Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Al-Marzouqi, M. &El-Naas, M.H. (2012).The Role of Environmental Design Competitions in Engineering Education, Int. J. Eng. Educ., 28(4), 959-965.
• Blijlevens, J. Gemser, G. &Mugge, R. (2012). The importance of being ‘well-placed’: the influence of context on perceived typicality and esthetic appraisal of product appearance. Acta Psychol., 139, 178–186.
• Carbon, C.C. (2011). Cognitive mechanisms for explaining dynamics of aesthetic appreciation, i-Perception, 2, 708–719.
• Cardenas, C. (2011).A multidisciplinary approach to teach the design of socially relevant computing systems for social change, Int. J. Eng. Educ.,27(1), 2011, pp. 3–13.
• Chitturi, R., Raghunathan, R. &Mahajan, V. (2008).Delight by design: the role of hedonic versus utilitarian benefits, J. Marketing, 72(3), 48–63.
• Crilly, N., Moultrie, J., &Clarkson, P.J. (2009).Shaping things: intended consumer response and the other determinants of product form, Des. Stud., 30, 224–254.
• Dagman, J., Karlsson, M.A. &Wikström, L. (2010). Investigating the haptic aspects of verbalised product experiences, Int. J. Design, 4(3), 15–27.
• Daniels, M., Cajander, A. Clear, T. & McDermott, R. (2015). Collaborative technologies in global engineering: new competencies and challenges,Int. J. Eng. Educ., 31(1B),267–281.
• Friedman, K. (2003).Theory construction in design research: criteria: approaches, and methods,Des. Stud., 24, 507–522.
• Gnaur, D.,Svidt, K. &Thygesen, M.K. (2015). Developing students’ collaborative skills in interdisciplinary learning environments,Int. J. Eng. Educ., 31(1B), 257–266.
• Hafeez, K., Zhang, Y. &Malak,N. (2002). Determining key capabilities of a firm using analytical hierarchy process, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 76 (1), 39–51.
• Hassenzahl, M. (2004).The interplay of beauty, goodness, and usability in interactive products,Hum-Comput. Interact., 19(4), 319–349.
• Hassenzahl, M. &Monk, A.(2010). The inference of perceived usability from beauty, HumComput. Interact., 25(3), 235–260.
• Heilman, R.M., Crisan, L.G., Houser, D., Miclea, M., &Miu, A.C. (2010).Emotion regulation and decision making under risk and uncertainty, Emotion , 10, 257–265.
• Hsueh, S.L., Lee, J.R. &Chen, Y.L. (2013).DFAHP multicriteria risk assessment model for redeveloping derelict public buildings, Int. J. Strateg. Prop. Manag., 17(4), 333–346.
• Kurilovas, E. & Zilinskiene, I. (2012).Evaluation of quality of personalised learning scenarios: an improved MCEQLS AHP method, Int. J. Eng. Educ.,28(6), 1309–1315.
• Leder, H., Belke, B., Oeberst, A., &Augustin, M.D. (2004). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments, Br. J. Psychol., 95, 489–508.
• Li J.Y. & Shieh, C.J. (2016). A Study on the Effects of Multiple Goal Orientation on Learning Motivation and Learning Behaviors, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(1), 161-172.
• Litzinger, T., Zappe, S., Hunter, S. &Mena, I. (2015).Increasing integration of the creative process across engineering curricula, Int. J. Eng. Educ., 31(1B),335–342.
• Maffei, A., Akillioglu, H. &Lohse, N. (2014). Analysis of the student perception of the link between product and production system: towards effective strategies to teach the holistic nature of product design,Int. J. Eng. Educ., 30(6A),1357–1366.
• Maier, J.R.A. &Fadel, G.M. (2009). Affordance-based design methods for innovative design, redesign and reverse engineering, Res. Eng. Des., 20(4), 225–239.
• Masry M., Kang, D.J. & Lipson, H. (2005), A freehand sketching interface for progressive construction of 3D objects, Comput. Graphics, 29(4), 563–575.
• Mccrae,J. & Singh,K. (2009).Sketch-based path design,GI 09 Proceedings of Graphics Interface,2009,95–102.
• McLaughlan, R.G. (2007). Instructional strategies to educate for sustainability in technology assessment, Int. J. Eng. Educ., 23(2), 201–208.
• Mihelcic, J.R., Eatmon, T.D., Harris, R.A. &Muga, H.E. (2007). Engineering Sustainable Construction Materials for the Developing World: a Meta-discipline Approach to Engineering Education, Int. J. Eng. Educ., 23(6), 1116-1125.
• Noble, C.H. &Kumar, M. (2012). Exploring the appeal of product design: a grounded, valuebased model of key design elements and relationships, J. Prod. Innovat. Manag., 27, 640– 657.
• Park, S., Choi, D. & Kim, J. (2004). Critical factors for the aesthetic fidelity of web pages: empirical studies with professional web designers and users, Interact. Comput., 16(2), 351–376.
• Ryu S. & Sandoval, W.A. (2015). The Influence of Group Dynamics on Collaborative Scientific Argumentation, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(2), 335-351.
• Sethi, R., Smith, D.C. &Park,C.W. (2011). Cross functional product development teams, creativity and the innovativeness of new consumer products, J. Marketing Res.,38(1), 2001, pp. 73–85.
• Shieh, C.J., Zhifang, S. &Yeh,S.P. (2014).Key success factors in cultivating students’ learning motivation, Int. J. Eng. Educ., 30(2),326–332.
• Shyr, W.J. &Lo, T.C. (2012).The Working Competency Items for Energy Technology: A ThreeStage Empirical Method, International Journal of Engineering Education, 28(3),599–605.
• Steen, M., Manschot, M. & De Koning, N. (2011). Benefits of co-design in service design projects, Int. J. Design, 5(2), 2011, pp. 53–60.
• Xenakisa, I. & Arnellosb, A. (2013). The relation between interaction aesthetics and affordances, Des. Stud., 34(1), 57–73.

APA

Hsueh, S.-L., & Kuo, C.-H. (2016). Factors in an Interdisciplinary Curriculum For The Students Of Industrial Design Designing Multifunctional Products. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(4), 1075-1089. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1555a

Vancouver

Hsueh SL, Kuo CH. Factors in an Interdisciplinary Curriculum For The Students Of Industrial Design Designing Multifunctional Products. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2016;12(4):1075-89. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1555a

AMA

Hsueh SL, Kuo CH. Factors in an Interdisciplinary Curriculum For The Students Of Industrial Design Designing Multifunctional Products. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2016;12(4), 1075-1089. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1555a

Chicago

Hsueh, Sung-Lin, and Chih-hua Kuo. "Factors in an Interdisciplinary Curriculum For The Students Of Industrial Design Designing Multifunctional Products". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2016 12 no. 4 (2016): 1075-1089. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1555a

Harvard

Hsueh, S.-L., and Kuo, C.-H. (2016). Factors in an Interdisciplinary Curriculum For The Students Of Industrial Design Designing Multifunctional Products. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(4), pp. 1075-1089. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1555a

MLA

Hsueh, Sung-Lin et al. "Factors in an Interdisciplinary Curriculum For The Students Of Industrial Design Designing Multifunctional Products". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 12, no. 4, 2016, pp. 1075-1089. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1555a