Abstract
Increasing communication between government schools, universities, and industry can benefit STEM education programs and STEM careers. These collaborations are pertinent in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) because the nation is aiming to meet the growing demand for a future STEM workforce by increasing the number of students pursuing STEM careers. The main purpose of the study is to investigate the stakeholder’s perceptions and responses on STEM education programs, STEM careers, and triple helix components (THC) in the UAE. The researcher employed a quantitative methods approach for this study that used questionnaires. The results from this study showed that the stakeholders had positive perceptions on STEM education programs, STEM careers, and THC. Further investigation is needed to gain more information about the significant differences in perspectives between and within the stakeholder clusters.
License
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Article Type: Research Article
EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, Volume 19, Issue 8, August 2023, Article No: em2303
https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13424
Publication date: 01 Aug 2023
Online publication date: 21 Jun 2023
Article Views: 1882
Article Downloads: 976
Open Access References How to cite this articleReferences
- Achzab, A., Budiyanto, C., & Budianto, A. (2018, September). Analysis of the 21st century skills achievement using constructivist learning with Arduino based driverless vehicle technology. In K. B. Sangka, I. Widiastuti, P. N. Y. Indriyanti, N. M. Nordin, R. Mustapha, & S.-T. A. Hung (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Teacher Training and Education 2018 (pp. 201-205). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/ictte-18.2018.35
- ADEK. (2020). Our partner. Abu Dhabi Department of Education and Knowledge: Activity Platform. https://activityplatform.adek.gov.ae/
- Admawati, H., Jumadi, J., & Nursyahidah, F. (2018). The effect of STEM project-based learning on students’ scientific attitude based on social constructivism theory. In R. Ekawati (Ed.), Proceedings of the Mathematics, Informatics, Science, and Education International Conference (pp. 191-194). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/miseic-18.2018.65
- Ahmed, H. O. K. (2016). Strategic future directions for developing STEM education in higher education in Egypt as a driver of innovation economy. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(8), 127-145. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1095333.pdf
- Al Murshidi, G. (2019). STEM education in the United Arab Emirates: Challenges and possibilities. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(12), 316-332. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.12.18
- Anderhag, P., Wickman, P. O., Bergqvist, K., Jakobson, B., Hamza, K. M. & Säljö, R. (2016). Why do secondary school students lose their interest in science? Or does it never emerge? A possible and overlooked explanation. Science Education, 100(5), 791-813. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21231
- Andrée, M., & Hansson, L. (2020). Industrial actors and their rationales for engaging in STEM education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 52(4), 551-576. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2019.1682055
- Ashour, S. (2020). Quality higher education is the foundation of a knowledge society: Where does the UAE stand? Quality in Higher Education, 26(2), 209-223. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2020.1769263
- Bell, M. L., Whitehead, A. L., & Julious, S. A. (2018). Guidance for using pilot studies to inform the design of intervention trials with continuous outcomes. Clinical Epidemiology, 10, 153-157. https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S146397
- British Council. (2018). Future skills supporting the UAE’s future workforce. https://www.britishcouncil.ae/sites/default/files/bc_futureskills_english_1mar18_3.pdf
- Burnette, J. L., Pollack, J. M., Forsyth, R. B., Hoyt, C. L., Babij, A. D., Thomas, F. N., & Coy, A. E. (2019). A growth mindset intervention: Enhancing students’ entrepreneurial self-efficacy and career development. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 5(20), 878-908. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258719864293
- Cai, Y., & Etzkowitz, H. (2020). Theorizing the triple helix model: Past, present, and future. Triple Helix, 7(2-3), 189-226. https://doi.org/10.1163/21971927-bja10003
- Cai, Y., & Liu, C. (2020). The role of university as institutional entrepreneur in regional innovation system: Towards an analytical framework. In M. T. Preto, A. Daniel, & A. Teixeira (Eds.), Examining the role of entrepreneurial universities in regional development (pp. 133-155). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-0174-0
- Canrinus, E. T., Klette, K., Hammerness, K., & Bergem, O. K. (2019). Opportunities to enact practice in campus courses: Taking a student perspective. Teachers and Teaching, 25(1), 110-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2018.1526171
- Cedefop. (2016). Skill shortages in Europe: Which occupations are in demand–and why. https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/en/news-and-press/news/skill-shortages-europe-which-occupations-are-demand-and-why
- Ceglie, R. J., & Setlage, J. (2016). College student persistence in scientific disciplines: Cultural and social capital as contributing factors. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(1), 169-186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9592-3
- Chryssou, C. E. (2020). University-industry interactions in the Sultanate of Oman: Challenges and opportunities. Industry and Higher Education, 34(5), 342-357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422219896748
- Cinar, S., Pirasa, N., & Sadoglu, G. P. (2016). Views of science and mathematics pre-service teachers regarding STEM. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(6), 1479-1487. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040628
- Colter, D. D. (2018). A study of urban principals’ perceptions of technology implementation and STEM program sustainability [Doctoral dissertation, University of New England].
