Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Andriessen, J. E. B., & Schwarz, B. B. (2009). Argumentative design. In N. Muller-Mirza, & A.-N. Perret-Clermont (Eds.), Argumentation and education–Theoretical foundations and practices (pp. 145-174). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-98125-3_6
• Asterhan, C. S. C., & Schwarz, B. B. (2016). Argumentation for learning: Well-trodden paths and unexplored territories. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 164-187. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1155458
• Ayalon, M., & Even, R. (2016). Factors shaping students' opportunities to engage in argumentative activity. International Journal of Science and Mathematics education, 14(3), 575-601.‏ https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9584-3
• Ayalon, M., Watson, A., & Lerman, S. (2016a). Progression towards functions: Students' performance on three tasks about variables from grades 7 to 12. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 14(6), 1153-1173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9611-4
• Ayalon, M., Watson, A., & Lerman, S. (2016b). Reasoning about variables in 11 to 18 year olds: Informal, schooled and formal expression in learning about functions. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 28, 379-404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-016-0171-5
• Ayalon, M., Watson, A., & Lerman, S. (2018). Comparison of students’ understanding of functions in classes following English and Israeli national curricula. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 97(3), 255-272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9798-8
• Ayalon, M., Wilkie, K. J., & Eid, K. H. (2021). Relating students’ emotions during argumentative discourse to their learning of real-life functional situations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 110, 23-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10121-5
• Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4-5), 585-614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407
• Burkhardt, H., & Swan, M. (2012). Designing assessment of performance in mathematics. Educational Designer, 2(5), 1-40.
• Cavagnetto, A. R., & Kurtz, K. J. (2016). Promoting students’ attention to argumentative reasoning patterns. Science Education, 100(4), 625-644. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21220
• CCSSI. 2010. Common core state standards for mathematics. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and the Council of Chief State School Officers. http://www.corestandards.org/the-standards
• Chazan, D. (1993). High school geometry students’ justification for their views of empirical evidence and mathematical proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24(4), 359-387. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01273371
• Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2010). Students’ questions and discursive interaction: Their impact on argumentation during collaborative group discussions in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(7), 883-908. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20385
• Chua, B. I., (2016). Justification in Singapore secondary mathematics. In P. C. Toh, & B. Kaur (Eds.), Developing 21^st century competencies in the mathematics classroom (pp. 165-188). World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813143623_0010
• Clement, J. (1985). Misconceptions in graphing. In Proceedings of the 9^th International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 369-375). Utrecht University.
• Corrbet, D., & Wilson, B. (1995). Make a difference with, not for, student. Educational Researcher, 24, 12-17. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X024005012
• Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). SAGE.
• Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 399-483. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI2004_1
• Erduran, S., & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2008). Argumentation in science education. Perspectives from classroom-based research. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6670-2
• Felton, M., Garcia-Mila, M., & Gilabert, S. (2009). Deliberation versus dispute: The impact of argumentative discourse goals on learning and reasoning in the science classroom. Informal Logic, 29(4), 417-446. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v29i4.2907
• Francisco, J. M., & Maher, C. A. (2005). Conditions for promoting reasoning in problem solving: Insights from a longitudinal study. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24(3-4), 361-372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2005.09.001
• Goldenberg, E. P. (1987). Believing is seeing: How preconceptions influence the perceptions of graphs. In J. Bergeron, N. Herscovits, & C. Kieran (Eds.), Proceedings of the eleventh conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 197-203).
• Goldenberg, E. P., & Kliman, M. (1988). Metaphors for understanding graphs: What you see is what you see. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED303369
• Janvier, C. (1981). Use of situations in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12(1), 113-122. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00386049
• Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., &Erduran, S. (2007). Argumentation in science education: An overview. In S. Erduran, & M. P. Jimenez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research (pp. 3-27). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6670-2_1
• Leinhardt, G., Zaslavsky, O., & Stein, M. K. (1990). Functions, graphs, and graphing: Tasks, learning, and teaching. Review of Educational Research, 60(1), 1-64. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543060001001
