Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Abbad, M. M. (2021). Using the UTAUT model to understand students’ usage of e-learning systems in developing countries. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7205-7224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10573-5
• Abdullah, F., & Kauser, S. (2023). Students’ perspective on online learning during pandemic in higher education. Quality & Quantity, 57(3), 2493-2505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01509-3
• Abdullah, F., & Ward, R. (2016). Developing a general extended technology acceptance model for e-learning (GETAMEL) by analyzing commonly used external factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 238-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.036
• Abuhassna, H., Yahaya, N., Zakaria, M. A. Z. M., Zaid, N. M., Samah, N. A., Awae, F., Nee, C. K., & Alsharif, A. H. (2023). Trends on using the technology acceptance model (TAM) for online learning: A bibliometric and content analysis. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 13(1), 131-142. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.1.1788
• Adewole-Odeshi, E. (2014). Attitude of students towards e-learning in south-west Nigerian universities: An application of technology acceptance model. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1035.
• Al Amin, M., Razib Alam, M., & Alam, M. Z. (2023). Antecedents of students’ e-learning continuance intention during COVID-19: An empirical study. E-Learning and Digital Media, 20(3), 224-254. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530221103915
• Alam, A., & Mohanty, A. (2023). Evaluation of software engineering virtual laboratory in determining undergraduate students’ conceptual understanding: A blended learning model using collaborative-creative virtual learning environment employing critical pedagogy. In Proceedings of the ICSADL 2022 (pp. 875-899). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5443-6_65
• Alamri, M. M., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Yahaya, N., Al-Rahmi, A. M., Abualrejal, H., Zeki, A. M., & Al-Maatouk, Q. (2019). Towards adaptive e-learning among university students: By applying technology acceptance model (TAM). E-Learning, 8(6S3), 270-276. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijeat.F1046.0986S319
• Alassafi, M. O. (2022). E-learning intention material using TAM: A case study. Materials Today: Proceedings, 61, 873-877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.08.026
• Alenezi, M. (2023). Digital learning and digital institution in higher education. Education Sciences, 13(1), Article 88. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13010088
• Al-Fadhli, S. (2008). Students’ perceptions of e-learning in Arab society: Kuwait University as a case study. E-Learning, 5(4), 408-428. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2008.5.4.408
• Alhabeeb, A., & Rowley, J. (2018). E-learning critical success factors: Comparing perspectives from academic staff and students. Computers & Education, 127, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.007
• Al-Harbi, K. (2011). e-Learning in the Saudi tertiary education: Potential and challenges. Applied Computing & Informatics, 9(1), 31-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aci.2010.03.002
• Alshurideh, M., Abuanzeh, A., Kurdi, B., Akour, I., & AlHamad, A. (2023). The effect of teaching methods on university students’ intention to use online learning: Technology acceptance model (TAM) validation and testing. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 7(1), 235-250. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2022.11.003
• Castro, M. D. B., & Tumibay, G. M. (2021). A literature review: Efficacy of online learning courses for higher education institution using meta-analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 1367-1385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10027-z
• Chauhan, M., & Rani, S. (2021). Covid-19: A revolution in the field of education in India. Learning how to learn using multimedia, 23-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1784-3_3
• Clarey, J. (2008). E-learning 101: An introduction to e-learning, learning tools, and technologies. Brandon Hall Research.
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
• Deng, P., Chen, B., & Wang, L. (2023). Predicting students’ continued intention to use e-learning platform for college English study: The mediating effect of e-satisfaction and habit. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1182980. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1182980
• Elkaseh, A. M., Wong, K. W., & Fung, C. C. (2016). Perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness of social media for e-learning in Libyan higher education: A structural equation modeling analysis. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(3), Article 192. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJIET.2016.V6.683
• Garrido-Gutiérrez, P., Sánchez-Chaparro, T., & Sánchez-Naranjo, M. J. (2023). Student acceptance of e-learning during the COVID-19 outbreak at engineering universities in Spain. Education Sciences, 13(1), Article 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13010077
• Ghali, Z., & Amari, A. (2024). Assessing the effectiveness of e-learning under the moderating role of self-efficacy. Education and Information Technologies, 29(7), 8327-8346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12147-z
• Habibi, A., Mukminin, A., Pratama, R., & Harja, H. (2019). Predicting factors affecting intention to use WEB 2.0 in learning: Evidence from science education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 18(4), 595-606. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/19.18.595
• Harnadi, B., Widiantoro, A. D., & Prasetya, F. H. (2024). Investigating the behavioral differences in the acceptance of MOOCs and e-learning technology. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 14, Article 100403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2023.100403
• Humida, T., Al Mamun, M. H., & Keikhosrokiani, P. (2022). Predicting behavioral intention to use e-learning system: A case study in Begum Rokeya University, Rangpur, Bangladesh. Education and Information Technologies, 27(2), 2241-2265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10708-8
• Jenkins, M., & Hanson, J. (2003). E-learning series No. 1: A guide for senior managers (vol. 1). Learning and Teaching Support Network Generic Center.
• Kapilan, N., Reddy, R. P., & Vidhya, P. (2021). Opportunities in virtual laboratory experiments in the teaching and learning process. In B. H. Khan, S. Affouneh, S. H. Salha, & Z. N. Khlaif (Eds.), Challenges and opportunities for the global implementation of e-learning frameworks (pp. 227-245). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-7607-6.ch014
• Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A., & Larsen, K. R. (2003). The technology acceptance model: Past, present, and future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12(1), Article 50. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.01250
• Liaw, S. S., & Huang, H. M. (2011). A study of investigating learners’ attitudes toward e-learning. In Proceedings of the 5^th International Conference on Distance Learning and Education (pp. 28-32).
• Mailizar, M., Burg, D., & Maulina, S. (2021). Examining university students’ behavioural intention to use e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: An extended TAM model. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7057-7077. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10557-5
