Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• AlAli, R., & Wardat, Y. (2024). Enhancing student motivation and achievement in science classrooms through STEM education. STEM Education, 4(3), 183-198. https://doi.org/10.3934/steme.2024012
• Al-Barbari, R. S. I. (2020). The design patterns of fixed and variable length adaptive electronic tests and their impact on reducing test anxiety and developing attitudes towards electronic tests among students of the faculty of education. Educational Technology, 30(1), 23-87. https://doi.org/10.21608/tesr.2020.91492
• Alkan, V., & Deniz, K. (2023). Developing a computerized adaptive test form of the occupational field interest inventory. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 14(1), 47-61. https://doi.org/10.21031/epod.1153713
• Alneyadi, S., Abulibdeh, E., & Wardat, Y. (2023). The impact of digital environment vs. traditional method on literacy skills; reading and writing of Emirati fourth graders. Sustainability, 15(4), Article 3418. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043418
• Audrey, J. (2019). Study of exposure control methods using a variable-length computerized reducer using the partial credit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 43(8), 624-638. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621618824856
• Ayanwale, M. A., & Ndlovu, M. (2024). The feasibility of computerized adaptive testing of the national benchmark test: A simulation study. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 8(2), 95-112. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202425210
• Babcock, B., & Weiss, D. J. (2012). Termination criteria in computerized adaptive tests: Do variable-length CATs provide efficient and effective measurement? Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 1(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.7333/1212-0101001
• Bao, Y., Shen, Y., Wang, S., & Bradshaw, L. (2021). Flexible computerized adaptive tests to detect misconceptions and estimate ability simultaneously. Applied Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621620965730
• Bichi, A. A., & Talib, R. (2018). Item response theory: An introduction to latent trait models to test and item development. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 7(2), 142-151. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v7i2.12900
• Burhanettin, O. & Selahattin, G. (2022). Measuring language ability of students with compensatory multidimensional CAT: A post-hoc simulation study. Education and Information Technologies, 27, Article 62736294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10853-0
• Chen, S. K., Hou, L., & Dodd, B. G. (1998). A comparison of maximum likelihood estimation and expected a posteriori estimation in CAT using the partial credit model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58(4), 569-585. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164498058004004
• Choi, S. W., Grady, M. W., & Dodd, B. G. (2011). A new stopping rule for computerized adaptive testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71(1), 37-53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164410387338
• Dodd, B. G., Koch, W. R., & De Ayala, R. J. (1989). Operational characteristics of adaptive testing procedures using the graded response model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13(2), 129-143. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662168901300202
• Ebenbeck, N., & Gebhardt, M. (2022). Simulating computerized adaptive testing in special education based on inclusive progress monitoring data. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.945733
• Ebenbeck, N., Bastian, M., Mühling, A., & Gebhardt, M. (2024). Duration versus accuracy–What matters for computerised adaptive testing in schools? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(6), 3443-3453. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.13074
• Hambleton, R., & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item response theory: Principles and applications. Kluwer Nijhoff Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1988-9
• Hambleton, R., Swamination, H., & Rogers, H. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. SAGE.
• Hol, A. M., Vorst, H. C. M., & Mellenbergh, G. J. (2008). Computerized adaptive testing of personality traits. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 216(1), 12-21. https://doi.org/10.1027/0044-3409.216.1.12
• Hori, K., Fukuhara, H., & Yamada, T. (2021). Item response theory and its applications in educational measurement part II: Theory and practices of test equating. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 14(7), e1543. https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.1543
• Janpla, S., & Piriyasurawong, P. (2023). The architecture of an intelligent multilevel item bank system for higher education graduate standardized testing. Journal for ReAttach Therapy and Developmental Diversities, 6(9s[2]), 1393-1405.
• Jatobá, V. M. G., Farias, J. S., Freire, V., Ruela, A. S., & Delgado, K. V. (2020). ALICAT: A customized approach to item selection process in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society, 26, Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13173-020-00098-z
• Kalender, I., & Berberoglu, G. (2017). Can computerized adaptive testing work in students admission to higher education programs in Turkey? Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 17(2), 573-596.
• Lee, Y., & Kim, J. (2020). Efficiency of computerized adaptive testing in reducing item exposure. Psychological Methods, 25(3), 537-553.
• Leroux, A. J., & Dodd, B. G. (2014). A comparison of stopping rules for computerized adaptive screening measures using the rating scale model. Journal of Applied Measurement, 15(3), 213-226.
• Luo, H., Cai, Y., & Tu, D. (2020). Procedures to develop a computerized adaptive testing to advance the measurement of narcissistic personality. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01437
• Liu, Q., Zhuang, Y., Bi, H., Huang, Z., Huang, W., Li, J., Yu, J., Liu, Z., Hu, Z., Hong, Y., Pardos, Z. A., Ma, H., Zhu, M., Wang, S., & Chen, E. (2024). Survey of computerized adaptive testing: A machine learning perspective (arXiv:2404.00712). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.00712
