Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2000). Making believe: The collective construction of public mathematical knowledge in the elementary classroom. In D. C. Philips (Ed.) Constructivism in education: Opinions and second opinions on controversial issues (ninety-ninth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education) (pp. 193-224). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1999). In search of understandings: The case for constructivist classrooms. Virginia: ASCD.
• Burblules, N. C. (2000). Moving beyond the impasse. In D. C. Philips (Ed.) Constructivism in education: Opinions and second opinions on controversial issues (ninety-ninth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education) (pp. 308- 330). Chicago: University of Chicago.
• Fawcett, L. M., & Gourton A.F. (2005). The effects of peer collaboration on children’s problem-solving ability, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 157-169.
• Fosnot, C. T. (Ed.) (2005). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives and practice (2nd ed.) NY: Teacher’s College Press.
• Fosnot, C. T., & Dolk, M. (2005). “Mathematics” or “mathematizing”? In C. T. Fosnot (Ed.) Constructivism: Theory, perspectives and practice (2nd ed.) (pp. 175-191). NY: Teacher’s College Press.
• Frege, G. (1953). Grundlagen der arithmetik [The foundations of arithmetic: A logico-mathematical enquiry into the concept of number]. (J. L. Austin, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell. (Original work published in 1884)
• Glaserfeld, E.v. (2005). Introduction: Aspects of constructivism. In C. T. Fosnot (Ed.) Constructivism: Theory, perspectives and practice (2nd ed.) (pp. 3-7). NY: Teacher’s College Press.
• Kong, J., Wang, C., Kwong, K., Vangel, M., Chua, E., & Gollub, R. (2005). The neural substrate of arithmetic operations and procedural complexity, Cognitive Brain Research, 22(3), 397-405.
• Nelson, G. E. (1996). Student diversity requires different approaches to college teaching, even in math and science. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(2), 165-175.
• Philips, D. C. (Ed.) (2000). Constructivism in education: Opinions and second opinions on controversial issues (ninety-ninth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Philips, D. C. (2000a). An opinionated account of the constructivist landscape. In D. C. Philips (Ed.) Constructivism in education: Opinions and second opinions on controversial issues (ninety-ninth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education) (pp. 1-16). Chicago: University of Chicago.
• Piaget, J. (1932). The moral judgments of the child. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
• Piaget, J. (1959). The language and thought of the child (3rd ed.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
• Pichat, M., & Ricco, G. (2001). Mathematical problem solving in didactic institutions as a complex system: The case of elementary calculus, Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 20, 43-53.
• Schliemann, A. D., & Carraher, D. W. (2002). The evolution of mathematical reasoning: Everyday versus idealized understandings, Developmental Review, 22, 242-266.
• Slezak, P. (2000). A critique of radical social constructivism. In D. C. Philips (Ed.) Constructivism in education: Opinions and second opinions on controversial issues (ninety-ninth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education) (pp. 91-126). Chicago: University of Chicago.
• Solmon, J. (2000). The changing perspectives of constructivism: Science wars and children’s creativity. In D. C. Philips (Ed.) Constructivism in education: Opinions and second opinions on controversial issues (ninety-ninth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education) (pp. 283-307). Chicago: University of Chicago.
• Sriraman, B. (2004). Reflective abstraction uniframes and the formalization of generalizations, The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23(2), 205-222.
• Stigler, J. W., & Stevenson, H. W. (1999-2000). How Asian teachers polish each lesson to perfection. In Child Growth and Development (6th ed.) (pp. 66-77). Connecticut: McGraw-Hill.
• Vidakovic, D., & Martin, W.O. (2004). Small group searches for mathematical proofs and individual reconstructions of mathematical concepts, Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23(4), 465-492.
• Vygotsky L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press.

APA

Gupta, A. (2008). Constructivism and Peer Collaboration in Elementary Mathematics Education: The Connection to Epistemology. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 4(4), 381-386. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75364

Vancouver

Gupta A. Constructivism and Peer Collaboration in Elementary Mathematics Education: The Connection to Epistemology. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2008;4(4):381-6. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75364

AMA

Gupta A. Constructivism and Peer Collaboration in Elementary Mathematics Education: The Connection to Epistemology. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2008;4(4), 381-386. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75364

Chicago

Gupta, Anoop. "Constructivism and Peer Collaboration in Elementary Mathematics Education: The Connection to Epistemology". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2008 4 no. 4 (2008): 381-386. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75364

Harvard

Gupta, A. (2008). Constructivism and Peer Collaboration in Elementary Mathematics Education: The Connection to Epistemology. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 4(4), pp. 381-386. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75364

MLA

Gupta, Anoop "Constructivism and Peer Collaboration in Elementary Mathematics Education: The Connection to Epistemology". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 4, no. 4, 2008, pp. 381-386. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75364