The effect of the 5E instructional model on students’ cognitive processes and their attitudes towards chemistry as a subject
Full Text (PDF)
More Detail
1 Department of Chemistry Didactics, Faculty of Science, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University in Košice, Košice, SLOVAKIA* Corresponding Author
Abstract
The research aim was to examine the effect of the 5E instructional model on students’ cognitive processes and attitudes towards chemistry as a subject. The research was performed at three Slovak grammar schools in the 1st year during the 2nd term of the 2021/2022 school year. This research employed the experimental approach with a quasi-experimental design that involved experimental and control groups. The research sample consisted of 218 students, and it was divided into two groups: the experimental group comprised 114 students (who studied using the 5E model) and the control group comprised 104 students (who studied conventionally). The intervention took place during eight lessons (four two-hour laboratory exercises). A set of inquiry-based activities for the “chemical reactions and equations” thematic unit verified via pilot research was implemented using the 5E model in the experimental group. The research used the following tools: the chemistry concepts test based on the revised Bloom’s taxonomy and a questionnaire to identify the attitudes of students towards chemistry as a subject. The chemistry concepts test results indicated that teaching with the 5E model was more effective than teaching without the 5E model in terms of developing cognitive processes. It affected all the observed cognitive processes (memorization, understanding, application, analysis, and evaluation). After teaching with 5E model, students’ attitudes in experimental group towards learning chemistry as a subject changed significantly. Finally, research presents some recommendations, including conducting more studies on 5E model-based strategy, cognitive processes, and attitudes towards science.
License
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Article Type: Research Article
EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, Volume 19, Issue 9, September 2023, Article No: em2317
https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13469
Publication date: 01 Sep 2023
Online publication date: 09 Jul 2023
Article Views: 2685
Article Downloads: 2317
Open Access References How to cite this articleReferences
- Abdi, A. (2014). The effect of inquiry-based learning method on students’ academic achievement in science course. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2(1), 37-41. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2014.020104
- Aguilera, D., & Perales-Palacios, F. J. (2020). What effects do didactic interventions have on students’ attitudes towards science? A meta-analysis. Research in Science Education, 50(2), 573-597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9702-2
- Amaliyah, T., Rusdianto, R., & Supeno, S. (2023). The effect of the 5E learning cycle model on the critical thinking skills of junior high school students in learning science. Prisma Sains: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu dan Pembelajaran Matematika dan IPA IKIP Mataram [Prisma Sains: Journal of the Study of Science and Learning Mathematics and IPA IKIP Mataram], 11(2), 253-266. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v11i2.7223
- Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom´s taxonomy of educational objectives. https://www.uky.edu/~rsand1/china2018/texts/Anderson-Krathwohl%20-%20A%20taxonomy%20for%20learning%20teaching%20and%20assessing.pdf
- Areepattamannil, S., Cairns, D., & Dickson, M. (2020). Teacher-directed versus inquiry-based science instruction: Investigating links to adolescent students’ science dispositions across 66 countries. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 31(6), 675-704. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2020.1753309
- Ash, D., Bartels, D., Dow, P., Dyasi, H., M., Harlen, W., Hein, G., E., Bell, B., K., Lee, S., Rankin, L., John, M., & Worth, K. (2003). Inquiry: Thoughts, views, and strategies for the K-5 classroom, volume 2 (Foundations: A monograph for professionals in science, mathematics, and technology education). National Science Foundation.
- Bakri, S., & Adnan, M. (2021). Effect of 5E learning model on academic achievement in teaching mathematics: Meta-analysis study. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(8), 196-204. https://doi.org/10.17762/turcomat.v12i8.2783
- Balansag, S. (2018). Improvement of the teaching style: From traditional teacher-centered to student-centered teaching style. GRIN Verlag.
- Bezen, S., & Bayrak, C. (2020). Determining students’ attitudes and views using an inquiry-based learning approach. Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 49(2), 555-599.
