Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Ab Halim, A. S., Osman, K., Aziz, M. M., Ibrahim, M. F., & Ahmad, A. A. K. (2021). The competency of science teachers in integrating higher order thinking skills in teaching and learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1793, Article 012005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1793/1/012005
• Akben, N. (2020). Effects of the problem-posing approach on students’ problem solving skills and metacognitive awareness in science education. Research in Science Education, 50(3), 1143-1165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9726-7
• Alrawili, K. S., Osman, K., & Almuntasheri, S. (2020). Effect of scaffolding strategies on higher-order thinking skills in science classroom. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(5), 718-729. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.718
• Alrawili, K. S., Osman, K., & Almuntasheri, S. S. (2021). Scaffolding strategies in promoting attitudes of Saudi middle school science students. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(1), 71-86. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/11385
• Andreatta, P., & Dougherty, P. (2019). Supporting the development of psychomotor skills. In D. Nestel, K. Dalrymple, J. Paige, & R. Aggarwal (Eds.), Advancing surgical education: Innovation and change in professional education (pp. 183-196). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3128-2_17
• Asenahabi, B. M. (2019). Basics of research design: A guide to selecting appropriate research design. International Journal of Contemporary Applied Researches, 6(5), 76-89.
• Barak, M., & Shakhman, L. (2008). Fostering higher-order thinking in science class: Teachers’ reflections. Teachers and Teaching, 14(3), 191-208. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600802006079
• Bloom, B., Englehart, M., Furst, E., Hill, W., & Krathwohl, D. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. Longmans.
• Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. ASCD.
• Ciardiello, A. V. (2000). Student questioning and multidimensional literacy in the 21^st century. The Educational Forum, 64(3), 215-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131720008984757
• Cullinane, A. (2010). Bloom’s taxonomy and its use in classroom assessment. Resource & Research Guides, 1(13), 2-3.
• De Jong, T. (2006). Scaffolds for scientific discovery learning. In J. Elen, & D. Clark (Eds.), Handling complexity in learning environments: Research & theory (pp. 107-128). Elsevier.
• Delgado-Rico, E., Carretero-Dios, H., & Ruch, W. (2012). Content validity evidences in test development: An applied perspective. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology España, 12(3), 449-460.
• Doolittle, P. E. (1997). Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development as a theoretical foundation for cooperative learning. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 8(1), 83-103.
• Fahmi, Setiadi, I., Elmawati, D., & Sunardi (2019). Discovery learning method for training critical thinking skills of students. European Journal of Education Studies, 6(3), 342-351. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3345924
• Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. SAGE.
• Hugerat, M., & Kortam, N. (2014). Improving higher order thinking skills among freshmen by teaching science through inquiry. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(5), 447-454. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1107a
• Jailani, J., Sugiman, S., & Apino, E. (2017). Implementing the problem-based learning in order to improve the students’ HOTS and characters. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 247-259. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v4i2.17674
• Janssen, F. J., Westbroek, H. B., & van Driel, J. H. (2014). How to make guided discovery learning practical for student teachers. Instructional Science, 42, 67-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9296-z
• Khan, A., Egbue, O., Palkie, B. & Madden, J. (2017). Active learning: Engaging students to maximize learning in an online course. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 15(2), 107-115.
• Khasanah, N., Dwiastuti, S. & Nurmiyati. (2016). The influence of guided discovery learning model toward scientific literacy based on naturalist intelligence. Proceeding Biology Education Conference, 13(1), 346-351. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.18-11-2020.2311739
• Kim, S., Raza, M., & Seidman, E. (2019). Improving 21st-century teaching skills: The key to effective 21st-century learners. Research in Comparative and International Education, 14(1), 99-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499919829214
• Larkin, M. J. (2002). Using scaffolded instruction to optimize learning. ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education.
• Lewis, A., & Smith, D. (1993). Defining higher order thinking. Theory into Practice, 32(3), 131-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849309543588
• Lord, T., & Baviskar, S. (2007). Moving students from information recitation to information understanding–Exploiting bloom’s taxonomy in creating science questions. Journal of College Science Teaching, 36(5), 40-44.
• Miri, B., David, B. C., & Uri, Z. (2007). Purposely teaching for the promotion of higher-order thinking skills: A case of critical thinking. Research in Science Education, 37, 353-369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9029-2
• Muhali, M., Prahani, B. K., Mubarok, H., Kurnia, N., & Asy’ari, M. (2021). The impact of guided-discovery-learning model on students’ conceptual understanding and critical thinking skills. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: E-Saintika, 5(3), 227-240. https://doi.org/10.36312/esaintika.v5i3.581
• Ormrod, J. E., Anderman, E. M., & Anderman, L. H. (2023). Educational psychology: Developing learners. Pearson.
