Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Androutsos, A., & Brinia, V. (2019). Developing and piloting a pedagogy for teaching innovation, collaboration, and co-creation in secondary education based on design thinking, digital transformation, and entrepreneurship. Education Sciences, 9(2), Article 113. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9020113
• Barton, A. C., Tan, E., & Greenberg, D. (2017). The makerspace movement: Sites of possibilities for equitable opportunities to engage underrepresented youth in STEM. Teachers College Record, 119(6), 1-44. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811711900608
• Bestelmeyer, S. V., Elser, M. M., Spellman, K. V., Sparrow, E. B., Haan-Amato, S. S., & Keener, A. (2015). Collaboration, interdisciplinary thinking, and communication: New approaches to K–12 ecology education. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 13(1), 37-43. https://doi.org/10.1890/140130
• Bevan, B., Gutwill, J. P., Petrich, M., & Wilkinson, K. (2015). Learning through STEM-rich tinkering: Findings from a jointly negotiated research project taken up in practice. Science Education, 99(1), 98-120. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21151
• Blackley, S., Rahmawati, Y., Fitriani, E., Sheffield, R., & Koul, R. (2018). Using a “makerspace” approach to engage Indonesian primary students with STEM. Issues in Educational Research, 28(1), 18-42.
• Brady, J., & Katre, A. (2021). Innovating at the nexus of world languages and cultures and design thinking. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 16(4), 378-396. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480x.2021.1897011
• Brooks, S., & Kenny, J. (2022). How to be more critical and less descriptive: A student’s perspective. University of Sheffield Management School. https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/media/31071/download?attachment
• Browne, M. N., & Keeley, S. M. (2007). Asking the right questions: A guide to critical thinking (8th ed.). Pearson Education.
• Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), Article 30.
• Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. NSTA Press.
• Chiu, T. K., Chai, C. S., Williams, P. J., & Lin, T.-J. (2021). Teacher professional development on self-determination theory-based design thinking in STEM education. Educational Technology & Society, 24(4), 153-165.
• Clark, S. G., & Wallace, R. L. (2015). Integration and interdisciplinarity: Concepts, frameworks, and education. Policy Sciences, 48(2), 233-255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-015-9210-4
• Cockell, C. (2002). Astrobiology–A new opportunity for interdisciplinary thinking. Space Policy, 18(4), 263-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0265-9646(02)00039-5
• Cohen, J., Jones, W. M., Smith, S., & Calandra, B. (2017). Makification: Towards a framework for leveraging the maker movement in formal education. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 26(3), 217-229.
• Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods (3rd ed.). SAGE.
• Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE.
• Davies, M., & Devlin, M. (2007). Interdisciplinary higher education and the Melbourne model [Paper presentation]. The Philosophy of Education Society of Australasia.
• Donar, A. (2011). Thinking design and pedagogy: An examination of five Canadian post-secondary courses in design thinking. Canadian Review of Art Education: Research and Issues, 38, 84-102.
• Dorland, A. (2022). That’s a good question: Using design thinking to foster question formulation skill development. Journal of Effective Teaching in Higher Education, 5(1), 30-52. https://doi.org/10.36021/jethe.v5i1.115
• English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K-12: Perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1
• English, L. D., Adams, R., & King, D. (2020). Design learning in STEM education. In C. C. Johnson, M. J. Mohr-Schroeder, T. J. Moore, & L. D. English (Eds.), Handbook of research on STEM education (pp. 76-86). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429021381-9
• Ericson, J. D. (2022). Mapping the relationship between critical thinking and design thinking. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13(1), 406-429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00733-w
• Falloon, G., Forbes, A., Stevenson, M., Bower, M., & Hatzigianni, M. (2020). STEM in the making? Investigating STEM learning in junior school makerspaces. Research in Science Education, 52, 511-537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09949-3
• Farwati, R., Metafisika, K., Sari, I., Sitinjak, D. S., Solikha, D. F., & Solfarina, S. (2021). STEM education implementation in Indonesia: A scoping review. International Journal of STEM Education for Sustainability, 1(1), 11-32. https://doi.org/10.53889/ijses.v1i1.2
• Forest, C. R., Moore, R. A., Jariwala, A. S., Fasse, B. B., Linsey, J., Newstetter, W., Ngo, P., & Quintero, C. (2014). The invention studio: A university maker space and culture. Advances in Engineering Education, 4(2).
• Gesthuizen, R., Kidman, G., Tan, H., Mangao. D., & Macdonald, S. (2020). STEM inspiration: A phenomenological investigation exploring beyond the solution. In E. Creely, J. Southcott, K. Carabott, & D. Lyons (Eds.), Phenomenological inquiry in education (pp. 225-242). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429285646-15
• Glancy, A. W., & Moore, T. J. (2013). Theoretical foundations for effective STEM learning environments. School of Engineering Education Working Papers. http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/enewp/1
• Golding, C. (2009). Integrating the disciplines: Successful interdisciplinary. Centre for the Study of Higher Education. The University of Melbourne.
• Goldman, S., & Zielezinski, M. B. (2016). Teaching with design thinking: Developing new vision and approaches to twenty-first century learning. In L. A. Annetta, & J.s Minogue (Eds.), Connecting science and engineering education practices in meaningful ways (pp. 237-262). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16399-4_10
