Opportunity to learn about optimization problems provided by undergraduate calculus textbooks: A case study

Thembinkosi Peter Mkhatshwa

doi:10.29333/ejmste/13575

Full Text (PDF)

Thembinkosi Peter Mkhatshwa ¹ ^*

More Detail

¹ Department of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Miami University, Middletown, OH, USA^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

This study investigated opportunities to learn about optimization problems provided by undergraduate calculus textbooks. To accomplish this, we analyzed examples and practice problems from two calculus textbooks widely used in the teaching of calculus in the United States. Findings of this study indicate that a majority of the problems in both textbooks lack realistic and essential contexts, have matching or missing information, and require a low cognitive demand to solve. Setting up objective functions is either not necessary or it is straightforward for most problems in the two textbooks. In addition, both textbooks provide ample opportunities to interpret critical numbers and extrema in context. Overall, findings of this study suggest the existence of a relationship between known students’ difficulties with solving optimization problems and the opportunities to learn about optimization problems provided by calculus textbooks. Implications for several stakeholders, including calculus textbook authors and calculus instructors are discussed.

Keywords

opportunity to learn
textbook research
textbook analysis
calculus
optimization problems

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, Volume 19, Issue 10, October 2023, Article No: em2335

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13575

Publication date: 01 Oct 2023

Online publication date: 11 Aug 2023

Article Views: 1192

Article Downloads: 755

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Aguinis, H., & Solarino, A. M. (2019). Transparency and replicability in qualitative research: The case of interviews with elite informants. Strategic Management Journal, 40(8), 1291-1315. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3015
Alajmi, A. H. (2012). How do elementary textbooks address fractions? A review of mathematics textbooks in the USA, Japan, and Kuwait. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(2), 239-261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9342-1
Begle, E. G. (1973). Some lessons learned by SMSG. Mathematics Teacher, 66(3), 207-214. https://doi.org/10.5951/MT.66.3.0207
Borgen, K. L., & Manu, S. S. (2002). What do students really understand? The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21(2), 151-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(02)00115-3
Brijlall, D., & Ndlovu, Z. (2013). High school learners’ mental construction during solving optimization problems in calculus: A South African case study. South African Journal of Education, 33(2), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v33n2a679
Carroll, J. (1963). A model of school learning. Teachers College Record, 64, 723-733. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146816306400801
Chang, B. L., Cromley, J. G., & Tran, N. (2016). Coordinating multiple representations in a reform calculus textbook. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(8), 1475-1497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9652-3
Charalambous, C. Y., Delaney, S., Hsu, H. Y., & Mesa, V. (2010). A comparative analysis of the addition and subtraction of fractions in textbooks from three countries. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12(2), 117-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060903460070
de Lange, J. (1995). Assessment: No change without problems. In T. A. Romberg (Ed.), Reform in school mathematics (pp. 87-172). SUNY Press.
Dole, S., & Shield, M. J. (2008). The capacity of two Australian eighth-grade textbooks for promoting proportional reasoning. Research in Mathematics Education, 10(1), 19-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794800801915863
Dominguez, A. (2010). Single solution, multiple perspectives. In R. Lesh, P L. Galbraith, C. R. Haines, & A. Hurford (Eds.), Modeling students’ mathematical modeling competencies: ICTMA 13 (pp. 223-233). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0561-1_19
Floden, R. E. (2002). The measurement of opportunity to learn. In A. C. Porter, & A. Gamoran (Eds.), Methodological advances in cross-national surveys of educational achievement (pp. 231-266). National Academy Press.
Gravemeijer, K., & Doorman, M. (1999). Context problems in realistic mathematics education: A calculus course as an example. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 39(1-3), 111-129. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003749919816
Haghjoo, S., Radmehr, F., & Reyhani, E. (2023). Analyzing the written discourse in calculus textbooks over 42 years: The case of primary objects, concrete discursive objects, and a realization tree of the derivative at a point. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 112(1), 73-102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-022-10168-y
Hughes-Hallett, D., Lock, P. F., Gleason, A. M., Flath, D.E., Gleason, A. M., Luzano, G. I., Rhea, K., Connally, E., McCallum, W. G., Sahin, A., Kalaycioglu, S., Osgood, B. G., Spiegler, A. H., Lahme, B., Patterson, C. L., Tecosky-Feldman, J., Lomen, D. O., Quinney, D., Tucker, T. W., Lovelock, D., & Wooten, A. D. (2018). Applied calculus. Wiley.
Husen, T. (Ed.). (1967). International study of achievement in mathematics: A comparison of twelve countries. John Wiley & Sons.
Jones, D. L., & Tarr, J. E. (2007). An examination of the levels of cognitive demand required by probability tasks in middle grades mathematics textbooks. Statistics Education Research Journal, 6(2), 4-27. https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v6i2.482
Kolovou, A., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Bakker, A. (2009). Non-routine problem solving tasks in primary school mathematics textbooks–a needle in a haystack. Mediterranean Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 8(2), 31-68.
