Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Alshqaq, S. S. A., Ahmadini, A. A. H., & Ali, I. (2022). Nonlinear stochastic multiobjective optimization problem in multivariate stratified sampling design. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2502346
• Arnon, I., Cottrill, J., Dubinsky, E., Oktac, A., Fuentes, S. R., Trigueros, M., & Weller, K. (2014). APOS theory: A framework for research and curriculum development in mathematics education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7966-6
• Asiala, M., Cottrill, J., Dubinsky, E., & Schwingerdorf, K. E. (1997). The development of students’ graphical understanding of the derivative. Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 16(4), 399-431. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(97)90015-8
• Bezuidenhout, J. (2001). Limits and continuity: Some conceptions of first-year students. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 32, 487-500. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390010022590
• Bilondi, M. T., & Radmehr, F. (2023). Students’ mathematical thinking of the tree concept: An integration of APOS with Tall’s three worlds of mathematics. Research in Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2023.2292260
• Borji, V., & Martínez-Planell, R. (2020). On students’ understanding of implicit differentiation based on APOS theory. Education Studies in Mathematics, 105, 163-179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09991-y
• Brijlall, D., & Ndlovu, Z. (2013). High school learners’ mental construction during solving optimisation problems in calculus: A South African case study. South African Journal of Education, 33(2), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v33n2a679
• Department of Basic Education. (2011). Curriculum and assessment policy statement grades 10-12 mathematics. Government Printers.
• Desfitri, R. (2016). In-service teachers’ understanding on the concept of limits and derivatives and the way they deliver the concepts to their high school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 693, Article 012016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/693/1 /012016
• Doorman, M., Bos, R., & Duijzer, C. (2022). Developing basic principles of calculus and motion in lower secondary education. In C. Michelsen, A. Beckmann, V. Freiman, U. T. Jankvist, & A. Savard (Eds), Mathematics and its connections to the arts and sciences (pp. 311-323). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10518-0_17
• Dubinsky, E. (1991). Reflective abstraction in advanced mathematical thinking. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 95-123). Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47203-1_7
• Dubinsky, E. (1994). A theory and practice of learning college mathematics. In A. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Mathematical thinking and problem solving (pp. 221-243). Erlbaum.
• Dubinsky, E., & McDonald, M. (2001). APOS: A constructivist theory of learning in undergraduate mathematics education. In D. Holton (Ed.), The teaching and learning of mathematics at university level (pp. 275-282). Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47231-7_25
• Ellis, G. W., & Turner, W. A. (2002). Improving the conceptual understanding of kinematics through graphical analysis. Engineering: Faculty Publications, Smith College.
• Estonanto, A. J. J., & Dio, R. V. (2019). Factors causing mathematics anxiety of senior high school students in calculus. Asian Journal of Education and E-Learning, 7(1), 37-47. https://doi.org/10.24203/ajeel.v7i1.5701
• Fatmanissa, N., Kusnandi, & Usdiyana, D. (2019). Student difficulties in word problems of derivatives: A multisemiotic perspective. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157, Article 032111. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/3/032111
• García, M., Llinares, S., & Sánchez-Matamoros, G. (2011). Characterizing thematized derivative schema by the underlying emergent structures. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 1023-1045. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9227-2
• Hashemi, N., Abu, M. S., Kashefi, H., Mokhtar, M., & Rahimi, K. (2015). Designing learning strategy to improve undergraduate students’ problem solving in derivatives and integrals: A conceptual framework. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(2), 227-238. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1318a
• Hitier, M., & González-Martín, A. S. (2022). Derivatives and the study of motion at the intersection of calculus and mechanics: A praxeological analysis of practices at the college level. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 8, 293-317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-022-00182-z
• Kazunga, C., & Bansilal, S. (2020). An APOS analysis of solving systems of equations using the inverse matrix method. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 103, 339-358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09935-6
• Kertil, M., & Dede, H. G. (2022). Promoting prospective mathematics teachers’ understanding of derivative across different real-life contexts. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.4256/ijmtl.v23i1.361
• Klymchuk, S., Zverkova, T., & Gruenwald, N. (2010). University students’ difficulties in solving application problems in calculus: Student perspectives. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 22, 81-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217567
