Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Abels, S., & Markic, S. (Eds.). (2016). Science Education towards inclusion. New York: Nova.
• Aksela, M. (2010). Evidence-based teacher education: becoming a lifelong research-oriented chemistry teacher? Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 11(2), 84-91. https://doi.org/10.1039/C005350N.
• Calderhead, J. (2011). Contribution of research on teachers thinking to the professional development. In C. Day, J. Calderhead, & P. Denicolo (Eds.), Research on teacher thinking (pp. 11–18). New York: Routledge.
• Campbell, P. B. (1996). How would I handle that? Using vignettes to promote good math and science education. New York: American Association for the Advancement of Science. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED413170.
• Eilks, I., & Ralle, B. (2002). Participatory Action Research. In B. Ralle, & I. Eilks (Eds.), Research in chemical Education – What does it mean? Proceedings of the 16th Symposium on Chemical Education at the University of Dortmund, 22-24 May 2002 (pp. 87-98). Aachen: Shaker.
• European Commission (Eds.). (2016). Structural indicators on achievement in basic skills in Europe – 2016. Eurydice report, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/fpfis/mwikis/eurydice/images/1/1b/Achievement_in_Basic_Skills_.pdf.
• Haq, F. S., & Mundia, L. (2012). Comparison on Brunei preservice student teachers´ attitudes to inclusive education and specific disabilities: Implications for teacher education. The Journal of Educational Research, 105(5), 366-374. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2011.627399.
• Heidinger, C., Abels, S., Plotz, T., & Koliander, B. (2018). Inclusion and chemistry teaching – deliberating conflicting demands. Retrieved on 07.06.2018 from https://keynote.conference-services.net/resources/444/5233/pdf/ESERA2017_1090_paper.pdf.
• Jäger, R. S. (2009). Diagnostische Kompetenz und Urteilsbildung als Element von Lehrprofessionalität. In O. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, K. Beck, D. Sembill, & R. Mulder, (Eds.), Lehrprofessionalität – Bedingungen, Genese, Wirkung und ihre Messung [professional teachers – conditions, influences and assessment] (pp. 105–116). Weinheim: Beltz.
• Klug, J., Bruder, S., Kelava, A., Spiel, C., & Schmitz, B. (2013), Diagnostic competence of teachers: A process model that accounts for diagnosing learning behaviour tested by means of a case scenario, Teaching and Teacher Education, 30, 38-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.10.004.
• Kousa, P., Kavonius, R., & Aksela, M. (2018). Low-achieving students´ attitudes towards chemistry and it´s teaching methods. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RP00226B.
• Krell, G., Riedmüller, B., Sieben, B., & Vinz, D. (2007). Einleitung – Diversity studies als integrierende Forschungseinrichtung. In G. Krell, B. Riedmüller, B. Sieben, & D. Vinz (Eds.), Diversity studies, Grundlagen und disziplinäre Ansätze [diversity studies, basics and disciplinary approaches] (pp. 7-16). Frankfurt: Campus.
• Lärvinen, T., & Jahnukainen, M. (2008). Koulutus, polarisaatio ja tasa-arvo: hyvä- ja huono-osaistuminen perus- ja keskiasteen koulutuksessa. In M. Autio, K. Eräranta, & S. Myllyniemi (Eds.), Nuoret ja polarisaatio: nuorten elinolot vuosikirja [Polarized youth? The young people’s living conditions’ yearbooks] (pp. 72–81). Helsinki: Council of youth affairs, The youth research network and Finland’s national research and development centre for Welfare and Health.
• Lynch, S. (2001). “Science for all” is not equal to “one size fits all”: linguistic and cultural diversity and science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(5), 622-627. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.1021.
• Markic, S. (2015). Chemistry teachers’ attitudes and needs when dealing with linguistic heterogeneity in the classroom. In M. Kahveci, & M. K. Orgill (Eds), Affective dimensions in chemistry education (pp. 279–296). Heidelberg: Springer.
• Markic, S. (2018). Learning language and intercultural understanding in science classes in Germany. In K.-S. Tang, & K. Danielsson (Eds.), Global Developments in Literacy Research for Science Education (pp. 63-78). Heidelberg: Springer.
• Markic, S., Broggy, J., & Childs, P. (2013). How to deal with linguistic issues in chemistry classes. In I. Eilks, & A. Hofstein (Eds.), Teaching Chemistry - A Studybook (pp. 127-152). Rotterdam: Sense.
• Mittler, P. (2015). Working towards inclusive education: social Context. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: David Fulton Publishers.
• Mumba, F., Banda, A., & Chabalengula, V. M. (2015). Chemistry teachers´ perceived benefits and challenges of inquiry-based instruction in inclusive chemistry classrooms. Science Education International, 26(2), 180-194.
• Ohle, A., & McElvany, N. (2015). Teachers´ diagnostic competences and their practical relevance, special issue editorial, Journal for educational Research Online, 7(2), 5-10.
• Rose, D., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the Digital Age: Universal Design for Learning. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
• Salmela-Aro, K., Read, S., Minkkinen, J., Kinnunen, M., & Rimpelä, A. (2017). Immigrant status, gender, and school burnout in Finnish lower secondary school students: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 42(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025417690264.
• Schlueter, A.-K., & Melle, I. (2018).Professionalization of future chemistry teachers für teaching in inclusive classes. eProceeding of Esera 2017 conference, Dublin City university, Part 13. Pre-service science teacher education.
• Sliwka, A., (2010). From homogeneity to diversity in German education. In OECD (Ed.), Educating teachers for diversity: Meeting the challenge (pp. 205–217). Paris: OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264079731-12-en.
• Stellbrink, M. (2012). Inklusion als Herausforderung für die Entwicklung von Unterricht, Schule und Lehrerbildung [Inclusion as a challenge for development of Lesson, schooll and teacher education]. In S. Fürstenau (Ed.), Interkulturelle Pädagogik und Sprachliche Bildung [intercultural and language education]. Wiesbaden: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-18785-3_5.
• Subban, P., & Sharma, U. (2006). Primary school teachers’ perceptions of inclusive education in Victoria. International Journal of Special Education, 2(1), 42-52.
• Taber, K. (2005). Developing teachers as a learning doctor. Teacher Development, 9(2), 219-235. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530500200262.
• Tolsdorf, Y., & Markic, S. (2016). Language in science classrooms: diagnosing students´ linguistic skills. In S. Abels, & S. Markic (Eds.), Science education towards inclusion (pp. 23-42). New York: Nova.
• Tolsdorf, Y., & Markic, S. (2017). Exploring chemistry student teachers` diagnostic competence – a qualitative cross-level study. Education Sciences, 7(86), 86-100. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7040086.
• Tolsdorf, Y., & Markic, S. (2018). Development of an instrument and evaluation pattern for the analysis of chemistry student teachers diagnostic competence. International Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, 9(3), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijpce/80707.
• Tolsdorf, Y., & Markic, S. (accepted). Participatory Action research in university chemistry teacher training. Centre for Educational Policy Studies Journal.
• Tolsdorf, Y., & Markic, S. (in review). Exploring student teachers´ knowledge about diagnostics in science lessons – a longitudinal study.
• Van Driel, J. H., de Jong, O., & Verloop, N. (2002). The development of pre-service chemistry teachers’ PCK. Science Teacher Education, 86(4), 572-590. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10010.
• Vitoriano, F. A., Teles, V. L. G., Rizzatti, I. M., & Pesssoa de Lima, R. C. (2016). Promoting inclusice chemisctry teaching by developing an accessible thermometer for students with visual disabilities. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(12), 2046-2051. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00162.
• Weinert, F. E. (1997). Notwendige Methodenvielfalt [Necessary a variety of methods]. Friedrich Jahresheft, 15, 50-52.

