Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Agustika Siagian, Q., & Herman, T. (2023). Praxeological analysis of mathematics textbooks for class XI high school students on arithmetic and geometric sequences. Eduma: Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching, 12(2), 139-152. https://doi.org/10.24235/eduma.v12i2.13289
• Aprizal Bintara, I., & Prabawanto, S. (2024). Learning obstacles of junior high school students on the concept of triangle. KnE Social Sciences, 9(13), 500-509. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i13.15952
• Artigue, M., Haspekian, M., & Corblin-Lenfant, A. (2014). Introduction to the theory of didactical situations (TDS). In A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, & S. Prediger (Eds.), Networking of theories as a research practice in mathematics education (pp. 47-65). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05389-9_4
• Audi, R. (2020). Seeing, knowing, and doing: A perceptualist account. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197503508.001.0001
• Ayuwanti, I., Marsigit, & Siswoyo, D. (2021). Teacher-student interaction in mathematics learning. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(2), 660-667. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i2.21184
• Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is–or might be–the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, 25(9), 6-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X025009006
• Barzilai, S., & Chinn, C. A. (2018). On the goals of epistemic education: Promoting apt epistemic performance. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 27(3), 353-389. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1392968
• Bosch, M., & Gascón, J. (2014). Introduction to the anthropological theory of the didactic (ATD). In A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, & S. Prediger (Eds.), Networking of theories as a research practice in mathematics education. Advances in mathematics education (pp. 67-83). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05389-9_5
• Bouck, E. C., Bouck, M. K., Joshi, G. S., & JOhnsono, L. (2016). Understanding problem-solving errors by students with learning disabilities in standards-based and traditional curricula. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(1), 14-26. https://doi.org/10.18666/ldmj-2016-v21-i1-6896
• Brownlee, J. L., Curtis, E., Spooner-Lane, R., & Feucht, F. (2017). Understanding children’s epistemic beliefs in elementary education. Education 3-13, 45(2), 191-208. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2015.1069369
• Charikova, I., & Zhadanov, V. (2017). Teacher to student epistemological interaction in the contemporary paradigm of university education. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 8(2), 117-129. https://doi.org/10.17499/jsser.360868
• Chevallard, Y. (2005). Opening plenary steps towards: A new epistemology in mathematics education. CERME4. https://doi.org/10.24529/hjme.1205
• Chevallard, Y. (2019). Introducing the anthropological theory of the didactic: An attempt at a principled approach. Hiroshima Journal of Mathematics Education, 12, 71-114.
• Fan, L., Trouche, L., Qi, C., Rezat, S., & Visnovska, J. (2018). ICME-13 monographs research on mathematics textbooks and teachers’ resources. ICME13. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73253-4
• Fauzan, F., Ansori, R. A. M., Dannur, Moh., Pratama, A., & Hairit, A. (2023). The implementation of the Merdeka curriculum (independent curriculum) in strengthening students’ character in Indonesia. Aqlamuna: Journal of Educational Studies, 1(1), 136-155. https://doi.org/10.58223/aqlamuna.v1i1.237
• Fuadiah, N. F. (2015). Epistemological obstacles on mathematics’ learning in junior high school students: A study on the operations of integer material. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Research, Implementation and Education of Mathematics and Sciences (pp. 17-19).
• Glasnovic Gracin, D. (2018). Requirements in mathematics textbooks: A five-dimensional analysis of textbook exercises and examples. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(7), 1003-1024. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2018.1431849
• Gök, M., Erdoğan, A., & Özdemir Erdoğan, E. (2019). Transpositions of function concept in mathematics curricula and textbooks from the historical development perspective. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 1189-1206. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12176a
• Goldman, S. R., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2015). Research on learning and instruction: Implications for curriculum, instruction, and assessment. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2(1), 33-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215601866
• González-Martín, A. S., Bloch, I., Durand-Guerrier, V., & Maschietto, M. (2014). Didactic situations and didactical engineering in university mathematics: Cases from the study of calculus and proof. Research in Mathematics Education, 16(2), 117-134. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2014.918347
• Green, H. J., & Hood, M. (2013). Significance of epistemological beliefs for teaching and learning psychology: A review. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 12(2), 168-178. https://doi.org/10.2304/plat.2013.12.2.168
• Gunawan, I. (2017). Instructional management in Indonesia: A case study. Science & Commerce International Refereed Research Journal, 8, 99-107. https://doi.org/10.18843/rwjasc/v8i1/12
• HastiYunianta, T. N., Suryadi, D., Dasari, D., & Herman, T. (2023). Textbook praxeological-didactical analysis: Lessons learned from the Indonesian mathematics textbook. Journal on Mathematics Education, 14(3), 503-524. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v14i3.pp503-524
• Hausberger, T. (2020). On the networking of Husserlian phenomenology and didactics of mathematics. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 12(2), 201-210. https://hal.science/hal-02946122
• Heikkilä, M., Hermansen, H., Iiskala, T., Mikkilä-Erdmann, M., & Warinowski, A. (2023). Epistemic agency in student teachers’ engagement with research skills. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(3), 455-472. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1821638
• Hendriyanto, A., Suryadi, D., Dahlan, J. A., & Juandi, D. (2023). Praxeology review: Comparing Singaporean and Indonesian textbooks in introducing the concept of sets. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(2), Article em2229. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12953
• Hidayat, C. R., Rosjanuardi, R., & Juandi, D. (2019). Epistemological obstacle on the topic of triangle and quadrilateral. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157, Article 042110. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042110
• Isnawan, M. G., Suryadi, D., Turmudi, T., & Marfuah, M. (2022). Parental obstacles during distance learning mathematics in Indonesia: A phenomenology study. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(2), 873-883. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.2.873
• Kampa, N., Neumann, I., Heitmann, P., & Kremer, K. (2016). Epistemological beliefs in science-a person-centered approach to investigate high school students’ profiles. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 46, 81-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.04.007