• Maphosa, V. (2021). Factors influencing student’s perceptions towards e-learning adoption during COVID-19 pandemic: A developing country context. European Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Education, 2(2), Article e02109. https://doi.org/10.30935/ejimed/11000
• Mishra, L., Gupta, T., & Shree, A. (2020). Online teaching-learning in higher education during lockdown period of COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1, Article 100012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100012
• Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2019). Factors influencing behavioral intention to use mobile-based assessment: A STEM teachers’ perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 587-600. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12609
• Padalia, A., Jamilah, A., Syakhruni, S., Rini, Y. S., & Idkhan, A. M. (2023). E-learning application usage in higher education with technology acceptance model (TAM) for students’ assessment. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 13(3), 1059-1067. https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.13.3.18691
• Patil, P. B., Vijayalakshmi, M., & Humbi, N. (2022). Learning styles of first-year undergraduate engineering majors at an Indian technological university. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE IFEES World Engineering Education Forum-Global Engineering Deans Council (pp. 1-5). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/WEEF-GEDC54384.2022.9996222
• Perienen, A. (2020). Frameworks for ICT integration in mathematics education–A teacher’s perspective. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(6), Article em1845. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/7803
• Qazi, M. A., Sharif, M. A., & Akhlaq, A. (2024). Barriers and facilitators to adoption of e-learning in higher education institutions of Pakistan during COVID-19: Perspectives from an emerging economy. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 15(1), 31-52. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-01-2022-0002
• Padalia, A., Jamilah, A., Syakhruni, S., Rini, Y. S., & Idkhan, A. M. (2023). E-learning application usage in higher education with Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) for students’ assessment. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 13(3), 1059-1067. https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.13.3.18691
• Panigrahi, R., Srivastava, P. R., & Panigrahi, P. K. (2021). Effectiveness of e-learning: The mediating role of student engagement on perceived learning effectiveness. Information Technology & People, 34(7), 1840-1862. https://doi.org/10.1108/itp-07-2019-0380
• Rabaa’i, A. A. (2016). Extending the technology acceptance model (TAM) to assess students’ behavioral intentions to adopt an e-learning system: The case of Moodle as a learning tool. Journal of Emerging Engineering and Applied Sciences Trends, 7(1), 13-30.
• Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., & Wohlgenannt, I. (2020). A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Computers & Education, 147, Article 103778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778
• Rahmi, B. A. K. I., Birgoren, B., & Aktepe, A. (2018). A meta-analysis of factors affecting perceived usefulness and ease of use in adopting e-learning systems. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 19(4), 4-42. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.471649
• Rogers, E. M. (1995). Lessons for guidelines from the diffusion of innovations. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement, 21(7), 324-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1070-3241(16)30155-9
• Rosaline, S., & Wesley, J. R. (2017). Factors affecting students’ adoption of ICT tools in higher education institutions: An Indian context. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 13(2), 82-94. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJICTE.2017040107
• Rosenberg, M. J. (2001). E-learning: Strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age. McGraw-Hill.
• Salloum, S. A. S. (2018). Investigating students’ acceptance of e-learning in higher educational environments in the UAE: Applying the extended technology acceptance model (TAM) [Doctoral dissertation, British University in Dubai].
• Sangrà, A., Vlachopoulos, D., & Cabrera, N. (2012). Building an inclusive definition of e-learning: An approach to the conceptual framework. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(2), 145-159. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i2.1161
• Šumak, B., Heričko, M., & Pušnik, M. (2011). A meta-analysis of e-learning technology acceptance: The role of user and e-learning technology types. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2067-2077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.005
• Tan, P. S. H., Seow, A. N., Choong, Y. O., Tan, C. H., Lam, S. Y., & Choong, C. K. (2023). University students’ perceived service quality and attitude towards hybrid learning: Ease of use and usefulness as mediators. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-03-2023-0113
• Teo, T., Sang, G., Mei, B., & Hoi, C. K. W. (2018). Investigating pre-service teachers’ acceptance of Web 2.0 technologies in their future teaching: A Chinese perspective. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(4), 530-546. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1489290
• Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
• Williams, J. (2022). Using assistive and instructional technologies. In J. McLeskey, L. Maheady, B. Billingsley, M. T. Brownell, & T. J. Lewis (Eds.), High leverage practices for inclusive classrooms (pp. 295-312). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003148609-25

APA

Alreiahi, N. J., Patil, P., & Alruqobah, E. (2024). Engineering students’ perceptions of e-learning in higher education: A two-university comparison. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(12), em2550. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15706

Vancouver

Alreiahi NJ, Patil P, Alruqobah E. Engineering students’ perceptions of e-learning in higher education: A two-university comparison. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2024;20(12):em2550. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15706

AMA

Alreiahi NJ, Patil P, Alruqobah E. Engineering students’ perceptions of e-learning in higher education: A two-university comparison. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2024;20(12), em2550. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15706

Chicago

Alreiahi, Nadeyah Jasem, Preeti Patil, and Essam Alruqobah. "Engineering students’ perceptions of e-learning in higher education: A two-university comparison". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2024 20 no. 12 (2024): em2550. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15706

Harvard

Alreiahi, N. J., Patil, P., and Alruqobah, E. (2024). Engineering students’ perceptions of e-learning in higher education: A two-university comparison. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(12), em2550. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15706

MLA

Alreiahi, Nadeyah Jasem et al. "Engineering students’ perceptions of e-learning in higher education: A two-university comparison". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 20, no. 12, 2024, em2550. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15706