- Creswell J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2014). Understanding research: A consumer’s guide. Pearson.
- D’Este P., & Perkmann, M. (2011). Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(3), 316-339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-010-9153-z
- Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice? European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 291-309. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1315399
- DeCoito, I. (2016). STEM education in Canada: A knowledge synthesis. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 16(2), 114-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2016.1166297
- Desai, N., & Manjunath, V. S. (2018). Role and challenges of universities in a triple helix model [Paper presentation]. The National Conference on Trending Research in Engineering, Science, and Management.
- Dickson, M., Fidalgo, P. & Cairns, D. (2019). The ‘S’ and ‘T’ in STEM: Integrating science and technology in education in the UAE. In K. Gallagher (Ed.), Education in the United Arab Emirates: Innovation and transformation (pp. 95-111). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7736-5_6
- Ehlers, U. D. (2020). Future skills: The future of learning and higher education. McFarland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-29297-3
- El-Deghaidy, H., & Mansour, N. (2015). Science teachers’ perceptions of STEM education: Possibilities and challenges. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 51-54. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijlt.1.1.51-54
- Eltanahy, M., Forawi, S., & Mansour, N. (2020). STEM leaders and teachers views of integrating entrepreneurial practices into STEM education in high school in the United Arab Emirates. Entrepreneurship Education, 3, 133-149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41959-020-00027-3
- Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The triple helix: University-industry-government innovation in action (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203929605
- Etzkowitz, H. & Zhou, C. (2017). The triple helix: University-industry-government innovation and entrepreneurship. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315620183
- Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1997). Introduction to special issue on science policy dimensions of the triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Science and Public Policy, 24(1), 2-5.
- Fernández-Nogueira, D., Arruti, A., Markuerkiaga, L., & Saenz, N. (2018). The entrepreneurial university: A selection of good practices. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 21(3), 1-17.
- FLL. (2020). Inspiring youth through hands-on STEM learning. First Lego League. https://www.firstlegoleague.org/
- Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2015). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill.
- Green, A., & Sanderson, D. (2018). The roots of STEM achievement: An analysis of persistence and attainment in STEM majors. The American Economist, 63(1), 79-93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0569434517721770
- Habig, B., Gupta, P., Levine, B., & Adams, J. (2020). An informal science education program’s impact on STEM major and STEM career outcomes. Research in Science Education, 50(3), 1051-1074. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9722-y
- Hathcock, S. J., Dickerson, D. L., Eckhoff, A., & Katsioloudis, P. (2015). Scaffolding for creative product possibilities in a design-based STEM activity. Research in Science Education, 45(5), 727-748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9437-7
- Hughes, T. (2014). Co-creation: Moving towards a framework for creating innovation in the Triple Helix. Prometheus, 32(4), 337-350. https://doi.org/10.1080/08109028.2014.971613
- Husain, F. Y. (2022). Investigating the themes and perceptions of the formal and informal STEM education programs, STEM career development, and their connections to the triple helix component in the UAE [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The British University in Dubai.
- Jenset, I. S. (2017). Practice-based teacher education coursework: An examination of the extent and characteristics of how teacher education coursework is grounded in practice across six teacher education programs in Finland, Norway and California, US [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Oslo.
