An analysis of calculus application questions in grade 12 mathematics exams in South Africa

Eric Machisi

doi:10.29333/ejmste/15431

Full Text (PDF)

Eric Machisi ¹ ^*

More Detail

¹ Fujairah Boys’ School, Fujairah, UAE^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

This study employed a quantitative survey methodology to analyze the 2021-2023 grade 12 calculus application exam questions in the context of South Africa. A total of 11 grade 12 teachers and 220 grade 12 students participated in the study. Analysis of the survey data and students’ test results points to the view that examiners sometimes misjudge the level of difficulty of the exam questions and include questions that are very difficult, which fail to discriminate between strong and weak candidates. It was noticed that calculus applications questions that most students could not correctly answer included multiple mathematical skills that were compacted in a short statement. This paper recommends that mathematics examiners should continuously reflect on their own work and find ways to improve their skills in setting future exam papers. The inclusion of item difficulty and item discrimination indices in post-exam analysis of results could be part of the examiners’ reflective practice. Feedback from the grade 12 mathematics teachers on the standard of each exam question is just as important to the examiners as the examiners’ reports are to the teachers.

Keywords

calculus application
exam questions
item difficulty
expert opinion
discrimination index

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, Volume 20, Issue 10, October 2024, Article No: em2519

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15431

Publication date: 13 Oct 2024

Article Views: 63

Article Downloads: 35

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Adedoyin, O. O., & Mokobi, T. (2013). Using IRT psychometric analysis in examining the quality of junior certificate mathematics multiple choice examination test items. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 3(4), 992-1011.
Amadi, B. D., Ogunka, R. I., & Tandi, L. I. (2019). Estimating the psychometric properties of 50 multiple choice mathematics item for senior secondary II students in Ikwerre Local Government Area of Rivers State using classical test theory. The African Journal of Behavioural and Scale Development Research, 1(2).
Balila, J. S., & Cajilig, N. G. (2016). Psychometric analysis of mathematics achievement test using item response theory. Jurnal Universitas Advent Indonesia, 1(2), 34-44.
Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, Article 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149
Burdman, P. (2019). Why calculus? Why indeed? JustEquations. https://justequations.org/blog/why-calculus-why-indeed
Chinn, S. (2020). The trouble with maths: A practical guide to helping learners with numeracy difficulties (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003017714
Date, A. P., Borkar, A. S., Badwaik, R. T., Siddiqui, R. A., Shende, T. R., & Dashputra, A. V. (2019). Item analysis as tool to validate multiple choice question bank in pharmacology. International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology, 8(9), 1999-2003. https://doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20194106
Dennon, A. (2022). Want to get into Harvard? Ace calculus. BestColleges.com. https://www.best colleges.com/news/analysis/2022/02/28/college-admissions-calculus/
Department of Basic Education. (2021). National senior certificate grade 12 mathematics P1 November 2021. Department of Basic Education. https://www.education.gov.za/Curriculum/NationalSeniorCertificate(NSC)Examinations/2021NSCExamPapers.aspx
Department of Basic Education. (2022a). 2021 national senior certificate diagnostic report part 1: Content subjects. Department of Basic Education. https://www.education.gov.za/?fileticket=4JVOD_6ncds%3D&tabid=92&portalid=0&mid=4359
Department of Basic Education. (2022b). National senior certificate grade 12 mathematics P1 November 2022. Department of Basic Education. https://www.education.gov.za/Curriculum/NationalSeniorCertificate(NSC)Examinations/2022NovemberExams.aspx
Department of Basic Education. (2023a). National senior certificate 2022 diagnostic report part 1: Content subjects. Department of Basic Education. https://www.education.gov.za/?fileticket=4JVOD_6ncds%3D&tabid=92&portalid=0&mid=4359
Department of Basic Education. (2023b). National senior certificate grade 12 mathematics P1 November 2023. Department of Basic Education. https://www.education.gov.za/Curriculum/NationalSeniorCertificate(NSC)Examinations/2023NSCNovemberpastpapers.aspx
Department of Basic Education. (2024). 2023 diagnostic report book 1. Department of Basic Education. https://www.ecexams.co.za/2023_NSC_Exam_Results/Diagnostic%20Report%202023%20Book%201.......pdf
Djidu, H., Jailani, J., & Retnawati, H. (2021). Higher-order thinking skills among male and female students: An experimental study of the problem-based calculus learning model in secondary schools. Beta: Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 14(2), 107-125. https://doi.org/10.20414/betajtm.v14i2.432
Dosek, T. (2012). Snowball sampling and Facebook: How social media can help access hard-to-reach populations. PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(4), 651-655. https://doi.org/10.1017/S104909652100041X
Gamage, S. H., Ayres, J. R., Behrend, M. B., & Smith, E. J. (2019). Optimising Moodle quizzes for online assessments. International Journal of STEM Education, 6, Article 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0181-4
Gardner, J., O’Leary, M., & Yuan, L. (2021). Artificial intelligence in educational assessment: ‘Breakthrough? or buncombe and ballyhoo?’. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(5), 1207-1216. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12577
Geisler, S., & Rolka, K. (2021). “That wasn’t the math I wanted to do!”–Students’ beliefs during the transition from school to university mathematics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(3), 599-618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10072-y
