“Away from the Textbook,” Metacognitive Strategies in Mathematics: A Qualitative Study on Saudi Students’ Motivation to Learn Mathematics

Khalid S. Alzahrani

doi:10.29333/ejmste/11507

Full Text (PDF)

Khalid S. Alzahrani ¹ ^*

More Detail

¹ Imam Abdulrahman bin Feisal University, Dammam, SAUDI ARABIA^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

This study explores Saudi students’ perceptions of their motivation to learn Mathematics using metacognitive strategies. Data were collected using a qualitative case study design among 13 Saudi secondary school students. The findings from the data collected through semi-structured interviews show that several motives encourage the participants to learn metacognitively. For instance, the findings demonstrate that the desire to experiment with a new concept helped to capture the interest of the learners and stimulate their curiosity to learn. Likewise, the desire to improve methods of thought which can meet the personal needs and goals of the learner may foster a positive attitude in learners and therefore contribute to their motivation. In addition, it is argued that students’ confidence in their skills may help them feel they can successfully control their learning. Finally, it was shown that the desire of students to improve their thinking strategies in their lives reinforced their achievements with internal rewards and therefore helped them to be satisfied with their learning.

Keywords

metacognition
motivation
mathematics
IMPROVE program
cognitive skills

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, Volume 18, Issue 1, January 2022, Article No: em2070

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11507

Publication date: 09 Jan 2022

Article Views: 2143

Article Downloads: 1422

Open Access Disclosures References How to cite this article

Disclosure

Declaration of Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest is declared by author(s).

Data sharing statement: Data supporting the findings and conclusions are available upon request from the corresponding author(s).