- Karmokar, S., & Shekar, A. (2018). Outreach programs using the triple helix model to encourage interest in science and engineering among underrepresented youth. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 23(1), 88-103
- Kim, S. Y. (2017). The fourth industrial revolution and the triple helix [Paper presentation]. The XV International Triple Helix Conference 2017.
- Kumar, R. (2011). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners. SAGE.
- Kupersmidt, J., Stelter, R., Garringer, M., & Bourgoin, J. (2018). STEM mentoring. Supplement to the “elements of effective practice for mentoring.” MENTOR: National Mentoring Partnership. https://www.mentoring.org/resource/stem-mentoring-supplement-to-the-elements-of-effective-practice-for-mentoring/
- Lawton Smith, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2014). The triple helix in the context of global change: Dynamics and challenges. Prometheus, 32(4), 321-336. https://doi.org/10.1080/08109028.2014.972135
- Lent, R. W. (2005). A social cognitive view of career development and counseling. In S. D. Brown, & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work (pp. 101-127). Wiley.
- Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (2002). Social cognitive career theory. Career Choice and Development, 4(1), 255-311.
- Lent, R. W., Sheu, H. B., Singley, D., Schmidt, J. A., Schmidt, L. C., & Gloster, C. S. (2008). Longitudinal relations of self-efficacy to outcome expectations, interests, and major choice goals in engineering students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73(2), 328-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2008.07.005
- Leong, F. T. (2008). Social cognitive career theory. In F. T. L. Leong (Ed.), Encyclopedia of counseling (pp. 1628-1631). SAGE.
- Let’s Talk Science. (2017). Canada 2067 learning roadmap. https://canada2067.ca/app/uploads/2018/09/Canada-2067-Learning-Roadmap-FINAL.pdf
- Litchfield, B. C., & Dempsey, J. V. (2015). Authentic assessment of knowledge, skills, and attitudes. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 142(142), 65-80. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20130
- Lowe, C. (1982). The triple helix - NIH, industry, and the academic world. Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 55(3-4), 239-246.
- Lowery, C. L., Hess, M. E., Hartman, S. L., Kennedy, C., & Mazid, I. (2018). Establishing partnership spaces: Reflections of educational leaders on founding professional development schools. Education Leadership, 19(1), 92-110.
- Lund, A., & Eriksen, T. M. (2016). Teacher education as transformation: Some lessons learned from a center for excellence in education. Acta Didactica Norge, 10(2), 53-72. https://doi.org/10.5617/adno.2483
- Maheady, L., Magiera, K., & Simmons, R. (2016). Building and sustaining school-university partnerships in rural settings: One approach for improving special education service delivery. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 35(2), 33-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/875687051603500205
- Mandrup, M., & Jensen, T. L. (2017). Educational action research and triple helix principles in entrepreneurship education: Introducing the EARTH design to explore individuals in triple helix collaboration. Triple Helix, 4, 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40604-017-0048-y
- McDonald, K. S., & Waite, A. M. (2019). Future directions: Challenges and solutions facing career readiness and development in STEM fields. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 21(1), 133-138. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422318814552
- Milner-Bolotin, M., & Marotto, C. C. (2018). Parental engagement in children’s STEM education. Part I: Meta-analysis of the literature. LUMAT: International Journal on Math, Science and Technology, 6(1), 41-59. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.6.1.292
- MoE. (2021). Ministry of Education strategic plan 2017-2021. https://www.moe.gov.ae/En/about theMinistry/Pages/MinistryStrategy.aspx
- Momeni, F., Arab Mazar Yazdi, A., & Najafi, S. M. S. (2019). Changing economic systems and institutional dimensions of the triple helix model. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 8, 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-018-0096-1
- Moon, B. (2016). Do universities have a role in the education and training of teachers? An international analysis of policy and practice. Cambridge University Press.