• Lemke, J. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Ablex.
• McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2007). Middle school students’ use of appropriate and inappropriate evidence in writing scientific explanations. In M. Lovett, & P. Shah (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33^rd Carnegie Symposium on Cognition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
• McNeill, K. L., & Pimentel, D. S. (2010). Scientific discourse in three urban classrooms: The role of the teacher in engaging high school students in argumentation. Science Education, 94(2), 203-229. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20364
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. SAGE.
• Ministry of Education. (2020). The adult character skills document. https://meyda.education.gov.il/files/Mazkirut_Pedagogit/MadaTechnologya/yesodi/boger2030.pdf
• Ministry of Education. (2024). The new mathematics curriculum for middle-high school. https://pop.education.gov.il/tchumey_daat/matmatika/chativat-beynayim/teaching-mathematics/tohnit-limudim/
• Mueller, M., Yankelewitz, D., & Maher, C. (2014). Teachers promoting student mathematical reasoning. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 7(2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/24727466.2014.11790339
• Reuter, F. (2023). Explorative mathematical argumentation: A theoretical framework for identifying and analysing argumentation processes in early mathematics learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 112, 415-435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-022-10199-5
• Schultz, K., Clement, J., & Mokros, J. (1986). Adolescents’ graphing skills: A descriptive analysis [Paper presentation]. The Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
• Schwarz, B. B., & Baker, M. J. (2017). Dialogue: Argumentation and education: History, theory and practice. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316493960
• Slavit, D. (1997). An alternate route to the reification of function. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 33(3), 259-281. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002937032215
• Staples, M. (2014). Supporting student justification in middle school mathematics classrooms: Teachers’ work to create a context for justification. CRME Publications. 4. https://digitalcommons.lib.uconn.edu/merg_docs/4
• Thompson, P. W. (1994). Images of rate and operational understanding of the fundamental theorem of calculus. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26(2-3), 229-274. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01273664
• Toh, P. C., & Kaur, B. (Eds.). (2016). Developing 21^st century competencies in the mathematics classroom. World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/10132
• Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press.
• van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (2004). A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616389
• Weber, K., Maher, C., Powell, A., & Lee, H. S. (2008). Learning opportunities from group discussions: Warrants become the objects of debate. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 68(3), 247-261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9114-8
• Wood, T., Williams, G., & McNeal, B. (2006). Children’s mathematical thinking in different classroom cultures. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(3), 222-255.
• Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 458-477. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.27.4.0458
• Zambak, V. S., & Magiera, M. T. (2020). Supporting grades 1-8 pre-service teachers’ argumentation skills: Constructing mathematical arguments in situations that facilitate analyzing cases. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(8), 1196-1223. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1762938

APA

Ayalon, M., Wilkie, K. J., & Swaid, R. (2024). Investigating students’ arguments with real-life functional situations throughout a sequence of collaborative activities. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(11), em2526. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15482

Vancouver

Ayalon M, Wilkie KJ, Swaid R. Investigating students’ arguments with real-life functional situations throughout a sequence of collaborative activities. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2024;20(11):em2526. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15482

AMA

Ayalon M, Wilkie KJ, Swaid R. Investigating students’ arguments with real-life functional situations throughout a sequence of collaborative activities. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2024;20(11), em2526. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15482

Chicago

Ayalon, Michal, Karina J. Wilkie, and Rina Swaid. "Investigating students’ arguments with real-life functional situations throughout a sequence of collaborative activities". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2024 20 no. 11 (2024): em2526. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15482

Harvard

Ayalon, M., Wilkie, K. J., and Swaid, R. (2024). Investigating students’ arguments with real-life functional situations throughout a sequence of collaborative activities. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(11), em2526. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15482

MLA

Ayalon, Michal et al. "Investigating students’ arguments with real-life functional situations throughout a sequence of collaborative activities". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 20, no. 11, 2024, em2526. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15482