Turkish Mathematics Teachers’
Concerns about the Curriculum
Reform in the First Year of
Implementation

Tuba Gokcek; Adnan Baki

doi:10.12973/eurasia.2013.928a

Turkish Mathematics Teachers’ Concerns about the Curriculum Reform in the First Year of Implementation

Full Text (PDF)

Tuba Gokcek ¹ ^* , Adnan Baki ¹

More Detail

¹ Karadeniz Technical University, TURKEY^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine mathematics teachers’ concerns about the sixth grade curriculum that was launched in Turkey in 2006. As a data collection tool, the Stages of Concern Questionnaire (SoCQ), based on the Concerns Based Adoption Model (CBAM), was administered twice (at the beginning and the end of the instructional year) to 110 teachers who were using the new mathematics curriculum for the first time. The same teachers were also asked to provide an open-ended statement in order to obtain qualitative data. The data were analyzed separately to highlight changes in the teachers’ concerns about the 6th grade curriculum. According to the results, the teachers were mainly concerned about becoming sufficiently informed about the program; organization and timing issues; inadequate school conditions and students’ backgrounds. They were also concerned about the new instructional materials, although the intensity of their concerns changed over time.

Keywords

change
concerns
mathematics teachers
curriculum

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, Volume 9, Issue 2, 2013, 177-190