References

Ali, J., & McInerney, D. M. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of school motivation. In Proceedings of the Third International Biennial SELF Research Conference. Berlin, Germany.
Alzahrani, K. S. (2017). Metacognition and its role in Mathematics learning: An exploration of the perceptions of a teacher and students in a secondary school. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(3), 521-537. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/629
Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., & Norman, M. K. (2010). How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. John Wiley & Sons.
Bakkaloglu, S. (2020). Analysis of metacognitive awareness of primary and secondary school students in terms of some variables. Journal of Education and Learning, 9(1), 156-163. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v9n1p156
Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation and mysterious mechanisms. In R. K. Franz, & E. Weinert (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation and understanding (pp. 65-117). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Buratti, S., & Allwood, C. M. (2015). Regulating metacognitive processes—support for a meta-metacognitive ability. In A. Peña-Ayala (Ed.), Metacognition: Fundaments, applications, and trends (pp. 17-38). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11062-2_2
Carr, M., Alexander, J., & Folds‐Bennett, T. (1994). Metacognition and mathematics strategy use. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 8(6), 583-595. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350080605
Cetin, I., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2014). Assessing the impact of meta-cognitive training on students’ understanding of introductory programming concepts. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 50(4), 507-524. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.50.4.d
Clayton, K., Blumberg, F., & Auld, D. P. (2010). The relationship between motivation, learning strategies and choice of environment whether traditional or including an online component. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 349-364. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00993.x
Desoete, A., Baten, E., Vercaemst, V., De Busschere, A., Baudonck, M., & Vanhaeke, J. (2019). Metacognition and motivation as predictors for mathematics performance of Belgian elementary school children. ZDM, 51(4), 667-677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-01020-w
Efklides, A. (2011). Interactions of metacognition with motivation and affect in self-regulated learning: The MASRL model. Educational Psychologist, 46(1), 6-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.538645
Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2×2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.501
Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2001). Achievement goals and the hierarchical model of achievement motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 13(2), 139-156. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009057102306
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education. Mc Graw-Hill.
Gama, C. (2004). Metacognition in interactive learning environments: The reflection assistant model. In: J. C. Lester, R. M. Vicari, & F. Paraguacu (Eds.), Intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 668-677). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30139-4_63
George, M. (2012). Autonomy and motivation in remedial mathematics. PRIMUS, 22(4), 255-264. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2010.497958
Grizzle-Martin, T. (2014). The effect of cognitive-and metacognitive-based instruction on problem solving by elementary students with mathematical learning difficulties [Doctoral dissertation, Walden University].
Ibrahim, M., Baharun, H., Harun, H., & Othman, N. (2017). Antecedents of intrinsic motivation, metacognition and their effects on students’ academic performance in fundamental knowledge for matriculation courses. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 14(2), 211-246. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2017.14.2.8
Jansen, A., & Middleton, J. (2011). Motivation matters and interest counts: Fostering engagement in mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Karaali, G. (2015). Metacognition in the classroom: Motivation and self-awareness of mathematics learners. PRIMUS, 25(5), 439-452. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2015.1027837
Keller, J. M. (1987). Strategies for stimulating the motivation to learn. Performance and Instruction, 26(8), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.4160260802
Kim, N., & Ulgado, F. (2014). Motivational orientation for word-of-mouth and its relationship with WOM messages. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 24(2), 223-240. https://doi.org/10.1080/21639159.2014.881115
Kluwe, R. H. (1982). Cognitive knowledge and executive control: Metacognition. In D. R. Griffin (Ed.), Animal mind-human mind (pp. 201-224). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-68469-2_12
Korpershoek, H., Kuyper, H., & van der Werf, G. (2015). Differences in students’ school motivation: A latent class modelling approach. Social Psychology of Education, 18(1), 137-163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-014-9274-6
Kramarski, B., & Mevarech, Z. R. (2003). Enhancing mathematical reasoning in the classroom: The effects of cooperative learning and metacognitive training. American Educational Research Journal, 40(1), 281-310. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312040001281
Kramarski, B., & Michalsky, T. (2013). Student and teacher perspectives on IMPROVE self-regulation prompts in web-based learning. R. Azevedo, & V. Aleven (Eds.), International Handbook of Metacognition and Learning Technologies (pp. 35-51). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5546-3_3
Kurtz, B. E., & Borkowski, J. G. (1984). Children’s metacognition: Exploring relations among knowledge, process, and motivational variables. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 37(2), 335-354.https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(84)90008-0
Landine, J., & Stewart, J. (1998). Relationship between metacognition, motivation, locus of control, self-efficacy, and academic achievement. Canadian Journal of Counselling, 32(3), 200-212.
Maehr, M. L. (1984). Meaning and motivation: Toward a theory of personal investment. Research on Motivation in Education, 1(4), 115-144.
Marulis, L. M., & Nelson, L. J. (2020). Metacognitive processes and associations to executive function and motivation during a problem-solving task in 3-5 year olds. Metacognition and Learning, 16, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09244-6
McInerney, D. M., & Ali, J. (2006). Multidimensional and hierarchical assessment of school motivation: Cross‐cultural validation. Educational Psychology, 26(6), 717-734. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410500342559
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education: Revised and expanded from case study research in education. Jossey Bass Wiley.
Mevarech, Z., & Kramarski, B. (1997). IMPROVE: A multidimensional method for teaching mathematics in heterogeneous classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 34(2), 365-394. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312034002365
Ocak, G., & Yamac, A. (2013). Examination of the relationships between fifth graders’ self-regulated learning strategies, motivational beliefs, attitudes, and achievement. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 13(1), 380-387.
Ozcan, Z. C., & Eren Gumus, A. (2019). A modeling study to explain mathematical problem-solving performance through metacognition, self-efficacy, motivation, and anxiety. Australian Journal of Education, 63(1), 116-134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944119840073
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
Rosen, L. D., Lim, A. F., Carrier, L. M., & Cheever, N. A. (2011). An empirical examination of the educational impact of text message-induced task switching in the classroom: Educational implications and strategies to enhance learning. Educational Psychology, 17(2), 163-177. https://doi.org/10.5093/ed2011v17n2a4
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2016). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics (Reprint). Journal of Education, 196(2), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741619600202
Schraw, G., & Gutierrez, A. P. (2015). Metacognitive strategy instruction that highlights the role of monitoring and control processes. A. Peña-Ayala (Ed.), Metacognition: Fundaments, applications, and trends (pp. 13-16). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11062-2_1
Soenens, B., Sierens, E., Vansteenkiste, M., Dochy, F., & Goossens, L. (2012). Psychologically controlling teaching: Examining outcomes, antecedents, and mediators. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), 108. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025742
Torres, J., & Ash, M. (2007). Cognitive development. In C. C. Reynolds, K. J. Vannest, & E. Fletcher-Janzen (Eds.), Encyclopedia of special education: A reference for the education of children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities and other exceptional individuals. John Wiley.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Moylan, A. R. (2009). Self-regulation: Where metacognition and motivation intersect. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 299-315). Routledge.

How to cite this article

APA

Alzahrani, K. S. (2022). “Away from the Textbook,” Metacognitive Strategies in Mathematics: A Qualitative Study on Saudi Students’ Motivation to Learn Mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(1), em2070. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11507

Vancouver

Alzahrani KS. “Away from the Textbook,” Metacognitive Strategies in Mathematics: A Qualitative Study on Saudi Students’ Motivation to Learn Mathematics. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2022;18(1):em2070. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11507

AMA

Alzahrani KS. “Away from the Textbook,” Metacognitive Strategies in Mathematics: A Qualitative Study on Saudi Students’ Motivation to Learn Mathematics. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2022;18(1), em2070. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11507

Chicago

Alzahrani, Khalid S.. "“Away from the Textbook,” Metacognitive Strategies in Mathematics: A Qualitative Study on Saudi Students’ Motivation to Learn Mathematics". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2022 18 no. 1 (2022): em2070. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11507

Harvard

Alzahrani, K. S. (2022). “Away from the Textbook,” Metacognitive Strategies in Mathematics: A Qualitative Study on Saudi Students’ Motivation to Learn Mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(1), em2070. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11507

MLA

Alzahrani, Khalid S. "“Away from the Textbook,” Metacognitive Strategies in Mathematics: A Qualitative Study on Saudi Students’ Motivation to Learn Mathematics". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 18, no. 1, 2022, em2070. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11507