Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Agyei, D. D., & Voogt, J. (2012). Developing technological pedagogical content knowledge in pre-service mathematics teachers through collaborative design. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(4). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.827
• Areepattamannil, S., & Santos, L. (2019). Adolescent students’ perceived information and communication technology (ICT) competence and autonomy: Examining links to dispositions toward science in 42 countries. Computers in Human Behavior, 98, 50-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.04.005
• Bacher-Hicks, A., Goodman, J., & Mulhern, C. (2021). Inequality in household adaptation to schooling shocks: COVID-19-induced online learning engagement in real time. Journal of Public Economics, 193, 104345-104361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104345
• Balanskat, A., Blamire, R., & Kefala, S. (2006). The ICT impact report: A review of studies of ICT impact on schools in Europe. UNESCO. https://en.unesco.org/icted/content/ict-impact-report-review-studies-ict-impact-schools-europe
• BECTA. (2004). A review of the research literature on barriers to the uptake of ICT by teachers. British Educational Communications and Technology Agency.
• Bingimlas, K. A. (2009). Barriers to the successful integration of ICT in teaching and learning environment: A review of the literature. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 5(3), 235-245. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75275
• Bozkurt, A., Jung, I., Xiao, J., Vladimirschi, V., Schuwer, R., Egorov, G., Lambert, S. R., Al-Freih, M., Pete, J., Olcott Jr, D., Rodes, V., Aranciaga, I., Bali, M., Alvarez Jr, A. V., Roberts, J., Pazurek, A., Raffaghelli, J. E., Panagiotou, N., de Coëtlogon, P., … Paskevicius, M. (2020). A global outlook to the interruption of education due to COVID-19 pandemic: Navigating in a time of uncertainty and crisis. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 1-126. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3878572
• Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2012). Factors influencing teachers’ adoption and integration of information and communication technology into teaching: A review of the literature. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 8(1), 136-155.‏
• Chand, V. S., Deshmukh, K. S., & Shukla, A. (2020). Why does technology integration fail? Teacher beliefs and content developer assumptions in an Indian initiative. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(5), 2753-2774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09760-x
• Chiu, T. K., & Churchill, D. (2016). Adoption of mobile devices in teaching: Changes in teacher beliefs, attitudes and anxiety. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(2), 317-327. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1113709
• Conole, G., de Laat, M., Dillon T., & Darby J. (2008). “Disruptive technologies”, “pedagogical innovation”: What’s new? Findings from an in-depth study of students’ use and perception of technology. Computers & Education, 50(2), 511-524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.009
• Cox, M. J., & Marshall, G. (2007). Effects of ICT: Do we know what we should know? Education and Information Technologies, 12, 59-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-007-9032-x
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
• Eickelmann, B., & Vennermann, M. (2017). Teachers’ attitudes and beliefs regarding ICT in teaching and learning in European countries. European Educational Research Journal, 16(6), 36-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904117725899
• Funkhouser, B. J., & Mouza, C. (2013). Drawing on technology: An investigation of preservice teacher beliefs in the context of an introductory educational technology course. Computers & Education, 62, 271-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.005
• Goktas, Y., Yildirim, S., & Yildirim, Z. (2009). Main barriers and possible enablers of ICTs integration into pre-service teacher education programs. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(1), 193-204.
• Green, J. K., Burrow, M. S., & Carvalho, L. (2020). Designing for transition: Supporting teachers and students cope with emergency remote education. Postdigital Science and Education, 2, 906-922. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00185-6
• Haspekian, M. (2014). Teachers’ instrumental geneses when integrating spreadsheet software. In A. Clark-Wilson, O. Robutti, & N. Sinclair (Eds.), The mathematics teacher in the digital era (pp. 241-275). Springer. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4638-1_11
• Hativa, N., & Goodyear, J. (2001). Research on teacher thinking, beliefs, and knowledge in higher education: Foundation, status and prospects. In N. Hativa, & P. Goodyear (Eds.), Teacher thinking, beliefs and knowledge in higher education. (pp. 335-359). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0593-7_15
• Hipp, L., Bünning, M., Munnes, S., & Sauermann, A. (2020). Problems and pitfalls of retrospective survey questions in COVID-19 studies. Survey Research Methods, 14(2), 109-114. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2020.v14i2.7741
• Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
• Huang, R., & Zbiek, R. M. (2017). Prospective secondary mathematics teacher preparation and technology. In The mathematics education of prospective secondary teachers around the world (pp. 17-23). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38965-3_3
• Joo, Y. J., Park, S., & Lim, E. (2018). Factors influencing preservice teachers’ intention to use technology: TPACK, teacher self-efficacy, and technology acceptance model. Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 48-59.
• Khatoony, S., & Nezhadmehr, M. (2020). EFL teachers’ challenges in integration of technology for online classrooms during coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in Iran. AJELP: The Asian Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 8(2), 89-104.
• Klemer, A., Keisar, E., & Rapoport, S. (2020a). Development of mathematics trainee teachers’ knowledge while creating a MOOC. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(6), 939-953.‏ https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1688402
• Klemer, A., Rapoport, S., & Lev-Zamir, H. (2020b). Building a computerized dynamic representation as an instrument for mathematical explanation of division of fractions. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(2), 247-264.‏ https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1648888
• Knezek, G., & Christensen, R. (2016). Extending the will, skill, tool model of technology integration: Adding pedagogy as a new model construct. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 28(3), 307-325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-016-9120-2
• Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.
• Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., & Tsai, C. C. (2014). Demographic factors, TPACK constructs, and teachers’ perceptions of constructivist-oriented TPACK. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(1), 185-196.
• Kramarski, B., & Michalsky, T. (2015). Effect of a TPCK-SRL model on teachers’ pedagogical beliefs, self-efficacy and technology-based lesson design. In C. Angeli, & N. Valanides (Eds.), Technological pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 89-112). Springer. https://doi.org//10.1007/978-1-4899-8080-9_5
• Krause, M., Pietzner, V., Dori, Y., & Eilks, I. (2017). Differences and developments in attitudes and self-efficacy of prospective chemistry teachers concerning the use of ICT in education. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(8), 4405-4417. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00935a
• Lai, J. W. M., & Bower, M. (2019). How is the use of technology in education evaluated? A systematic review. Computers & Education, 133, 27-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.010
• Leung, F. K. S. (2013). Introduction to section C: Technology in the mathematics curriculum. In M. A. Clements, A. J. Bishop, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), The third international handbook of mathematics education. (pp. 517-524). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4684-2
• Lim, C. P., Zhao, Y., Tondeur, J., Chai, C. S., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). Bridging the gap: Technology trends and use of technology in schools. Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 59-68.
• Lim, W., Son, J. W., & Kim, D. J. (2018). Understanding preservice teacher skills to construct lesson plans. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(3), 519-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9783-1
