Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Adiguzel, T., Kaya, M. H., & Cansu, F. K. (2023). Revolutionizing education with AI: Exploring the transformative potential of ChatGPT. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(3), ep429. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13152
• Baidoo-Anu, D., & Owusu Ansah, L. (2023). Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4337484
• Bitzenbauer, P. (2023). ChatGPT in physics education: A pilot study on easy-to-implement activities. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(3), ep430. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13176
• Borji, A. (2023). A categorical archive of ChatGPT failures. ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2895792/v1
• Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Agarwal, S., Herbert-Voss, A., Krueger, G., Henighan, T., Child, R., Ramesh, A., Ziegler, D. M., Wu, J., Winter, C., … Amodei, D. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2005.14165
• Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by “collaborative learning”? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1-19). Elsevier.
• dos Santos, R. P. (2023). Enhancing chemistry learning with ChatGPT and Bing Chat as agents to think with: A comparative case study. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4447416
• Franciscu, S. (2023). ChatGPT: A natural language generation model for Chatbots. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.24777.83044
• Frieder, S., Pinchetti, L., Griffiths, R.-R., Salvatori, T., Lukasiewicz, T., Petersen, P. C., Chevalier, A., & Berner, J. (2023). Mathematical capabilities of ChatGPT. ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2301.13867
• Gregorcic, B., & Pendrill, A.-M. (2023). ChatGPT and the frustrated Socrates. Physics Education, 58(3), 035021. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/acc299
• Halaweh, M. (2023). ChatGPT in education: Strategies for responsible implementation. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(2), ep421. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13036
• Haraway, D. (1990). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. Routledge.
• Khosrawi-Rad, B., Rinn, H., Schlimbach, R., Gebbing, Pia, J., Yang, Xingyue, J., Lattemann, C., Markgraf, D., & Robra-Bissantz, S. (2022). Conversational agents in education–A systematic literature review. In Proceedings of the 30^th European Conference on Information Systems.
• Kuhail, M. A., Alturki, N., Alramlawi, S., & Alhejori, K. (2023). Interacting with educational chatbots: A systematic review. Education and information Technologies, 28, 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11177-3
• Latour, B. (1991). Nous n’avons jamais été modernes: Essai d’anthropologie symétrique [We were never modern: An essay in symmetrical anthropology]. La Découverte.
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social:An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. OUP - Oxford University Press.
• MacIsaac, D. (2023). Chatbots attempt physics homework–ChatGPT: Chat generative pre-trained transformer. The Physics Teacher, 61(4), 318-318. https://doi.org/10.1119/10.0017700
• Mehdi, Y. (2023). Confirmed: the new Bing runs on OpenAI’s GPT-4. Microsoft Bing Blog. https://blogs.bing.com/search/march_2023/Confirmed-the-new-Bing-runs-on-OpenAI’s-GPT-4
• Milmo, D. (2023). ChatGPT reaches 100 million users two months after launch. The Guardian–Technology. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/feb/02/chatgpt-100-million-users-open-ai-fastest-growing-app
• Mishra, A., Soni, U., Arunkumar, A., Huang, J., Kwon, B. C., & Bryan, C. (2023). PromptAid: Prompt exploration, perturbation, testing and iteration using visual analytics for large language models. ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.01964
• Mollick, E. R. (2023). A guide to prompting AI (for what it is worth): A little bit of magic, but mostly just practice. One Useful Thing Blog. https://www.oneusefulthing.org/p/a-guide-to-prompting-ai-for-what
• Mollick, E. R., & Mollick, L. (2022). New modes of learning enabled by AI Chatbots: Three methods and assignments. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4300783
• Okonkwo, C. W., & Ade-Ibijola, A. (2021). Chatbots applications in education: A systematic review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100033
• OpenAI. (2023). GPT-4 technical report. OpenAI. https://cdn.openai.com/papers/gpt-4.pdf
• Papert, S. A. (1980). Mindstorms–Children, computers and powerful ideas. Basic Books.
• Papert, S. A. (1999). Introduction: What is Logo? And who needs it? In Logo philosophy and implementation. Logo Computer Systems, Inc.
• Papert, S. A., & Harel Caperton, I. (1991). Situating constructionism. In I. Harel, & S. A. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism: Research reports and essays, 1985-1990 (pp. 1-14). Ablex Publishing.
• Sabzalieva, E., & Valentini, A. (2023). ChatGPT and artificial intelligence in higher education: Quick start guide. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000385146
• Swan, M. (2015). We should consider the future world as one of multi-species intelligence. Response to the edge question 2015: What do you think about machines that think? Edge.org. http://edge.org/response-detail/26070
• Taylor, C. A., Hogarth, H., Hacking, E. B., & Bastos, E. (2022). Posthuman object pedagogies: Thinking with things to think with theory for innovative educational research. Cultural and Pedagogical Inquiry, 14(1), 206-221. https://doi.org/10.18733/cpi29662
• Turkle, S. (1984). The second self: Computers and the human spirit. Simon and Schuster.
• Turkle, S. (2007). Evocative objects: Things we think with. MIT Press.
• Yin, R. K. (2011). Applications of Case Study Research. SAGE.

APA

Vasconcelos, M. A. R., & dos Santos, R. P. (2023). Enhancing STEM learning with ChatGPT and Bing Chat as objects to think with: A case study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(7), em2296. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13313

Vancouver

Vasconcelos MAR, dos Santos RP. Enhancing STEM learning with ChatGPT and Bing Chat as objects to think with: A case study. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2023;19(7):em2296. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13313

AMA

Vasconcelos MAR, dos Santos RP. Enhancing STEM learning with ChatGPT and Bing Chat as objects to think with: A case study. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2023;19(7), em2296. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13313

Chicago

Vasconcelos, Marco Antonio Rodrigues, and Renato P. dos Santos. "Enhancing STEM learning with ChatGPT and Bing Chat as objects to think with: A case study". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2023 19 no. 7 (2023): em2296. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13313

Harvard

Vasconcelos, M. A. R., and dos Santos, R. P. (2023). Enhancing STEM learning with ChatGPT and Bing Chat as objects to think with: A case study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(7), em2296. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13313

MLA

Vasconcelos, Marco Antonio Rodrigues et al. "Enhancing STEM learning with ChatGPT and Bing Chat as objects to think with: A case study". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 19, no. 7, 2023, em2296. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13313