Mathematics Teachers’ Use of
Questions: Is There a Change of
Practice after the Curriculum
Change?

Ali Delice; Emin Aydın; K. Seda Çevik

doi:10.12973/eurasia.2013.9410a

Mathematics Teachers’ Use of Questions: Is There a Change of Practice after the Curriculum Change?

Full Text (PDF)

Ali Delice ¹ ^* , Emin Aydın ¹, K. Seda Çevik ¹

More Detail

¹ Marmara Üniversitesi, TURKEY^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the questions that are used by teachers. In broader sense the intention is to focus on questions as part of teachers’ formal as well as informal assessments. We will mainly concentrate on how students are assessed and how the questions in the assessments are formed and marked. The research is mainly qualitative having both descriptive and exploratory purposes. Questionnaire and semi-structured interviews are used as the research instruments Convenience sampling was chosen as the most appropriate purposeful sampling strategy for this study. The qualitative data obtained from 86 teachers were categorised in terms of themes relevant to research questions and then these categorizations were coded. Data was collected in two phases. In the first phase a semi-structured interview was conducted to reveal the contexts in which teachers ask questions. Second phase started one month after the end of the first phase for which interviews and questionnaire were used together. Two dominant themes that emerged from this study are the effect of the institutional context teachers working within and the national examination system.

Keywords

mathematics assessment
mathematics questions
marking questions
curriculum
change

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, Volume 9, Issue 4, 2013, 417-427