• Lin, J. M. C., Wang, P. Y., & Lin, I. (2012). Pedagogy technology: A two-dimensional model for teachers’ ICT integration. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(1), 97-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01159.x
• Lin, T. C., Tsa, S. C., Chai, S. C., & Lee, H. M. (2013). Identifying science teachers’ perceptions of technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK). Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(3), 325-336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9396-6
• Lucas, M., Bem-Haja, P., Siddiq, F., Moreira, A., & Redecker, C. (2021). The relation between in-service teachers’ digital competence and personal and contextual factors: What matters most? Computers & Education, 160, 104052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104052
• Marissa, D. N., & Allahji, W. (2021). Exploring EFL teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and student engagement in an emergency remote teaching context. In J. Chen (Ed.) Emergency remote teaching and beyond: Voices from world language teachers and researchers (pp. 485-506). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84067-9_22
• Mason, J. (1998). Enabling teachers to be real teachers: Necessary levels of awareness and structure of attention. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1(3), 243-267. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009973717476
• Meadows, M. L., & Caniglia, J. (2018). Co-teacher noticing: Implications for professional development. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 22(12), 1345-1362. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2017.1420827
• Miedijensky, S. (2023). Metacognitive knowledge and self-regulation of in-service teachers in an online learning environment. In Supporting self-regulated learning and student success in online courses (pp. 143-159). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-6500-4.ch007
• Miedijensky, S., Sasson, I., & Yehuda, I. (2021). Teachers' learning communities for developing high order thinking skills – A case study of a school pedagogical change. Interchange, 52, 577-598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-021-09423-7
• Nantschev, R., Feuerstein, E., González, R. T., Alonso, I. G., Hackl, W. O., Petridis, K., Triantafyllou, E., & Ammenwerth, E. (2020). Teaching approaches and educational technologies in teaching mathematics in higher education. Education Sciences, 10(12), 354-365. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10120354
• National Research Council. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18290
• Ng, B. Y. (2021). Engaging students in emergency remote teaching: Strategies for the instructor. In D. Ktoridou, E. Doukanari, & N. Eteokleous (Eds.), Fostering meaningful learning experiences through student engagement (pp. 74-91). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4658-1.ch004
• Niess, M. L., & Gillow-Wiles, H. (2017). Expanding teachers’ technological pedagogical reasoning with a systems pedagogical approach. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(3). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3473
• OECD. (2015). Students, computers and learning: Making the connection. PISA, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264239555-en
• OECD. (2019a). OECD learning compass 2030: A series of concept notes. OECD future education and skills 2030. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26068-2_3
• OECD. (2019b). TALIS 2018 results: Teachers and school leaders as lifelong learners. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1d0bc92a-en
• Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332.‏ https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307
• Pape, S. J., & Prosser, S. K. (2018). Barriers to technology implementation in community college mathematics classrooms. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30, 620-636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9195-z
• Pelgrum, W. J. (2001). Obstacles to the integration of ICT in education: Results from a worldwide educational assessment. Computers & Education, 37(2), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(01)00045-8
• Perienen, A. (2020). Frameworks for ICT integration in mathematics education–A teacher’s perspective. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(6), em1845. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/7803
• Polly, D., & Orrill, C. (2012). Developing technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) through professional development focused on technology-rich mathematics tasks. Meridian, 15(1).‏
• Pozas, M., & Letzel, V. (2021). Do you think you have what it takes? Exploring predictors of pre-service teachers’’ prospective ICT use. Technology, Knowledge, and Learning, 28, 823-841. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09551-0
• Prestridge, S. (2012). The beliefs behind the teacher that influences their ICT practices. Computers & Education, 58(1), 449-458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.028
• Rap, S., Feldman-Maggor, Y., Aviran, E., Shvarts-Serebro, I., Easa, E., Yonai, E., Waldman, R., & Blonder, R. (2020). An applied research-based approach to support chemistry teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 3278-3284. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00687
• Rodríguez-Muñiz, L. J., Burón, D., Aguilar-González, Á., & Muñiz-Rodríguez, L. (2021). Secondary mathematics teachers’ perception of their readiness for emergency remote teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case study. Education Sciences, 11(5), 228. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11050228
• Scherer, R., Tondeur, J., Siddiq, F., & Baran, E. (2018). The importance of attitudes toward technology for pre-service teachers’ technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge: Comparing structural equation modeling approaches. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 67-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.003
• Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544
• Segal, R., Stupel, M., Sigler. A., Jahangiril, J. (2018). The effectiveness of the ‘what if not’ strategy coupled with dynamic geometry software in an inquiry-based geometry classroom. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 4 (7), 1099-1109. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2018.1452302
• Segal, R., Oxman, V., & Stupel, M. (2021). Using dynamic geometry software to enhance specialized content knowledge: Pre-service mathematics teachers’ perceptions. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 16(3), em0647. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11065
• Sepulveda-Escobar, P., & Morrison, A. (2020). Online teaching placement during the COVID-19 pandemic in Chile: Challenges and opportunities. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 587-607. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1820981
• Sherry, L., & Gibson, D. (2002). The path to teacher leadership in educational technology. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 2(2), 178-185.
• Shin, D. (2022). Teaching mathematics integrating intelligent tutoring systems: Investigating prospective teachers’ concerns and TPACK. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(8), 1659-1676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10221-x
• Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4-14. https://doi.org/10.2307/1175860
• Spiteri, M., & Chang Rundgren, S. N. (2020). Literature review on the factors affecting primary teachers’ use of digital technology. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 25(1), 115-128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9376-x
• Tabach, M., & Slutzky, G. (2017). Studying the practice of high school mathematics teachers in a single computer setting. In E. Faggiano, F. Ferrara, & A. Montone (Eds.), Innovation and technology enhancing mathematics education: Mathematics education in the digital era (pp. 215-233). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61488-5_10
• Teo, T. (2011). Factors influencing teachers’ intention to use technology: Model development and test. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2432-2440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.008
• Urezm, D., Volman, M., & Kral, M. (2018). Teacher educators’ competences in fostering students teachers’ proficiency in teaching and learning with technology: An overview of relevant research literature. Teacher and Teacher Education, 70, 12-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.11.005
• Widiyatmoko, A. (2018). The effectiveness of simulation in science learning on conceptual understanding: A literature review. Journal of International Development and Cooperation, 24(1), 35-43. https://doi.org/10.15027/45251