APA

Tolsdorf, Y., Kousa, P., Markic, S., & Aksela, M. (2018). Learning to Teach at Heterogeneous and Diverse Chemistry Classes - Methods for University Chemistry Teacher Training Courses. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(10), em1593. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/93377

Vancouver

Tolsdorf Y, Kousa P, Markic S, Aksela M. Learning to Teach at Heterogeneous and Diverse Chemistry Classes - Methods for University Chemistry Teacher Training Courses. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2018;14(10):em1593. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/93377

AMA

Tolsdorf Y, Kousa P, Markic S, Aksela M. Learning to Teach at Heterogeneous and Diverse Chemistry Classes - Methods for University Chemistry Teacher Training Courses. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2018;14(10), em1593. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/93377

Chicago

Tolsdorf, Yannik, Päivi Kousa, Silvija Markic, and Maija Aksela. "Learning to Teach at Heterogeneous and Diverse Chemistry Classes - Methods for University Chemistry Teacher Training Courses". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2018 14 no. 10 (2018): em1593. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/93377

Harvard

Tolsdorf, Y., Kousa, P., Markic, S., and Aksela, M. (2018). Learning to Teach at Heterogeneous and Diverse Chemistry Classes - Methods for University Chemistry Teacher Training Courses. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(10), em1593. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/93377

MLA

Tolsdorf, Yannik et al. "Learning to Teach at Heterogeneous and Diverse Chemistry Classes - Methods for University Chemistry Teacher Training Courses". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 14, no. 10, 2018, em1593. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/93377