Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Ardichvili, A., Page, V., & Wentling, T. (2003). Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge sharing teams. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(1), 64-77. doi:10.1108/13673270310463626
• Centola, D. (2010). The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment. Science, 329(5996), 1194-1197. doi:10.1126/science.1185231.
• Chiu, C. M., Hsu, M. H., & Wang, E. T. (2006). Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision support systems, 42(3), 1872-1888. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2006.04.001
• Cowan, R., & Jonard, N. (2004). Network structure and the diffusion of knowledge. Journal of economic Dynamics and Control, 28(8), 1557-1575. doi:10.1016/j.jedc.2003.04.002
• Cummings, J. N. (2004). Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management science, 50(3), 352-364. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1030.0134
• Eckert, P. (2006). Communities of practice. Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 2(2006), 683-685. doi:10.1016/b0-08-044854-2/01276-1
• Fritsch, M., & Kauffeld-Monz, M. (2010). The impact of network structure on knowledge transfer: an application of social network analysis in the context of regional innovation networks. The Annals of Regional Science, 44(1), 21-38. doi:10.1007/s00168-008-0245-8
• Holme, P., & Kim, B. J. (2002). Growing scale-free networks with tunable clustering. Physical review E, 65(2), 026107. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.65.026107
• Kirschner, P. A., & Lai, K. W. (2007). Online communities of practice in education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 16(2), 127-131. doi:10.1080/14759390701406737
• Kwok, J. S., & Gao, S. (2004). Knowledge sharing community in P2P network: a study of motivational perspective. Journal of knowledge Management, 8(1), 94-102. doi:10.1108/13673270410523934
• ave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355.003
• Lin, F. R., & Huang, H. Y. (2013). Why people share knowledge in virtual communities? The use of Yahoo! Kimo Knowledge+ as an example. Internet Research, 23(2), 133-159. doi:10.1108/10662241311313295
• Ma, W. W., & Yuen, A. H. (2011). Understanding online knowledge sharing: An interpersonal relationship perspective. Computers & Education, 56(1), 210-219. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.004
• Schenkel, A., & Teigland, R. (2008). Improved organizational performance through communities of practice. Journal of knowledge management, 12(1), 106-118. doi:10.1108/13673270810852421
• Soller, A. (2004). Computational modeling and analysis of knowledge sharing in collaborative distance learning. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 14(4), 351-381. doi:10.1023/B:USER.0000043436.49168.3b
• Stewart, S. A., & Abidi, S. S. R. (2012). Applying social network analysis to understand the knowledge sharing behaviour of practitioners in a clinical online discussion forum. Journal of medical Internet research, 14(6), e170. doi:10.2196/jmir.1982
• Wang, J., Gwebu, K., Shanker, M., & Troutt, M. D. (2009). An application of agent-based simulation to knowledge sharing. Decision Support Systems, 46(2), 532-541. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2008.09.006
• Wang, S., & Noe, R. A. (2010). Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 20(2), 115-131. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.10.001
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511803932
• Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. doi:10.1225/3308
• Yu, T. K., Lu, L. C., & Liu, T. F. (2010). Exploring factors that influence knowledge sharing behavior via weblogs. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(1), 32-41. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.08.0021

APA

Cao, Y. (2017). Effectiveness of Key Knowledge Spreader Identification in Online Communities of Practice: A Simulation Study from Network Perspective. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 2749-2760. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01251a

Vancouver

Cao Y. Effectiveness of Key Knowledge Spreader Identification in Online Communities of Practice: A Simulation Study from Network Perspective. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2017;13(6):2749-60. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01251a

AMA

Cao Y. Effectiveness of Key Knowledge Spreader Identification in Online Communities of Practice: A Simulation Study from Network Perspective. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2017;13(6), 2749-2760. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01251a

Chicago

Cao, Yu. "Effectiveness of Key Knowledge Spreader Identification in Online Communities of Practice: A Simulation Study from Network Perspective". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2017 13 no. 6 (2017): 2749-2760. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01251a

Harvard

Cao, Y. (2017). Effectiveness of Key Knowledge Spreader Identification in Online Communities of Practice: A Simulation Study from Network Perspective. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), pp. 2749-2760. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01251a

MLA

Cao, Yu "Effectiveness of Key Knowledge Spreader Identification in Online Communities of Practice: A Simulation Study from Network Perspective". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 13, no. 6, 2017, pp. 2749-2760. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01251a