Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Asadullin, R. M. (2009). Reform priorities of teacher education. Retrieved from http://oprb.ru/data/part-ner/8/message/7Gu7J871_2840.pdf.
• Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to Meta-Analysis. London: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470743386.
• Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2010). A basic introduction to fixed‐effect and random‐effects models for meta‐analysis. Research synthesis methods, 1(2), 97-111. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.12.
• Brock, L. L., Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., & Wanless, S. B. (2014). Delay of gratification in first grade: The role of instructional context. Learning and Individual Differences, 29, 81-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.10.012.
• Carr, M., & Borkowski, J. G. (1989). Attributional training and the generalization of reading strategies with underachieving children. Learning and Individual Differences, 1(3), 327-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/1041-6080(89)90015-0.
• Chilingaryan, K. P., & Gorbatenko, R. G. (2014). Competence and competency. Ability and motivation. Language, Individual & Society. Journal of International Scientific Publications, 8, 40-53.
• Cohen, J. S., & Smerdon, B. A. (2009). Tightening the dropout tourniquet: Easing the transition from middle to high school. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 53(3), 177-184. https://doi.org/10.3200/PSFL.53.3.177-184.
• Delamare, F. L., & Winterton, J. (2007). What Is Competence? Human Resource Development International, 8, 27-46.
• Duan, Q., Jiao, J., Chen, X., & Wang, X. (2018). Association between water fluoride and the level of children’s intelligence: a dose–response meta-analysis. Public Health, 154, 87-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2017.08.013.
• Erdniyev, O. P. (2001) Genesis of Methodical System of Enlargement of Didactic Unities (EDU) in the Works of the Academician Erdniyev P. M. Bulletin of the Kalmyk Institute of Social, Economic, and Legal Studies, 2, 172-185.
• Gein, A. G., & Nekrasov, V. P. (2013). Metacognitive Invariants as Psychological-Pedagogical Factors of Training. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 1(2), 128-132.
• Gorev, P. M., & Masalimova, A. R. (2017). Development of Meta-subject Competencies of the 7-9 Grades Basic School Students through the Implementation of Interdisciplinary Mathematical Courses. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3919-3933.
• Gorev, P. M., Masalimova, A. R., Mukhametzyanova, F. S., & Makarova, E. V. (2017). Developing Creativity of Schoolchildren through the Course “Developmental Mathematics.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 1799-1815. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00698a.
• Guruzhapov, V. A. (2012). The problem of interdisciplinary competence assessment of the subjects. Psychological science and education, 3, 64-66.
• Hu, B. Y., Ren, J., Lo, C. C., Roberts, S. K., Yang, Y., & Vong, K. I. (2018). Chinese kindergarten teachers’ use of instructional support strategies during whole-group language lessons. Teaching and Teacher Education, 70, 34-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.10.016.
• Illushin, L., Hufton, N., Willis, W., & Elliott, J. (2005). Motivation, engagement, and educational performance: International perspectives on the contexts for learning. London: Springer.
• Khutorskoy, A. V. (2003). Didactic heuristics: Theory and technology of creative learning. Moscow: AST.
• Khutorskoy, A. V., & Kraevskiy, V. V. (2008). Meta-subject functions of educational competencies. Teaching basics: Didactic studies, 5, 140-144.
• Khuziakhmetov, A. N., & Sytina, N.S. (2016). Educational Process Navigator as Means of Creation of Individual Educational Path of a Student. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(9), 2255-2264.
• Khuziakhmetova, A. N., & Naumova, M. V. (2016). Diagnostics of Pupils’ Meta-Subject Competence during Lessons on Mathematics in Secondary Schools. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(9), 2333-2342.
• Konovko, O. V. (2012). The possibilities of modern mathematical education in school. Teacher education in the Altai, 1, 377-380.
• Köymen, B., & Tomasello, M. (2018). Children’s meta-talk in their collaborative decision making with peers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 166, 549-566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.09.018.
• Kraevskiy, V. V., & Khutorskoy, A. V. (2003). Subject and meta-subject in educational standards. Pedagogy, 2, 3-10.
• Lebedev, O. E. (2004). Competence approach in education. School of technology, 5, 3-12.
• Leontiev, A. N. (1956). A child’s mental development. Moscow: Academia.
• Lerner, I. Y. (2003). Didactic bases of teaching methods. Moscow: Pedagogy.
• Masalimova, A. R. (2017). Development of Meta-subject Competencies of the 7-9 Grades Basic School Students through the Implementation of Interdisciplinary Mathematical Courses. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3919-3933.
• Miller, P. H. (1994). Individual differences in children’s strategic behaviors: Utilization deficiencies. Learning and Individual Differences, 6(3), 285-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/1041-6080(94)90019-1.
• Novikov, A. M. (2010). The Foundation of pedagogy. Moscow: Evges.
• Osgood, C. E., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1955). The principle of congruity in the prediction of attitude change. Psychological Review, 62,42-55. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048153.
• Praet, M., & Desoete, A. (2014). Enhancing young children’s arithmetic skills through non-intensive, computerised kindergarten interventions: A randomised controlled study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 39, 56-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.12.003.
• Quail, A., & Smyth, E. (2014). Multigrade teaching and age composition of the class: The influence on academic and social outcomes among students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 43, 80-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.06.004.
• Rubinstein, M. M. (1913). Essay on educational psychology in the context of General pedagogy. Moscow: AST.
• Sanderse, W., Walker, D. I., & Jones, C. (2015) Developing the whole child in an age of academic measurement: Can this be done according to U.K. teachers? Teaching and Teacher Education, 47, 195-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.01.010.
• Semenov, A. L. & Atasyan, S. L. (2014). Formation of mathematical competence in primary school. Science and school, 5, 7-12.
• Sneed, T. G., Carlson, J. S., & Little, T. D. (1994). The relationship of teacher and parent ratings of academically related personality traits to academic performance in elementary age students. Learning and Individual Differences, 6(1), 37-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/1041-6080(94)90014-0.
• Sopegina, V. T., Chapaev, N. K., & Simonova, M. V. (2016). Integration of Pedagogical and Technological Knowledge in Forming Meta-Competencies of a Modern Worker. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 11(15), 216-225.
• Steinberg, V. E., & Khuziakhmetov, A. N. (2016). Logical-Semantic Visual Navigators-Aids for Teachers. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(8), 1877-1887.
• Testov, V. A. (2014). Problems of realization of the concept of development of mathematical education. Actual problems of teaching in mathematics, 2, 152-154.
• The concept of development of mathematical education in the Russian Federation. (2013). The Russian newspaper. Retrieved from http://www.rg.ru/2013/12/27/matematika-sitedok.html.
• Verbitskiy, A. A., & Ermakova, O. B. (2009). School contextual learning as a model of realization of competence approach in General education. Innovative programs and projects in education, 4, 22-25.
• Voltmer, K., & Salisch, M. V. (2017). Three meta-analyses of children’s emotion knowledge and their school success. Learning and Individual Differences, 59, 107-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.08.006.
• Vygotskiy, L. S. (1999). Educational psychology. Moscow: Pedagogika Press.
• Yakushev, M. V. (2013). Concerning a possible approach to students’ learning outcomes assessment. European journal of Social Sciences, 7, 105-106.

