(2), 259-262.
- Rosen, Y., Stoeffler, K., & Simmering, V. (2020). Imagine: Design for creative thinking, learning, and assessment in schools. Journal of Intelligence, 8(2), Article 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence8020016
- Sandoval-Lucero, E., Antony, K., & Hepworth, W. (2017). Co-curricular learning and assessment in new student orientation at a community college. Creative Education, 8(10), 1638-1655. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2017.810111
- Schneider, S., Beege, M., Nebel, S., Schnaubert, L., & Rey, G. D. (2022). The cognitive-affective-social theory of learning in digital environments (CASTLE). Educational Psychology Review, 34, 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09626-5
- Shi, Y., Yang, H., MacLeod, J., Zhang, J., & Yang, H. H. (2020). College students’ cognitive learning outcomes in technology-enabled active learning environments: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(4), 791-817. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119881477
- Shieh, C. J., & Yu, L. (2016). A study on information technology integrated guided discovery instruction towards students’ learning achievement and learning retention. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(4), 833-842. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1554a
- Shin, D. (2022). Expanding the role of trust in the experience of algorithmic journalism: User sensemaking of algorithmic heuristics in Korean users. Journalism Practice, 16(6), 1168-1191. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2020.1841018
- Sotiriou, S. A., Lazoudis, A., & Bogner, F. X. (2020). Inquiry-based learning and e-learning: How to serve high and low achievers. Smart Learning Environments, 7, Article 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-020-00130-x
- Sovey, S., Osman, K., & Matore, M. E. E. M. (2022). Rasch analysis for disposition levels of computational thinking instrument among secondary school students. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(3), 2-15. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11794
- Suardana, I. N., Selamet, K., Sudiatmika, A. A. I. A. R., Sarini, P., & Devi, N. L. P. L. (2019). Guided inquiry learning model effectiveness in improving students’ creative thinking skills in science learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1317, Article 012215. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1317/1/012215
- Susilawati, W., Suryadi, D., & Dahlan, J. A. (2021). The improvement of mathematical spatial visualization ability of student through cognitive conflict. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(2), 155-166. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/607
- Thornhill-Miller, B., Camarda, A., Mercier, M., Burkhardt, J. M., Morisseau, T., Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Vinchon, F., El Hayek, S., Augereau-Landais, M., Mourey, F., Feybesse, C., Sundquist, D., & Lubart, T. (2023). Creativity, critical thinking, communication, and collaboration: Assessment, certification, and promotion of 21st century skills for the future of work and education. Journal of Intelligence, 11(3), Article 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11030054
- Tikva, C., & Tambouris, E. (2021). A systematic mapping study on teaching and learning computational thinking through programming in higher education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, Article 100849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100849
- Toheri, Winarso, W., & Haqq, A. A. (2020). Where exactly for enhance critical and creative thinking: The use of problem posing or contextual learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 877-887. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.2.877
- Ulusoy, F. M., & Onen, A. S. (2014). A research on the generative learning model supported by context-based learning. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(6), 537-546. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1215a
- Ural, E. (2016). The effect of guided-inquiry laboratory experiments on science education students’ chemistry laboratory attitudes, anxiety and achievement. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(4), 217-227. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i4.1395
- Ürey, Z. Ç. U. (2021). Fostering creative cognition in design education: A comparative analysis of algorithmic and heuristic educational methods in basic design education. METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 38(1), 53-80. https://doi.org/10.4305/METU.JFA.2021.1.9
- Voon, X. P., Wong, S. L., Wong, L. H., Khambari, M. N. M., & Syed-Abdullah, S. I. S. (2022). Developing computational thinking competencies through constructivist argumentation learning: A problem-solving perspective. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 12(6), 529-539. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2022.12.6.1650
- Wechsler, S. M., Saiz, C., Rivas, S. F., Vendramini, C. M. M., Almeida, L. S., Mundim, M. C., & Franco, A. (2018). Creative and critical thinking: Independent or overlapping components? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27, 114-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.12.003
- Wena, M. (2018). Strategi pembelajaran inovatif kontemporer: Suatu tinjauan konseptual operasional [Contemporary innovative learning strategies: An operational conceptual review]. Bumi Aksara.
- Wittrock, M. C. (1992). Generative learning processes of the brain. Educational Psychologist, 27(4), 531-541. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2704_8
- Xie, H., Song, Y., Cai, C., & Zheng, J. (2022). The impact of cognitive heterogeneity on the behavioral integration of the R&D team: The perspective of conflict management. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1126772
- Yang, J., & Zhao, X. (2021). The effect of creative thinking on academic performance: Mechanisms, heterogeneity, and implication. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 40, Article 100831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100831
- Yi, K. M., Verdie, Y., Fua, P., & Lepetit, V. (2016). Learning to assign orientations to feature points. In Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.19
- Yusoff, K. M., Ashaari, N. S., Wook, T. S. M. T., & Ali, N. M. (2021). Validation of the components and elements of computational thinking for teaching and learning programming using the fuzzy Delphi method. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2021.0120111
- Zheng, A., Briley, D. A., Malanchini, M., Tackett, J. L., Harden, K. P., & Tucker-Drob, E. M. (2019). Genetic and environmental influences on achievement goal orientations shift with age. European Journal of Personality, 33(3), 317-336. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2202
How to cite this article
APA
Akmam, A., Afrizon, R., Koto, I., Setiawan, D., Hidayat, R., & Novitra, F. (2024). Integration of cognitive conflict in generative learning model to enhancing students’ creative thinking skills. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(9), em2504. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15026
Vancouver
Akmam A, Afrizon R, Koto I, Setiawan D, Hidayat R, Novitra F. Integration of cognitive conflict in generative learning model to enhancing students’ creative thinking skills. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2024;20(9):em2504. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15026
AMA
Akmam A, Afrizon R, Koto I, Setiawan D, Hidayat R, Novitra F. Integration of cognitive conflict in generative learning model to enhancing students’ creative thinking skills. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2024;20(9), em2504. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15026
Chicago
Akmam, Akmam, Renol Afrizon, Irwan Koto, David Setiawan, Rahmat Hidayat, and Fuja Novitra. "Integration of cognitive conflict in generative learning model to enhancing students’ creative thinking skills". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2024 20 no. 9 (2024): em2504. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15026
Harvard
Akmam, A., Afrizon, R., Koto, I., Setiawan, D., Hidayat, R., and Novitra, F. (2024). Integration of cognitive conflict in generative learning model to enhancing students’ creative thinking skills. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(9), em2504. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15026
MLA
Akmam, Akmam et al. "Integration of cognitive conflict in generative learning model to enhancing students’ creative thinking skills". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 20, no. 9, 2024, em2504. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15026