Mathematics education and technology: Bibliometric analysis and systematic review (2000-2024)

Lizzeth Aurora Navarro-Ibarra; Omar Cuevas-Salazar; Laura Lillian Acuña-Michel; Jeanneth Milagros Valenzuela-Ochoa

doi:10.29333/ejmste/16072

Lizzeth Aurora Navarro-Ibarra ¹ ^* , Omar Cuevas-Salazar ¹ , Laura Lillian Acuña-Michel ¹ , Jeanneth Milagros Valenzuela-Ochoa ¹

More Detail

¹ Department of Mathematics, Instituto Tecnológico de Sonora, Sonora, MEXICO^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

The objective of the present study is to obtain an updated perspective of the state of education in mathematics and technology, as well as the emerging veins of research in these areas. The study began by selecting articles in the database Scopus, between 2000-2024, with the search criteria of “mathematics,” “education” and “technology.” 6,215 registries of articles were found. The analysis of the records was performed using data mining in R language. The United States is the leading country in publications and the University of California is the one with the highest production of articles. Three emerging lines of research were obtained. The first line of the investigation is related to gender and science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) graduate studies. The second line of research is related to motivation and permanence in STEM, including studies with secondary students’ parents. The third emerging line of research is on mathematical identity in primary and secondary education.

Keywords

education
mathematics
STEM
data mining

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Review Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, Volume 21, Issue 3, March 2025, Article No: em2607

