Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Ahmadi, S. D., & Marandi, S. S. (2014). Social software in the classroom: The case of wikis for scaffolding. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 100-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.394
• Ahmed, I., & Chao, T. (2018). Assistive learning technologies for students with visual impairments: A critical rehumanizing review. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 10(3), 173-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2018.1463005
• Alzahrani, J. I., & Emsley, M. W. (2013). The impact of contractors’ attributes on construction project success: A post construction evaluation. International Journal of Project Management, 31(2), 313-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.06.006
• Apriwanda, W., & Hanri, C. (2022). Level of creative thinking among prospective chemistry teachers. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia [Journal of Indonesian Science Education], 11(2), 296-302. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i2.34572
• Ayu, H. D., & Sarwanto, S. (2019). Analysis of seismic signal in order to determine subsurface characteristics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1375, 012079. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1375/1/012079
• Ayu, H. D., Jufriadi, A., Mustika, S. E., Kurniawati, M., Pratiwi, H. Y., Sundaygara, C., & Hudha, M. N. (2021). How to learn oscillation and wave in SAMR framework? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1869, 012160. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1869/1/012160
• Azid, N., & Md-Ali, R. (2020). The effect of the successful intelligence interactive module on Universiti Utara Malaysia students’ analytical, creative and practical thinking skills. South African Journal of Education, 40(3), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v40n3a1743
• Barker, R. (2019). Creatives talk technology: Exploring the role and influence of digital media in the creative process of advertising art directors and copywriters. Media Practice and Education, 20(3), 244-259. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741136.2018.1464741
• Boelens, R., De Wever, B., & Voet, M. (2017). Four key challenges to the design of blended learning: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 22, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.06.001
• Bray, A., & Tangney, B. (2017). Technology usage in mathematics education research–A systematic review of recent trends. Computers and Education, 114, 255-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.004
• Canton, A., Torrents, C., Ric, A., & Guerrero, I. (2021). Exploratory behavior and the temporal structure of soccer small-sided games to evaluate creativity in children. Creativity Research Journal, 33(1), 16-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2020.1836878
• Capraro, M., Whitfield, J. G., Etchells, M. J., & Capraro, R. M. (2016). A companion to interdisciplinary STEM project based learning. Sense. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-485-5
• Chan, Z. C. Y. (2013). Critical thinking and creativity in nursing: Learners’ perspectives. Nurse Education Today, 33(5), 558-563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2012.09.007
• Chien, Y. C., Liu, M. C., & Wu, T. T. (2020). Discussion-record-based prediction model for creativity education using clustering methods. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36, 100650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100650
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design. SAGE.
• Cserháti, G., & Szabó, L. (2014). The relationship between success criteria and success factors in organizational event projects. International Journal of Project Management, 32(4), 613-624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.08.008
• Cummings, J. B., & Blatherwict, M. L. (2017). Creative dimensions of teaching and learning in the 21^st century. Sense. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-047-9
• Dwiyogo, W. D. (2018). Developing a blended learning-based method for problem-solving in capability learning. TOJET: Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 17(1), 51-61.
• Elastika, R. W., Sukono, & Dewanto, S. P. (2021). Analysis of factors affecting students’ mathematics learning difficulties using SEM as information for teaching improvement. International Journal of Instruction, 14(4), 281-300. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14417a
• Ernawati, M. D. W., Sudarmin, S., Asrial, A., Muhammad, D., & Haryanto, H. (2022). Creative thinking of chemistry and chemistry education students in biochemistry learning through problem based learning with scaffolding strategy. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia [Journal of Indonesian Science Education], 11(2), 282-295. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i2.33842
• Genlott, A. A., Grönlund, Å., Viberg, O., & Andersson, A. (2021). Leading dissemination of digital, science-based innovation in school–a case study. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1955272
• Glaveanu, V. P., Ness, I. J., & de Saint Laurent, C. (2020). Creativity, learning and technology: Opportunities, challenges and new horizons. Creativity Research Journal, 32(1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2020.1712167
• Gube, M., & Lajoie, S. (2020). Adaptive expertise and creative thinking: A synthetic review and implications for practice. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100630
• Haase, J., Hoff, E. V., Hanel, P. H. P., & Innes-Ker, Å. (2018). A meta-analysis of the relation between creative self-efficacy and different creativity measurements. Creativity Research Journal, 30(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2018.1411436
• Hamilton, E. R., Rosenberg, J. M., & Akcaoglu, M. (2016). The substitution augmentation modification redefinition (SAMR) model: A critical review and suggestions for its use. TechTrends, 60(5), 433-441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0091-y