https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2013.928a

Publication date: 14 Dec 2013

Article Views: 1893

Article Downloads: 1187

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Aksit, N. (2007). Educational reform in Turkey. International Journal of Educational Development, 27, 129-137.
Atkins, N. E. & Vasu, E. S. (2000). Measuring knowledge of technology usage and stages of concern about computing: A study of middle school teachers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8(4), 279-302.
Baki, A. (2006). Kuramdan uygulamaya matematik egitimi, Trabzon: Derya Kitabevi.
Baki, A. & Gokcek, T. (2007). Elementary teachers' concerns about the new mathematics curriculum in Turkey. Paper presented at the International Symposium Elementary Maths Teaching, Prague, Czech Republic. p. 69
Barr, R. & Sadow, M. W. (1989). Influence of basal programs on fourth-grade reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 24(1), 44-71.
Bukova-Guzel, E. & Alkan, H. (2005). Yeniden yapılandırılan ilkogretim programı pilot uygulamasının degerlendirilmesi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 5, 385-420.
Bulut, M. (2007). Curriculum reform in Turkey: A case of primary school mathematics curriculum, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(3), 203- 212.
Buyukozturk, S. (2004). Veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: PegemA.
Can, N. (2005). Bir ogretim lideri olarak okul yoneticisinin ilkOgretim programlarının gelistirilmesindeki yeterliligi (Sufficiency of school manager as an instructional leader on the development of elementary curriculum). Egitimde Yansımalar: VIII Yeni İlkogretim Programlarını Degerlendirme Sempozyumu, 14-16 Kasım 2005 Erciyes Universitesi, Kayseri, Turkey, pp. 77-87.
Castro, A. M. (2006). Preparing elementary preservice teachers to use mathematics curriculum materials, The Mathematics Educator, 16(2), 14-24.
Chamblee, G. & Slough, S. (2002). Mathematics classrooms: Is the implementation process the same for both disciplines? Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching 21(1), 3–15.
Christou, C., Eliophotou-Menon, M. & Philippou, G. (2004). Teachers’ concerns regarding the adaptation of a new curriculum: An application of CBAM. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 57(2), 157-176.
Clarke, D. (1994). Ten key principles from research for the professional development of teachers. In D. Aichele & A. Coxford (Eds.), Professional development for teachers of mathematics (pp. 37-47). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Crawford, A. R., Chamblee, G. E. & Rowlett, R. J. (1998). Assessing concerns of algebra teachers during a curriculum reform: A constructivist approach. Journal of In-service Education, 24(2), 317-327.
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cetinkaya, B. (2012). Understanding teachers in the midst of reform: Teachers’ concerns about reformed sixth grade mathematics curriculum in Turkey, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 8(3), 155-166.
Dello-lacovo, B. (2009). Curriculum reform and ‘Quality Education’ in China: An overview. International Journal of Educational Development, 29, 241–249.
Dincer, B. & Ozaslan, M. (2004). İlcelerin sosyo-ekonomik gelismislik sıralaması arastırması. Ankara: DPT Yayını.
Freeman, D. J. & Porter, A. C. (1989). Do textbooks dictate the content of mathematics instruction in elementary schools? American Educational Research Journal, 26(3), 403- 421.
Friel, S. & Gann, J. (1993). Making change in schools. Arithmetic Teacher, 40, 286-289.
Fullan, M. (1999). Change forces: The sequel. Falmer: London.
Fullan, M. & Miles, M. (1992). Getting reform right: What works and what doesn’t. Phi Delta Kappan, 73, 745-752.
George, A. A., Hall, G. E. & Stiegelbauer, S. M. (2006). Measuring implementation in schools: The stages of concern questionnaire. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
Gershner, V. T. & Snider, S. L. (2001). Integrating the use of internet as an instructional tool: Examining the process of change. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 25(3), 283-300.
Giannakaki, M. S. (2005). Using mixed-methods to examine teachers' attitudes to educational change: The case of the skills for life strategy for improving adult literacy and numeracy skills in England. Educational Research and Evaluation, 11(4), 323- 348.
Gokcek, T. (2008). 6. sınıf matematik Ogretmenlerinin yeni ilkOgretim programına uyum surecinin incelenmesi (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey.
Gozutok, F. D., Akgun, O. E. & Karacaoglu, O. C. (2005). İlkOgretim programlarının ogretmen yeterlilikleri acısından degerlendirilmesi (Evaluation of the elementary curriculum from the aspect of teachers' sufficiency). Egitimde Yansımalar: VIII Yeni İlkogretim Programlarını Degerlendirme Sempozyumu, 14-16 Kasım 2005 Erciyes Universitesi, Kayseri, Turkey, pp. 17-40.
Gray, K. (2005). Becoming a Middle School: Using the concerns of teachers to pave the way. The Journal of the New England League of Middle Schools, 16(1), 24-28.
Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J. & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11, 255–274.
Greene, J. C. (2007) Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Guskey, T. R. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher, 15(5), 5-12.
Hall, G. E. (1979). The concerns-based approach to facilitating change. Educational Horizons, 57(4), 202-208.
Hall, G. E. & Hord, S. M. (2006). Implementing Change: Patterns, principles and potholes, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Hall, G. E. & Hord, S. M. (1987). Change in schools: Facilitating the process. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Heaton, R. (1994). Creating and studying a practice of elementary mathematics for understanding. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
Holloway, K. (2003). A measure of concern: Research-based program aids innovation by addressing teacher concerns. Tools for Schools, National Staff Development Council. Retrieved from http://www.nsdc.org/ members/tools/tools2-03.pdf
Koc, Y., Isiksal, M. & Bulut, S. (2007). Elementary school curriculum reform in Turkey. International Education Journal, 8(1), 30-39.
Korkmaz, I. (2006). Yeni ilkogretim programının Ogretmenler tarafından degerlendirilmesi (Evaluation of the new elementary curriculum by the teachers). Ulusal Sınıf Ogretmenligi Kongresi Bildiri Kitabı (p. 249-259) vol:2, Ankara: KOk.
Kupcu, A. R. & Kardes, D. (2007). Matematik Ogretim programında yapılandırmacılık yansımaları. I. Ulusal İlkogretim Kongresi, Ankara.
Leung, W. L. (2008). Teacher concerns about curriculum reform: The case of project learning. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 17(1), 75-97.