• Madani, R. A. (2019). Analysis of educational quality, a goal of education for all policy. Higher Education Studies, 9(1), Article 100. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v9n1p100
• Maharani, A., & Putra, L. W. Y. (2023). How to design problem-based learning for reasoning ability? IJORER International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 4(5), 610-619. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v4i5.289
• Martatiyana, D. R., Derlis, A., Aviarizki, H. W., Jurdil, R. R., Andayani, T., & Hidayat, O. S. (2023). Analisis komparasi implementasi kurikulum merdeka dan kurikulum 2013 [Comparative analysis of the implementation of the independent curriculum and the 2013 curriculum]. Muallimuna: Jurnal Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 9(1), Article 96. https://doi.org/10.31602/muallimuna.v9i1.11600
• Muis, K. R., Chevrier, M., & Singh, C. A. (2018). The role of epistemic emotions in personal epistemology and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 53(3), 165-184. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1421465
• Nordin, A., & Sundberg, D. (2018). Exploring curriculum change using discursive institutionalism–A conceptual framework. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 50(6), 820-835. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2018.1482961
• Nursobah, A., Tinggi, S., Syari’ah, I., & Asy’ari Kediri, F. (2018). Implementasi kurikulum 2013 dalam meningkatkan prestasi belajar siswa (studi multi situs di MIN Ngepoh Tanggunggunung dan MIN Mergayu Bandung Tulungagung) [Implementation of the 2013 curriculum in improving student learning achievement (multi-site study at MIN Ngepoh Tanggunggunung and MIN Mergayu Bandung Tulungagung)]. Jurnal Dirasah, 1(2), Article 26212838. https://doi.org/10.29062/dirasah.v1i2.22
• Panjaitan, M. A., & Juandi, D. (2024). Analysis of problems in learning mathematics based on difficulties, errors, and misconceptions in the material of equations and inequality absolute values of one variable: Systematic literature review. KnE Social Sciences, 9(13), 316-324. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i13.15932
• Pepin, B., Choppin, J., Ruthven, K., & Sinclair, N. (2017). Digital curriculum resources in mathematics education: Foundations for change. ZDM, 49(5), 645-661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0879-z
• Prediger, S. (2008). The relevance of didactic categories for analyzing obstacles in conceptual change: Revisiting the case of multiplication of fractions. Learning and Instruction, 18(1), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.08.001
• Pritchard, D. (2013). Epistemic virtue and the epistemology of education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 47(2), 236-247. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12022
• Pritchard, D. (2018). What is this thing called knowledge? Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351980326
• Putra, Z. H., Dahnilsyah, & Aljarrah, A. (2021). A praxeological analysis of pre-service elementary teacher-designed mathematics comics. Journal on Mathematics Education, 12(3), 563-580. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.12.3.14143.563-580
• Remillard, J. T. (2000). Can curriculum materials support teachers’ learning? Two fourth-grade teachers’ use of a new mathematics text. The Elementary School Journal, 100(4), 331-350. https://doi.org/10.1086/499645
• Remillard, J. T., & Heck, D. J. (2014). Conceptualizing the curriculum enactment process in mathematics education. ZDM, 46(5), 705-718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0600-4
• Remillard, J. T., Reinke, L. T., & Kapoor, R. (2019). What is the point? Examining how curriculum materials articulate mathematical goals and how teachers steer instruction. International Journal of Educational Research, 93, 101-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.09.010
• Siagian, M. D., Suryadi, D., Nurlaelah, E., & Prabawanto, S. (2022). Investigation of secondary students’ epistemological obstacles in the inequality concept. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 14(4), 106-128.
• Steinbring, H. (1998). Epistemological constraints of mathematical knowledge in social learning settings. In A. Sierpinska, & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Mathematics education as a research domain: A search for identity: An ICMI study book 1. An ICMI study book 2 (pp. 513-526). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5470-3_34
• Sudianto, M., S, A. K., Hutapea, T. A., Sinaga, L. P., Sinaga, B., S, M. M., & Sinambela, P. N. J. M. (2017). Matematika kelas XI K13 (turunan) [Mathematics class XI K13 (derivatives)]. Pusat Perbukuan Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.
• Suryadi, D. (2023). Jalan epistemik menghasilkan pengetahuan melalui didactical design research (DDR) [The epistemic path of producing knowledge through didactical design research (DDR)]. Pusat Pengembangan DDR Indonesia.
• Takeuchi, H., & Shinno, Y. (2020). Comparing the lower secondary textbooks of Japan and England: A praxeological analysis of symmetry and transformations in geometry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(4), 791-810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09982-3
• Tezci, E., Akif Erdener, M., & Atıcı, S. (2016). The effect of pre-service teachers’ epistemological beliefs on teaching approaches. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(12A), 205-215. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.041326
• Thakuri, R. R. (2023). Fostering engaged pedagogical innovation for meaningful learning: A literature review. Pragyaratna, 5(1), 63-73. https://doi.org/10.3126/pragyaratna.v5i1.59272
• Tombolato, M. (2022). Renewing the curriculum to promote epistemic cognition in the knowledge society: Some procedural principles. Education and New Developments, 2022, 383-387. https://doi.org/10.36315/2022v1end087
• Utami, W. B., Widodo, S. A., & Sulistyowati, F. (2022). Matematika tingkat lanjut [Advanced mathematics]. Pusat Perbukuan Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.
• Wahyuni, H., Iskandar, R. S. F., Raditya, A., & Talde, D. K. J. C. (2023). Analysis of algebra questions in curriculum 2013 and Merdeka curriculum mathematics textbooks. International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education, 1(3), 218-226. https://doi.org/10.56855/ijmme.v1i3.735
• Watagodakumbura, C. (2017). Principles of curriculum design and construction based on the concepts of educational neuroscience. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(3), 54-69. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n3p54
• Wijaya, A., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Doorman, M. (2015). Opportunity-to-learn context-based tasks provided by mathematics textbooks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 89(1), 41-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9595-1
• Wijayanti, D., & Winsløw, C. (2017). Mathematical practice in textbooks analysis: Praxeological reference models, the case of proportion. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 6(3), 307-330. https://doi.org/10.17583/redimat.2017.2078
• Yenil, T., Arslan, Ç., & Tapan Broutin, M. S. (2023). Triangle inequality concept teaching: The theory of didactic situations case. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 7(4), 14-29. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202318961