APA

Klemer, A., Segal, R., Miedijensky, S., Herscu-Kluska, R., & Kouropatov, A. (2023). Changes in the attitudes of mathematics and science teachers toward the integration and use of computerized technological tools as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(7), em2295. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13306

Vancouver

Klemer A, Segal R, Miedijensky S, Herscu-Kluska R, Kouropatov A. Changes in the attitudes of mathematics and science teachers toward the integration and use of computerized technological tools as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2023;19(7):em2295. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13306

AMA

Klemer A, Segal R, Miedijensky S, Herscu-Kluska R, Kouropatov A. Changes in the attitudes of mathematics and science teachers toward the integration and use of computerized technological tools as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2023;19(7), em2295. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13306

Chicago

Klemer, Anat, Ruti Segal, Shirley Miedijensky, Ronit Herscu-Kluska, and Anatoli Kouropatov. "Changes in the attitudes of mathematics and science teachers toward the integration and use of computerized technological tools as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2023 19 no. 7 (2023): em2295. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13306

Harvard

Klemer, A., Segal, R., Miedijensky, S., Herscu-Kluska, R., and Kouropatov, A. (2023). Changes in the attitudes of mathematics and science teachers toward the integration and use of computerized technological tools as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(7), em2295. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13306

MLA

Klemer, Anat et al. "Changes in the attitudes of mathematics and science teachers toward the integration and use of computerized technological tools as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 19, no. 7, 2023, em2295. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13306