Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Abah, J. A., Iji, C. O., Abakpa, B. O., & Anyagh, P. I. (2021). Design, implementation and assessment of a web-based ethnomathematics instructional content repository for mathematics teachers in Benue State, Nigeria. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 1(1), em002. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/11075
• Anonimous. (2010). Non-Euclidean geometry: A mathematical revolution during the long 19^th century. http://www.f.waseda.jp/sidoli/MI314_10_NonEuclidean.pdf
• Anwar, & Rofiki, I. (2018). Investigating students’ learning trajectory: A case on triangle. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1088, 012021. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1088/1/012021
• Arnellis, Suherman, & Amalita, N. (2019). Implementasi learning trajectory kalkulus berbasis realistic mathematics education untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir matematis tingkat tinggi siswa sma Kota Padang [Implementation of learning trajectory calculus based on realistic mathematics education to improve high-level mathematical thinking skills of high school students in Padang City]. MENARA Ilmu [Tower of Knowledge], 13(6), 11-18.
• Arnis, F. M., Syahputra, E., & Surya, E. (2019). Analysis of trajectory thinking of middle school students to complete the problem of spatial ability with realistic mathematical education learning. Journal of Education and Practice, 10(20), 103-109. https://doi.org/10.7176/jep/10-20-12
• Bednarz, N., & Proulx, J. (2003). The (relativity of the) whole as a fundamental dimension in the conceptualization of fractions. http://cerme8.metu.edu.tr/wgpapers/WG2/WG2_Bednarz_Proulx.pdf
• Clayton, L. K. (2010). Non-Euclidean geometry. In H. R. Jacobs (Ed.), Geometry: Seeing, doing, understanding. W.H. Freeman and Company.
• Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2010). Encyclopedia on early childhood development learning trajectories in early mathematics-sequences of acquisition and teaching. In Encyclopedia on early childhood development (pp. 1-6).
• Cooley, L., Trigueros, M., & Baker, B. (2007). Schema thematization: A framework and an example. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(4), 370-392. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034879
• Dubinsky, E., & McDonald, M. A. (2000). APOS: A constructivist theory of learning in undergraduate mathematics education research. In D. Holton, M. Artigue, U. Kirchgräber, J. Hillel, M. Niss, & A. Schoenfeld (Eds.), The teaching and learning of mathematics at university level (pp. 275-282). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47231-7_25
• Eves, H. (1972). A survey of geometry. Allyn & Bacon, Inc.
• Fauzan, A., Slettenhaar, D., & Plomp, T. (2002). Traditional mathematics education vs. realistic mathematics education: Hoping for changes. In Proceedings of the 3^rd International Mathematics Education and Society Conference (pp. 1-4).
• Frassia, M. G., & Serpe, A. (2017). Learning geometry through mathematical modelling: An example with GeoGebra. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2017, 411.
• Gebre, D. G., Kassa, S. A., & Wodeyesus, K. M. (2021). Ethnomathematics in Kafa, Ethiopia: Number sense and its level of inclusion in school curriculum. Mediterranean Journal of Social & Behavioral Research, 5(3), 41-50. https://doi.org/10.30935/mjosbr/11291
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2006). The discovery of grounded theory, strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Transaction.
• Gravemeijer, K. (2008). RME theory and mathematics. Tools and Processes in Mathematics Teacher Education, 283-302. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087905460_014
• Gravemeijer, K., Figueiredo, N., van Galen, F., Keijzer, R., & Munk, F. (2016). Learning-teaching trajectories in geometry. Measurement and Geometry in Upper Primary School, 107-171. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-746-7_5
• Herawaty, D., Khrisnawati, D., Widada, W., & Mundana, P. (2020). The cognitive process of students in understanding the parallels axiom through ethnomathematics learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1470, 012077. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1470/1/012077
• Hitchman, M. P. (2018). Geometry with an introduction to cosmic topology. McMinnville.
• Karadag, Z. (2009). Analyzing students mathematical thinking in technology in technology-supported environments. www.statisticshowto.com/wp.../06/Dyscalculia-createspace-v3.pdf
• Maier, P. H. (1998). Spatial geometry and spatial ability–How to make solid geometry solid? In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of Didactics of Mathematics 1996 (pp. 69-81).
• Maloney, A., & Confrey, J. (2013). A learning trajectory framework for the mathematics common core: TurnOnCCMath for interpretation, instructional planning, and collaboration. In Proceedings of the 17^th Annual Conference of the Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators.
• Möhring, W., Ribner, A. D., Segerer, R., Libertus, M. E., Kahl, T., Troesch, L. M., & Grob, A. (2021). Developmental trajectories of children’s spatial skills: Influencing variables and associations with later mathematical thinking. Learning and Instruction, 75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101515
• Nugroho, K. U. Z., Sukestiyarno, Y. L., & Nurcahyo, A. (2021). Weaknesses of Euclidean geometry: A step of needs analysis of non-Euclidean geometry learning through an ethnomathematics approach. Edumatika: Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika [Edumatics: Research Journal of Mathematics Education], 4(2), 126-149. https://doi.org/10.32939/ejrpm.v4i2.1015
• Nugroho, K. U. Z., Sukestiyarno, Y., Sugiman, & Asikin, M. (2022). Students’ spatial ability in learning non-Euclid geometry through ethnomathematics approach. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(10), 10-35.
• Nugroho, K. U. Z., Widada, W., & Herawaty, D. (2019). The ability to solve mathematical problems through YouTube based ethnomathematics learning. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 8(10), 1232-1237.
• Panorkou, N., & Greenstein, S. (2015). A learning trajectory for transformation-based reasoning in geometry. In Proceedings of the 2^nd Annual Meeting of the Research Council on Mathematical Learning.
• Plomp, T., & Nieveen, N. (2013). Educational design research. SLO.
• Pratiwi, W. D., Hauda, N., Kurniadi, E., Araiku, J., & Astuti, P. (2020). Qualitative thinking level for geometry learning based on rigorous mathematical thinking (RMT) approach. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematik [AKSIOMA: Journal of the Mathematics Education Study Program], 5(3), 248-253.
• Prediger, S., Gravemeijer, K., & Confrey, J. (2015). Design research with a focus on learning processes: An overview on achievements and challenges. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 47(6), 877-891. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0722-3
• Ross, S. W. (2010). Non-Euclidean geometry [PhD thesis, University of Maine].
• Setiadi, D. R., Mulyana, E., & Asih, E. C. M. (2019). Learning trajectory of three dimensions’ topic through analytical geometry approach. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157, 032109. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/3/032109
• Siegler, R. S., & Crowley, K. (1991). The microgenetic method: A direct means for studying cognitive development. American Psychologist, 46(6), 606-620. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.46.6.606
• Simon, M. (2014). Hypothetical learning trajectories in mathematics education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8_72
• Solso, R. L. (1995). Cognitive psychology. Allyn and Bacon.
• Sunzuma, G., Zezekwa, N., Gwizangwe, I., & Zinyeka, G. (2021). A Comparison of the effectiveness of ethnomathematics and traditional lecture approaches in teaching consumer arithmetic: Learners’ achievement and teachers’ views. Pedagogical Research, 6(4), em0103. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/11215
• Widada, W, Agustina, A., Serlis, S., Dinata, B. M., & Hasari, S. T. (2019a). The abstraction ability of students in understanding the concept of geometry. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1318, 012082. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1318/1/012082
• Widada, W, Herawaty, D., Widiarti, Y., Aisyah, S., & Tuzzahra, R. (2020). The cognitive process of students in understanding the triangles in geometry of Riemann through local content. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1657, 012033. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1657/1/012033
• Widada, W. (2002). Teori APOS sebagai suatu alat analisis dekomposisi genetik terhadap perkembangan konsep matematika seseorang [APOS theory as a genetic decomposition analysis tool for the development of one’s mathematical concepts]. Journal of Indonesian Mathematical Society, 8.
• Widada, W. (2011). Mathematics learning towards extended trans level. Universitas Bengkulu.
• Widada, W. (2017). Beberapa dekomposisi genetik siswa dalam memahami matematika [Some genetic decomposition students in understanding mathematics]. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Raflesia [Raflesia Mathematics Education Journal], 1(1), 44-54.
• Widada, W., Herawaty, D., Jumri, R., & Wulandari, H. (2020). Students of the extended abstract in proving Lobachevsky’s parallel lines theorem. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1470, 012098. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1470/1/012098
• Widada, W., Herawaty, D., Nugroho, K. U. Z., & Anggoro, A. F. D. (2019b). The ability to understanding of the concept of derivative functions for inter-level students during ethnomathematics learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1179, 012056. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1179/1/012056
• Wu, D., & Ma, H. (2006). The distributions of Van Hiele levels of geometric thinking among 1st through 6th graders. In Proceedings of the 30^th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 409-416).
• Yuliardi, R., & Rosjanuardi, R. (2021). Hypothetical learning trajectory in student’s spatial abilities to learn geometric transformation. Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education, 6(3), 174-190. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v6i3.13338
• Zhang, Q. P., & Wong, N. Y. (2021). The learning trajectories of similarity in mathematics curriculum: An epistemological analysis of Hong Kong secondary mathematics textbooks in the past half century. Mathematics, 9, 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9182310

