Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Arnold, S. (2004). Investigating functions: Domains and ranges. Australian Senior Mathematics Journal, 18(1), 59-64.
• Ayres, P. L. (2001). Systematic mathematical errors and cognitive load. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(2), 227-248.
• Bardini, C., Radford, L., & Sabena, C. (2005). Struggling with variables, parameters, and indeterminate objects or how to go insane in mathematics. Proceedings of the 29th International PME Conference, (Vol.2, pp. 129-136). Melbourne: Australia.
• Bednarz, N. & Dufour-Janvier, B. (1991). A Study of External Representations of Change developed by Young Children. (pp. 140-146). Proceedings of the Thirteenth PME-NA Conference, Blacksburg, Virginia.
• Benítez, E. (2004). Los usos de la variable en libro de texto de matemáticas para secundaria. Unpublished Master Thesis, Departamento de Matemática Educativa, CINVESTAV-IPN.
• Bikner-Ahsbahs, A. & Prediger, S. (Eds). Networking of Theories as a Research Practice in Mathematics Education. Springer, Switzerland.
• Bills, L. (2001). Shifts in the Meanings of Literal Symbols, In M. Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (Ed.), Proceedings of the Twenty-fifth PME International Conference. 2-(p.p. 161, 2-168.) Utrecht, The Neatherlands.
• Booth, L. (1988). Children’s difficulties in beginning algebra. In A. F. Coxford, & A. P. Shulte (Eds.), The Ideas of Algebra, K-12. 1988 Yearbook. Reston, VA: NCTM.
• Bush, W. S. (2003). Bridging the gap between culture and mathematics: The Appalachian perspective. Annual Meeting of the American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education, New Orleans, LA., Retrieved from ERIC database (ED478244).
• Chi, M.H. (2000). Self-explaining expository texts: The dual processes of generating inferences and repairing mental models. In Glaser, R. (Ed.), Advances in Instructional Psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erbaum Associates.
• Christou, K.P., & Vosniadou, S. (2006). Students’ interpretation of the use of literal symbolsa in algebra-a conceptual change approach. Proceedings of the Thirty International PME Conference. (Vol. 1, pp.171). Prague, Czech Republic : PME.
• Dreyfuss, T. & Hosch, M. (2004). Equations – a structural approach. In M. J. Høines, & A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-eighth International PME Conference. (Vol. 1, pp. 152-155). Bergen, Norway.
• Drouhard, J. P. (1992). Les Écritures Symboliques de l’Algébre Elémentaire, Thése, Université Denis Diderot, París 7.
• English, L. D. & Sharry, P. V. (1996). Analogical Reasoning and the Development of Algebraic Abstraction. Educational Studies in Mathematics., 30, 135-157.
• Fischbein, E. (1987). Intuition in Science and Mathematics. An Educational Approach. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Filloy, E. and Rojano, T. (1989). Solving equations: The transition from arithmetic to algebra’, For the Learning of Mathematics, 9(2), 19-25.
• Gillard, E., Van Dooren, W., Schaeken, W., & Verschaffel, L. (2009). Dual processes in the psychology of mathematics education and cognitive psychology. Human Development, 52, 95–108.
• Gascón J. (1994). Un nouveau modèle de l’algèbre élémentaire comme alternative à l’« arithmetique généralisée ». Petit x, 37, 43-63.
• Gómez-Chacón, I. Mª, García-Madruga, J. A;. José Óscar Vila, J, Elosúa, Mª: R, Rodríguez, R (2014) The dual processes hypothesis in mathematics performance: Beliefs, Cognitive Reflection, Reasoning and Working Memory, Learning and Individual Differences, 29, 67–73.
• Heffernan, N. T., and Koedinger, K. R.(1997) The composition effect in symbolizing: the role of symbol production versus text comprehension. Proceeding of the Nineteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 307-312). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Herscovics, N. & Linchevski, L. (1991). Pre-algebraic Thinking: Range of Equations and Informal Solution Processes Used by Seventh Graders Prior to any Instruction. Proceedings of the Fifteenth PME Conference. (173-180). Assisi, Italy.
• Juárez, J.A. (2002). La comprensión del concepto de variable en profesores de matemáticas de secundaria. Unpublished Master Thesis, Departamento de Matemática Educativa, CINVESTAV-IPN.
• Kahneman, D. y S. Frederick (2005). A Model of Heuristic Judgment, In K.J. Holyoac, & R.J. Morrison (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning. (pp. 267-293) Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• Kieran, C. (1984). Cognitive mechanism underlying the equation-solving errors of algebra novice. Proceedings of the Eighth PME International Conference., 1, 70-77.
• Kieran, C. (1992). The learning and teaching of school algebra. In D. Grouws (Ed.). Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, 390-419.
• Kieran, C (2007). Learning and Teaching Algebra at the Middle School trough College levels. In F. Lester (ed), Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning. (pp. 706- 761). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
• Küchemann, D. (1980). The Understanding of Generalised Arithmetic (Algebra) by Secondary School Children, PhD Thesis, University of London.
• Knuth, E.J., Alibali, M.W., McNeil, N.M., Weinberg, A. and Stephens, A.C. (2005). Middle school students’ understanding of core algebraic concepts: Equivalence & variable, ZDM, 37 (1), 68-76.
• Leron, U. & Hazzan, 0. (2006). The rationality debate: Application of cognitive psychology to mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62,105-126.
• Leron, U. & Hazzan, 0. (2009) Intuitive vs analytical thinking: four perspectives, Educacional Studies Mathematics, 71, 263–278.
• López, A. (1996). Construcción de la Noción de Variable Algebraica en Alumnos de Nivel medio Superior. Unpublished Master Thesis, Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro Facultad de Psicología, Maestría en Psicología Educativa.
• Lozano, D. (1998). El concepto de variable: evolución a lo largo de la instrucción matemática. Tesis de Licenciatura no publicada. ITAM: México.
• Malisani, E. & Spagnolo, F. (2009). From arithmetical thought to algebraic thought: the role pf the “variable”. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71, 19-41.
