Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Anderson, T. (2003). Modes of interaction in distance education: Recent developments and research questions. Handbook of distance education, 129-144.
• Baxter J. (2012). Who am I and what keep me going? Profiling the distance learning student in higher education. The International review of research in open and distance learning, 13(4),106-129.
• Chou, C. C. (2000). Patterns of Learner-Learner Interactıon in Distance Learning Networks, Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, Chesapeake, 207-212
• Conole, G. (2013). Designing of learning in an open world. London: Springer.
• Creswell, J. W. (2008). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approach. London: Sage
• Digital Agenda for Europe. (2015). Digital Agenda for Europe. A Europe 2020 Initiative. European Commission. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/
• Fengliang L., Mengying Z. & Baolong, F. (2014). Can distance education increase educational equality? Evidence from the expansion of Chinese higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 39(10), 1811- 1822.
• Freire, A. P., Linhalis, F., Bianchini, S. L., Fprtes R. P.M. & Pimentel M. G. C., 2010, Revealing the whiteboard to blind students: An inclusive approach to provide mediation in synchronous elearning activities, Computers & Education, 52, 4, 866-876.
• Frydenberg, J. (2007). Pesistence in university continuing education online classes. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(3).
• Gillies, D., 2008. Student Perspectives on Videoconferencing in Teacher Education at a Distance, Distance Education, 29, 1, 107-118.
• Gunawardena, C.N. & Mcisaac, M.S. (2004). Distance Education. In David H. Jonassen (Ed.) Handbook Of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, Second Edition. A Project of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Mahwah, New Jersey London. P. 355– 397.
• Hart, J, (2014). Social learning handbook 2014. Centre for Learning & Performance Technologies.
• Jin - Seung, H., (2005), Analyzing Student-Student and Student-Instructor Interactıon Through Multiple Communıcatıon Tools In Web-Based Learning, International Journal of Instructional Media, 32, 1, 59-67
• Johnson, G. (2008). The relative learning benefits of synchronous and asynchronous text-based discussion. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39 (1), 166–169.
• Karen, K. (2004). Peer learning using asynchronous discussion systems in distance education. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 19(2).
• Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science. Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. Routledge, London.
• Ling, L.H. (2007). Community of Inquiry in an Online Undergraduate Information Technology Course. Journal of Information Technology Education, 6 (5), 153-168.
• Mabrito, M. (2006). A Study of Synchronous Versus Asynchronous Collaboration in an Online Business Writing Class. American Journal of Distance Education, 20 (2), 93- 107.
• Minocha, S. (2009). Role of Social Software Tools in Education: A Literature Review. Education + Training, 51(5/6), 353-369.
• Ossiannilsson, E. (2012). Benchmarking e-learning in higher education. Lessons learned from international projects. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Industrial Engineering and Management. Oulu University, Finland.
• Ossiannilsson, E., Williams, K., Camilleri, A., & Brown, M. (2015). Quality models in online and open education around the globe: State of the art and recommendations. Oslo: The International Council for Online and Distance Education (ICDE)
• Salmon, G., & Wright, P. (2014). Transforming Future Teaching through ‘Carpe Diem’ Learning Design. Educ. Sci. 2014, 4, 52-63; doi:10.3390/educsci4010052. Available at: http://www.gillysalmon.com/uploads/1/6/0/5/16055858/_salmon__wright_transforming_futu re_teaching_through_carpe_diem_learning_design_2.pdf
• Schwarz, B. B., & Asterhan, C. S. (2011). E-Moderation of synchronous discussions in educational settings: A Nascent practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20 (3).
• Simonson, M. & Schlosser, L., A. (2009). Distance Education: Definition and Glossary of Terms, Third Edition, Information Age Publishing, USA.
• Smith, J. A. & Eatough, V. (2007). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. In E. Lyons & A. Coyle (Eds.). Analysing Qualitative Data In Psychology. (p. 35-50). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
• UNESCO. (2015). Open and distance learning. Available at: http://www.unesco.org/new/en/unesco/themes/icts/lifelong-learning/open-and-distancelearning/
• Wang, Y. & Sun, C., (2000), Synchronous Distance Education: Enhancing Speaking Skills via Internetbased Real Time Technology, 1st International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering.

APA

Alhih, M., Ossiannilsson, E., & Berigel, M. (2017). Levels of Interaction Provided by Online Distance Education Models. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 2733-2748. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01250a

Vancouver

Alhih M, Ossiannilsson E, Berigel M. Levels of Interaction Provided by Online Distance Education Models. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2017;13(6):2733-48. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01250a

AMA

Alhih M, Ossiannilsson E, Berigel M. Levels of Interaction Provided by Online Distance Education Models. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2017;13(6), 2733-2748. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01250a

Chicago

Alhih, Mohammed, Ebba Ossiannilsson, and Muhammet Berigel. "Levels of Interaction Provided by Online Distance Education Models". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2017 13 no. 6 (2017): 2733-2748. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01250a

Harvard

Alhih, M., Ossiannilsson, E., and Berigel, M. (2017). Levels of Interaction Provided by Online Distance Education Models. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), pp. 2733-2748. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01250a

MLA

Alhih, Mohammed et al. "Levels of Interaction Provided by Online Distance Education Models". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 13, no. 6, 2017, pp. 2733-2748. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01250a