• Halliburton, P., Georgiou, H., & Nielsen, W. (2024). Makerspaces: Building confidence in STEM for primary preservice teachers. Research in Science Education, 54, 573-594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-024-10153-w
• Hasanah, U. (2020). Key definitions of STEM education: Literature review. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 16(3), Article e2217. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/8336
• Henriksen, D., Richardson, C., & Mehta, R. (2017). Design thinking: A creative approach to educational problems of practice. Thinking skills and Creativity, 26, 140-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.10.001
• Herschbach, D. R. (2011). The STEM initiative: Constraints and challenges. Journal of STEM Teacher Education, 48(1), Article 9. https://doi.org/10.30707/JSTE48.1Herschbach
• Hursh, B., Haas, P., & Moore, M. (1983). An interdisciplinary model to implement general education. The Journal of Higher Education, 54(1), 42-59. https://doi.org/10.2307/1981644
• Jho, H., Hong, O., & Song, J. (2016). An analysis of STEM/STEAM teacher education in Korea with a case study of two schools from a community of practice perspective. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(7), 1843-1862. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1538a
• Jolly, A. (2017). STEM by design: Strategies and activities for grades 4-8. Taylor & Francis.
• Kim, B. (2001). Social constructivism. In M. Orey (Ed.), Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
• Li, Y., Froyd, J. E., & Wang, K. (2019). Learning about research and readership development in STEM education: A systematic analysis of the journal’s publications from 2014 to 2018. International Journal of STEM Education, 6, Article 19). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0176-1
• Li, Y., Wang, K., Xiao, Y., & Froyd, J. E. (2020). Research and trends in STEM education: A systematic review of journal publications. International Journal of STEM Education, 7, Article 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00207-6
• Mansilla, V. B. (2005). Assessing student work at disciplinary crossroads. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 37(1), 14-21. https://doi.org/10.3200/chng.37.1.14-21
• Mansilla, V. B., & Duraising, E. D. (2007). Targeted assessment of students’ interdisciplinary work: An empirically grounded framework proposed. The Journal of Higher Education, 78(2), 215-237. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2007.0008
• McCurdy, R. P., Nickels, M. L., & Bush, S. B. (2020). Problem-based design thinking tasks: Engaging student empathy in STEM. The Electronic Journal for Research in Science & Mathematics Education, 24(2), 22-55. https://doi.org/10.3102/1431229
• MoECRT. (2020). Regulation of Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology of Indonesia No. 3 year 2020 (the national higher education standard). MoECRT.
• MoECRT. (2022). Regulation of Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology of Indonesia No. 262/M/2022. (the guidelines for implementing the curriculum). MoECRT.
• Nadelson, L. S., Callahan, J., Pyke, P., Hay, A., Dance, M., & Pfiester, J. (2013). Teacher STEM perception and preparation: Inquiry-based STEM professional development for elementary teachers. The Journal of Educational Research, 106(2), 157-168. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2012.667014
• Newell, W. H. (2007). Decision making in interdisciplinary studies. In G. Morcol (Ed.), Handbook of decision making (pp. 245-264). CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420016918.ch13
• Ng, A., Kewalramani, S., & Kidman, G. (2022). Integrating and navigating STEAM (inSTEAM) in early childhood education: An integrative review and inSTEAM conceptual framework. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(7), Article em2133. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12174
• Nichols, K., Musofer, R., Fynes-Clinton, L., & Blundell, R. (2022). Design thinking and inquiry behaviours are co-constituted in a community of inquiry middle years’ science classroom context: Empirical evidence for design thinking and pragmatist inquiry interconnections. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(5), 2527-2551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09711-4
• Nohra, G. (2020). Makerpaces in international and Lebanese context: Recommendations for decision makers. Center for Educational Research and Development. https://www.crdp.org/sites/default/files/2021-04/Makerspace_complete_merged.pdf
• Nugraha, M. G., Kidman, G., & Tan, H. (2023). Pre-service teacher in STEM education: An integrative review and mapping of the Indonesian research literature. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(5), Article em2262. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13155
• Özkaya, A. (2019). STEM eğitimi alanında yapılan yayınların bibliyometrik analizi [Bibliometric analysis of the publications made in STEM education area]. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(2), 590-628. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.450825
• Pande, M., & Bharathi, S. V. (2020). Theoretical foundations of design thinking–A constructivism learning approach to design thinking. Thinking skills and Creativity, 36, Article 100637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100637
• Papert, S., & Harel, I. (1991). Situating constructionism. constructionism, In I. Harel (Ed.), Constructionist learning. MIT Media Laboratory.
• Perry, W. (1981). Cognitive and ethical growth: The making of meaning, the modern American college. Jossey-Boss.
• Power, E., & Handley, J. (2019). A best-practice model for integrating interdisciplinarity into the higher education student experience. Studies in Higher Education, 44(3), 554-570. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1389876
• Sahin, A. (2015). A practice-based model of STEM teaching: STEM students on the stage (SOS). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-019-2
