Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Alexander, P. A., & Judy, J. E. (1988). The interaction of domain-specific and strategic knowledge in academic performance. Review of Educational research, 58(4), 375–404.
• Arquero, J. L., & Romero-Frías, E. (2013). Using social network sites in higher education: An experience in business studies. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 50(3), 238–249.
• Aydin, S. (2014). NOTE FOR EDITOR: Twitter as an educational environment. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 15(1).
• Blankenship, M. (2011). How social media can and should impact higher education. Education Digest, 76(7), 39–42.
• Celik, I., Yurt, E., & Sahin, I. (2015). A Model for Understanding Educational Facebook Use. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(4), 899–907.
• Chin, W. W., & Dibbern, J. (2010). An introduction to a permutation based procedure for multi-group PLS analysis: Results of tests of differences on simulated data and a cross cultural analysis of the sourcing of information system services between Germany and the USA. Handbook of partial least squares (pp. 171–193): Springer.
• Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003). A partial least squares latent variable modelling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research, 14(2), 189–217.
• Corno, L., Cronbach, L. J., Kupermintz, H., Lohman, D. F., Mandinach, E. B., Porteus, A. W., & Talbert, J. E. (2001). Remaking the concept of aptitude: Extending the legacy of Richard E. Snow: Routledge.
• Daugherty, T., & Hoffman, E. (2013). eWOM and the importance of capturing consumer attention within social media. Journal of Marketing Communications, 20(1–2), 82–102. doi: 10.1080/13527266.2013.797764
• Davis III, C. H., Deil-Amen, R., Rios-Aguilar, C., & Gonzalez Canche, M. S. (2012). Social media in higher education: A literature review and research directions.
• Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Buehl, M. M. (1999). The relation between assessment practices and outcomes of studies: The case of research on prior knowledge. Review of Educational research, 69(2), 145–186.
• Fancsali, S. (2014). Causal discovery with models: Behaviour, affect, and learning in Cognitive Tutor Algebra. In Educational Data Mining 2014.
• Forcino, F. L. (2013). The importance of a laboratory section on student learning outcomes in a University Introductory Earth Science Course. Journal of Geoscience Education, 61(2), 213–221.
• Hilgard, E. R. (1980). The trilogy of mind: Cognition, affection, and conation. Journal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences, 16(2), 107–117.
• Keller, J. M. (2009). Motivational design for learning and performance: The ARCS model approach: Springer Science & Business Media.
• Kupermintz, H. (2002). Affective and conative factors as aptitude resources in high school science achievement. Educational Assessment, 8(2), 123–137.
• Kushin, M. J., & Yamamoto, M. (2010). Did social media really matter? College students’ use of online media and political decision making in the 2008 election. Mass Communication and Society, 13(5), 608–630. doi: 10.1080/15205436.2010.516863
• Lampe, C., Wohn, D. Y., Vitak, J., Ellison, N. B., & Wash, R. (2011). Student use of Facebook for organizing collaborative classroom activities. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(3), 329–347.
• Lin, P.-C., Hou, H.-T., Wang, S.-M., & Chang, K.-E. (2013). Analyzing knowledge dimensions and cognitive process of a project-based online discussion instructional activity using Facebook in an adult and continuing education course. Computers & Education, 60(1), 110–121. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.017
• Liu, L.-W., Chang, C.-M., Huang, H.-C., & Chang, Y.-L. (2016). Verification of social network site use behavior of the university physical education students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education (4), 793-805.
• Mazman, S. G., & Usluel, Y. K. (2010). Modeling educational usage of Facebook. Computers & Education, 55(2), 444–453.
• Meiselwitz, G. (2002). Using the web to maintain the benefits of small class instruction in large classes. J. Comput. Sci. Coll., 17(3), 141–148.
• Park, B., Flowerday, T., & Brünken, R. (2015). Cognitive and affective effects of seductive details in multimedia learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 267-278.
• Prestridge, S. (2014). A focus on students’ use of Twitter–their interactions with each other, content and interface. Active Learning in Higher Education, 1469787414527394.
• Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2015). Smartpls 3. Hamburg: SmartPLS.
• Shavelson, R. J., Roeser, R. W., Kupermintz, H., Lau, S., Ayala, C., Haydel, A., & Quihuis, G. (2002). Richard E. Snow’s remaking of the concept of aptitude and multidimensional test validity: Introduction to the special issue. Educational Assessment, 8(2), 77–99.
• Snow, R. E., Corno, L., & Jackson, D., III. (1996). Individual differences in affective and conative functions. Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 243–310). New York: Macmillan.
• Um, E., Plass, J. L., Hayward, E. O., & Homer, B. D. (2012). Emotional design in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(2), 485.
• Valenzuela, S., Park, N., & Kee, K. F. (2009). Is there social capital in a social network site?: Facebook use and college students’ life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 14(4), 875–901.
• Wang, Q., Woo, H. L., Quek, C. L., Yang, Y., & Liu, M. (2012). Using the Facebook group as a learning management system: An exploratory study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(3), 428– 438. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01195.x
• Wang, X., Liu, C., Mao, W., & Fang, Z. (2015). The open access advantage considering citation, article usage and social media attention. Scientometrics, 103(2), 555–564. doi: 10.1007/s11192-015-1547-0
• Wilson, R. E., Gosling, S. D., & Graham, L. T. (2012). A review of Facebook research in the social sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(3), 203–220. doi: 10.1177/1745691612442904
• Wood, E. G., Wood, S. E., & Boyd, D. (2010). THE WORLD OF PSYCHOLOGY, 7/E: Pearson Education Inc.

APA

Hwang, W.-Y., Kongcharoen, C., & Ghinea, G. (2017). Influence of Students’ Affective and Conative Factors on Laboratory Learning: Moderating Effect of Online Social Network Attention. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(3), 1013-1024. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00655a

Vancouver

Hwang WY, Kongcharoen C, Ghinea G. Influence of Students’ Affective and Conative Factors on Laboratory Learning: Moderating Effect of Online Social Network Attention. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2017;13(3):1013-24. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00655a

AMA

Hwang WY, Kongcharoen C, Ghinea G. Influence of Students’ Affective and Conative Factors on Laboratory Learning: Moderating Effect of Online Social Network Attention. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2017;13(3), 1013-1024. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00655a

Chicago

Hwang, Wu-Yuin, Chaknarin Kongcharoen, and Gheorghita Ghinea. "Influence of Students’ Affective and Conative Factors on Laboratory Learning: Moderating Effect of Online Social Network Attention". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2017 13 no. 3 (2017): 1013-1024. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00655a

Harvard

Hwang, W.-Y., Kongcharoen, C., and Ghinea, G. (2017). Influence of Students’ Affective and Conative Factors on Laboratory Learning: Moderating Effect of Online Social Network Attention. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(3), pp. 1013-1024. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00655a

MLA

Hwang, Wu-Yuin et al. "Influence of Students’ Affective and Conative Factors on Laboratory Learning: Moderating Effect of Online Social Network Attention". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 13, no. 3, 2017, pp. 1013-1024. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00655a