The Educational Effectiveness of Didactical Games in Project-based Science Learning among 5th Grade Students

Muhamad Hugerat; Naji Kortam; Nassrin Toubia Maroun; Ahmad Basheer

doi:10.29333/ejmste/8490

Full Text (PDF)

Muhamad Hugerat ¹ ^* , Naji Kortam ¹, Nassrin Toubia Maroun ¹, Ahmad Basheer ¹

More Detail

¹ The Academic Arab College for Education in Israel – Haifa, ISRAEL^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine how the use of didactic games in teaching science affects the learning environment, achievement, and motivation among primary school students. The research population consisted of 188 5^th grade students from two primary schools. This group was divided into an experimental group and a control group. The research tools consisted of two questionnaires: one to determine the motivation to study science, and the other to determine the learning environment. Moreover, a pre-test in science was administered before the intervention and a post-test was administered afterwards. In addition, 20 pupils were interviewed. It was found that the use of didactic games in teaching significantly increases student motivation to learn science and that it has a positive effect on all the components of the “learning environment”, as perceived by the students. In classes in which didactic games were used, the classroom atmosphere improved more than in classes where such games were not used.

Keywords

didactic game
achievement
motivation
learning environment

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, Volume 16, Issue 10, October 2020, Article No: em1888

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8490

Publication date: 30 Aug 2020

Article Views: 3060

Article Downloads: 1951

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Afari, E., Aldridge, J. M., Fraser, B. J., & Khine, M. S. (2013). Students’ perceptions of the learning environment and attitudes in game-based mathematics classrooms. Learning Environments Research, 16(1), 131-150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-012-9122-6
Allery, L. (2014). Make use of educational games. Education for Primary Care, 25(1), 65-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2014.11494245
Ames, C. (1992). Achievement goals, motivational climate, and motivational processes. In G. C. Roberts (Ed.), Motivation in Sport and Exercise (pp. 161-176). Human Kinetics.
Arbel, H., Lahman, D., Aofestien, N., Kawfman, H., & Keblentsky-Bendor, D. (2011). Lemeda bemtsaut meshakeem [Learning through games]. Oorika, 32, 1-14 (Hebrew).
Bailey, S., & Watson, R. (1998). Establishing basic ecological understanding in younger pupils: a pilot evaluation of a strategy based on drama/role play. International Journal of Science Education, 20(2), 139-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980200202
Bassuk, S., Church, T., & Manson, J. (2013). Researchers explain why exercise works magic. Scientific American, 309(2), 74-79. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0813-74
Begoray, D. L., & Stinner, A. (2005). Representing science through historical Drama. Science & Education, 14(3-5), 457-471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-005-0780-y
Ben-Menahem, E. (2005). Meshak owmtseuot - hatsad haregshee shel horaat hamadaim. [Game and Reality - The Emotional Side of Teaching Science]. Oorika, 28, 1-14 (Hebrew).
Beswick, K. (2011). Putting context in context: An examination of the evidence for the benefits of ‘contextualised’ tasks. International journal of science and mathematics education, 9(2), 367-390.‏ https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9270-z
Chang, C. C. (2009). Using jigsaw collaborative learning strategy in online discussion to foster a project based learning community on the Web. International Journal of Instructional Media, 36(2), 221-233.
Choe, S. W. T., & Drennan, P. M. (2001). Analyzing scientific literature using a jigsaw group activity: Piecing together student discussions on environmental research. Journal of College Science Teaching, 30(5), 328-330.
Chao, S., Stigler, J. W., & Woodward, A. J. (2000). The effects of physical materials on kindergartners’ learning of number concepts. Cognition and Instruction, 18(3), 285-316. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI1803_1
da Silva Júnior, J. N., Sousa Lima, M. A., Nunes Miranda, F., Melo Leite Junior, A. J., Alexandre, F. S. O., de Oliveira Assis, D. C., & Nobre, D. J. (2018). Nomenclature bets: An innovative computer-based game to aid students in the study of nomenclature of organic compounds.‏ Journal of Chemical Education, 95(11), 2055-2058. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00298
Foster, A. (2008). Games and motivation to learn science: personal identity, applicability, relevance and meaningfulness. Journal of Interactive Learning research, 19(4), 597-614.
Fraser, B. J., & Walberg, H. J. (Eds.) (1991). Educational Environments: Evaluation, Antecedents, Conseqences. Pergamon.
Glynn, S. M., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Brickman, P. (2009). Science motivation questionnaire: Construct validation with nonscience majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(2), 127-146. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20267
Goleman, D. (2006). Social intelligence: then new science of human relationships. Bantam Dell.
Hadkaew, P., Wiwatanapataphee, B., & Wu, Y. H. (2008). Project-based learning model for the study of blood flow in the human blood circulatory system. International Journal of Learning, 15(3), 195-202.‏ https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9494/CGP/v15i03/45686
Hannula, M., & Lehtinen, E. (2005). Spontaneous focusing on numerosity and mathematical skills of young children. Learning and Instruction, 15(3), 237-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.04.005
Hartley, R. E., Frank, L. K., & Goldenson, R. (2013). Understanding children’s play. Routledge.
Hugerat, M. (2016). How teaching science using project-based learning strategies affects the classroom learning environment. Learning Environments Research, 19(3), 383-395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-016-9212-y
Jancic, P., & Hus, V. (2018). Teaching social studies with games. International Journal of Game-Based Learning, 8(2), 68-79.‏ https://doi.org/10.4018/IJGBL.2018040106
Karbach, J., & Schubert, T. (2013). Training-induced cognitive and neural plasticity. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 7, 48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-012-9122-6