APA

Sukestiyarno, Y. L., Nugroho, K. U. Z., Sugiman, S., & Waluya, B. (2023). Learning trajectory of non-Euclidean geometry through ethnomathematics learning approaches to improve spatial ability. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(6), em2285. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13269

Vancouver

Sukestiyarno YL, Nugroho KUZ, Sugiman S, Waluya B. Learning trajectory of non-Euclidean geometry through ethnomathematics learning approaches to improve spatial ability. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2023;19(6):em2285. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13269

AMA

Sukestiyarno YL, Nugroho KUZ, Sugiman S, Waluya B. Learning trajectory of non-Euclidean geometry through ethnomathematics learning approaches to improve spatial ability. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2023;19(6), em2285. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13269

Chicago

Sukestiyarno, Yohanes Leonardus, Khathibul Umam Zaid Nugroho, Sugiman Sugiman, and Budi Waluya. "Learning trajectory of non-Euclidean geometry through ethnomathematics learning approaches to improve spatial ability". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2023 19 no. 6 (2023): em2285. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13269

Harvard

Sukestiyarno, Y. L., Nugroho, K. U. Z., Sugiman, S., and Waluya, B. (2023). Learning trajectory of non-Euclidean geometry through ethnomathematics learning approaches to improve spatial ability. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(6), em2285. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13269

MLA

Sukestiyarno, Yohanes Leonardus et al. "Learning trajectory of non-Euclidean geometry through ethnomathematics learning approaches to improve spatial ability". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 19, no. 6, 2023, em2285. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13269