- Moonesar, I., & Mourtada, R. (2015). Persistence in the Abu Dhabi STEM pipeline: Preparing Emirati youth for careers in the UAE innovation economy. The Emirates Foundation and Mohamed Bin Rashid School of Government. http://www.mbrsg.ae/HOME/PUBLICATIONS/Research-Report-Research-Paper-White-Paper.aspx
- Müller, M., Álamos, P., Meckes, L., & Sanyal, A. (2015). Student teachers’ perceptions of opportunities to develop core practices in a Chilean teacher education program [Paper presentation]. The European Conference on Educational Research.
- Nguyen, T. P. L., Nguyen, T. H., & Tran, T. K. (2020). STEM education in secondary schools: Teachers’ perspective towards sustainable development. Sustainability, 12(21), 8865. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218865
- NRF. (2019). National Research Foundation. https://nrf.ae/
- Nugent, G., Barker, B., Welch, G., Grandgenett, N., Wu, C., & Nelson, C. (2015). A model of factors contributing to STEM learning and career orientation. International Journal of Science Education, 37(7), 1067-1088. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1017863
- Pasnik, S., & Hupert, N. (2016). Early STEM learning and the roles of technologies. Education Development Center. https://cct.edc.org/sites/cct.edc.org/files/publications/EarlySTEMTechWhitePaper.pdf
- Peters, B. G. (2019). Institutional theory in political science the new institutionalism. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
- Petersen, E. A., Tillinghast, R. C., Mainiero, C., & Dabiri, S. (2018). A STEM outreach program model: Case study of a US army-based STEM program [Paper presentation]. The 2018 ASEE Southeastern Section Conference.
- Peterson, B. (2017). Engaging parents in STEM education. Children’s Technology and Engineering, 22(1), 18-21.
- Popovic, G., & Lederman, J. S. (2015). Implications of informal education experiences for mathematics teachers’ ability to make connections beyond formal classroom. School Science and Mathematics, 115(3), 129-140. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12114
- Purzer, S., & Shelley, M. (2018). The rise of engineering in STEM education: The “E” in STEM. In M. Shelley, & S. A. Andree (Eds.), Research highlights in STEM education (pp. 38-56). ISRES Publishing.
- Radloff, J., & Guzey, S. (2016). Investigating preservice STEM teacher conceptions of STEM education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(5), 759-774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9633-5
- Ranga, M., & Etzkowitz, H. (2013). Triple helix systems: An analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the knowledge society. Entrepreneurship and Knowledge Exchange, 27(4), 237-262. https://doi.org/10.5367/ihe.2013.0165
- Resnick, L., Asterhan, C., & Clarke, S. (2015). Socializing intelligence through academic talk and dialogue. American Educational Research Association. https://doi.org/10.3102/978-0-935302-43-1
- Roberts, T., Jackson, C., Mohr-Schroeder, M. J., Bush, S. B., Maiorca, C., Cavalcanti, M., Schroeder, D. C., Delaney, A., Putnam, L., & Cremeans, C. (2018). Students’ perceptions of STEM learning after participating in a summer informal learning experience. International Journal of STEM Education, 5, 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0133-4
- Rodrigues, C., & Melo, A. (2013). The triple helix model as inspiration for local development policies: An experience-based perspective. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(5), 1675-1687. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01117.x
- Sabato, J. & Mackenzie, M. (1982). La producción de tecnología. Autónoma o transnacional [Technology production. Autonomous or transnational]. Editorial Nueva Imagen, S. A. https://repositorio.esocite.la/640/
- Scharmer, C.O., & Käufer, K. (2000). Universities as the birthplace for the entrepreneuring human being. Reflections: The SoL Journal on Knowledge, Learning and Change, 1-19. https://www.academia.edu/download/45824008/2000_uni21us.pdf
- Schleicher, A. (2019). PISA 2018 insights and interpretations. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/PISA%202018%20Insights%20and%20Interpretations%20FINAL%20PDF.pdf
- Schultz, D. P., & Schultz, S. E. (2016). Theories of personality. Cengage Learning.
