The Importance and Satisfaction of Collaboartive Innovation for Strategic Entrepreneurship

I-Chang Tsai; Han-Sheng Lei

doi:10.12973/eurasia.2015.1601a

Full Text (PDF)

I-Chang Tsai ¹ ^* , Han-Sheng Lei ¹

More Detail

¹ National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, TAIWAN^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

Building on network, learning, resource-based and real options theories, collaborative innovation through the sharing of ideas, knowledge, expertise, and opportunities can enable both small and large firms to successfully engage in strategic entrepreneurship. We use the real case of a research-oriented organization and its incubator for analysis to strengthen our claim that inter-organizational network, co-learning, resource allocation and real options all have a positive impact on innovation performance for both the research-oriented organization and the start-up companies in the incubator.

Keywords

collaborative innovation (CI)
strategic entrepreneurship (SE)
SERVQUAL
importance-performance analysis
science education

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, Volume 12, Issue 3, March 2016, 569-582

https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1601a

Publication date: 17 Jun 2016

Article Views: 2405

Article Downloads: 1168

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Anthony, S. D. (2012). The new corporate garage. Harvard Business Review,90(9), 44- 53.
Arora, A., & Fosfuri, A. (2003). Licensing the market for technology. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 52(2), 277-295.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage.Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120.
Battilana, J., & Dorado, S. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1419-1440.
Cheng, J. H., Lai, C. Y., Chen, H. P., & Ou, C. L. (2010, July). The service quality analysis of public transportation system using PZB model—Dynamic bus information system. In Computers and Industrial Engineering (CIE), 2010 40th International Conference on (pp. 1-5). IEEE. Chesbrough, H.W. 2003.
Chesbrough, H. W. (2006). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press.
Clay, A., & Paul, R. (2012). Open Innovation: A Muse for Scaling, Stanford Social Innovation Review, 17–18.
Lijphart, A., & Aitkin, D. (1994). Electoral systems and party systems: A study of twentyseven democracies, Oxford University Press.
Floyd, S. W., & Lane, P. J. (2000). Strategizing throughout the organization: Managing role conflict in strategic renewal. Academy of management review,25(1), 154-177.
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American journal of sociology, 1360-1380.
Grimaldi, R., Kenney, M., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2011). 30 years after Bayh–Dole: Reassessing academic entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 40(8), 1045-1057.
Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A., Camp, S. M., & Sexton, D. L. (2001). Integrating entrepreneurship and strategic management actions to create firm wealth. The Academy of Management Executive, 15(1), 49-63.
Kenney, M. & Mowery. D. (2014). Public Universities and Regional Development: Insights from the University of California System. Palo Alto, CA, Stanford University Press.
Ketchen, D. J., Ireland, R. D., & Snow, C. C. (2007). Strategic entrepreneurship, collaborative innovation, and wealth creation. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(3‐4), 371-385.
Link, A.N. & Siegel, D.S. (2007). Innovation, Entrepreneurship, and Technological Change. Oxford University Press: Oxford, U.K.
Martilla, J. A., & James, J. C. (1977). Importance-performance analysis. The journal of marketing, 41(1) 77-79.
Miles RE, Miles, G, & Snow, CC. (2005). Collaborative Entrepreneurship: How Communities of Networked Firms Use Continuous Innovation to Create Economic Wealth. Stanford University Press: Stanford, CA.
Mowery, D. (2002). The changing role of universities in the 21st century US R&D system. AAAS Science and Technology Policy Yearbook, 253-71.
Nambisan, S. (2009). Platforms for collaboration. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 7(3), 44-49.
Nambisan, S. & Sawhney. M. (2007a). The Global Brain: Your Roadmap for Innovating Faster and Smarter in a Networked World. Wharton School Publishing, PA.
Nambisan, S., & Sawhney, M. (2007). A buyer's guide to the innovation bazaar.Harvard Business Review, 85(6), 109.
Nambisan, S., Bacon, J., & Throckmorton, J. (2012). The role of the innovation capitalist in open innovation: A case study and key lessons learned. Research-Technology Management, 55(3), 49-57.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. the Journal of Marketing, 41-50.
Sharp, D. J. (1991). Uncovering the hidden value in high-risk investments. MIT Sloan Management Review, 32(4), 69–74.
Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D., & Link, A. (2003). Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study. Research policy, 32(1), 27-48.
Thompson JD. (1967). Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory. McGraw-Hill: New York.
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic management journal, 5(2), 171-180.

How to cite this article

APA

Tsai, I.-C., & Lei, H.-S. (2016). The Importance and Satisfaction of Collaboartive Innovation for Strategic Entrepreneurship. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(3), 569-582. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1601a

Vancouver

Tsai IC, Lei HS. The Importance and Satisfaction of Collaboartive Innovation for Strategic Entrepreneurship. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2016;12(3):569-82. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1601a

AMA

Tsai IC, Lei HS. The Importance and Satisfaction of Collaboartive Innovation for Strategic Entrepreneurship. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2016;12(3), 569-582. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1601a

Chicago

Tsai, I-Chang, and Han-Sheng Lei. "The Importance and Satisfaction of Collaboartive Innovation for Strategic Entrepreneurship". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2016 12 no. 3 (2016): 569-582. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1601a

Harvard

Tsai, I.-C., and Lei, H.-S. (2016). The Importance and Satisfaction of Collaboartive Innovation for Strategic Entrepreneurship. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(3), pp. 569-582. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1601a

MLA

Tsai, I-Chang et al. "The Importance and Satisfaction of Collaboartive Innovation for Strategic Entrepreneurship". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 12, no. 3, 2016, pp. 569-582. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1601a