• Han, S., Yalvac, B., & Capraro, M. M. (2015). In-service teachers’ implementation and understanding of STEM project based learning. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(1), 63-76. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1306a
• Hashimi, S. Al, Muwali, A. Al, & Zaki, Y. (2019). The effectiveness of social media and multimedia-based pedagogy in enhancing creativity among art, design, and digital media students. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(21), 176-190. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i21.10596
• Henriksen, D., Mishra, P., & Fisser, P. (2016). Infusing creativity and technology in 21^st century education: A systemic view for change. Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 27-37.
• Hernawan, A. H., Septiana, A. I., Rachman, I., Darmawan, D., & Kodama, Y. (2022). Environmental education in elementary school with Kamiholo: Kamishibai and hologram as teaching multimedia. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia [Journal of Indonesian Science Education], 11(2), 229-236. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i2.31918
• Hilton, J. T. (2016). A case study of the application of SAMR and TPACK for reflection on technology integration into two social studies classrooms. The Social Studies, 107(2), 68-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2015.1124376
• Hoffmann, J., Ivcevic, Z., & Brackett, M. (2016). Creativity in the age of technology: Measuring the digital creativity of millennials. Creativity Research Journal, 28(2), 149-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2016.1162515
• Janthon, U., Songkram, N., & Koraneekij, P. (2015). Work-based blended learning and technological scaffolding system to enhance communication skills for caregivers under local administrative organization, Ministry of Interior, Thailand (part I). Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 984-991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.722
• Jude, L., Kajura, M., & Birevu, M. (2014). Adoption of the SAMR model to asses ICT pedagogical adoption: A Case of Makerere University. International Journal of E-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning, 4(2), 106-115. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijeeee.2014.v4.312
• Jufriadi, A., & Ayu, H. D. (2019). Investigation of resistivity for delineation aquifer layers and subsurface structures. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1381, 012067. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1381/1/012067
• Jufriadi, A., Ayu, H. D., & Pratiwi, H. Y. (2019). Developing e-scaffolding integrated with e- assessment to improve student’s mastery of concept. In Proceedings of the 1^st International Conference on Education and Social Science Research (pp. 176-179). https://doi.org/10.2991/icesre-18.2019.37
• Karwowski, M., Gralewski, J., Patston, T., Cropley, D. H., & Kaufman, J. C. (2020). The creative student in the eyes of a teacher: A cross-cultural study. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100636
• Kock, N., & Hadaya, P. (2018). Minimum sample size estimation in PLS‐SEM: The inverse square root and gamma‐exponential methods. Information Systems Journal, 28(1), 227-261. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12131
• Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741319300303
• Lou, S. J., Chou, Y. C., Shih, R. C., & Chung, C. C. (2017). A study of creativity in CaC₂ steamship-derived STEM project-based learning. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 2387-2404. https://doi.org/10.12973/EURASIA.2017.01231A
• Ma, W. W. K., Kwan, R., Lee, G., Lam, J., & Au, O. (Eds.). (2013). Hybrid learning: Theory, application & practice. City University of Hong Kong & University of Toronto School of Continuing.
• Martínez-Cerdá, J. F., Torrent-Sellens, J., & González-González, I. (2020). Socio-technical e-learning innovation and ways of learning in the ICT-space-time continuum to improve the employability skills of adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 107, 105753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.10.019
• Martín-Gutiérrez, J., Mora, C. E., Añorbe-Díaz, B., & González-Marrero, A. (2017). Virtual technologies trends in education. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(2), 469-486. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00626a
• Mbatha, B. (2013). Adoption of web-based technologies in pursuit of work productivity and creativity within the public sector in South Africa. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 18(3), 8.
• Mihardi, S., Harahap, M. B., & Sani, R. A. (2013). The effect of project based learning model with KWL worksheet on student creative thinking process in physics problems. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(25), 188-200.
• Nakano, T. C., & Wechsler, S. M. (2018). Creativity and innovation: Skills for the 21^st century. Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas) [Psychology Studies (Campinas)], 35(3), 237-246. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-02752018000300002
• Netolicka, J., & Simonova, I. (2017). SAMR model and bloom’s digital taxonomy applied in blended learning/teaching of general English and ESP. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Symposium on Educational Technology (pp. 277-281). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISET.2017.68
• Nissen, J. M., Talbot, R. M., Nasim Thompson, A., & Van Dusen, B. (2018). Comparison of normalized gain and Cohen’s d for analyzing gains on concept inventories. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(1), 10115. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.010115
• Ogbonna, C. G., Ibezim, N. E., & Obi, C. A. (2019). Synchronous versus asynchronous e-learning in teaching word processing: An experimental approach. South African Journal of Education, 39(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v39n2a1383
• Onyango, G., & Gitonga, R. (2017). Exploring how technology complements constructivism using a lesson plan. In Proceedings of the 2017 IST-Africa Week Conference (pp. 1-11). https://doi.org/10.23919/ISTAFRICA.2017.8102351