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16072

Publication date: 03 Mar 2025

Article Views: 30

Article Downloads: 22

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Abramovich, S., Schunn, C., & Higashi, R. M. (2013). Are badges useful in education?: It depends upon the type of badge and expertise of learner. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61, 217-232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-013-9289-2
Aguilera, D., & Ortiz-Revilla, J. (2021). STEM vs. STEAM education and student creativity: A systematic literature review. Education Sciences, 11(7), Article 331. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070331
Akar, N., Yörük, T., & Tosun, Ö. (2024). Predicting women’s career decisiveness in the ICT sector: A serial multiple mediation model among MIS students. PLoS ONE, 19(12), Article e0316154. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0316154
Álvarez, J., & Olatunde-Aiyedun, T. G. (2024). A systematic literature review on STEAM pre- and in-service teacher education for sustainability: Are teachers ready? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(9), Article em2498. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14982
Apkarian, N., Henderson, C., Stains, M., Raker, J., Johnson, E., & Dancy, M. (2021). What really impacts the use of active learning in undergraduate STEM education? Results from a national survey of chemistry, mathematics, and physics intructors. PLoS ONE, 16(2), Article e0247544. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247544
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
Babalola, O. O., du Plessis, Y., & Babalola, S. S. (2024). Power of shared success: How can sharing success and roles of others motivate African women in STEM? International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 24, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-023-09583-1
Baker, V. L. (2010). Developmental networks and learning: Toward an interdisciplinary perspective on identity development during doctoral study. Studies in Higher Education, 35(7), 807-827. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903501887
Bakker, A., Cai, J., & Zenger, L. (2021). Future themes of mathematics education research: An international survey before and during the pandemic. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 107, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10049-w
Bandoh, S. O., Akweittey, E., Lotey, E. K., Gordon, J. F., & Appiagyei, E. (2024). Using UTAUT model to assess the factors influencing the use of ICT in Ghanaian pre-tertiary mathematics education. Journal of Digital Educational Technology, 4(1), Article ep2407. https://doi.org/10.30935/jdet/14297
Bandura, A. (1976). Self reinforcement: Theoretical and methodological considerations. Behaviorism, 4(2), 135-155.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice Hall.
Bandura, A. (1978a). Reflections on self-efficacy. Advances in Behavior Research and Therapy, 1(4), 237-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-6402(78)90012-7
Bandura, A. (1978b). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Advances in Behavior Research and Therapy, 1(4), 139-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-6402(78)90002-4
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122-147. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall.
Bandura, A., & Adams, N. E. (1977). Analysis of self-efficacy theory of behavioral change. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1(4), 287-310. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01663995
Bandura, A., Adams, N. E., & Beyer, J. (1977). Cognitive processes mediating behavioral change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(3), 125-139. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.35.3.125
Berenson, S. B., Slaten, K. M., Williams, L., & Ho, C. W. (2004). Voices of women in a software engineering course: Reflections on collaboration. Journal on Educational Resources in Computing, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1145/1060071.1060074
Bloodhart, B., Balgopal, M. M., Casper, A. M. A., Sample, L. B., & Fischer, E. V. (2020). Outperforming yet undervalued: Undergraduate women in STEM. PLoS ONE, 15(6), Article e0234685. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234685
Bond, M. (2020). Facilitating student engagement through the flipped learning approach in K-12: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 151, Article 103819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103819
Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., & Rogers, C. (2008). Advancing engineering education in P-12 classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 369-387. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00985.x
Bunce, L., Baird, A., & Jones, S. E. (2016). The student-as-consumer approach in higher education and its effects on academic performance. Studies in Higher Education, 42(11), 1958-1978. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1127908
Cameron, C., Lee, H. Y., Anderson, C. B., Dahlstrom, E. K., & Chang, S. (2024). Helping mentors address scientific communication in STEM research training helps their mentees stay the course. International Journal of STEM Education, 11, Article 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00497-0
Carlone, H. B., Johnson, A., & Scott, C. M. (2015). Agency amidst formidable structures: How girls perform gender in science class. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(4), 474-488. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21224
Ceci, S. J., & Williams, W. M. (2011). Understanding current causes of women’s underrepresentation in science. PNAS, 108(8), 3157-3162. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1014871108
Ceci, S. J., Williams, W. M., & Barnett, S. M. (2009). Women’s underrepresentation in science: Sociocultural and biological considerations. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 218-261. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014412
Chu, I. T., Lin, H. H., & Wei, J. J. (2024). Application of multi-criteria decision-making in STEAM teaching in design innovation at the university. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(12), Article em2359. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15653