Macnab, D. S. (2003). Implementing change in mathematics education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35, 197–216.
Marsh, C. J. (1987). Implementation of a social studies curriculum in an Australian elementary school. Elementary School Journal, 87(4), 475-486.
McGorry, S. Y. (2000). Measurement in a cross-cultural environment: Survey translation issues. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 3(2), 74-81.
MONE [Ministry of National Education]. (2004). Mufredat Gelistirme Sureci: Program Gelistirme Modeli Cercevesinde Yapılan Calısmalar. Retrieved from http://programlar. meb.gov.tr/program_giris/calismalar_4.htm
MONE. (2005). Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Baskanlıgı, İlkOgretim Matematik Dersi (1-5. Sınıflar) Ogretim Programı. (Board of Education, Elementary school mathematics curriculum (1-5th grades) Ankara: MEB Publishing.
NAS (National Academies). (2005). The Concerns-Based Adoption Model (CBAM): A model for change in individuals. Retrieved from http://www.nas.edu/rise/backg4a.htm
Newhouse, C. P. (2001). Applying the concerns-based adoption model to research on computers in classrooms. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 33(5), 1-21.
Newlove, B. W. & Hall, G. E. (1998). A manual for assessing open-ended statements of concern. Research and Development Center for Teacher Education, University of Texas, Austin, TX.
Orrill, C. H. & Anthony, H. G. (2003). Implementing reform curriculum: A case of who’s in charge. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago, IL. p.17
Ozdas, A., Tanisli, D., Kose, N.Y. & Kilic, C. (2005). Yeni ilkogretim matematik dersi (1-5). sınıflar öğretim programının öğretmen görüşlerine dayalı olarak değerlendirilmesi (An evaluation of new elementary mathematics curriculum based on teacher' views), Egitimde Yansımalar: VIII. Yeni İlkogretim Proğramlarını Değerlendirme Sempozyumu, 14-16 Kasım 2005 Erciyes Universitesi, Kayseri, Turkey, pp. 239-255.
Peterson, P. L. (1990). Doing more in the same amount of time: Cathy Swift. Education and Policy Analysis, 12(3), 261-280.
Prawat, R. S. (1991). Conversations with self and settings: A framework for thinking about teacher development. American Educational Research Journal, 28(4), 737-757.
Rakes, G. C. & Casey, H. B. (2002). An analysis of teacher concerns toward instructional technology. International Journal of Educational Technology, 3(1). ISSN:1327-7308 Retrieved from http://education.illinois.edu/ijet/v3n1/ rakes/ index.html
Remillard, J. T. & Bryans, M. B. (2004). Teachers’ orientations toward mathematics curriculum materials: Implications for teacher learning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(5), 352–388.
Rodriquez, B. T. (2000). An investigation into how a teacher uses a reform-oriented mathematics curriculum, The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Rogan, J. M. & Grayson, D. F. (2003). Towards a theory of curriculum implementation with particular reference to science education in developing countries. International Journal of Science Education, 25(10), 1171–1204.
Schifter, D. & Fosnot, C. T. (1993). Reconstructing mathematics education: Stories of teachers meeting the challenge of reform. New York: Teachers College Press.
Stodolsky, S. S. (1988). The subject matters: Classroom activity in math and social studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C., (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Teddlie, C. & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77-100.
Temiz, N. (2005). İlkogretim 4. sınıf matematik dersi yeni ogretim programının yansımaları (Reclections of fourth grade elementary mathematics curriculum). XIV. Ulusal Egitim Bilimleri Kongresi Pamukkale Universitesi, 28- 30 Eylul 2005, Denizli, Turkey.
Thompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 127-146). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Van den Berg, R., Sleegers, P., Geijsel, F., & Vandenberghe, R. (2000). Implementation of an innovation: Meeting the concerns of teachers. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 26(4), 331-350.
Walen, S. B. & Williams, S. R. (2000). Validating classroom issues: Case method in support of teacher change. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3, 3–26.
Weissglass, J. (1991). Teachers have feelings: What can we do about it? Journal of Staff Development, 12(1), 28–33.
Yasar, S., Gultekin, M., Turkan, B., Yildiz, N. & Girmen, P. (2005). Yeni ilkogretim programlarının uygulanmasına iliskin sınıf ogretmenlerinin hazırbulunusluk duzeylerinin ve egitim gereksinimlerinin belirlenmesi. Egitimde Yansımalar: VIII. Yeni İlkOgretim Programlarını Degerlendirme Sempozyumu, 14-16 Kasım 2005 Erciyes Universitesi, Kayseri, Turkey, pp. 51-63.
Yilmaz, T. (2006). Yenilenen 5. sınıf matematik programı hakkında Ogretmen gorusleri (Sakarya ili ornegi). (Unpublished Master Thesis). Sakarya University, Adapazarı, Turkey.
Yuliang, L. & Huang, C. (2005). Concerns of teachers about technology integration in the USA. European Journal of Teacher Education, 28(1), 35-48.

How to cite this article

APA

Gokcek, T., & Baki, A. (2013). Turkish Mathematics Teachers’ Concerns about the Curriculum Reform in the First Year of Implementation. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 9(2), 177-190. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2013.928a

Vancouver

Gokcek T, Baki A. Turkish Mathematics Teachers’ Concerns about the Curriculum Reform in the First Year of Implementation. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2013;9(2):177-90. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2013.928a

AMA

Gokcek T, Baki A. Turkish Mathematics Teachers’ Concerns about the Curriculum Reform in the First Year of Implementation. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2013;9(2), 177-190. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2013.928a

Chicago

Gokcek, Tuba, and Adnan Baki. "Turkish Mathematics Teachers’ Concerns about the Curriculum Reform in the First Year of Implementation". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2013 9 no. 2 (2013): 177-190. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2013.928a

Harvard

Gokcek, T., and Baki, A. (2013). Turkish Mathematics Teachers’ Concerns about the Curriculum Reform in the First Year of Implementation. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 9(2), pp. 177-190. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2013.928a

MLA

Gokcek, Tuba et al. "Turkish Mathematics Teachers’ Concerns about the Curriculum Reform in the First Year of Implementation". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 9, no. 2, 2013, pp. 177-190. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2013.928a