• Lam, T. T. (2009). On in-service mathematics teachers’ content knowledge of calculus and related concepts. The Mathematics Educator, 12(1), 69-86.
• Longe, I. O., & Maharaj, A. (2023). Applying APOS theory to enhance algebraic logic skills: Comparing traditional teaching and computer-assisted instruction. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(1), 378-394. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v6i3.16298
• Maharaj, A. (2013). An APOS analysis of natural science students’ understanding of derivatives. South African Journal of Education, 33(1), 458-478. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v33n1a458
• Matindike, F., & Makonye, J. P. (2023). An APOS analysis of grade 11 learners’ errors and misconceptions under hyperbolic functions: A case study at a rural high school in Limpopo Province in South Africa. SAGE Open, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231190348
• Mkhatshwa, T. P. (2023a). Opportunity to learn about optimization problems provided by undergraduate calculus textbooks: A case study. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(10), em2335. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13575
• Mkhatshwa, T. P. (2023b). Calculus instructors’ perspectives on effective instructional approaches in the teaching of related rates problems. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(11), Article em2346. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13658
• Mkhatshwa, T. P. (2024). Best practices for teaching the concept of the derivative: Lessons from experienced calculus instructors. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(4), Article em2426. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14380
• Oktaç, A., Trigueros, M., & Romo, A. (2019). APOS theory: Connecting research and teaching. For the Learning of Mathematics, 39(1), 33-37.
• Piaget, J., & Garcia, R. (1989). Psychogenesis and the history of science. Columbia University Press.
• Pospiech, G. (2019). Framework of mathematization in physics from a teaching perspective. In G. Pospiech, M. Michelini, & B. S. Eylon (Eds.), Mathematics in physics education (pp. 1-33). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04627-9_1
• Retamoso, I. (2022). Heuristic method for minimizing distance without using calculus and its significance. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 14(4), 225-236.
• Siyepu, S. W. (2013). An exploration of students’ errors in derivatives in a university of technology. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(3), 577-592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.05.001
• Skemp, R. R. (1962). The need for a schematic learning theory. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 32(P2), 133-142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1962.tb01748.x
• Talib, N. A., Rahim, S. S. A., & Zulnaidi, H. (2023). Slope conception as rate of change starter kit: Malaysian pre-service secondary mathematics teachers’ subject matter knowledge in rate of change. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(12), em2368. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13862
• Tall, D. (2004). Thinking through three worlds of mathematics. In Proceedings of the 28^th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 281-288).
• Tyne, J. G. (2016). Calculus students’ reasoning about slope and derivative as rates of change [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of North Carolina.
• Wijaya, A., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., Doorman, M., & Robitzch, A. (2014). Difficulties in solving context-based PISA mathematics tasks: An analysis of students’ errors. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 11(3), 555-584. https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1317
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research, design and method. SAGE.

APA

Tatira, B. (2024). Undergraduate students’ abstractions of kinematics in differential calculus. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(9), em2497. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14981

Vancouver

Tatira B. Undergraduate students’ abstractions of kinematics in differential calculus. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2024;20(9):em2497. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14981

AMA

Tatira B. Undergraduate students’ abstractions of kinematics in differential calculus. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2024;20(9), em2497. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14981

Chicago

Tatira, Benjamin. "Undergraduate students’ abstractions of kinematics in differential calculus". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2024 20 no. 9 (2024): em2497. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14981

Harvard

Tatira, B. (2024). Undergraduate students’ abstractions of kinematics in differential calculus. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(9), em2497. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14981

MLA

Tatira, Benjamin "Undergraduate students’ abstractions of kinematics in differential calculus". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 20, no. 9, 2024, em2497. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14981