Kats, V. J. (2007). Algebra, getaway to a technological future. Mathematical Association of America.
Klopfer, E., Osterweil, S., & Salen, K. (2009). Moving learning games forward. The Education Arcade.
Krasnor, L. R., & Pepler, D. J. (1980). The study of children’s play: Some suggested future directions. In K. H. Rubin (Ed.), Children’s play: New directions for child development (pp. 85-95). Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.23219800908
Lee, S., Kang, E., & Kim, H. B. (2015). Exploring the impact of students’ learning approach on collaborative group modeling of blood circulation. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(2-3), 234-255.‏ https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9509-5
Leisman, G., Machado, C., & Mualem, R. (2013).) The merging the neurosciences principles with educational practice in the treatment of ADHD: Function specific treatment for rehabilitation. Frontiers of Public Health: Frontiers of Child Health and Human Development, 1, 22. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2013.00022
Liu, E. Z. F., & Chen, P. K. (2013). The effect of game-based learning on students’ learning performance in science learning - A case of “Conveyance Go”. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 1044-1051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.430
Martin, A. J., & Dowson, M. (2009). Interpersonal relationships, motivation, engagement, and achievement: Yields for theory, current issues, and educational practice. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 327-365. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325583
Mayo, M. J. (2010). Bringing game-based learning to scale: the business challenges of serious games. International Journal of Learning & Media, 2(2-3), 81-100. https://doi.10.1162/ijlm_a_00048
McCaslin, M., & Good, T. L. (1996). The informal curriculum. In D. C. Berliner, & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 622-670). Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
McNeil, N., & Jarvin, L. (2007). When theories don’t add up: Disentangling В the manipulatives debate. Theory and Practice, 46(4), 309-316. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840701593899
Meece, J. L., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Hoyle, R. H. (1988). Students goal orientations and cognitiv engagement in classroom activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 514-523. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.4.514
Moreno, L. F., Hincapié, G., & Alzate, M. V. (2014). Cheminoes: A didactic game to learn chemical relationships between valence, atomic number, and symbol. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(6), 872-875.‏ https://doi.org/10.1021/ed4008183
Patel, J. (2008). Using game format in small group classes for pharmacotherapeutics case studies. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 72(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.5688/aj720121
Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (2^nd Ed.). Prentice Hall.
Randler, C. & Bogner, F. X. (2009). Efficacy of Two Different Instructional Methods Involving Complex Ecological Content. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(2), 315-337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-007-9117-4
Sánchez-Rivas, E., Ruiz-Palmero, J., & Sánchez-Rodríguez, J. (2019). Gamification of assessments in the natural sciences subject in primary education. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 19(1), 95-111.‏
Santini, J. T., Bloor, T., & Sensevy, G. (2018). Modeling Conceptualization and Investigating Teaching Effectiveness. Science & Education, 27(9-10), 921-961. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-0016-6
Saputra, M. D., Joyoatmojo, S., Wardani, D. K., & Sangka, K. B. (2019). Developing critical-thinking skills through the collaboration of jigsaw model with problem-based learning model. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 1077-1094.‏ https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12169a
Schiller, P. (2010). Early brain development research review and update. Brain Development, 196, 26-30.
Shonkoff, J. P., & Levitt P. (2010). Neuroscience and the future of early childhood policy: Moving from why to what and how. Neuron, 67(6), 689-691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2010.08.032
Selvi, M., & Çosan, A. Ö. (2018). The effect of using educational games in teaching kingdoms of living things. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(9), 2019-2028.‏ https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2018.060921
Siraj-Blatchford, I., & Kwi-Ok, N. (2014). A comparison of the pedagogical practices of mathematics education for young children in England and South Korea. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(1), 145-165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9412-1
Sousa Lima, M. A., Monterio, A. C., Melo Leite Junior, A. J. M., de Andrade Matos, I. S., Alexandre, F. S. O., Nobre, D. J., Monteiro, A. J., & da Silva Júnior, J. N. (2019). Game-based application for helping students review chemical nomenclature in a fun way. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(4), 801-805. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00540
Su, T., Cheng, M. T., & Lin, S. H. (2014). Investigating the effectiveness of an educational card game for learning how human immunology is regulated. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 13(3), 504-515. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-10-0197
Tal, M. (1993). Shelov h’meshak betahlechee lmeda - lama o’ketsad? [Integrating the game into learning processes – why and how]. Levensky College, H’amerkaz laheshtalmoiut ovdee horah o’mesrad henoch, H’merkazeem H’bedagogeem (Hebrew).
Takeda, K., Takahashi, K., Masukawa, H., & Shimamori, Y. (2017). Influence on learning of a collaborative learning method comprising the jigsaw method and problem-based learning (PBL). Yakugaku zasshi: Journal of the Pharmaceutical Society of Japan, 137(6), 659-664.‏ https://doi.org/10.1248/yakushi.16-00224-2
Triboni, E., & Weber, G. (2018). MOL: Developing a European-style board game to teach organic chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(5), 791-803.‏ https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00408
Wassermann, S. (1992). Serious play in the classroom. Childhood Education, 68(3), 133-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.1992.10522562
Zedan, R. (2010). New dimensions in the classroom climate. Learning Environments Research, 13(1), 75-88. https://doi.10.1007/s10984-009-9068-5

