Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2006). Preservice and experienced biology teachers’ global and specific subject matter structures: implications for conceptions of pedagogical content knowledge. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2(1), 1-29.
• Akkoç, H. (2006) Bilgisayar Destekli Matematik Öğretimi: Grafik Analiz Yaklaşımı: İlköğretim İkinci Kademe ve Liseler İçin (CD Ekli Öğretmen Çalışma Kitabı). Toroslu Kitaplığı: İstanbul.
• Akkoç, H. (2008). Kavramsal anlama için matematik eğitiminde teknoloji kullanımı. Özmantar, M.F., Bingölbali, E., Akkoç, H. (Eds.) Matematiksel Kavram Yanılgıları ve Çözüm Önerileri (pp. 361-392), Pegem Akademi, Ankara.
• Alagic, M. & Palenz, D. (2006). Teachers Explore Linear and Exponential Growth: Spreadsheets as Cognitive Tools, Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14 (3), 633-649.
• Amoah, V. & Laridon, P. (2004). Using multiple representations to assess students’ understanding of the derivative concept. Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 24(1), 1- 6, London, UK.
• Arnold, S.R., Padilla, M.J. & Tunhikorn, B. (2009). The development of pre-service teachers’ professional knowledge in utilizing ICT to support professional lives. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 5(2), 91-101.
• Berthold, K., Eysink, T.H.S., & Renkl, A. (2009). Assisting self-explanation prompts are more effective than open prompts when learning with multiple representations. Instructional Science, 37: 345-363.
• Bingölbali, E. (2008). Türev kavramına ilişkin öğrenme zorlukları ve kavramsal anlama için öneriler. Özmantar, M.F., Bingölbali, E., Akkoç, H. (Eds.) Matematiksel Kavram Yanılgıları ve Çözüm Önerileri (pp. 223-255), Pegem Akademi, Ankara.
• Blokland, P., Giessen, C. & Tall, D.O. (2006). Graphic Calculus Software. VUsoft.
• Cuoco, A. A. (2001) Yearbook of the National Council of the Teachers of Mathematics: The Roles of Representation in School Mathematics (pp.173-185). Reston, Virginia: The Council.
• de Jong, T., Ainsworth, S., Dobson, M., van der Hulst, A., Levonen, J., Reimann, P., Sime, J.-A., van Someren, M. W., Spada, H., & Swaak, J. (1998). Acquiring knowledge in science, mathematics: The use of multiple representations in technology-based learning environments. In M. van Someren, P. Reimann, H. P. A. Boshuizen, & T. de Jong (Eds.), Learning with Multiple Representations (pp. 9–40). Amsterdam: Pergamon.
• Ertmer, P. A., Addison, P., Lane, M., Ross, E., & Woods, D. (1999). Examining teachers’ beliefs about the role of technology in the elementary classroom. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(1), 54–71.
• Friedlander, A. & Tabach, M. (2001) Promoting Multiple representations in Algebra. In A.A: Cuoco (Ed.) Yearbook of the National Council of the Teachers of Mathematics: The Roles of Representation in School Mathematics (pp.173-185). Reston, Virginia: The Council.
• Goldenberg, E.P. (1988). Mathematics, metaphors, and human factors: Mathematical, technical, and pedagogical challenges in the educational use of graphical representations. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 7, 135- 173.
• Grossman, P. L. (1990). The Making of a Teacher: Teacher Knowledge and Teacher Education. New York: Teachers College Press.
• Hakkarainen, K., Muukonen, H., Lipponen, L., Ilomaki, L., Rahikainen, M., & Lehtinen, E. (2001). Teachers’ information and communication technology skills and practices of using ICT. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9(2), 181–197.
• Hew, K.F. & Brush, T. (2007) Integrating technology into K12 teaching and learning: current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55:223–252.
• Juersivich, N., Garofalo, J. & Fraser, V. (2009). Student Teachers’ Use of Technology-Generated Representations: Exemplars and Rationales, Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 17, 2, 149-173.
• Kaput, J. J. (1989). Linking representations in the symbol systems of algebra. In S. Wagner, & C. Kieran (Eds.), Research Issues in the Learning and Teaching of Algebra (pp. 167-194).
• Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Magnusson, S. Krajcik, J. & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In Gess-Newsome & Lederman (Eds.), Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge: The Construct and Its Implications for Science Education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Mishra, P. & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
• Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Multimedia-supported metaphors for meaning making in mathematics. Cognition and Instruction, 17, 215–248.
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989). Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA.: The Council.
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and Standards of School Mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
• Newhouse, C. P. (2001). A follow-up study of students using portable computers at a secondary school. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(2), 209–219.
• Niess, M.L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 509–523.
• Ozmantar, M.F., Akkoç, H. & Bingölbali, E. (2009). Development of pedagogical content knowledge with regard to intersubjectivity and alterity. Proceedings of 33rd International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, vol: 4, 265-272.
• Ozmantar, M. F. (2005). An Investigation of the Formation of Mathematical Abstractions through Scaffolding. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Leeds.
• Pelgrum, W. J. (2001). Obstacles to the integration of ICT in education: Results from a worldwide educational assessment. Computers and Education, 37, 163–178.
• Pierson, M. E. (2001). Technology integration practice as a function of pedagogical expertise. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(4), 413-429.
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4–14.
• Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 122.
• Tall, D. ve Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limits and continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 151-169.
• Uşak, M. (2009). Preservice Science and Technology Teachers' Pedagogical Content Knowledge on Cell Topics. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 9(4), 2013- 2046.
• Yerushalmy, M. (2005). Functions of interactive visual representations in interactive mathematical textbooks. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 10, 217-249.
• Zbiek, R M.., Heid, M. K., Blume, G., & Dick, T.P. (2007). Research on technology in mathematics education: The perspective of constructs. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second Handbook of Research in Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 1169-1207). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

APA

Özmantar, M. F., Akkoç, H., Bingölbali, E., Demir, S., & Ergene, B. (2010). Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers’ Use of Multiple Representations in Technology-Rich Environments. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 6(1), 19-36. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75224

Vancouver

Özmantar MF, Akkoç H, Bingölbali E, Demir S, Ergene B. Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers’ Use of Multiple Representations in Technology-Rich Environments. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2010;6(1):19-36. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75224

AMA

Özmantar MF, Akkoç H, Bingölbali E, Demir S, Ergene B. Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers’ Use of Multiple Representations in Technology-Rich Environments. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2010;6(1), 19-36. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75224

Chicago

Özmantar, Mehmet Fatih, Hatice Akkoç, Erhan Bingölbali, Servet Demir, and Berna Ergene. "Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers’ Use of Multiple Representations in Technology-Rich Environments". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2010 6 no. 1 (2010): 19-36. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75224

Harvard

Özmantar, M. F., Akkoç, H., Bingölbali, E., Demir, S., and Ergene, B. (2010). Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers’ Use of Multiple Representations in Technology-Rich Environments. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 6(1), pp. 19-36. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75224

MLA

Özmantar, Mehmet Fatih et al. "Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers’ Use of Multiple Representations in Technology-Rich Environments". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 6, no. 1, 2010, pp. 19-36. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75224