• Padesky, C. A. (2022). Collaboration and guided discovery. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 29(3), 545-548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2022.02.003
• Reichardt, C. S. (2009). Quasi-experimental design. In R. E. Millsap, & A. Maydeu-Olivares (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of quantitative methods in psychology (pp. 490-500). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857020994.n3
• Rowe, J. A. (2004). From creative intelligence: Discovering the innovative potential in ourselves & others. Prentice Hall.
• Saido, G. M., Siraj, S., Nordin, A. B. B., & Al_Amedy, O. S. (2018). Higher order thinking skills among secondary school students in science learning. MOJES: Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(3), 13-20.
• Sari, E. N. F. T., Amin, M., Hudha, A. M., Fatmawati, D., & Fauzi, A. (2021). Development of HOTS-based biology learning documents using ADDIE model. Research and Development in Education, 1(2), 61-70. https://doi.org/10.22219/raden.v1i2.19049
• Simpson, E. J. (1972). The classification of educational objectives: Psychomotor domain. UI Press.
• Sukatiman, Akhyar, M., Siswandari, & Roemintoyo. (2020). Enhancing higher-order thinking skills in vocational education through scaffolding-problem based learning. Open Engineering, 10(1), 612-619. https://doi.org/10.1515/eng-2020-0070
• Sulaiman, T., Muniyan, V., Madhvan, D., Hasan, R., & Rahim, S. S. A. (2017). Implementation of higher order thinking skills in teaching of science: A case study in Malaysia. International Research Journal of Education and Sciences, 1(1), 2550-2158.
• Summers, S. (1993). Establishing the reliability and validity of a new instrument: Pilot testing. Journal of Post Anesthesia Nursing, 8(2), 124-127.
• Sun, H., Xie, Y., & Lavonen, J. (2022). Exploring the structure of students’ scientific higher order thinking in science education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 43, Article 100999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.100999
• Turner, V. D., & Berkowitz, M. W. (2005). Scaffolding morality: Positioning a socio-cultural construct. New Ideas in Psychology, 23(3), 174-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2006.04.002
• Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 271-296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6
• Van Der Stuyf, R. R. (2002). Scaffolding as a teaching strategy. Adolescent Learning and Development, 52(3), 5-18.
• Villanueva, L. C. (1976). On the effectiveness of the discovery approach as a teaching method for population education. Population Center Foundation.
• Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
• Wartono, W., Alfroni, Y. F., Batlolona, J. R., & Mahapoonyanont, N. (2019). Inquiry-scaffolding learning model: Its effect on critical thinking skills and conceptual understanding. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 8(2), 245-255. https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v8i2.4214
• Wass, R., Harland, T., & Mercer, A. (2011). Scaffolding critical thinking in the zone of proximal development. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(3), 317-328. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2010.489237
• Widiawati, L., Joyoatmojo, S., & Sudiyanto, S. (2018). Higher order thinking skills as effect of problem based learning in the 21^st century learning. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 5(3), 96-105.
• Zain, F. M., Sailin, S. N., & Mahmor, N. A. (2022). Promoting higher order thinking skills among pre-service teachers through group-based flipped learning. International Journal of Instruction, 15(3), 519-542. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15329a
• Zohar, A., & Dori, Y. J. (2003). Higher order thinking skills and low-achieving students: Are they mutually exclusive? The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), 145-181. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1202_1
• Zoller, U. (1993). Are lecture and learning compatible? Maybe for LOCS: Unlikely for HOCS. Journal of Chemical Education, 70(3), 195-199. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed070p195

APA

Alanazi, A. A., Osman, K., & Halim, L. (2024). Effect of scaffolding strategies and guided discovery on higher-order thinking skills in physics education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(9), em2496. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14980

Vancouver

Alanazi AA, Osman K, Halim L. Effect of scaffolding strategies and guided discovery on higher-order thinking skills in physics education. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2024;20(9):em2496. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14980

AMA

Alanazi AA, Osman K, Halim L. Effect of scaffolding strategies and guided discovery on higher-order thinking skills in physics education. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2024;20(9), em2496. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14980

Chicago

Alanazi, Abdulaziz Abdullah, Kamisah Osman, and Lilia Halim. "Effect of scaffolding strategies and guided discovery on higher-order thinking skills in physics education". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2024 20 no. 9 (2024): em2496. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14980

Harvard

Alanazi, A. A., Osman, K., and Halim, L. (2024). Effect of scaffolding strategies and guided discovery on higher-order thinking skills in physics education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(9), em2496. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14980

MLA

Alanazi, Abdulaziz Abdullah et al. "Effect of scaffolding strategies and guided discovery on higher-order thinking skills in physics education". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 20, no. 9, 2024, em2496. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14980