Georgetown University. (2022). The case for de-emphasizing calculus in college admissions. Access and affordability. Georgetown University. https://feed.georgetown.edu/access-affordability/the-case-for-de-emphasizing-calculus-in-college-admissions/
Gierl, M. J., Bulut, O., Guo, Q., & Zhang, X. (2017). Developing, analyzing, and using distractors for multiple-choice tests in education: A comprehensive review. Review of Educational Research, 87(6), 1082-1116. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317726529
Hartati, N., & Yogi, H. P. (2019). Item analysis for a better quality test. English Language in Focus, 2(1), 59-70. https://doi.org/10.24853/elif.2.1.59-70
Huntley, B., Engelbrecht, J., & Harding, A. (2010). A model for measuring the quality of a mathematics question. Far East Journal of Mathematical Education, 5(2), 141-171.
Issah, Z. (2022a). Education in Kenya: The problem with KCPE and KCSE. Medium. https://zinahissa.medium.com/education-in-kenya-the-problem-with-kcpe-and-kcse-9ff91b921730
Issah, Z. (2022b). Standardizing Kenya’s national exams. Medium. https://zinahissa.medium.com/standardizing-kenyas-national-exams-d1d907d429b1
Kheyami, D., Jaradat, A., Al-Shibani, T., & Ali, F. A. (2018). Item analysis of multiple choice questions at the Department of Paediatrics, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Bahrain. Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal, 18(1), 68-74. https://doi.org/10.18295/squmj.2018.18.01.011
Kumar, D., Jaipurkar, R., Shekhar, A., Sikri, G., & Srinivas, V. (2021). Item analysis of multiple choice questions: A quality assurance test for an assessment tool. Medical Journal Armed Forces India, 77(1), 85-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mjafi.2020.11.007
Lee, H. Y., Yune, S. J., Lee, S. Y., Im, S., & Kam, B. S. (2024). The impact of repeated item development training on the prediction of medical faculty members’ item difficulty index. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), Article 599. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05577-x
Mitra, N. K., Nagaraja, H. S., Ponnudurai, G., & Judson, J. P. (2009). The levels of difficulty and discrimination indices in type A multiple choice questions of pre-clinical semester 1 multidisciplinary summative tests. IeJSME, 3(1), 2-7. https://doi.org/10.56026/imu.3.1.2
Nitko, A. (2004). Educational assessment of students (4th ed.). Pearson/Merill Prentice Hall.
Noble, S., Scheinost, D., & Constable, R. T. (2021). A guide to the measurement and interpretation of fMRI test-retest reliability. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 40, 27-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.12.012
Ntumi, S., Agbenyo, S., & Bulala, T. (2023). Estimating the psychometric properties (“item difficulty, discrimination and reliability indices”) of test items using Kuder-Richardson approach (KR-20). Shanlax International Journal of Education, 11(3), 18-28. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v11i3.6081
Padua, R., & Santos, R. G. (1997). Educational evaluation and measurement: Theory, practice, and application. KATHA Publishing.
Patil, R., Palve, S. B., Vell, K., & Boratne, A. V. (2016). Evaluation of multiple choice questions by item analysis in a medical college at Pondicherry, India. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health, 3(6), 1612-1616. https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20161638
Rafi, I., Retnawati, H., Apino, E., Hadiana, D., Lydiati, I., & Rosyada, M. N. (2023). What might be frequently overlooked is actually still beneficial: Learning from post national-standardized school examination. Pedagogical Research, 8(1), Article em0145. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/12657
Rush, B. R., Rankin, D. C., & White, B. J. (2016). The impact of item-writing flaws and item complexity on examination item difficulty and discrimination value. BMC Medical Education, 16, 250. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0773-3
Sharma, L. R. (2021). Analysis of difficulty index, discrimination index and distractor efficiency of multiple choice questions of speech sounds of English. International Research Journal of MMC, 2(1), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.3126/irjmmc.v2i1.3
Syeda, Z. F., Nazir, H. M., & Shah, A. A. (2021). Semi standadrdization of a test of secondary school mathematics. Pakistan Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences Research, 4(2), 1-50. https://doi.org/10.37605/pjhssr.v4i2.61
Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273-1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
Tjabolo, S. A., & Otaya, L. G. (2019). Quality of school exam tests based on item response theory. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(10), 2156-2164. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.071013

How to cite this article

APA

Machisi, E. (2024). An analysis of calculus application questions in grade 12 mathematics exams in South Africa. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(10), em2519. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15431

Vancouver

Machisi E. An analysis of calculus application questions in grade 12 mathematics exams in South Africa. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2024;20(10):em2519. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15431

AMA

Machisi E. An analysis of calculus application questions in grade 12 mathematics exams in South Africa. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2024;20(10), em2519. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15431

Chicago

Machisi, Eric. "An analysis of calculus application questions in grade 12 mathematics exams in South Africa". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2024 20 no. 10 (2024): em2519. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15431

Harvard

Machisi, E. (2024). An analysis of calculus application questions in grade 12 mathematics exams in South Africa. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(10), em2519. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15431

MLA

Machisi, Eric "An analysis of calculus application questions in grade 12 mathematics exams in South Africa". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 20, no. 10, 2024, em2519. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15431