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Conde, M. A., Rodríguez-Sedano, F. J., Fernández-Llamas, C., Goncalves, J., Lima, J., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2021). Fostering STEAM through challenge-based learning, robotics, and physical devices: A systematic mapping literature review. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(1), 46-65. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22354
Corlu, S. S., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2014). Introducing STEM education: Implications for educating our teachers for the age of innovation. Education and Science, 39(171), 74-85.
Cribbs, J. D., Hazari, Z., Sonnert, G., & Sadler, P. M. (2015). Establishing an explanatory model for mathematics identity. Child Development, 86(4), 1048-1062. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12363
Dabney, K. P., Chakraverty, D., & Tai, R. H. (2013). The association of family influence and initial interest in science. Science Learning in Everyday Life, 97(3), 395-409. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21060
Dennehy, T. C., & Dasgupta, N. (2017). Female peer mentors early in college increase women’s positive academic experiences and retention in engineering. PNAS, 114(23), 5964-5969. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1613117114
Dori, Y. J., Refaeli-Mishkin, H., Wengrowicz, N., Yoel, S. R., & Dori, D. (2024). Exploring career choice and retention among engineering undergraduate students and systems engineers: A gender perspective. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(11), Article em2527. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15483
Dorouka, P., Papadakis, S., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2020). Tablets and apps for promoting robotics, mathematics, STEM education and literacy in early childhood education. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organization, 14(2), 255-274. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2020.106179
Dou, R., Hazari, Z., Dabney, K., Sonnert, G., & Sadler, P. (2019). Early informal STEM experiences and STEM identity: The importance of talking science. Science Education, 103(3), 623-637. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21499
Dweck, C. S. (2007). Is math a gift? Beliefs that put females at risk. In S. J. Ceci, & W. M. Williams (Eds.), Why aren’t more women in science?: Top researchers debate the evidence (pp. 47–55). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/11546-004
Eagan, M. K., Hurtado, S., Chang, M. J., Garcia, G. A., Herrera, F. A., & Garibay, J. C. (2013). Making a difference in science education: The impact of undergraduate research programs. American Educational Research Journal, 50(4), 683-713. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831213482038
Eccles, J. S. (2014). Gender and achievement choices. In E. T. Gershoff, R. S. Mistry, & D. A. Crosby (Eds.), Societal contexts of child development: Pathways of influence and implications for practice and policy (pp. 19-34). Oxford University Press.
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2023). Expectancy-value theory to situated expectancy-value theory: Reflections on the legacy of 40 years of working together. Motivation Science, 9(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000275
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2024). The development, testing, and refinement of Eccles, Wigfield, and colleagues’ situated expectancy-value model of achievement performance and choice. Educational Psychology Review, 36, Article 51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09888-9
Eccles, J. S., Fredricks, J. A., & Baay, P. (2015). Expectancies, values, identities, and self-regulation. In G. Oettingen, & P. M. Gollwitzer (Eds.), Self-regulation in adolescence (pp. 30-56). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139565790.003
Estrada, M., Burnett, M., Campbell, A. G., Campbell, P. B., Denetclaw, W. F., Gutiérrez, C. G., Hurtado, S., John, G. H., Matsui, J., McGee, R., Okpodu, C. M., Robinson, T. J., Summers, M. F., Werner-Washburne, M., & Zavala, M. E. (2016). Improving underrepresented minority student persistence in STEM. CBE–Life Sciences Education, 15(3), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-01-0038
Estrada, M., Hernandez, P. R., & Shultz, P. W. (2018). A longitudinal study of how quality mentorship and research experience integrate underrepresented minorities into STEM careers. CBE–Life Sciences Education, 17(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-04-0066
Feldon, D. F., Peugh, J., Timmerman, B. E., Maher, M. A., Hurst, M., Strickland, D., Gilmore, J. A., & Stiegelmeyer, C. (2011). Science, 333(6045), 1037-1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204109
Feldon, D. F., Timmerman, B. C., Stowe, K. A., & Showman, R. (2010). Translating expertise into effective instruction: The impacts of cognitive task analysis (CTA) on lab report quality and student retention in the biological sciences. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(10), 1165-1185. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20382
Flanagan, B., Hourigan, M., & Leavy, A. (2024). Primary teachers’ learning experiences of integrated STEM education. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 22(4), 556-569. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X241257335
Fortus, D., & Vedder-Weiss, D. (2014). Measuring students’ continuing motivation for science learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(4), 497-522. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21136
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. PNAS, 111(23), 8410-8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
Godwin, A., Potvin, G., Hazari, Z., & Lock, R. (2016). Identity, critical agency, and engineering: An affective model for predicting engineering as a career choice. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(2), 312-340. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20118
Golde, C. M. (2005). The role of the department and discipline in doctoral student attrition: Lessons from four departments. The Journal of Higher Education, 76(6), 669-700. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2005.11772304
