Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Alvermann, D. E., Unrau, N. J., Sailors, M., & Ruddell, R. B. (2018). Theoretical models and processes of literacy. In Theoretical models and processes of literacy. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315110592
• Anderson, J. (2009). Mathematics curriculum development and the role of problem solving. ACSA Conference 2009, 1, Article 8.
• Apriliyanto, B., Saputro, D. R. S., & Riyadi. (2018). Student’s social interaction in mathematics learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983, Article 012130. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012130
• Azmitia, M. (2016). Peer interaction and problem solving: When are two heads better than one? Child Development, 59(1), 87-96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1988.tb03197.x
• Campbell, T. G., & Hodges, T. S. (2020). Using positioning theory to examine how students collaborate in groups in mathematics. International Journal of Educational Research, 103, Article 101632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101632
• Caspi, S., & Sfard, A. (2012). Spontaneous meta-arithmetic as a first step toward school algebra. International Journal of Educational Research, 51-52, 45-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2011.12.006
• Chong, M. S. F., & Shahrill, M. (2016). The use of an emerging framework to explore students’ cognitive competency. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(16). https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i16/78812
• Cobb, P., Boufi, A., McClain, K., & Whitenack, J. (2012). Reflective discourse and collective reflection. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(3), 258-277. https://doi.org/10.2307/749781
• Cole, M. (2010). Reflections on the discussion reflections on the discussion. Comparative and General Pharmacology, 9039(917682025), 2-27.
• Daher, W. (2020). Students’ positioning and emotions in learning geometric definition. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(1), 111-134. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.1.9057.111-134
• Deal, L. J., & Wismer, M. G. (2010). NCTM principles and standards for mathematically talented students. Gifted Child Today, 33(3), 55-65. https://doi.org/10.1177/107621751003300313
• DeJarnette, A. F. (2018). Using student positioning to identify collaboration during pair work at the computer in mathematics. Linguistics and Education, 46, 43-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2018.05.005
• DeJarnette, A. F., & González, G. (2015). Positioning during group work on a novel task in algebra II. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(4), 378-422. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.46.4.0378
• Esmonde, I. (2013). Mathematics learning in groups: Analyzing equity in two cooperative activity structures. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(2), 247-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400902797958
• Flood, V. J. (2018). Multimodal revoicing as an interactional mechanism for connecting scientific and everyday concepts. Human Development, 61(3), 145-173. https://doi.org/10.1159/000488693
• Forman, E. A., & Larreamendy-Joerns, J. (2015). Learning in the context of peer collaboration: A pluralistic perspective on goals and expertise. Cognition and Instruction, 13(4), 549-564. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1304_6
• Francisco, J. M. (2013). Learning in collaborative settings: Students building on each other’s ideas to promote their mathematical understanding. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82(3), 417-438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9437-3
• Gagné, R. M., & Smith, E. C. (1962). A study of the effects of verbalization on problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(1), 12-18. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048703
• Harré, R. (2015). Positioning theory. The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction, 2009, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi120
• Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A., Wagner, D., Johnson, K. R., Suh, H., & Figueras, H. (2015). Positioning in mathematics education: Revelations on an imported theory. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 89(2), 185-204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9588-5
• Herbst, P. G. (2003). Using novel tasks in teaching mathematics: Three tensions affecting the work of the teacher. American Educational Research Journal, 40(1), 197-238. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312040001197
• Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2014). Cooperative learning: Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory. Journal of Excellence in College Teaching, 25, 85-118.
• Kavanagh, S. S., Metz, M., Hauser, M., Fogo, B., Taylor, M. W., & Carlson, J. (2020). Practicing responsiveness: Using approximations of teaching to develop teachers’ responsiveness to students’ ideas. Journal of Teacher Education, 71(1), 94-107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487119841884
• Kayı-Aydar, H. (2019). Positioning theory in applied linguistics. In Positioning theory in applied linguistics (pp. 1-26). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97337-1
• Kim, D.-J., Choi, S., & Lim, W. (2017). Sfard’s commognitive framework as a method of discourse analysis in mathematics. International Journal of Cognitive and Language Sciences, 11(11), 481-485.
• Lederman, E. (2009). Journey into problem solving: A gift from Polya. The Physics Teacher, 47(2), 94-97. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3072455
• Lee, C. I. (2017). An appropriate prompts system based on the Polya method for mathematical problem-solving. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(3), 893-910. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00649a
• Lee, J., & Martin, L. (2017). Investigating students’ perceptions of motivating factors of online class discussions. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(5), 148-172. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.2883
• Mueller, M., Yankelewitz, D., & Maher, C. (2012). A framework for analyzing the collaborative construction of arguments and its interplay with agency. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(3), 369-387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9354-x
• Nardi, E., Ryve, A., Stadler, E., & Viirman, O. (2014). Commognitive analyses of the learning and teaching of mathematics at university level: The case of discursive shifts in the study of calculus. Research in Mathematics Education, 16(2), 182-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2014.918338
• Nilsson, P., & Ryve, A. (2010). Focal event, contextualization, and effective communication in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 74(3), 241-258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9236-7
• Okafor, T. U. (2019). Effect of Polya’s problem solving technique on the academic achievement of senior secondary school student in physics. European Journal of Physics Education, 10(1), 38-48.