APA

Chandra, F. E., Suryadi, D., Afgani Dahlan, J., Hayuningrat, S., & Rahman, S. (2025). Derivative in Indonesian textbook curricula: A praxeological analysis of learning obstacles in Indonesian mathematics textbooks. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(5), em2627. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16256

Vancouver

Chandra FE, Suryadi D, Afgani Dahlan J, Hayuningrat S, Rahman S. Derivative in Indonesian textbook curricula: A praxeological analysis of learning obstacles in Indonesian mathematics textbooks. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2025;21(5):em2627. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16256

AMA

Chandra FE, Suryadi D, Afgani Dahlan J, Hayuningrat S, Rahman S. Derivative in Indonesian textbook curricula: A praxeological analysis of learning obstacles in Indonesian mathematics textbooks. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2025;21(5), em2627. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16256

Chicago

Chandra, Fitriana Eka, Didi Suryadi, Jarnawi Afgani Dahlan, Silfia Hayuningrat, and Sendy Rahman. "Derivative in Indonesian textbook curricula: A praxeological analysis of learning obstacles in Indonesian mathematics textbooks". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2025 21 no. 5 (2025): em2627. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16256

Harvard

Chandra, F. E., Suryadi, D., Afgani Dahlan, J., Hayuningrat, S., and Rahman, S. (2025). Derivative in Indonesian textbook curricula: A praxeological analysis of learning obstacles in Indonesian mathematics textbooks. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(5), em2627. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16256

MLA

Chandra, Fitriana Eka et al. "Derivative in Indonesian textbook curricula: A praxeological analysis of learning obstacles in Indonesian mathematics textbooks". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 21, no. 5, 2025, em2627. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16256