Hale, J., Harkess, A., & Könyves, K. (2024). The Jersey Daffodil Project: Integrating nanopore sequencing into classrooms improves STEM skills, scientific identity and career development. Plants People Planet, 6(6), 1293-1298. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10550
Handley I. M., Brown, E. R., Moss-Racusin, C. A., & Smith, J. L. (2015). Quality of evidence revealing subtle gender biases in science is in the eye of the beholder. PNAS, 112(43), 13201-13206. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1510649112
Harackiewicz, J. M., Rozek, C. S., Hulleman, C. S., & Hyde, J. S. (2012). Helping parents to motivate adolescents in mathematics and science: An experimental test of a utility-value intervention. Psychological Science, 23(8), 899-906. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611435530
Harackiewicz, J. M., Tibbetts, Y., Canning, E., & Hyde, J. S. (2014). Harnessing values to promote motivation in education. In S. A. Karabenick, & T. Urdan (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement. Motivational interventions, volume 18 (pp. 71-105). Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0749-742320140000018002
Harris, R. B., Mack, M. R., Bryant, J., Theobald, E. J., & Freeman, S. (2020). Reducing achievement gaps in undergraduate general chemistry could lift underrepresented students into a “hyperpersistent zone”. Science Advances, 6(24). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz5687
Hernandez, P. R., Schultz, P. W., Estrada, M., Woodcock, A., & Chance, R. C. (2013). Sustaining optimal motivation: A longitudinal analysis of interventions to broaden participation of underrepresented students in STEM. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 89-107. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029691
Herro, D., & Quigley, C. (2017). Exploring teachers’ perceptions of STEAM teaching through professional development: Implications for teacher educators. Professional Development in Education, 43(3), 416-438. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2016.1205507
Hillmayr, D., Ziernwald, L., Reinhold, F., Hofer, S. I., & Reiss, K. M. (2020). The potential of digital tools to enhance mathematics and science learning in secondary schools: A context-specific meta-analysis. Computer & Education, 153, Article 103897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103897
Hsu, Y.-S., Lin, Y.-H., & Yang, B. (2017). Impact of augmented reality lessons on students’ STEM interest. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12, Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-016-0039-z
Huh, Y., Lee, D., & Reigeluth, C. (2024). Teacher supports and technology needs to develop students’ self-regulated learning at U.S. K-12 online schools. Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(3), Article ep523. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/14956
Ismail, M. H., Fadzil, H. M., Salleh, M. F. M., Saat, R. M., Kurniawan, C., & Hariyono, E. (2024). Science teachers’ instructional practices: A need analysis for preparing integrated STEM practices through scientist-teacher-student partnership. Asian Journal of University Education, 20(3), 630-644.
Jacobs, S. J., & Herselman, M. E. (2005). An ICT-hub model for rural communities. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 1(3), 57-93.
Jang, H. (2016). Identifying 21^st century STEM competencies using workplace data. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25, 284-301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9593-1
Jang, S., & Tsai, M. (2012). Exploring the TPACK of Taiwanese elementary mathematics and science teachers with respect to use of interactive whiteboards. Computers & Education, 59(2), 327-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.003
Jarrah, A. M., Fayez, K., Almarashdi, H., & Fidalgo, P. (2024). Enhancing mathematics education in the UAE: Elementary teachers’ views on distance education methods. Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(3), Article ep516. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/14714
Kim, D., & Bolger, M. (2017). Analysis of Korean elementary pre-service teachers’ changing attitudes about integrated STEAM pedagogy through developing lesson plans. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15, 587-605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9709-3
Kondrashev, S. V., Vavulskaia, E. I., Burenina, V. I., Prokopyev, A. I., Ibraeva, G. R., & Nikitina, S. A. (2024). Research trends in engineering education research through bibliometric analysis. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(7), Article em2476. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14760
Lamb, R., Akmal, T., & Petrie, K. (2015). Development of a cognition-priming model describing learning in a STEM classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(3), 410-437. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21200
Lave, J., & E. Wenger (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
Lavi, R., Tal, M., & Dori, Y. J. (2021). Perceptions of STEM alumni and students on developing 21^st century skills through methods of teaching and learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70, Article 101002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101002
Lombardi, D., Shipley, T. F., Bailey, J. M., Bretones, P. S., Prather, E. E., Ballen, C. J., Knight, J. K., Smith, M. K., Stowe, R. L., Cooper, M. M., Prince, M., Atit, K., Uttal, D. H., LaDue, N. D., McNeal, P. M., Ryker, K., St. John, K., van der Hoeven Kraft, K. J., & Docktor, J. L. (2021). The curious construct of active learning. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 22(1), 8-43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100620973974
Maass, K., Geiger, V., Romero, M., & Goss, M. (2019). The role of mathematics in interdisciplinary STEM education. ZDM Mathematics Education, 51, 869-884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01100-5
Maiorca, C., Roberts, T., Jackson, C., Bush, S., Delaney, A., Mohr-Schroeder, M. J., & Soledad, S. Y. (2021). Informal learning environments and impact on interests in STEM careers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19, 45-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10038-9