• Pimta, S., Tayruakham, S., & Nuangchale, P. (2009). Factors influencing mathematic problem-solving ability of sixth grade students. Journal of Social Sciences, 5(4), 381-385. https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2009.381.385
• Polya, G. (1973). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616747.007
• Retnowati, E., Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2017). Can collaborative learning improve the effectiveness of worked examples in learning mathematics? Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(5), 666-679. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000167
• Sfard, A. (2001). There is more to discourse than meets the ears: Looking at thinking as communicating to learn more about mathematical learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46(1-3), 13-57. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1014097416157
• Sfard, A. (2006). There is more to discourse than meets the ears: Looking at thinking as communicating to learn more about mathematical learning. In Learning discourse (pp. 13-57). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48085-9_1
• Sfard, A. (2007). When the rules of discourse change, but nobody tells you: Making sense of mathematics learning from a commognitive standpoint. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(4), 565-613. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400701525253
• Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511499944
• Sfard, A. (2015). Learning, commognition and mathematics. In D. Scott, & E. ‎Hargreaves (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of learning (pp. 129-138). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473915213.n12
• Sfard, A., Nesher, P., Streefland, L., Cobb, P., & Mason, J. (1998). Learning mathematics through conversation: Is it as good as they say? For the Learning of Mathematics, 18(1), 41-51.
• Shahsavari, H., Zare, Z., Parsa-Yekta, Z., Griffiths, P., & Vaismoradi, M. (2018). Learning situations in nursing education: A concept analysis. Research and Theory for Nursing Practice, 32(1), 23-45. https://doi.org/10.1891/1541-6577.32.1.23
• Simpol, N. S. H., Shahrill, M., Li, H. C., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2018). Implementing thinking aloud pair and Pólya problem solving strategies in fractions. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 943, Article 012013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/943/1/012013
• Sriraman, B. (2009). Book review: What’s all the commotion over commognition? A review of Annasfard’s thinking as communicating. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1170
• Staples, M. (2014). Supporting whole-class collaborative inquiry in a secondary mathematics classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 25(2-3), 161-217. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000701301125
• Stein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Smith, M. S., & Hughes, E. K. (2008). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: Five practices for helping teachers move beyond show and tell. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10(4), 313-340. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060802229675
• Stein, M. K., Grover, B. W., & Henningsen, M. (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 455-488. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312033002455
• Struyve, C., Hannes, K., Meredith, C., Vandecandelaere, M., Gielen, S., & De Fraine, B. (2018). Teacher leadership in practice: Mapping the negotiation of the position of the special educational needs coordinator in schools. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 62(5), 701-718. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2017.1306798
• Tholander, M., & Aronsson, K. (2014). Doing subteaching in school group work: Positionings, resistance and participation frameworks. Language and Education, 17(3), 208-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780308666849
• Thoma, A., & Nardi, E. (2016). Routines in the didactical and mathematical discourses of closed-book examination tasks. In Proceedings of INDRUM 2016: 1^st Conference of the International Network for Didactic Research in University Mathematics (pp. 411-420).
• Tohir, M., Maswar, M., Moh, A., Saiful, S., & Rizki Pradita, D. A. (2020). Prospective teachers’ expectations of students’ mathematical thinking processes in solving problems. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(4), 1735-1748. https://doi.org/10.12973/EU-JER.9.4.1735
• Tuset, G. A. (2018). A commognitive lens to study pre-service teachers ‘ teaching in the context of achieving a goal of ambitious mathematics teaching. In Proceeding, Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 3185-3192).
• van Langenhove, L., & Harré, R. (1999). Introducing positioning theory. In L. van Langenhove, & R. Harré (Eds.), Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action (pp. 14-31). Oxford Basil Blackwell Publishers. Editors: Luk Van Langenhove, Rom Harré.
• Viirman, O. (2015). Explanation, motivation and question posing routines in university mathematics teachers’ pedagogical discourse: A commognitive analysis. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 46(8), 1165-1181. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1034206
• Webb, N. M., Franke, M. L., Ing, M., Turrou, A. C., Johnson, N. C., & Zimmerman, J. (2019). Teacher practices that promote productive dialogue and learning in mathematics classrooms. International Journal of Educational Research, 97, 176-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.07.009
• Wood, M. B. (2013). Mathematical micro-identities: Moment-to-moment positioning and learning in a fourth-grade classroom. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(5), 775-808. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.44.5.0775
• Yu, S., & Hu, G. (2017). Can higher-proficiency L2 learners benefit from working with lower-proficiency partners in peer feedback? Teaching in Higher Education, 22(2), 178-192. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1221806
• Zayyadi, M., Nusantara, T., Hidayanto, E., Sulandra, I. M., & Sa’Dijah, C. (2020). Content and pedagogical knowledge of prospective teachers in mathematics learning: Commognitive. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(1), 515-532. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.642131
• Zayyadi, M., Nusantara, T., Subanji, Hidayanto, E., & Sulandra, I. M. (2019). A commognitive framework: The process of solving mathematical problems of middle school students. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(2), 89-102. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.2.7
• Zhang, S., Chan, M. C. E., & Cao, Y. (2019). Studying student interactive positioning in collaborative mathematics problem solving: The case of four Chinese students. In Proceedings of the 42^nd Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 787-794).

