Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), Article 191. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
• Bertrand, M., & Bouchard, S. (2008). Applying the technology acceptance model to VR with people who are favorable to its use. Journal of Cyber Therapy & Rehabilitation, 1(2), 200-210.
• Bhise, A., Munshi, A., Rodrigues, A., & Sawant, V. (2022). Overview of AI in education. In Artificial intelligence in higher education (pp. 31-62). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003184157-2
• Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
• Clark, D. (2020). Artificial intelligence for learning: How to use AI to support employee development. Kogan Page Publishers.
• Cohen, A. K., Hoyt, L. T., & Dull, B. (2020). A descriptive study of COVID-19 related experiences and perspectives of a national sample of college students in spring 2020. Journal of Adolescent Health, 67(3), 369-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.06.009
• Creswell, J. W. (2021). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. SAGE.
• Cruciani, M. (2024). Post developmental mathematics: Experiences in college algebra for STEM students. Undergraduate Research, 4(1), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.58361/2766-3590.1070
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Technology acceptance model: TAM. In M. N. Al-Suqri, & A. S. Al-Aufi (Eds.), Information seeking behavior and technology adoption (pp. 205-219). IGI Global.
• Gannon, M. J., Taheri, B., & Azer, J. (2022). Contemporary research paradigms and philosophies. In F. Okumus, S. M. Rasoolimanesh, & S. Jahani (Eds.), Contemporary research methods in hospitality and tourism (pp. 5-19). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80117-546-320221002
• Gaona, J., López, S. S., & Montoya-Delgadillo, E. (2024). Prospective mathematics teachers learning complex numbers using technology. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 55(9), 2219-2248. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2022.2133021
• Garcia, M. (2018). The effects of photo math on mathematical problem-solving skills. Journal of Educational Technology Research, 12(4), 177-192.
• Garcia, M., Rodriguez, L., & Martinez, E. (2020). The use of photo math in college of education mathematics courses: A case study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(2), 89-104.
• Gyimah, A, (2019). The use of smartphone mathematics applications among pre-service mathematics teachers at teacher universities in Ghana [Doctoral dissertation, University of Education, Winneba].
• Kamal, S. S. L. B. A. (2019). Research paradigm and the philosophical foundations of a qualitative study. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 4(3), 1386-1394. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2019.43.13861394
• Kankam, P. K. (2019). The use of paradigms in information research. Library & Information Science Research, 41(2), 85-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2019.04.003
• Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., Kirschner, F., & Zambrano R, J. (2018). From cognitive load theory to collaborative cognitive load theory. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 13, 213-233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-018-9277-y
• Kirk, R. E (2007). Effect of magnitude. A different focus. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 137(5), 1634-1646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2006.09.011
• Klinger, M., & Walter, D. (2022). How users review frequently used apps and videos containing mathematics. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 29(1), 25-35. https://doi.org/10.1564/tme_v29.1.03
• Kusi, P., Bonyah, E., Teku, E., & Effah, S. K. (2024). Assessing pre-service mathematics teachers’ understanding in inductive and deductive reasoning in mathematics application. European Journal of Science, Innovation and Technology, 4(3), 37-57.
• LlenadaSantos, J. V. (2022). Comparative analysis of mobile applications for its integration in college mathematics subjects. Education: Journal of Education, 6(4), 324-345.
• López, J., Robles, I., & Martínez-Planell, R. (2016). Students’ understanding of quadratic equations. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 47(4), 552-572. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1119895
• Mathonsi, D. (2022). Intermediate phase teachers’ challenges when integrating ICT in mathematics teaching and learning in rural schools [Doctoral dissertation, University of Johannesburg].
• Pekrun, R. (2011). Emotions as drivers of learning and cognitive development. In R. A. Calvo, & S. K. D’Mello (Eds.), New perspectives on affect and learning technologies (pp. 23-39). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9625-1_3
• Pinca, J. (2023). Building bridges to commitment: Investigating employee retention practices and its influence on employees’ retention intention. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(5), 554-567.
• Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Mixed methods research. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 305-306. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262619
• Rusticus, S. A., & Lovato, C. Y. (2011). Applying tests of equivalence for multiple group comparisons: Demonstration of the confidence interval approach. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 16(1).
• Safiulina, E., Vintere, A., & Panova, O. (2024). Exploring AI-based mathematics learning platforms and applications. In Proceedings of the 16^th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (pp. 6861-6865). IATED. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2024.1629
• Seeland, J., Cliplef, L., Munn, C., & Dedrick, C. (2024). Mathematics and academic integrity: Institutional support at a Canadian college. In K. Seaton, B. Loch, & E. Lugosi (Eds.), Takeaways from teaching through a pandemic (pp. 115-122). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032627496-14
• Serdyukov, P. (2022). Challenging formalization in education and beyond: Problems and solutions for traditional and online learning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003290094
• Soia, O. M. (2022). Mobile technologies and learning tools in mathematics: Modern trends in the use of educational institutions. Publishing House “Baltija Publishing”. https://doi.org/10.30525/978-9934-26-200-5-7
• Surip, N. A., Razak, K. A., & Tamuri, A. H. (2019). Determining content validity instruments Shura elements among Islamic teachers in primary schools. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v8-i4/6912
• Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257-285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
• Taherdoost, H. (2016). Validity and reliability of the research instrument; how to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in research. International Journal of Academic Research in Management, 5. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205040
• Tsetsos, S., & Prentzas, J. (2020). A survey on recent learning approaches in school education using Edmodo. In M. Y. Zhou (Ed.), Open educational resources (OER) pedagogy and practices (pp. 91-111). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1200-5.ch005
• Wibaningrum, G., & Aurellya, C. D. (2020). Fear of missing out scale Indonesian version: An internal structure analysis. Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi Dan Pendidikan Indonesia, 9(2), 75-82. https://doi.org/10.15408/jp3i.v9i2.16283
• Zain, I. N., Setambah, M. A., Othman, M. S., & Hanapi, M. H. (2023). Use of photo math applications in helping improving students’ mathematical (algebra) achievement. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 4(2), 85-87. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2023.4.2.601
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64-70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2

APA

Kusi, P., Boateng, F. O., & Teku, E. (2025). The effect of technology integration on college of education students’ achievement in quadratic equations: The perspective of photo math utilization. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(1), em2561. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15799

Vancouver

Kusi P, Boateng FO, Teku E. The effect of technology integration on college of education students’ achievement in quadratic equations: The perspective of photo math utilization. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2025;21(1):em2561. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15799

AMA

Kusi P, Boateng FO, Teku E. The effect of technology integration on college of education students’ achievement in quadratic equations: The perspective of photo math utilization. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2025;21(1), em2561. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15799

Chicago

Kusi, Prince, Francis Ohene Boateng, and Emmanuel Teku. "The effect of technology integration on college of education students’ achievement in quadratic equations: The perspective of photo math utilization". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2025 21 no. 1 (2025): em2561. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15799

Harvard

Kusi, P., Boateng, F. O., and Teku, E. (2025). The effect of technology integration on college of education students’ achievement in quadratic equations: The perspective of photo math utilization. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(1), em2561. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15799

MLA

Kusi, Prince et al. "The effect of technology integration on college of education students’ achievement in quadratic equations: The perspective of photo math utilization". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 21, no. 1, 2025, em2561. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15799