• Scheer, A., Noweski, C., & Meinel, C. (2012). Transforming constructivist learning into action: Design thinking in education. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 17(3), 8-19.
• Schwartz, T. (2019). 9 must-have tools for a school makerspace. https://www.whitbyschool.org/passionforlearning/9-must-have-tools-for-a-school-makerspace
• Shahali, E. H. M., Halim, L., Rasul, M. S., Osman, K., & Zulkifeli, M. A. (2016). STEM learning through engineering design: Impact on middle secondary students’ interest towards STEM. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(5), 1189-1211. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00667a
• Sharma, G. (2021). The makerspace phenomenon: A bibliometric review of literature (2012-2020). International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 18(03), Article 2150006. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219877021500061
• Sheffield, R., Koul, R., Blackley, S., & Maynard, N. (2017). Makerspace in STEM for girls: A physical space to develop twenty-first-century skills. Educational Media International, 54(2), 148-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2017.1362812
• Sheridan, K., Halverson, E. R., Litts, B., Brahms, L., Jacobs-Priebe, L., & Owens, T. (2014). Learning in the making: A comparative case study of three makerspaces. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 505-531. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.4.brr34733723j648u
• Shively, K., Hitchens, C., & Hitchens, N. (2021). Teaching severe weather: Examining teacher candidates’ early field experience in a makerspace environment. Journal of Education, 201(3), 198-209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022057420908061
• Simeon, M. I., Samsudin, M. A., & Yakob, N. (2020). Effect of design thinking approach on students’ achievement in some selected physics concepts in the context of STEM learning. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32, 185-212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09601-1
• Spelt, E. J., Biemans, H. J., Tobi, H., Luning, P. A., & Mulder, M. (2009). Teaching and learning in interdisciplinary higher education: A systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 21(4), 365-378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-009-9113-z
• Spiller, P. (2017). Could subjects soon be a thing of the past in Finland? https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-39889523
• Syahril, I. (2019). The new generation of high quality ESL/EFL teachers: A proposal for interdisciplinary teacher education. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 22(1), 33-45. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v22i1.1797
• Tan, H., & Kidman, G. (2021). Authentic assessment in STEM education: An integrative review of research. In T. Barkatsas & T. McLaughlin (Eds.), Authentic assessment and evaluation approaches and practices in a digital era (pp. 24-52). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004501577_002
• Tan, E., & So, H.-J. (2019). Role of environmental interaction in interdisciplinary thinking: From knowledge resources perspectives. The Journal of Environmental Education, 50(2), 113-130. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2018.1531280
• Thao, T. T. P., Ha, C. T., Trung, N. T., Huong, L. T. T., Dinh, N. V., & Trung, T. (2020). A bibliometric review of research on STEM education in ASEAN: Science mapping the literature in Scopus Database, 2000 to 2019. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(10), Article em1889. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8500
• Timms, M. J., Moyle, K., Weldon, P. R., & Mitchell, P. (2018). Challenges in STEM learning in Australian schools: Literature and policy review. Australian Council for Educational Research. https://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1028&context=policy_analysis_misc
• Tytler, R., Prain, V., & Hobbs, L. (2021). Rethinking disciplinary links in interdisciplinary STEM learning: A temporal model. Research in Science Education, 51(Suppl 1), 269-287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09872-2
• Vasquez, J. A., Sneider, C. I., & Comer, M. W. (2013). STEM lesson essentials, grades 3-8: Integrating science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Heinemann.
• Willett, R. (2016). Making, makers, and makerspaces: A discourse analysis of professional journal articles and blog posts about makerspaces in public libraries. The Library Quarterly, 86(3), 313-329. https://doi.org/10.1086/686676

APA

Nugraha, M. G., Kidman, G., & Tan, H. (2024). Interdisciplinary STEM education foundational concepts: Implementation for knowledge creation. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(10), em2523. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15471

Vancouver

Nugraha MG, Kidman G, Tan H. Interdisciplinary STEM education foundational concepts: Implementation for knowledge creation. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2024;20(10):em2523. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15471

AMA

Nugraha MG, Kidman G, Tan H. Interdisciplinary STEM education foundational concepts: Implementation for knowledge creation. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2024;20(10), em2523. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15471

Chicago

Nugraha, Muhamad Gina, Gillian Kidman, and Hazel Tan. "Interdisciplinary STEM education foundational concepts: Implementation for knowledge creation". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2024 20 no. 10 (2024): em2523. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15471

Harvard

Nugraha, M. G., Kidman, G., and Tan, H. (2024). Interdisciplinary STEM education foundational concepts: Implementation for knowledge creation. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(10), em2523. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15471

MLA

Nugraha, Muhamad Gina et al. "Interdisciplinary STEM education foundational concepts: Implementation for knowledge creation". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 20, no. 10, 2024, em2523. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15471