APA

Muslim, M., Nusantara, T., Sudirman, S., & Irawati, S. (2024). The causes of changes in student positioning in group discussions using Polya’s problem-solving and commognitive approaches. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(9), em2506. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15148

Vancouver

Muslim M, Nusantara T, Sudirman S, Irawati S. The causes of changes in student positioning in group discussions using Polya’s problem-solving and commognitive approaches. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2024;20(9):em2506. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15148

AMA

Muslim M, Nusantara T, Sudirman S, Irawati S. The causes of changes in student positioning in group discussions using Polya’s problem-solving and commognitive approaches. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2024;20(9), em2506. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15148

Chicago

Muslim, Muslim, Toto Nusantara, Sudirman Sudirman, and Santi Irawati. "The causes of changes in student positioning in group discussions using Polya’s problem-solving and commognitive approaches". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2024 20 no. 9 (2024): em2506. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15148

Harvard

Muslim, M., Nusantara, T., Sudirman, S., and Irawati, S. (2024). The causes of changes in student positioning in group discussions using Polya’s problem-solving and commognitive approaches. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(9), em2506. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15148

MLA

Muslim, Muslim et al. "The causes of changes in student positioning in group discussions using Polya’s problem-solving and commognitive approaches". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 20, no. 9, 2024, em2506. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15148