• MacGregor, M. (1998). Goals and Content of an Algebra Curriculum for Compulsory Years of Schooling, In The Future of the Teaching and Learning of Algebra, the 12th ICMI Study, New ICMI Study Series Vol.8, (pp. 311-328). Netherlands: Springer.
• Montes, M.D. (2003). Iniciación al álgebra a través de la variable. Una aplicación didáctica del modelo 3UV. Unpublished Master Thesis, Departamento de Matemática Educativa, CINVESTAV-IPN.
• OECD (2013). PISA 2012 Assessment and Analytical Framework Mathematics, Reading, Science, Problem Solving and Financial Literacy. OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264190511-en
• OECD (2013). Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA 2012) México: http://gpseducation.oecd.org/CountryProfile?primaryCountry=MEX&treshold=10&top ic=PI
• Pedersen, I.F. (2015). What characterizes the algebraic competence of Norwegian upper secondary school students? Evidence from timss advanced. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(Suppl 1), S71-S96.
• Philipp, R. (1992). The many uses of algebraic variables. Mathematics Teacher, 85, 557-561.
• Remillard, J. T (2005) Examining key concepts in research on teachers' use of mathematics curricula, Review of Educational research, 75 (2), 211-246).
• Reggiani, M. (1994). Generalisation as a basis for Algebraic Thinking: Observations with 11- 12 year old pupils. Proceedings of the Eighteenth International PME Conference., IV-97, IV-104.
• Robitaille, D.F. & Robeck, E.G. (1996) The character and the context of TIMSS, in: D.F. Robitaille & R.A. Garden (Eds) Research questions and study design, TIMSS Monograph No. 2 (Vancouver, Pacific Educational Press).
• Rosnick, P. (1981) Some misconceptions concerning the concept of variable, The Mathematics Teacher, 74(6), 418-420, 450
• Ruíz Higueras, L. (1991). Una aproximación a las concepciones de los alumnos de secundaria sobre la noción de función. Epsilon: Revista de la Sociedad Andaluza de Educación Matemática "Thales", 20, 104.
• Schoenfeld, A.H. & Arcavi, A. (1988) On the Meaning of Variable, The Mathematics Teacher, 81 (6), 420-427.
• Singer, F.M. (2009). Recent research in cognitive science and neuroscience: is it relevant to mathematics learning? Proceedings of the 6th International Congress of Romanian Mathematicians (pp. 587-597), Bucharest: Romanian Academy of Science P.H.
• Singer, F. M. (2009). The Dynamic Infrastructure of Mind - a Hypothesis and Some of its Applications, New Ideas in Psychology, 27(1), 48–74.
• Stacey K. & MacGregor M. (1997). Ideas about symbolism that students bring to algebra. The Mathematics Teacher., 90(2), 110-113
• Stacey, K, & Chick, H. (2004). Solving the problem with algebra. In K. Stacey., H. Chick, & M. Kendal (Eds.), The Future of Teaching and Learning of Algebra. The 12th ICMI Study (pp. 1-20). Boston: Kluwer.
• Stanovich, K.E. & West, R.F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning. implications for the rational debate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 645–726.
• Stavy, R., & Tirosh, D. (2000). How students (mis-)understand science and mathematics: Intuitive rules. New York: Teachers College Press.
• Tahir, S., Cavanah, M, & Mitchelmore, M. (2009). A multifaceted approach to teaching algebra: students’ understanding of variable. Proceedings of the Thirty-third International PME Conference, Thessaloniki, Greece, 5-217 - 5-224.
• Trigueros, M. & Ursini, S. (1999). Does the understanding of variable evolve through schooling? Proceedings of the Twenty-third International PME Conference (pp. 4-273 - 4- 280). Haifa, Israel.
• Trigueros, M. & Ursini, S. (2003). First year undergraduates’ difficulties in working with the concept of variable. CBMS, Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education, 12, 1-29.
• Trigueros, M., Ursini, S., y Lozano Ma.D. (2000). La concepción de la variable en la enseñanza media, Educación Matemática, 12(2), 27-48. México.
• Ursini, S. (1994). Pupils' Approaches to Different Characterisations of Variable in Logo, PhD Thesis, University of London Institute of Education.
• Ursini, S. (1996). Creación de un Potencial para Trabajar con la Noción de Variable. In Hitt F. (Ed.), Investigaciones en Matemática Educativa., 423-440.
• Ursini, S. (2014). Errori e difficoltà nella comprensione del concetto di variabile algebrica. Quadermi CIRD, 8, 7-22.
• Ursini, S., Escareño, F., Montes, D. y Trigueros, M. (2005). Enseñanza del álgebra elemental. Una propuesta alternativa. México: Editorial Trillas.
• Ursini, S. & Trigueros, M. (1997). Understanding of different uses of variable: A study with starting college students, In Pehkonen, E. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Twenty-first International PME Conference., (pp. 4-254, 4-261). Finland.
• Ursini, S. & Trigueros, M. (2001). A model for the uses of variable in elementary algebra. In Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen M. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Twenty-fifth International PME Conference., Utrecht, Neatherlands, 4, 327-334.
• Ursini, S. & Trigueros, M. (2006). Mejora la comprensión del concepto variable cuando los estudiantes cursan matemáticas avanzadas? Educación Matemática., 18(3), 5-38.
• Ursini, S. y Trigueros, M. (2010). The role of variable in Elementary Algebra: An Aproach through the 3UV Model. En R. V. Nata Progress in Education, Vol. 19, Progress in Education series. (pp. 1-38) Mexico.
• Usiskin Z. (1988). Conceptions of School Algebra and Uses of Variables, In Coxford A.F. y Shulte A. P. (Eds.), The Ideas of Algebra K-12, (8-19). VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
• Vinner, S. (1997). The pseudo-conceptual and the pseudo-analytical thought processes in mathematics learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 34, 97–129.
• Wagner, S. (1981). An analytical framework for mathematical variables. Proceedings of the 5th International PME Conference, (pp.165-170), Grenoble, France,
• Warren, E. (1999). The concept of a variable; gauging students’ understanding. In Zaslavsky, O. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Twenty-third International PME Conference, (pp. 4, 313-320) .Haifa, Israel.
• Yore, L. D., Pimm, D. & Tuan, H.-L. (2007). The literacy component of mathematical and scientific literacy, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(4), 559–589.