- Boakye, S., & Nabie, M. J. (2022). The effect of using the 5E instructional model on students’ performance in and motivation to learn sine rule and its applications. International Journal of Current Education Studies, 1(1), 14-35. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6625280
- Burns, J. C., Okey, J. R., & Wise, K. C. (1985). Development of an integrated process skill Test: TIPS II. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22(2), 169-177. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660220208
- Bybee, R. W. (2009). The BSCS 5E instructional model and 21st century skills. The National Academies Board on Science Education.
- Bybee, R. W. (2015). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Creating teachable moments. NSTA Press.
- Bybee, R. W. (2019). Using the BSCS 5E instructional model to introduce STEM disciplines. Science and Children, 56(6), 8-12. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/sc19_056_06_8
- Cahyarini, A., Rahayu, S., & Yahmin, Y. (2016). The effect of 5E learning cycle instructional model using socio scientific issues (SSI) learning context on students’ critical thinking. Indonesian Journal of Science Education, 5(2), 222-229.
- Cakir, N. K. (2017). Effect of 5E learning model on academic achievement, attitude and science process skills: Meta-analysis study. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(11), 157. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v5i11.2649
- Chen, R. H. (2021). Fostering students’ workplace communicative competence and collaborative mindset through an inquiry-based learning design. Education Sciences, 11(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11010017
- Chu, S. K. W., Reynolds, R. B., Tavares, N. J., Notari, M., & Lee, C. W. Y. (2017). 21st century skills development through inquiry-based learning. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2481-8
- Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
- Duncan, R., Pilitsis, V., & Piegaro, M. (2010). Development of preservice teachers’ ability to critique and adapt inquiry-based instructional materials. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-009-9153-8
- Duran, L. B., & Duran, E. (2004). The 5E instructional model: A learning cycle approach for inquiry-based science teaching. The Science Education Review, 3(2), 49-58.
- Ergul, R., Simskeli, Y., Calis, S., Ozdilek, Z., Gocmencelebi, S., & Sanli, M. (2011). The effects of inquiry‐based science teaching on elementary school students’ science process skills and science attitudes. Bulgarian Journal of Science and Education Policy, 5(1), 48-66.
- ESTABLISH. (2011). Guide for developing ESTABLISH teaching and learning units. ESTABLISH project. http://www.establish-fp7.eu/sites/default/files/general/ESTABLISH_D3-4_GUIDE_UNITS_0.pdf
- Fazio, X., Melville, W., & Bartley, A. (2010). The problematic nature of the practicum: A key determinant of pre-service teachers’ emerging inquiry-based science practices. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21, 665-681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-010-9209-9
- Fogleman, J., McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2011). Examining the effect of teachers’ adaptations of a middle school science inquiry-oriented curriculum unit on student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(2), 149-169. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20399
- Fradd, S. H., Lee, O., Sutman, F. X., & Kim, S. M. (2015). Promoting! science literacy with English language learners through instructional materials development: A case study. Bilingual Research Journal, 25(4), 417-439. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2001.11074464
- Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
- Garcia I Grau, F., Valls, C., Piqué, N., & Ruiz-Martín, H. (2021). The long-term effects of introducing the 5E model of instruction on students’ conceptual learning. International Journal of Science Education, 43(9), 1441-1458. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1918354
- Gibson, H. L., & Chase, C. (2002). Longitudinal impact of an inquiry-based science program on middle school students’ attitudes toward science. Science Education, 86(5), 693-705. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10039
- Gillies, R. M., & Rafter, M. (2020). Using visual, embodied, and language representations to teach the 5E instructional model of inquiry science. Teaching and Teacher Education, 87, 102951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102951
- Gormally, C. Peggy, B., & Mary, L. (2012). Developing a test of scientific literacy skills (TOSLS): Measuring undergraduates’ evaluation of scientific information and arguments. CBE Life Science Education, 11(4), 364-377. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-03-0026
- Guven, G., Kozcu Cakir, N., Sulun, Y., Cetin, G., & Guven, E. (2020). Arduino-assisted robotics coding applications integrated into the 5E learning model in science teaching. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1812136
- Guzel, H. (2017). The effect of electric current teaching based upon the 5E model on academic achievement and attitudes of students. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 18(2), 1-21.