LaRue, R., & Infante, N. E. (2015). Optimization in first semester calculus: A look at a classic problem. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 46(7), 1021-1031. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1067844
Lithner, J. (2004). Mathematical reasoning in calculus textbook exercises. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23(4), 405-427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2004.09.003
Maass, K. (2007). Modelling tasks for low achieving students–first results of an empirical study. In D. Pitta Pantazi, & G. Philippou (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5^th Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 2120-2129).
Maass, K. (2010). Classification scheme for modelling tasks. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik [Journal for Mathematics Didactics], 31(2), 285-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2012.667515
Mesa, V., Suh, H., Blake, T., & Whittemore, T. (2012). Examples in college algebra textbooks: Opportunities for students’ learning. Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 23(1), 76-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2012.667515
Mkhatshwa, T. (2019). Students’ quantitative reasoning about an absolute extrema optimization problem in a profit maximization context. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 50(8), 1105-1127. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2018.1562116
Mkhatshwa, T. (2022a). A study of calculus students’ difficulties, approaches, and ability to solve multivariable optimization problems. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(11), 2987-3014. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2021.1927227
Mkhatshwa, T. (2022b). Quantitative and covariational reasoning opportunities provided by calculus textbooks: The case of the derivative. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2022.2129497
Nagle, C., Moore-Russo, D., Viglietti, J., & Martin, K. (2013). Calculus students’ and instructors’ conceptualizations of slope: A comparison across academic levels. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(6), 1491-1515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9411-2
Pickle, M. C. C. (2012), Statistical content in middle grades mathematics textbooks [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of South Florida.
Reys, B. J., Reys, R. E., & Chavez, O. (2004). Why mathematics textbooks matter. Educational Leadership, 61(5), 61-66.
Stacey, K., & Vincent, J. (2009). Modes of reasoning in explanations in Australian eighth-grade mathematics textbooks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72(3), 271-288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-009-9193-1
Stewart, J. (2021). Calculus: Early transcendentals. Cengage Learning.
Stylianides, G. J. (2009). Reasoning-and-proving in school mathematics textbooks. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 11(4), 258-288. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060903253954
Swanagan, B. S. (2012). The impact of students’ understanding of derivatives on their performance while solving optimization problems [Doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia].
Thompson, D. R., Senk, S. L., & Johnson, G. J. (2012). Opportunities to learn reasoning and proof in high school mathematics textbooks. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(3), 253-295. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.43.3.0253
Törnroos, J. (2005). Mathematics textbooks, opportunity to learn and student achievement. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 31(4), 315-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2005.11.005
Tyne, J. G. (2016). Calculus students’ reasoning about slope and derivative as rates of change [Unpublished master’s thesis]. The University of Maine.
van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2005). The role of contexts in assessment problems in mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 25(2), 2-9.
White, P., & Mitchelmore, M. (1996). Conceptual knowledge in introductory calculus. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(1), 79-95. https://doi.org/10.2307/749199
Wijaya, A., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Doorman, M. (2015). Opportunity-to-learn context-based tasks provided by mathematics textbooks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 89(1), 41-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9595-1

How to cite this article

APA

Mkhatshwa, T. P. (2023). Opportunity to learn about optimization problems provided by undergraduate calculus textbooks: A case study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(10), em2335. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13575

Vancouver

Mkhatshwa TP. Opportunity to learn about optimization problems provided by undergraduate calculus textbooks: A case study. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2023;19(10):em2335. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13575

AMA

Mkhatshwa TP. Opportunity to learn about optimization problems provided by undergraduate calculus textbooks: A case study. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2023;19(10), em2335. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13575

Chicago

Mkhatshwa, Thembinkosi Peter. "Opportunity to learn about optimization problems provided by undergraduate calculus textbooks: A case study". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2023 19 no. 10 (2023): em2335. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13575

Harvard

Mkhatshwa, T. P. (2023). Opportunity to learn about optimization problems provided by undergraduate calculus textbooks: A case study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(10), em2335. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13575

MLA

Mkhatshwa, Thembinkosi Peter "Opportunity to learn about optimization problems provided by undergraduate calculus textbooks: A case study". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 19, no. 10, 2023, em2335. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13575