APA

Alvarez, I., Gómez-Chacón, I. M., & Ursini, S. (2015). Understanding the Algebraic Variable: Comparative Study of Mexican and Spanish Students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(6), 1507-1529. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1409a

Vancouver

Alvarez I, Gómez-Chacón IM, Ursini S. Understanding the Algebraic Variable: Comparative Study of Mexican and Spanish Students. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2015;11(6):1507-29. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1409a

AMA

Alvarez I, Gómez-Chacón IM, Ursini S. Understanding the Algebraic Variable: Comparative Study of Mexican and Spanish Students. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2015;11(6), 1507-1529. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1409a

Chicago

Alvarez, Isabel, Inés M Gómez-Chacón, and Sonia Ursini. "Understanding the Algebraic Variable: Comparative Study of Mexican and Spanish Students". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2015 11 no. 6 (2015): 1507-1529. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1409a

Harvard

Alvarez, I., Gómez-Chacón, I. M., and Ursini, S. (2015). Understanding the Algebraic Variable: Comparative Study of Mexican and Spanish Students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(6), pp. 1507-1529. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1409a

MLA

Alvarez, Isabel et al. "Understanding the Algebraic Variable: Comparative Study of Mexican and Spanish Students". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 11, no. 6, 2015, pp. 1507-1529. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1409a