- Ha, V. T., Chung, L. H., Hanh, N. V., & Hai, B. M. (2023). Teaching science using argumentation supported 5E-STEM, 5E-STEM, and conventional didactic methods: Differences in the learning outcomes of middle school students. Education Sciences, 13(3), 247. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13030247
- Harlen, W. (2021). The case for inquiry-based science education–IBSE. InterAcademy Partnership.
- Hugerat, M., & Kortam, N. (2014). Improving higher-order thinking skills among freshmen by teaching science through inquiry. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(5), 447-454. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1107a
- Iscan, Y., & Seyhan, H. (2021). The effect of the 5E learning model supported with material ensuring conceptual change on science achievement: The example of “heat and temperature”. Mimbar Sekolah Dasar [Elementary School Platform], 8(3), 250-280. https://doi.org/10.53400/mimbar-sd.v8i3.33044
- Itsarangkul Na Ayutthaya, T., & Damrongpanit, S. (2022). A meta-analysis of instructional management models affecting creative thinking development. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(4), 2069-2085. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.4.2069
- Ješková, Z., Lukáč, S., Hančová, M., Šnajder, Ľ., Guniš, J., Balogová, B., & Kireš, M. (2016). Efficacy of inquiry-based learning in mathematics, physics and informatics in relation to the development of students’ inquiry skills. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(5), 559-574. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/16.15.559
- Ješková, Z., Lukáč, S., Šnajder, Ľ., Guniš, J., Klein, D., & Kireš, M. (2022). Active learning in STEM education with regard to the development of inquiry skills. Education Sciences, 12, 686. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100686
- Jiang, F., & McComas, W. F. (2015). The effects of inquiry teaching on student science achievement and attitudes: Evidence from propensity score analysis of PISA data. International Journal of Science Education, 37(3), 554-576. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.1000426
- Kang, J., & Keinonen, T. (2017). The effect of student-centered approaches on students’ interest and achievement in science: Relevant topic-based, open and guided inquiry-based, and discussion-based approaches. Research in Science Education, 48(4), 865-885. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9590-2
- Kekule, M., & Žák, V. (2014). The impact of inquiry based science education on second level students. ESTABLISH project. http://www.establish-fp7.eu/sites/default/files/general/ESTABLISH_D6-1_IMPACT_ON_STUDENTS_0.pdf
- Kim, M., & Tan, A.-L. (2011). Rethinking difficulties of teaching inquiry-based practical work: Stories from elementary pre-service teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 33(4), 465-486. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500691003639913
- Kireš, M., Ješková, Z., Ganajová, M., & Kimáková, K. (2016). Bádateľské aktivity v prírodovednom vzdelávaní [Inquiry activities in science education]. Štátny Pedagogický Ústav [National Institute for Education].
- Kmeťová, J., Silný, P., Medveď, M., & Vydrová, M. (2010). Chémia pre 1. ročník gymnázia [Chemistry for the 1st year gymnasium]. Expol Pedagogika.
- Kong, S. C., & Song, Y. (2014). The impact of a principle-based pedagogical design on inquiry-based learning in a seamless learning environment in Hong Kong. Educational Technology & Society, 17(2), 127-141.
- Kosturková, M., Ferencová, J., & Šuťáková, V. (2018). Critical thinking as an important part of the curriculum reform in Slovakia: Examining the phenomenon in the Slovak journals. Orbis Scholae, 12(1), 27-50. https://doi.org/10.14712/23363177.2018.283
- Koyunlu Unlu, Z., & Dokme, I. (2022). A systematic review of 5E model in science education: proposing a skill-based STEM instructional model within the 21-st century skills. International Journal of Science Education, 44(13), 2110-2130. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2114031
- Kruse, D. (2009). Thinking tools for the inquiry classroom. Curriculum Corporation.