https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2013.9410a

Publication date: 14 Dec 2013

Article Views: 1851

Article Downloads: 1199

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Ainley, J. (1987). Telling questions. Mathematics Teaching, 118, 24-26.
Aydin, E. (2002). Mathematics Teachers’ Perspectives on Internal School Assessment. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Leeds, England.
Aydin, E. (2009). An evaluation of the aims of the faculty school partnership scheme by mathematics student teachers and their mentors. Journal of Instructional Psychology. 36(3), 273-281.
Aydin, E. & Önder, O. (2010). Çoktan seçmeli ve klasik tipteki sorularla yapilan sinav hazirliğinin matematik başari düzeyine etkisi (The effect of exam preperations relying on multiple choice and extended response type questions on the level of achievement), Marmara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 30(1), 5-24.
Aydin, E. ve Delice A. (2010). Ölçme-Değerlendirmeye Kavram Yanılgıları Perspektifinden bir Bakış. (A look at assessment and evaluation from the perspective of misconceptions) Editorler: M. F. Özmantar, E. Bingölbali ve H. Akkoç. Matematiksel Kavram Yanılgıları ve Çözüm Önerileri, pp.393-436, PegemA Yayınevi.
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. La Salle, IL.
Berliner, D.C. (1988). The Development of Expertise in Pedagogy, American Association of Colleges for Teacher, Charles W. Hunt Memorial Lecture, http://eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED298122.pdf (Retrieved in 15.04.2011)
Bingölbali, E. (2005). Engineering and mathematics students’ conceptual development of the derivative: An institutional perspective. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Leeds, School of Education.
Black, S. (2001). Ask me a question: How teachers use inquiry in the classroom. American School Board, 188(5), 43-45.
Bloom, B. S. (1956) Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, the classification of educational goals Handbook I: Cognitive Domain New York: McKay
Boaler, J. , Brodie, K. , White, T. F., Shahan, E. , DiBrienza, J. and Fiori, N. , (2004) The importance, nature, and impact of teacher questions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Delta Chelsea Hotel, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Online.
Borko, H. & Livingstone, C. (1989). Cognition and improvisation: Differences in mathematics instruction by expert and novice teachers. American Educational Research Journal. 26(4), 473-489.
Brualdi, A. C. (1998). Classroom questions. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 6(6). http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=6&n=6 (Retrieved in 05.04.2011)
Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (1994). Research methods in education (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.
Cotton, K. (1989). Classroom questioning. School Improvement Research Series. Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
Ernest, P. (1989). The impact of beliefs on the teaching of mathematics. In P. Ernest (Ed). Mathematics Teaching: The State of the Art. London: Falmer.
Fullan, M., & Stiegelbauer, S., (1991), The New Meaning of Educational Change, London: Cassell.
Gall, M. (1984). Synthesis of research on teachers’ questioning. Educational Leadership, 42(3), 40-47.
Gödek, Y. (2004). ‘Öğretmen eğitiminde yeniden yapılanma, problemler ve bazı öneriler’ (Restructuring, problems and some suggestions in teacher education), Malatya, XIII. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kurultayı
Harrop, A., & Swinson, J. (2003). Teachers’ questions in the infant, junior and secondary school, Educational Studies, 29(1). 49-57.
Hiebert, J., & Wearne, D. (1993). Instructional tasks, classroom discourse, and students' learning in secondgrade arithmetic. American Educational Research Journal, 30(2), 393-425.
Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D. & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and Agency in Cultural Worlds, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kawanaka, T., & Stigler, J. W. (1999). Teachers’ use of questions by eight-grade mathematics classrooms in Germany, Japan, and the United States, Mathematical Thinking & Learning, 1, 255-278.
Klinzing, G., Klinzing-Eurich, G., & Tisher, R. P. (1985). Higher cognitive behaviours in classroom discourse: Congruencies between teachers' questions and pupils' responses. The Australian Journal of Education, 29(1), 63- 75.
Kogce, D. & Baki, A. (2009a). Farklı türdeki liselerin matematik sınavlarında sorulan soruların bloom taksonomisine göre karşılaştırılması, Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi 17(2), 557-574.
Kogce, D. & Baki, A. (2009b). Matematik öğretmenlerinin yazılı sınav soruları ile ÖSS sınavlarında sorulan matematik sorularının Bloom taksonomisine göre karşılaştırılması, Pamukkale Universitesi Eğitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 26, 70-80.
Lieberman, A. & Miller, L. (1990) Teacher development in professional practice schools. Teachers College Record. 92(l), 105-122.
Martin, N. (2003). Questioning styles. Mathematics Teaching 184, 18-19.
Martino, A. M., & Maher, C. A. (1999). Teacher questioning to promote justification and generalization in mathematics: What research practice has taught us. Journal of Mathematical Behavior 18 (1), 53-78.
McCallum, B., Gipps, C.V., McAlister; S; & Brown, M. (1995). National curriculum assessment: Emerging models of teacher assessment. In H. Torrance, Evaluating Authentic Assessment, Open University Press.
Mayer, P. S., & Milewicz, E. (2002). Learning to question: Categories of questiorirg used by preservice teachers during diagnostic mathematics interviews, Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education. 5, 293-315.
MNE (2005). Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (Ministry of National Education), Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı, Orta Öğretim Matematik (9,10,11 ve 12. Sınıflar) Dersi Öğretim Programı. Ankara.
Niss, M. (1993). Assessment in mathematics education and its effects: An introduction. In M. Niss (Ed.), Investigations into assessment in mathematics education (pp. 1-30). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers:
Official Newspaper (Resmi Gazete). (2007). RG.15/10/2007- 26664
Patton, M. Q. (1990). “Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods” (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Pfannkuch, M. (2001). Assessment of school mathematics: teachers' perceptions and practices, Mathematics Education Research Journal 13(3), 185-203.
Robson, C., (1993). “Real world research: a resource for social scientists and practitioner researchers”. Oxford, Blackwell.
Sanchez, E.; Rosales, J. & Canedo, I. (1999). Understanding and communication in expositive discourse: an analysis of the strategies used by expert and preservice teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education 15, 37-58
Schön D (1983). The reflective practitioner. Basic Books: New York.
Sahin, A. (2007). The effects of types, quantity, and quality of questioning in improving students’ understanding. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, School of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University.
Thompson, P. W., & Thompson, A. G. (1994). Talking about rates conceptually, Part I: A teacher's struggle. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(3), 279-303.
Thompson, A. G., & Thompson, P. W. (1996). Talking about rates conceptually, Part II: Mathematical knowledge for teaching. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(1), 2-24.
Türnüklü, E. B. (2003). Mathematics teachers’ assessment styles In Turkey and England. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 24, 108-118.
Tynjala, P. (1999). Towards expert knowledge? A comparison between a constructivist and a traditional learning environment in the university. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(5), 357- 442.
Voigt, J. (1992). Negotiation of mathematics meaning in classroom processes: Social interaction and learning mathematics. In L. Steffe, P. Nesher, P. Cobb, G. Goldin, & B. Greer (Eds.), Theories of mathematical learning (pp. 21-50). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Winne, P. H. (1979). Experiments relating teachers’ use of higher cognitive questions to student achievement, Review of Educational Research, 49, 13-50.
Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 458-477.
Yei, C.-J., Wang, K.-H., & Huang, S.-C. (1998). A Comparative Study on the Use of Questioning Strategies between Beginning Teacher and Experienced Teacher. ERIC Document no: ED418861

How to cite this article

APA

Delice, A., Aydın, E., & Çevik, K. S. (2013). Mathematics Teachers’ Use of Questions: Is There a Change of Practice after the Curriculum Change?. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 9(4), 417-427. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2013.9410a

Vancouver

Delice A, Aydın E, Çevik KS. Mathematics Teachers’ Use of Questions: Is There a Change of Practice after the Curriculum Change?. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2013;9(4):417-27. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2013.9410a

AMA

Delice A, Aydın E, Çevik KS. Mathematics Teachers’ Use of Questions: Is There a Change of Practice after the Curriculum Change?. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2013;9(4), 417-427. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2013.9410a

Chicago

Delice, Ali, Emin Aydın, and K. Seda Çevik. "Mathematics Teachers’ Use of Questions: Is There a Change of Practice after the Curriculum Change?". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2013 9 no. 4 (2013): 417-427. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2013.9410a

Harvard

Delice, A., Aydın, E., and Çevik, K. S. (2013). Mathematics Teachers’ Use of Questions: Is There a Change of Practice after the Curriculum Change?. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 9(4), pp. 417-427. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2013.9410a

MLA

Delice, Ali et al. "Mathematics Teachers’ Use of Questions: Is There a Change of Practice after the Curriculum Change?". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 9, no. 4, 2013, pp. 417-427. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2013.9410a