Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Andriessen, J. E. B., Pardijs, M., & Baker, M. (2013). Getting on and getting along: Tension in the development of collaborations. In M. Baker, S. Järvelä, & J. Andriessen, (Eds), Affective learning together (pp. 205-228). Routledge.
• Asterhan, C. S., & Schwarz, B. B. (2016). Argumentation for learning: Well-trodden paths and unexplored territories. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 164-187.‏ https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1155458
• Ayalon, M., & Even, R. (2016). Factors shaping students’ opportunities to engage in argumentative activity. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14, 575-601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9584-3
• Ayalon, M., & Hershkowitz, R. (2018). Mathematics teachers’ attention to potential classroom situations of argumentation. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 49, 163-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.11.010
• Ayalon, M., Watson, A., & Lerman, S. (2018). Comparison of students’ understanding of functions in classes following English and Israeli national curricula. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 97(3), 255-272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9798-8
• Ayalon, M., Wilkie, K. J., & Eid, K. H. (2021). Relating students’ emotions during argumentative discourse to their learning of real-life functional situations. Educational Studies in Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10121-5
• Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2003). Making mathematics reasonable in school. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin, & D. Shifter (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 27-44). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
• Byford, J., Lennon, S., & Russell, W. B. (2009). Teaching conflictual issues in the social studies: A research study of high school teachers. The Clearing House, 82, 165-170. https://doi.org/10.3200/TCHS.82.4.165-170
• Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2010). Supporting argumentation through students’ questions: Case studies in science classrooms. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(2), 230-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400903530036
• Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and the Council of Chief State School Officers. http://www.corestandards.org/the-standards
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE.
• Davis, P. J., & Hersh, R. (1981). The mathematical experience. Birkhäuser.
• DeBellis, V. A., & Goldin, G. A. (2006). Affect and meta-affect in mathematical problem solving: A representational perspective. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 131-147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9026-4
• Demiray, E., Isiksal-Bostan, M., & Saygi, E. (2023). How argumentation relates to formal proof process in geometry. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 18(3), em0741. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/13214
• Ekman, P. (1992). An argument for basic emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 6(3-4), 169-200. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939208411068
• Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S., & Hejmadi, A. (2008). Mother and child emotions during mathematics homework. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10(1), 5-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060701818644
• Engle, R. A., Langer-Osuna, J. M., & McKinney de Royston, M. (2014). Toward a model of influence in persuasive discussions: Negotiating quality, authority, privilege, and access within a student-led argument. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(2), 245-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2014.883979
• Evagorou, M., Papanastasiou, E., & Vrikki, M. (2023). What do we really know about students’ written arguments? Evaluating written argumentation skills. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(4), 615-634. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/13284
• Evans, J., Morgan, C., & Tsatsaroni, A. (2006). Discursive positioning and emotion in school mathematics practices. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 209-226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9029-1
• Felton, M., Garcia-Mila, M., & Gilabert, S. (2009). Deliberation versus dispute: The impact of argumentative discourse goals on learning and reasoning in the science classroom. Informal Logic, 29(4), 417-446. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v29i4.2907
• Fischer, A. H., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2008). Social functions of emotion. In M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones, & L. F. Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 456-468). The Guilford Press.
• Francisco, J. M., & Maher, C. A. (2005). Conditions for promoting reasoning in problem solving: Insights from a longitudinal study. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24(3-4), 361-372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9029-1
• Fredricks, J. A., & McColskey, W. (2012). The measurement of student engagement: A comparative analysis of various methods and student self-report instruments. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 763-782). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_37
• Goldenberg, E. P. (1987). Believing is seeing: How preconceptions influence the perceptions of graphs. In J. Bergeron, N. Herscovits, & C. Kieran (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11^th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 197-203).
• Goldin, G. A. (2002). Affect, meta-affect, and mathematical belief structures. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 59-72). Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47958-3_4
• Gravemeijer, K., Stephan, M., Julie, C., Lin, F. L., & Ohtani, M. (2017). What mathematics education may prepare students for the society of the future? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15, 105-123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9814-6 ‏
• Hannula, M. S. (2006). Motivation in mathematics: Goals reflected in emotions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 165-178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-005-9019-8
• Hannula, M. S. (2012). Exploring new dimensions of mathematics-related affect: Embodied and social theories. Research in Mathematics Education, 14(2), 137-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2012.694281
• Horn, I. S. (2008). Accountable argumentation as a participation structure to support learning through disagreement. In A. J. Schoenfeld, & N. Pateman (Eds.), A study of teaching: Multiple lenses, multiple views (pp. 97-126). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
• Immordino‐Yang, M. H., & Damasio, A. (2007). We feel, therefore we learn: The relevance of affective and social neuroscience to education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 1(1), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2007.00004.x
• Isohätälä, J., Näykki, P., Järvelä, S., & Baker, M. J. (2018). Striking a balance: Socio-emotional processes during argumentation in collaborative learning interaction. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 16, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.09.003
• Lampert, M., Rittenhouse, P., & Crumbaugh, C. (1996). Agreeing to disagree: Developing sociable mathematical discourse. In D. Olson, & N. Torrance (Eds.), Handbook of education and human development (pp. 731-764). Blackwell.
• Leinhardt, G., Zaslavsky, O., & Stein, M. K. (1990). Functions, graphs, and graphing: Tasks, learning, and teaching. Review of Educational Research, 60(1), 1-64.‏ https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543060001001
• McLeod, D.B. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualization. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics learning and teaching, (pp. 575-596). MacMillan.