- Lasaiba, M. (2023). The effectiveness of the 5E learning cycle model as an effort to optimize students’ activities and learning outcomes. Edu Sciences Journal, 4(1), 11-21. https://doi.org/10.30598/edusciencesvol4iss1pp11-21
- Levy, B. L. M., Thomas, E. E., Drago, K., & Rex, L. A. (2013). Examining studies of inquiry-based learning in three fields of education: Sparking generative conversation. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(5), 387-408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487113496430
- Lin, J. L., Cheng, M. F., Chang, Y. C., Li, H. W., Chang, J. Y., & Lin, D. M. (2014). Learning activities that combine science magic activities with the 5E instructional model to influence secondary-school students’ attitudes to science. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(5), 415-426. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1103a
- Liu, C., Zowghi, D., Kearney, M., & Bano, M. (2021). Inquiry-based mobile learning in secondary school science education: A systematic review. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12505
- Ma, X., & Kishor, N. (1997). Assessing the relationship between attitude toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics: A meta analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(1), 26-47. https://doi.org/10.2307/749662
- Maltese, A. V., & Tai, R. H. (2011). Pipeline persistence: Examining the association of educational experiences with earned degrees in STEM among U.S. students. Science Education, 95(5), 877-907. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20441
- Maxwell, D. O., Lambeth, D. T., & Cox, J. T. (2015). Effects of using inquiry-based learning on science achievement for fifth-grade students. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 16(21), 1-31.
- Melville, W., Fazio, X., Bartley, A., & Jones, D. (2008). Experience and reflection: Preservice science teachers’ capacity for teaching inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19, 477-494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-008-9104-9
- Miarti, E., Hasnunidah, N., & Abdurrahman, A. (2021). The effect of learning cycle 5E on critical thinking skills for junior high school students. Scientiae Educatia: Journal Pendidikan Sains [Science Education: Journal Pendidikan Sains], 10(2), 177-183. https://doi.org/10.24235/sc.educatia.v10i2.9127
- Miklovičová, J., & Valovič, J. (2019). PISA 2018: Národná správa Slovensko [PISA 2018: Slovakia national report]. Národný Ústav Certifikovaných Meraní Vzdelávania [National Institute for Certified Educational Measurements]. https://www.nucem.sk/dl/4636/Narodna_sprava_PISA_2018.pdf
- Miklovičová, J., Galabová, A., Valovič, J., & Gondžúrová, K. (2017). PISA 2015: Národná správa Slovensko [PISA 2015: Slovakia national report]. Národný Ústav Certifikovaných Meraní Vzdelávania [National Institute for Certified Educational Measurements]. https://www.nucem.sk/dl/3482/NS_PISA_2015.pdf
- Mubarok, H., Suprapto, N., & Adam, A. S. (2019). Using inquiry-based laboratory to improve students’ higher-order thinking skills (HOTs). Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1171(1), 012040. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1171/1/012040
- NICEM. (2015). Metodika tvorby testových úloh a testov [Methodology for creating test tasks and tests]. https://www.etest.sk/data/files/1969_metodika-tvorby_final-2016.pdf
- Nicol, C. B., Gakuba, E., & Habinshuti, G. (2022). Effects of inquiry-based chemistry experimentation on students’ attitudes towards the teaching and learning of chemistry. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 21(4), 663-679. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/22.21.663
- NIE. (2014). Štátny vzdelávací program pre vyššie sekundárne vzdelávanie [The state education program for upper secondary education]. https://www.statpedu.sk/sk/svp/inovovany-statny-vzdelavaci-program/inovovany-svp-gymnazia-so-stvorrocnym-patrocnym-vzdelavacim-programom/
- OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 results (volume II): Policies and practices for successful schools. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264267510-en
- Ong, E. T., Govindasay, A., Salleh, S. M., Tajuddin, N. M., Rahman, N. A., & Borhan, M. T. (2018). 5E inquiry learning model: Its effect on science achievement among Malaysian year 5 Indian students. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(12), 348-360. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i12/5017
- Osborne, J. F., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science Education in Europe. Nuffield Foundation.