Majeed, B. H., Jawad, L. F., & Alrikabi, H. T. S. (2021). The impact of teaching by using STEM approach in the development of creative thinking and mathematical achievement among the students of the fourth scientific class. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 15(13), 172-188. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i13.24185
Maltese, A. V., & Tai, R. H. (2011). Pipeline persistence: Examining the association of educational experiences with earned degrees in STEM among U.S. students. Science Education, 95(5), 877-907. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20441
Mansour, N., Said, Z., Çevik, M., & Abu-Tineh, A. (2024). Science and mathematics teachers’ integration of TPACK in STEM subjects in Qatar: A structural equation modeling study. Education Sciences, 14(10), Article 1138. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14101138
Marín-Spiotta, E., Barnes, R. T., Berhe, A. A., Hastings, M. G., Mattheis, A., Schneider, B., & Williams, B. M. (2020). Hostile climates are barriers to diversifying the geosciences. Advances in Geosciences, 53, 117-127. https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-53-117-2020
Master, A., Meltzoff, A. N., & Cheryan, S. (2021). Gender stereotypes about interests start early and cause gender disparities in computer science and engineering. PNAS, 118(48), Article e2100030118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2100030118
McGee, E. O. (2020). Interrogating structural racism in STEM higher education. Educational Researcher, 49(9), 633-644. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20972718
Miles, M. L., Brockman, A. J., & Naphan-Kingery, D. E. (2020). Invalidated identities: The disconfirming effects of racial microaggressions on Black doctoral students in STEM. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(10), 1608-1631. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21646
Miller, D. I., & Halpern, D. F. (2013). Can spatial training improve long-term outcomes for gifted STEM undergraduates? Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 141-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.03.012
Miller, R. A., Vaccaro, A., Kimball, E. W., & Forester, R. (2021). “It’s dude culture”: Students with minoritized identities of sexuality and/or gender navigating STEM majors. Journal of Diversity en Higher Education, 14(3), 340-352. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000171
Mystakidis, S., Christopoulos, A., & Pellas, N. (2022). A systematic mapping review of augmented reality applications to support STEM learning in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 1883-1927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10682-1
Nugraha, M. G., Kidman, G., & Tan, H. (2024). Interdisciplinary STEM education foundational concepts: Implementation for knowledge creation. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(10), Article em2523. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15471
O’Leary, E. S., Shapiro, C., Toma, S., Sayson, H. W., Levis-Fitzgerald, M., Johnson, T., & Sork, V. L. (2020). Creating inclusive classrooms by engaging STEM faculty in culturally responsive teaching workshops. International Journal of STEM Education, 7, Article 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00230-7
Oleson, A., & Hora, M. T. (2014). Teaching the way they were taught? Revisiting the sources of teaching knowledge and the role of prior experience in shaping faculty teaching practices. Higher Education, 68, 29-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9678-9
Ong, M., Smith, J. M., & Ko, L. T. (2018). Counterspaces for women of color in STEM higher education: Marginal and central spaces for persistence and success. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(2), 206-245. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21417
Pade-Khene, C., Mallinson, B., & Sewry, D. (2011). Sustainable rural ICT Project management practice for developing countries: Investigating the Dwesa and RUMEP projects. Information Technology for Development, 17(3), 187-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2011.568222
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books.
Posselt, J. (2018). Normalizing struggle: Dimensions of faculty support for doctoral students and implications for persistence and well-being. The Journal of Higher Education, 89(6), 988-1013. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2018.1449080
Revák, I. M., Csernoch, M., Szilágyi, K. C., Dávid, Á., Tóth, B. K., Malmos, E., Sütő, É., & Kurucz, D. (2024). A systematic review of STEM teaching-learning methods and activities in early childhood. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(8), Article em2481. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14779
Robledo, S., Osorio, G., & López, C. (2014). Networking en pequeña empresa: Una revisión bibliográfica utilizando la teoría de grafos [Networking in small businesses: A literature review using graph theory]. Revista Vínculos, 11(2), 6-16.
Robledo, S., Zuluaga, M., Valencia, L. A., Arbelaez-Echeverri, O., Duque, P., & Alzate-Cardona, J. D. (2022). Tree of Science with Scopus: A shiny application. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, (100). https://doi.org/10.29173/istl2698
Roehrig, G. H., Moore, T. J., Wang, H., & Park, M. S. (2012). Is adding the E enough? Investigating the impact of K-12 engineering standards on the implementation of STEM integration. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 31-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00112.x
Rozek, C. S., Hyde, J. S., Svoboda, R. C., Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2015). Gender differences in the effects of a utility-value intervention to help parents motivate adolescents in mathematics and science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 195-206. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036981
Rozek, C. S., Svoboda, R. C., Harackiewicz, J. M., Hulleman, C. S., & Hyde, J. S. (2017). Utility-value intervention with parents increases student’s STEM preparation and career pursuit. PNAS, 114(5), 909-914. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1607386114