• Magis, D., & Raîche, G. (2012). Random generation of response patterns under computerized adaptive testing with the R package cat R. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(8), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i08
• Magis, D., Yan, D., & Von Davier, A. (2017). Computer adaptive testing and multistage testing using R: Using packages cat R and mst R. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69218-0
• Mujtaba, D. F., & Mahapatra, N. R. (2020). Artificial intelligence in computerized adaptive testing. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (pp. 649-654). https://doi.org/10.1109/CSCI51800.2020.00116
• Nour ElDin, A. (2019). The effectiveness of computerized adaptive measurement in assessing university students’ achievement. Saudi Journal of Educational and Psychological Sciences, King Saud University, 64(5), 29-47.
• Özyurt, H., & Özyurt, Ö. (2015). Ability level estimation of students on probability unit via computerized adaptive testing. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, (58), 27-44.
• Rios, J. (2022). An examination of individual ability estimation and classification accuracy under rapid guessing misidentifications. Applied Measurement in Education, 35(4), 300-312. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2022.2155653
• Saleh, S., AlAli, R., Wardat, Y., Al-Qahtani, M., Soliman, Y., & Helali, M. (2023). Structural relationships between learning emotion and knowledge organization and management processes in distance learning environments: An applied study. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 13(9), 1569-1589. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13090114
• Stafford, R., Runyon, C., Casabianca, J., & Dodd, B. (2019). Comparing computer adaptive testing stopping rules under the generalized partial-credit model. Behavior Research Methods, 51(3), 1305-1320. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1068-x
• Stemler, S. E., & Naples, A. (2021). Rasch measurement v. Item response theory: Knowing when to cross the line. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 26, Article 11.
• Stoeckel, T., McLean, S., & Nation, P. (2021). Limitations of size and levels tests of written receptive vocabulary knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(1), 181-203. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226312000025X
• Tian, X., & Dai, B. (2020). Developing a computerized adaptive test to assess stress in Chinese college students. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00007
• van der Linden, W. J., & Glas, C. A. W. (Eds.). (2010). Elements of adaptive testing. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8
• Veldkamp, B. P., & Verschoor, A. J. (2019). Robust computerized adaptive testing. In B. P. Veldkamp, & C. Sluijter (Eds.), Theoretical and practical advances in computer-based educational measurement (pp. 291-305). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18480-3_15
• Wainer, H. (2000). Computerized adaptive testing: A primer. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410605931
• Wang, N., Wang, D., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Design of an adaptive examination system based on artificial intelligence recognition model. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 142, Article 106656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.106656
• Weiss, D. J., & Şahin, A. (2024). Computerized adaptive testing: From concept to implementation. The Guilford Press.
• Wulandari, F., Hadi, S., & Haryanto, H. (2020). Computer-based adaptive test development using fuzzy item response theory to estimate student ability. Computer Science and Information Technology, 8(3), 66-73. https://doi.org/10.13189/csit.2020.080302
• Yildiz, H., Tunaboylu Demir, C., Ulku, S., Giray, G., & Kelecioğlu, H. (2024). Investigation of measurement precision and test length in computerized adaptive tests under different conditions. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 15(1), 5-17. https://doi.org/10.21031/epod.1068572
• Zio, E. (2018). The future of risk assessment. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 177, 176-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2018.04.020
• Žitný, P., (2011). Presnosť, validita a efektívnosť počítačového adaptívneho testovania [Accuracy, validity, and effectiveness of computer-based adaptive testing]. Československá Psychologie, 55(2), 167-179.

APA

Dwahdh, L., & Alshraifin, N. (2025). The impact of computerized adaptive test termination rules on accuracy across different ability estimation methods. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(1), em2571. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15897

Vancouver

Dwahdh L, Alshraifin N. The impact of computerized adaptive test termination rules on accuracy across different ability estimation methods. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2025;21(1):em2571. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15897

AMA

Dwahdh L, Alshraifin N. The impact of computerized adaptive test termination rules on accuracy across different ability estimation methods. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2025;21(1), em2571. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15897

Chicago

Dwahdh, Lana, and Nedal Alshraifin. "The impact of computerized adaptive test termination rules on accuracy across different ability estimation methods". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2025 21 no. 1 (2025): em2571. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15897

Harvard

Dwahdh, L., and Alshraifin, N. (2025). The impact of computerized adaptive test termination rules on accuracy across different ability estimation methods. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(1), em2571. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15897

MLA

Dwahdh, Lana et al. "The impact of computerized adaptive test termination rules on accuracy across different ability estimation methods". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 21, no. 1, 2025, em2571. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15897