• Michaels, S., O’Connor, C., & Resnick, L. B. (2008). Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: Accountable talk in the classroom and in civic life. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27, 283-297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-007-9071-1
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded source book. SAGE.
• Ministry of Education. (2021). Mathematics curriculum for grades 7-9. https://edu.gov.il/special/Curriculum/Junior-High/Pages/Junior-High-List-of-subjects-per-grade.aspx
• Mischo, C. (2003). Cognitive, emotional, and verbal responses in unfair everyday discourse. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 22(1), 119-131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X02250064
• Moore, K. C., & Thompson, P. W. (2015). Shape thinking and students’ graphing activity. In Proceedings of the 18th meeting of the MAA special interest group on research in undergraduate mathematics education (pp. 782-789). RUME.
• Mueller, M., Yankelewitz, D., & Maher, C. (2012). A framework for analyzing the collaborative construction of arguments and its interplay with agency. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80, 369-387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9354-x
• Mueller, M., Yankelewitz, D., & Maher, C. (2014). Teachers promoting student mathematical reasoning. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 7(2), 1-20.‏ https://doi.org/10.1080/24727466.2014.11790339
• Muller Mirza, N., Perret-Clermont, A.-N., Tartas, V., & Iannaccone, A. (2009). Psychosocial processes in argumentation. In N. Muller Mirza, & A. N. Perret Clermont (Eds.), Argumentation and education (pp. 67-90). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-98125-3_3
• Oehrtman, M., Carlson, M. P., & Thompson, P. W. (2008). Foundational reasoning abilities that promote coherence in students’ function understanding. In M. P. Carlson, & C. L. Rasmussen (Eds.), Making the connection: Research and teaching in undergraduate mathematics education (pp. 27-42). Mathematical Association of America. https://doi.org/10.5948/UPO9780883859759.004
• Op’t Eynde, P., De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (2006). “Accepting emotional complexity”: A socio-constructivist perspective on the role of emotions in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 193-207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9034-4
• Plantin, C. (2004). On the inseparability of emotion and reason in argumentation. In E. Weigand (Ed.), Emotion in dialogic interaction (pp. 269-281). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.248.18pla
• Polo, C., Lund, K., Plantin, C., & Niccolai, G. (2016). Group emotions: The social and cognitive functions. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11(2), 123-156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-016-9232-8
• Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In J. V. Wertsch, P. del Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139-164). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174299.008
• Schreier, M., Groeben, N., & Christmann, U. (1995). “That’s not fair!” Argumentational integrity as an ethics of argumentative communication. Argumentation, 9(2), 267-289. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00721962
• Schwarz, B. B., & Baker, M. J. (2017). Dialogue: Argumentation and education: History, theory and practice. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316493960
• Slakmon, B., & Schwarz, B. B. (2019). Deliberative emotional talk. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 14(2), 185-217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-019-09304-3
• Staples, M. (2014). Supporting student justification in middle school mathematics classrooms: Teachers’ work to create a context for justification. CRME Publications.
• Stein, N. L., & Albro, E. R. (2001). The origins and nature of arguments: Studies in conflict understanding, emotion, and negotiation. Discourse Processes, 32(2-3), 113-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2001.9651594
• Tasdan, B. T., Dede, A. T., & Koyunkaya, M. Y. (2022). Examining pre-service mathematics teachers’ argumentation-supported lesson plans and their noticing during planning. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2022.2054741
• Thompson, P. W., & Carlson, M. (2017). Variation, covariation, and functions: Foundational ways of thinking mathematically. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 421-456). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
• van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (2004). A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Press Syndicate. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616389
• Webb, N. M., Franke, M. L., Ing, M., Wong, J., Fernandez, C. H., Shin, N., & Turrou, A. C. (2014). Engaging with others’ mathematical ideas: Interrelationships among student participation, teachers’ instructional practices, and learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 63, 79-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2013.02.001
• Weber, K., Maher, C., Powell, A., & Lee, H. S. (2008). Learning opportunities from group discussions: Warrants become the objects of debate. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 68(3), 247-261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9114-8
• Wilkie, K. J., & Ayalon, M. (2018). Investigating Years 7 to 12 students’ knowledge of linear relationships through different contexts and representations. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 30(4), 499-523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-018-0236-8
• Zan, R., Brown, L., Evans, J., & Hannula, M. S. (2006). Affect in mathematics education: An introduction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 113-121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9028-2
• Zhuang, Y. & Conner, A. (2022). Teachers’ use of rational questioning strategies to promote student participation in collective argumentation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 111, 345-365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-022-10160-6

APA

Wilkie, K., & Ayalon, M. (2023). Learning to argue while arguing to learn: Students’ emotional experiences during argumentation for graphing real-life functions. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(8), em2312. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13435

Vancouver

Wilkie K, Ayalon M. Learning to argue while arguing to learn: Students’ emotional experiences during argumentation for graphing real-life functions. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2023;19(8):em2312. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13435

AMA

Wilkie K, Ayalon M. Learning to argue while arguing to learn: Students’ emotional experiences during argumentation for graphing real-life functions. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2023;19(8), em2312. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13435

Chicago

Wilkie, Karina, and Michal Ayalon. "Learning to argue while arguing to learn: Students’ emotional experiences during argumentation for graphing real-life functions". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2023 19 no. 8 (2023): em2312. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13435

Harvard

Wilkie, K., and Ayalon, M. (2023). Learning to argue while arguing to learn: Students’ emotional experiences during argumentation for graphing real-life functions. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(8), em2312. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13435

MLA

Wilkie, Karina et al. "Learning to argue while arguing to learn: Students’ emotional experiences during argumentation for graphing real-life functions". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 19, no. 8, 2023, em2312. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13435