Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Blalock, H. M., Jr. (1960). Social statistics (2nd ed). New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Chabay, R. W. & Sherwood, B. A. (2002). Vol I: Matter and interactions: Modern mechanics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
• Chabay, R. W. & Sherwood, B. A. (1999). Bringing atoms into first-year physics [Electronic version]. American Journal of Physics, 67, 1045-1050.
• Churukian, A. D. (2002). Interactive engagement in an introductory university physics course: Learning gains and perceptions (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Kansas State University, 2002). Dissertation Abstracts International, 62, 1685.
• Czudkovà, L. & Musilovà, J. (2000). The pendulum: A stumbling block of secondary school mechanics. Physics Education, 35, 428-435.
• Greca, I. M. & Moreira, M. A. (2002). Mental, physical, and mathematical models in the teaching and learning of physics [Electronic version]. Science Education, 1, 106- 121.
• Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses [Electronic version]. American Journal of Physics, 66, 64-74.
• Hestenes, D., Wells, M., & Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force concept inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30, 141-151.
• Lomax, R. G. (2001). Statistical concepts: A second course for education and the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Lawrance Erlbaum.
• McMillan, J. H. & Schumacher, S. (2001). Research in education: A conceptual introduction (5th ed.). New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
• Savinalnen, A. & Scott, P. (2002). Using the force concept inventory to monitor studentlearning and to plan teaching [Electronic version]. Physics Education, 37, 53- 58.
• Scherer, D., Dubois, P., & Sherwood, B. (2000). VPython: 3D interactive scientific graphics for students. Computing in Science and Engineering, 82-88.

APA

Örnek, F. (2007). Evaluation Novelty in Modeling-Based and Interactive Engagement Instruction. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 3(3), 231-237. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75402

Vancouver

Örnek F. Evaluation Novelty in Modeling-Based and Interactive Engagement Instruction. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2007;3(3):231-7. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75402

AMA

Örnek F. Evaluation Novelty in Modeling-Based and Interactive Engagement Instruction. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2007;3(3), 231-237. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75402

Chicago

Örnek, Funda. "Evaluation Novelty in Modeling-Based and Interactive Engagement Instruction". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2007 3 no. 3 (2007): 231-237. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75402

Harvard

Örnek, F. (2007). Evaluation Novelty in Modeling-Based and Interactive Engagement Instruction. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 3(3), pp. 231-237. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75402

MLA

Örnek, Funda "Evaluation Novelty in Modeling-Based and Interactive Engagement Instruction". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 3, no. 3, 2007, pp. 231-237. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75402