How to cite this article

APA

Hugerat, M., Kortam, N., Maroun, N. T., & Basheer, A. (2020). The Educational Effectiveness of Didactical Games in Project-based Science Learning among 5th Grade Students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(10), em1888. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8490

Vancouver

Hugerat M, Kortam N, Maroun NT, Basheer A. The Educational Effectiveness of Didactical Games in Project-based Science Learning among 5th Grade Students. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2020;16(10):em1888. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8490

AMA

Hugerat M, Kortam N, Maroun NT, Basheer A. The Educational Effectiveness of Didactical Games in Project-based Science Learning among 5th Grade Students. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2020;16(10), em1888. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8490

Chicago

Hugerat, Muhamad, Naji Kortam, Nassrin Toubia Maroun, and Ahmad Basheer. "The Educational Effectiveness of Didactical Games in Project-based Science Learning among 5th Grade Students". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2020 16 no. 10 (2020): em1888. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8490

Harvard

Hugerat, M., Kortam, N., Maroun, N. T., and Basheer, A. (2020). The Educational Effectiveness of Didactical Games in Project-based Science Learning among 5th Grade Students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(10), em1888. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8490

MLA

Hugerat, Muhamad et al. "The Educational Effectiveness of Didactical Games in Project-based Science Learning among 5th Grade Students". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 16, no. 10, 2020, em1888. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8490