- Ozkul, H., & Ozden, M. (2020). Investigation of the effects of engineering-oriented STEM integration activities on scientific process skills and STEM career interests: A mixed methods study. Education and Science, 45(204), 41-63. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2020.8870
- Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., De Jong, T., Van Riesen, S. A., Kamp, E. T., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
- Potvin, P., & Hasni, A. (2014). Interest, motivation and attitude towards science and technology at K‐12 levels: A systematic review of 12 years of educational research. Studies in Science Education, 50(1), 85-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2014.881626
- Potvin, P., Hasni, A., & Sy, O. (2017). Using inquiry-based interventions to improve secondary student’s interest in science and technology. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(3), 262-270. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/9510
- Radmehr, F., & Drake, M. (2019). Revised Bloom’s taxonomy and major theories and frameworks that influence the teaching, learning, and assessment of mathematics: A comparison. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 50(6), 895-920. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2018.1549336
- Ramlee, N., Rosli, M. S., & Saleh, N. S. (2019). Mathematical HOTS cultivation via online learning environment and 5E inquiry model: Cognitive impact and the learning activities. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(24), 140-151. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i24.12071
- Risko, C. (2017). Hot and cold packs: A thermochemistry activity. Carolina Biological Supply Company. https://www.carolina.com/teacher-resources/Interactive/hot-and-cold-packs-a-thermochemistry-activity/tr29415.tr
- Roehrig, G. H., & Luft, J. A. (2004). Inquiry teaching in high school chemistry classrooms: The role of knowledge and beliefs. Journal of Chemical Education, 81(10), 1510-1516. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed081p1510
- Ruiz-Martín, H., & Bybee, R.W. (2022). The cognitive principles of learning underlying the 5E Model of Instruction. International Journal of STEM Education, 9, 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00337-z
- Rychtera, J., Bílek, M., Bártová, I., Chroustová, K., Kolář, K., Machková, V., Sloup, R., Šmídl, M., Štrofová, J., Votrubcová, Š., & Wolfová R. (2020). Kritická místa kurikula chemie na 2. stupni základní školy [Critical points of the chemistry curriculum at the lower secondary school]. Západočeská Univerzita v Plzni [University of West Bohemia in Pilsen].
- Saritas, E. (2016). Relationship between philosophical preferences of classroom teachers and their teaching styles. Educational Research and Reviews, 11(16), 1533-1541. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2016.2787
- Savelsbergh, E., Prins, G., Rietbergen, C., Fechner, S., Vaessen, B., Draijer, J., & Bakker, A. (2016). Effects of innovative science and mathematics teaching on student attitudes and achievement: A meta-analytic study. Educational Research Review, 19, 158-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.07.003
- Shadish, W. R., Cook, T., & Campbell, D. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.
- Shivam P. K., & Mohalik R. (2022). Effectiveness of ICT integrated 5E learning model on higher-order thinking skills in biology at secondary level. Current Research Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 5(1), 34-41. https://doi.org/10.12944/CRJSSH.5.1.05
- Singh, K., Granville, M., & Dika, S. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement: Effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(6), 323-332. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670209596607
- SPSS Inc. (2009). PASW statistics for Windows, version 18.0. SPSS Inc.