Rúa, F. J., Merchán, M. A., & Camacho-Tamayo, E. (2024). Teaching sequences based on the STEM approach for the development of inquiry in early childhood education: A systematic review. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(10), Article em2517. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15207
Schotten, M., Aisati, M. Meester, W., Steiginga, S., & Ross, C. (2017). A brief history of Scopus: The world’s largest abstract and citation database of scientific literature. In F. J. Cantu-Ortiz (Ed.), Research analytics: Boosting university productivity and competitiveness through scientometrics (1st ed.). Auerbach Publications. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315155890
Seo, S., Van Orman, D. S. J., Beattie, M., Paxson, L. C., & Murray, J. (2024). Transforming learning orientations through STEM interdisciplinary project-based learning. Education Sciences, 14(11), Article 1154. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14111154
Shernoff, D. J., Sinha, S., Bressler, D. M., & Ginsburg, L. (2017). Assessing teacher education and professional development needs for the implementation of integrated approaches to STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 4, Article 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0068-1
Simpkins, S. D., Fredricks, J. A., & Eccles, J. S. (2012). Charting the Eccles’ expectancy-value model from mothers’ beliefs in childhood to youths’ activities in adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 48(4), 1019-1032. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027468
Simsek, A. (2024). How will education look like in the future? Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(3), Article ep518. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/14794
Singh, P., Nasir, N. A., M., & Hoon, T. S. (2024). The cognitive gap in the mathematical thinking abilities of high school leavers for college: Are they ready? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(11), Article em2529. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15577
Smyth, F. L., & Nosek, B. A. (2015). On the gender-science stereotypes held by scientists: Explicit Accord with gender-ratios, implicit Accord with scientific identity. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00415
Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 21-51. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543069001021
Starr, C. R., Hunter, L., Dunkin, R., Honig, S., Palomino, R., & Leaper, C. (2020). Engaging in science practices in classrooms predicts increases in undergraduates’ STEM motivation, identity, and achievement: A short-term longitudinal study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(7), 1093-1118. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21623
Tan, E., Barton, A. C., Kang, H., & O’Neill, T. (2013). Desiring a career in STEM-related fields: How middle school girls articulate and negotiate identities-in-practice in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(10), 1143-1179. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21123
Tang, K. S., McLure, F., Williams, J., & Donnelly, C. (2024). Investigating the role of self-selected STEM projects in fostering student autonomy and self-directed learning. Australian Educational Researcher, 51(5), 2355-2379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-024-00696-2
Theobald, E. J., Hill, M. J., Tran, E., Agrawal, S., Arroyo, E. N., Behling, S., Chambwe, N., Cintrón, D. L., Cooper, J. D., Dunster, G., Grummer, J. A., Hennessey, K., Hsiao, J., Iranon, N., Jones, L., Jordt, H., Keller, M., Lacey, M. E., Littlefield, C. E., …, & Freeman, S. (2020). Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math. PNAS, 117(12), 6476-6483. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916903117
Uttal, D. H., Miller, D. I., & Newcombe, N. S. (2013). Exploring and enhancing spatial thinking: Links to achievement in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(5), 367-373. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413484756
Valencia-Hernandez, D. S., Robledo, S., Pinilla, R., Duque-Méndez, N. D., & Olivar-Tost, G. (2020). SAP algorithm for citation analysis: An improvement to Tree of Science. Ingeniería e Investigación, 40(1), 45-49. https://doi.org/10.15446/ing.investig.v40n1.77718
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4
Walton, G. M., Logel, C., Peach, J. M., Spencer, S. J., & Zanna, M. P. (2015). Two brief interventions to mitigate a “chilly climate” transform women’s experience, relationships, and achievement in engineering. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(2), 468-485. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037461
Wang, X. (2013). Why students choose STEM mayors: Motivation, high school learning, and postsecondary context of support. American Educational Research Journal, 50(5), 1081-1121. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831213488622
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2023). What is next for situated expectancy-value theory? A reply to our commentators. Motivation Science, 9(1), 19-20. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000282
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2024). The relevance of situated expectancy-value theory to understanding motivation and emotion in different contexts. In G. Hagenauer, R. Lazarides, & H. Järvenoja (Eds.), Motivation and emotion in learning and teaching across educational contexts (pp. 3-18). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003303473-2
Williams, D. A., & Wade-Golden, K. C. (2013). The chief diversity officer. Strategy structure and change management. Taylor & Francis.
Zhu, J., & Liu, W. (2020). A tale of two databases: The use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers. Scientometrics, 123, 321-335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03387-8
Zuluaga, M., Robledo, S., Arbelaez-Echeverri, O., Osorio-Zuluaga, G. A., & Duque-Méndez, N. (2022). Tree of Science-ToS: A web-based tool for scientific literature recommendation. Search less, research more! Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, (100). https://doi.org/10.29173/istl2696
Zupic, I., & Cater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629

