Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Archila, P. A., Molina, J., & de Mejía, A. T. (2020). Using historical scientific controversies to promote undergraduates’ argumentation. Science and Education, 29(3), 647-671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00126-6
• Dickerson, R. E., Gray, H. B., Darensbourg, M. Y., & Darensbourg, D. J. (1984). Chemical principles (4th ed.). CA: Benjamin/Cummings.
• Garritz, A. (2013). Teaching the philosophical interpretations of quantum mechanics and quantum chemistry through controversies. Science and Education, 22(7), 1787-1807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9444-x
• Hodson, D. (1988). Toward a Philosophically more valid science curriculum. Science Education, 72(1), 19-40. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730720103
• Hodson, D. (2009). Teaching and learning about science: language, theories, methods, history, traditions and values. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
• Jenkins, E. (1989). Why the history of science? In M. Shortland and A. Warwick (Eds.), Teaching the history of science. Basil Blackwell.
• Jones, B. F., Pierce, J., & Hunter, B. (1988-1989). Teaching students to construct graphic representations. Educational Leadership, 46(4), 20-25.
• Justi, R. & Mendonça, P. C. C. (2016). Discussion of the controversy concerning a historical event among pre-service teachers: Contributions to their knowledge about science, their argumentative skills, and reflections about their future teaching practice. Science and Education, 25(7-8), 795-822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-016-9846-2
• Kim, S. Y., & Irving, K. E. (2010). History of science as an instructional context: Student learning in genetics and nature of science. Science and Education, 19(2), 187-215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-009-9191-9
• Lee, G. & Yi, J. (2013). Where cognitive conflict arises from?: The structure of creating cognitive conflict. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(3), 601-623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9356-x
• Machamer, P., Pera, M., & Baltas, A. (2000). Scientific controversies: An introduction. In P. Machamer, M. Pera & A. Baltas (Eds.), Scientific controversies: Philosophical and historical perspectives (pp. 3-17). New York: Oxford University Press.
• Matthews, M. R. (2015). Science teaching: The role of history and philosophy of science 20th anniversary revised and expanded edition. New York: Routledge.
• Nahum, K. (2001). Scientific controversies in teaching science: The case of Volta. Science and Education, 10(1-2), 33-49. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008760521211
• Niaz, M. (1998). From cathode rays to alpha particles to quantum of action: A rational reconstruction of structure of the atom and its implications for chemistry textbooks. Science Education, 82(5), 527-552. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199809)82:5<527::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-B
• Niaz, M. (2009). Critical appraisal of physical science as a human enterprise: dynamics of scientific progress. Dordrecht: Springer.
• Niaz, M. & Coştu, B. (2009). Presentation of atomic structure in Turkish general chemistry textbooks. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 10(3), 233-240. https://doi.org/10.1039/B914503F
• Niaz, M. (2010). Are we teaching science as practiced by scientists? American Journal of Physics, 78(1), 5-6. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3238470
• Niaz, M. & Rodríguez, M. A. (2002). Improving learning by discussing controversies in 20th century physics. Physics Education, 37(1), 59-63. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/37/1/308
• Niaz, M., Kwon, S., Kim, N., & Lee, G. (2013). Do general physics textbooks discuss scientists’ ideas about atomic structure? A Case in Korea. Physics Education, 48(1), 57-64. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/48/1/57
• Rodríguez, M. A. & Niaz, M. (2004). A reconstruction of structure of the atom and its implications for general physics textbooks: A history and philosophy of science perspective. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(3), 409-424. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOST.0000045468.49500.3b
• Sequeira, M., & Leite, L. (1991). Alternative conceptions and history of science in physics teacher education. Science Education, 75(1), 45-56. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730750105

APA

Kwon, S., Lee, G., & Niaz, M. (2020). Toward Understanding the Structure of the Historical Controversy: Atomic Models as an Exemplar. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(12), em1914. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9148

Vancouver

Kwon S, Lee G, Niaz M. Toward Understanding the Structure of the Historical Controversy: Atomic Models as an Exemplar. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2020;16(12):em1914. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9148

AMA

Kwon S, Lee G, Niaz M. Toward Understanding the Structure of the Historical Controversy: Atomic Models as an Exemplar. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2020;16(12), em1914. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9148

Chicago

Kwon, Sangwoon, Gyoungho Lee, and Mansoor Niaz. "Toward Understanding the Structure of the Historical Controversy: Atomic Models as an Exemplar". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2020 16 no. 12 (2020): em1914. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9148

Harvard

Kwon, S., Lee, G., and Niaz, M. (2020). Toward Understanding the Structure of the Historical Controversy: Atomic Models as an Exemplar. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(12), em1914. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9148

MLA

Kwon, Sangwoon et al. "Toward Understanding the Structure of the Historical Controversy: Atomic Models as an Exemplar". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 16, no. 12, 2020, em1914. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9148