- Srisawasdi, N., & Panjaburee, P. (2015). Exploring effectiveness of simulation-based inquiry learning in science with integration of formative assessment. Journal of Computers in Education, 2(3), 323-352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-015-0037-y
- Suryanti, Arifin, I. S. Z., & Baginda, U. (2018). The application of inquiry learning to train critical thinking skills on light material of primary school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1108, 012128. http://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1108/1/012128
- Suwito, B., Handoyo, B., & Susilo, S. (2020). The effects of 5E learning cycle assisted with spatial based population geography textbook on students’ achievement. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 315-324. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13121a
- Tamir, P., & Lunetta, V. N. (1981). Inquiry-related tasks in high school science laboratory. Science Education, 65(5), 477-484. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730650503
- Tolba, E. G. A., & Al-Osaimi, A. M. (2023). The effectiveness of using the model-based thinking strategy in developing first-grade high school students’ physical concepts and inquiry thinking skills. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(4), em2254. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13111
- Ugwuanyi, C. S., Ezema, M. J., & Orji, E. I. (2023). Evaluating the instructional efficacies of conceptual change models on students’ conceptual change achievement and self-efficacy in particulate nature matter in physics. SAGE Open, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231153851
- Vafaeikia, M., Marandi, S., & Siyyari, M. (2023). Exploring the role of 5E-based online activities in English language students’ critical thinking and creativity. Issues in Language Teaching, 12(1), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.22054/ilt.2022.69234.723
- Van den Berg, E. (2013). The PCK of laboratory teaching: Turning manipulation of equipment into manipulation of ideas. Scientia in Educatione [Science in Education], 4(2), 74-92. https://doi.org/10.14712/18047106.86
- Varoglu, L., Yilmaz, A., & Sen, S. (2023). Effect of 5E learning cycle assisted with concept maps on conceptual understanding. Pedagogical Research, 8(3), em0161. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/13167
- Vorholzer, A., & von Aufschnaiter, C. (2019). Guidance in inquiry-based instruction: An attempt to disentangle a manifold construct. International Journal of Science Education, 41(11), 1562-1577. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1616124
- Wale, B., & Bishaw, K. (2020). Effects of using inquiry-based learning on EFL students’ critical thinking skills. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 5(9) 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-020-00090-2
- Wenning, C. J. (2007). Assessing inquiry skills as a component of scientific literacy. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online, 4(2), 21-24.
- Wiriani, N. M. A., & Ardana, I. M. (2022). The impact of the 5E learning cycle model based on the STEM approach on scientific attitudes and science learning outcomes. MIMBAR PGSD Undiksha, 10(2), 300-307. https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpgsd.v10i2.48515
- Wolf, S. J., & Fraser, B. J. (2008). Learning environment, attitudes and achievement among middle‐school science students using inquiry‐based laboratory activities. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 321-341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9052-y
- Zion, M., & Mendelovici, R. (2012). Moving from structured to open inquiry: Challenges and limits. Science Education International, 23(4), 383-399.
- Zohar, A. (2000). Inquiry learning as higher-order thinking: Overcoming cognitive obstacles. In Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 405-424). American Association for the Advancement of Science.
- Zohar, A., & Dori, Y. J. (2003). Higher-order thinking skills and low achieving students: Are they mutually exclusive. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 145-182. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1202_1
- Zoller, U. (2011). Science and technology education in the STES context in primary schools: What should it take? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(5), 444-453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9306-3
How to cite this article
APA
Sotáková, I., & Ganajová, M. (2023). The effect of the 5E instructional model on students’ cognitive processes and their attitudes towards chemistry as a subject. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(9), em2317. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13469
Vancouver
Sotáková I, Ganajová M. The effect of the 5E instructional model on students’ cognitive processes and their attitudes towards chemistry as a subject. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2023;19(9):em2317. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13469
AMA
Sotáková I, Ganajová M. The effect of the 5E instructional model on students’ cognitive processes and their attitudes towards chemistry as a subject. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2023;19(9), em2317. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13469
Chicago
Sotáková, Ivana, and Mária Ganajová. "The effect of the 5E instructional model on students’ cognitive processes and their attitudes towards chemistry as a subject". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2023 19 no. 9 (2023): em2317. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13469
Harvard
Sotáková, I., and Ganajová, M. (2023). The effect of the 5E instructional model on students’ cognitive processes and their attitudes towards chemistry as a subject. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(9), em2317. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13469
MLA
Sotáková, Ivana et al. "The effect of the 5E instructional model on students’ cognitive processes and their attitudes towards chemistry as a subject". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 19, no. 9, 2023, em2317. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13469