• Phakiti, A. (2014). Experimental research methods in language learning. Bloomsbury.
• Pheeraphan, N. (2013). Enhancement of the 21^st century skills for Thai higher education by integration of ICT in classroom. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 365-373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.346
• Puentedura, R. R. (2014). SAMR and TPCK: A hands-on approach to classroom practice. http://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/2014/12/11/SAMRandTPCK_HandsOnApproachClassroomPractice.pdf
• Rubenstein, L. D. V., Callan, G. L., Speirs Neumeister, K., & Ridgley, L. M. (2020). Finding the problem: How students approach problem identification. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100635
• Said-Metwaly, S., Kyndt, E., & Van den Noortgate, W. (2020). The factor structure of the verbal torrance test of creative thinking in an Arabic context: Classical test theory and multidimensional item response theory analyses. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100609
• Skains, R. L. (2018). Creative practice as research: Discourse on methodology. Media Practice and Education, 19(1), 82-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/14682753.2017.1362175
• Sothayapetch, P., & Lavonen, J. (2022). Technological pedagogical content knowledge of primary school science teachers during the COVID-19 in Thailand and Finland. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(7), em2124. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12118
• Stein, S., Ware, J., Laboy, J., & Schaffer, H. E. (2013). Improving K-12 pedagogy via a cloud designed for education. International Journal of Information Management, 33(1), 235-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.07.009
• Such, B. (2022). Blended, active, and persistent: An investigative study of blended learning affordances for active learning and student persistence in university-level introductory science courses. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 2(2), em010. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/12171
• Tan, J. C. L., & Chapman, A. (2016). Project-based learning for academically-able student. Sense. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-732-0
• Taylor, D. B., Handler, L. K., FitzPatrick, E., & Whittingham, C. E. (2020). The device in the room: Technology’s role in third grade literacy instruction. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(4), 515-533. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1747577
• Trisnayanti, Y., Khoiri, A., Miterianifa, & Ayu, H. D. (2019). Development of Torrance test creativity thinking (TTCT) instrument in science learning. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2194, 020129. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5139861
• Tseng, J.-J. (2019). Do EFL teachers transform their teaching with iPads? A TPACK-SAMR approach. In C. N. Giannikas, E. Kakoulli Constantinou, S. Papadima-Sophocleous, & J.-J. Tseng (Eds.), Professional development in CALL: A selection of papers (pp. 71-85. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2019.28.871
• Wang, X.-H., Kim, T.-Y., & Lee, D.-R. (2016). Cognitive diversity and team creativity: Effects of team intrinsic motivation and transformational leadership. Journal of Business Research, 69(9), 3231-3239.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.02.026
• Welsh, K. E., Mauchline, A. L., Park, J. R., Whalley, W. B., & France, D. (2013). Enhancing fieldwork learning with technology: Practitioner’s perspectives. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 37(3), 399-415. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2013.792042
• Wu, T. T., & Wu, Y. T. (2020). Applying project-based learning and SCAMPER teaching strategies in engineering education to explore the influence of creativity on cognition, personal motivation, and personality traits. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100631
• Yen, T.-F. (2020). The performance of online teaching for flipped classroom based on COVID-19 aspect. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 8(3), 57-64. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2020/v8i330229
• Zhou, J., & Yao, X. (2017). Hybrid teaching–learning-based optimization of correlation-aware service composition in cloud manufacturing. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing, 91, 3515-3533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0008-8

APA

Ayu, H. D., Saputro, S., Sarwanto, & Mulyani, S. (2023). Reshaping technology-based projects and their exploration of creativity. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(1), em2217. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12814

Vancouver

Ayu HD, Saputro S, Sarwanto, Mulyani S. Reshaping technology-based projects and their exploration of creativity. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2023;19(1):em2217. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12814

AMA

Ayu HD, Saputro S, Sarwanto, Mulyani S. Reshaping technology-based projects and their exploration of creativity. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2023;19(1), em2217. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12814

Chicago

Ayu, Hena Dian, Sulistyo Saputro, Sarwanto, and Sri Mulyani. "Reshaping technology-based projects and their exploration of creativity". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2023 19 no. 1 (2023): em2217. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12814

Harvard

Ayu, H. D., Saputro, S., Sarwanto, and Mulyani, S. (2023). Reshaping technology-based projects and their exploration of creativity. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(1), em2217. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12814

MLA

Ayu, Hena Dian et al. "Reshaping technology-based projects and their exploration of creativity". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 19, no. 1, 2023, em2217. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12814