APA

Asadullin, R. M., Naumova, M. V., Vlasova, V. K., Akhmetova, D. Z., & Zubova, S. P. (2018). Technological Features of Meta-Subject Expertise Development in Mathematical Education of Secondary School Students of 5^th Grades. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(12), em1622. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/95126

Vancouver

Asadullin RM, Naumova MV, Vlasova VK, Akhmetova DZ, Zubova SP. Technological Features of Meta-Subject Expertise Development in Mathematical Education of Secondary School Students of 5^th Grades. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2018;14(12):em1622. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/95126

AMA

Asadullin RM, Naumova MV, Vlasova VK, Akhmetova DZ, Zubova SP. Technological Features of Meta-Subject Expertise Development in Mathematical Education of Secondary School Students of 5^th Grades. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2018;14(12), em1622. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/95126

Chicago

Asadullin, Rail M., Marina V. Naumova, Vera K. Vlasova, Daniya Z. Akhmetova, and Svetlana P. Zubova. "Technological Features of Meta-Subject Expertise Development in Mathematical Education of Secondary School Students of 5^th Grades". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2018 14 no. 12 (2018): em1622. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/95126

Harvard

Asadullin, R. M., Naumova, M. V., Vlasova, V. K., Akhmetova, D. Z., and Zubova, S. P. (2018). Technological Features of Meta-Subject Expertise Development in Mathematical Education of Secondary School Students of 5^th Grades. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(12), em1622. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/95126

MLA

Asadullin, Rail M. et al. "Technological Features of Meta-Subject Expertise Development in Mathematical Education of Secondary School Students of 5^th Grades". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 14, no. 12, 2018, em1622. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/95126