- Sen, C., Ay, Z. S., & Kiray, S. A. (2018). STEM skills in the 21st century education. In M. Shelley & S. A. Kiray (Eds), Research highlights in STEM education (pp. 81-101). ISRES Publishing. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED616570.pdf
- Shaer, S., Zakzak, L., & Shibl, E. (2019). The STEAM dilemma: Advancing sciences in UAE schools–the case of Dubai. Mohammed Bin Rashid School of Government. https://mbrsgcdn.azureedge.net/cmsstorage/mbrsg/files/17/174c88b2-e633-4dc9-9f9a-a473f6c91892.pdf
- Shattock, M. (2009). Entrepreneurialism and organizational change in higher education. In M. Shattock (ed.), Entrepreneurialism in universities and the knowledge economy: Diversification and organizational change in European higher education (pp. 1-8). SRHE & Open University Press.
- Shernoff, D. J., Sinha, S., Bressler, D. M., & Ginsburg, L. (2017). Assessing teacher education and professional development needs for the implementation of integrated approaches to STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 4, 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0068-1
- Stephens, M., Spraggon M., & Vammalle, C. (2019). Agile government policy council paper session no 13. Mohammed Bin Rashid School of Government. https://mbrsgcdn.azureedge.net/cmsstorage/mbrsg/files/eb/eb10cc47-8ed3-4e8c-bb0e-69afe615cf90.pdf
- Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53-55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
- Thibaut, L., Ceuppens, S., De Loof, H., De Meester, J., Goovaerts, L., Struyf, A., Boeve-de Pauw, J., Dehaene, W., Deprez, J., De Cock, M., & Hellinckx, L. (2018). Integrated STEM education: A systematic review of instructional practices in secondary education. European Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 2-12. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/85525
- UNESCO. (2017). Cracking the code: Girls’ and women’s education in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000253479
- Vought, R. T. (2018). Charting a course for success: America’s strategy for STEM education. United States White House Office. https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2019/05/f62/STEM-Education-Strategic-Plan-2018.pdf
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes. Harvard University Press.
- Wan Husin, W. N. F., Mohamad Arsad, N., Othman, O., Halim, L., Rasul, M. S., Osman, K., & Iksan, Z. (2016). Fostering students’ 21st century skills through project oriented problem based learning (POPBL) in integrated STEM education program. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning & Teaching, 17(1), 1-18.
- WEF. (2020). The future of jobs report 2020. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs_2020.pdf
- Wiebe, E., Unfried, A., & Faber, M. (2018). The relationship of STEM attitudes and career interest. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(10), em1580. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/92286
- Williams, G. E. (2017). Teacher experiences on the play-based methods and instructional practices used in half vs. full day kindergarten [Doctoral dissertation, Northeastern University].
- Worrell, F. C., Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Dixson, D. D. (2019). Gifted students. Annual Review of Psychology, 70(1), 551-576. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102846
- Yang, D., & Baldwin, S. J. (2020). Using technology to support student learning in an integrated STEM learning environment. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 4(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.v4i1.22
- Zahran, R., Pettaway, L. D., Waller, L. R., & Waller, S. (2016). Educational leadership: Challenges in United Arab Emirates. The Global eLearning Journal, 5(1), 1-8.
How to cite this article
APA
Husain, F. Y., Forawi, S., & Chang, C.-Y. (2023). Triple helix components supporting STEM education to increase future STEM careers in the United Arab Emirates. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(8), em2303. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13424
Vancouver
Husain FY, Forawi S, Chang CY. Triple helix components supporting STEM education to increase future STEM careers in the United Arab Emirates. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2023;19(8):em2303. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13424
AMA
Husain FY, Forawi S, Chang CY. Triple helix components supporting STEM education to increase future STEM careers in the United Arab Emirates. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2023;19(8), em2303. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13424
Chicago
Husain, Fatima Yousif, Sufian Forawi, and Chun-Yen Chang. "Triple helix components supporting STEM education to increase future STEM careers in the United Arab Emirates". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2023 19 no. 8 (2023): em2303. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13424
Harvard
Husain, F. Y., Forawi, S., and Chang, C.-Y. (2023). Triple helix components supporting STEM education to increase future STEM careers in the United Arab Emirates. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(8), em2303. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13424
MLA
Husain, Fatima Yousif et al. "Triple helix components supporting STEM education to increase future STEM careers in the United Arab Emirates". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 19, no. 8, 2023, em2303. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13424