How to cite this article

APA

Navarro-Ibarra, L. A., Cuevas-Salazar, O., Acuña-Michel, L. L., & Valenzuela-Ochoa, J. M. (2025). Mathematics education and technology: Bibliometric analysis and systematic review (2000-2024). Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(3), em2607. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16072

Vancouver

Navarro-Ibarra LA, Cuevas-Salazar O, Acuña-Michel LL, Valenzuela-Ochoa JM. Mathematics education and technology: Bibliometric analysis and systematic review (2000-2024). EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2025;21(3):em2607. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16072

AMA

Navarro-Ibarra LA, Cuevas-Salazar O, Acuña-Michel LL, Valenzuela-Ochoa JM. Mathematics education and technology: Bibliometric analysis and systematic review (2000-2024). EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2025;21(3), em2607. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16072

Chicago

Navarro-Ibarra, Lizzeth Aurora, Omar Cuevas-Salazar, Laura Lillian Acuña-Michel, and Jeanneth Milagros Valenzuela-Ochoa. "Mathematics education and technology: Bibliometric analysis and systematic review (2000-2024)". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2025 21 no. 3 (2025): em2607. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16072

Harvard

Navarro-Ibarra, L. A., Cuevas-Salazar, O., Acuña-Michel, L. L., and Valenzuela-Ochoa, J. M. (2025). Mathematics education and technology: Bibliometric analysis and systematic review (2000-2024). Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(3), em2607. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16072

MLA

Navarro-Ibarra, Lizzeth Aurora et al. "Mathematics education and technology: Bibliometric analysis and systematic review (2000-2024)". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 21, no. 3, 2025, em2607. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16072