Exploring the Effectiveness of Two Types of Virtual Reality Headsets for Teaching High School Mathematics

Yi Chen Hsu

doi:10.29333/ejmste/10996

Full Text (PDF)

Yi Chen Hsu ¹ ^*

More Detail

¹ National Taipei University of Education, TAIWAN^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

This study examines the integration of virtual reality (VR) information technology in the teaching of systems of linear equations in three variables in a high school mathematics class. More broadly, the study investigates the effectiveness of digital teaching with respect to the learning process. The study tests two auxiliary teaching systems: a desktop-based VR system and an all-in-one VR system. Before and after the experiment, participants were asked to complete a questionnaire, and post-experiment interviews were conducted with both students and teachers, both of which provided quantitative and qualitative data for analysis. The result of data show that VR technology is a suitable tool for teaching high school mathematics, when it combined with the tradition curriculum were well-received and facilitate effective learning. In addition, the desktop-based VR system is found to be superior to the all-in-one VR system in terms of learning effectiveness since the high-efficiency display and better control.

Keywords

virtual reality
high school mathematics
digital teaching
learning effectiveness

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, Volume 17, Issue 8, August 2021, Article No: em1986

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/10996

Publication date: 23 Jun 2021

Article Views: 3148

Article Downloads: 2138

Open Access Disclosures References How to cite this article

Disclosure

Declaration of Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest is declared by author(s).

Data sharing statement: Data supporting the findings and conclusions are available upon request from the corresponding author(s).

References

Abdullah, F., Kassim, M. H. B., & Sanusi, A. N. Z. (2017). Go virtual: Exploring augmented reality application in representation of steel architectural construction for the enhancement of architecture education. Advanced Science Letters, 23(2), 804-808. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.7449
Amer, A., & Peralez, P. (2014). Affordable altered perspectives: Making augmented and virtual reality technology accessible. IEEE global humanitarian technology conference (GHTC 2014) (pp. 603-608). https://doi.org/10.1109/GHTC.2014.6970345
Amin, A., Gromala, D., Tong, X., & Shaw, C. (2016). Immersion in cardboard VR compared to a traditional head-mounted display. In International Conference on Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality (pp. 269-276). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39907-2_25
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, R. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M.C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s. Longman.
Ball, C., & Johnsen, K. (2016). An accessible platform for everyday educational virtual reality. Everyday virtual reality (WEVR), 2016 IEEE 2nd workshop on IEEE (pp. 26-31). https://doi.org/10.1109/WEVR.2016.7859540
Black, E. R. (2017). Learning then and there: an exploration of virtual reality in k-12 history education. (Unpublished doctoral thesis), The University of Texas: Texas.
Bogusevschi, D., Muntean, C. H., & Muntean, G.-M. (2020). Teaching and learning physics using 3D virtual learning environment: A case study of combined virtual reality and virtual laboratory in secondary school. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 39(1), 5-18.
Bogusevschi, D., Muntean, H. C., & Muntean, G. M. (2019). Teaching and learning physics using 3D virtual learning environment: A case study of combined virtual reality and virtual laboratory in secondary school. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 39(1), 5-18.
Brinson, J. R. (2015). Learning outcome achievement in non-traditional (virtual and remote) versus traditional (handson) laboratories: A review of the empirical research. Computers & Education, 87, 218-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.003
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-41. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018001032
Burdea, G. (1993, April). Virtual Reality Systems and Applications. In Electro ‘93 International Conference, Short Course, Edison, NJ, pp. 164-165.
Castelvecchi, D. (2016). Low-cost headsets boost virtual reality’s lab appeal. Nature, 533, 153-154. https://doi.org/10.1038/533153a
Chen, C.-M., & Hsu, S.-H. (2008). Personalized intelligent mobile learning system for supportive effective English learning. Educational Technology and Society Journal, 11(3), 153-180.
Cheng, K., & Hong, S. (2018, October 1). Will AR / VR affect future corporate competition strategies? EET Taiwan. https://www.eettaiwan.com/news/article/20181001NT31-AR-VR
Degli, E., Geronazzo, M., Vercovi, D., Nordahl, R., Serafin, S., Ludovico, L. A., & Avanzini, F. (2019). Mobile virtual reality for musical genre learning in primary education. Computers & Education, 139, 102-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.010
Fan, X., & Geelan D. (2012, October). Integrating information technology and science education for the future: A theoretical review on the educational use of interactive simulations. In J. Pagram & P. Newhouse (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2012 Australian Computers in Education Conference (ACEC), 1-9.
Freina, L., & Ott, M. (2015). A literature review on immersive virtual reality in education: State of the art and perspectives. eLearning and Software for Education (eLSE). Bucharest.
Heradio, R., de la Torre, L., Galan, D., Cabrerizo, F. J., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Dormido, S. (2016). Virtual and remote labs in education: A bibliometric analysis. Computers and Education, 98, 14-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.010
Hsu, Y. C. (2020). Exploring the Learning Motivation and Effectiveness of Applying Virtual Reality to High School Mathematics. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(2), 438-444. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080214
Hsu, Y. C., Lin, Y. C., Lin, Y. C., Chang, W. H., & Chen, C. C. (2018). Investigating the learning effectiveness of applying virtual reality to high school mathematics - A case study of the system of linear equations in three unknowns. 2018 Taiwan Academic Network Conference (pp. 2507-2511). https://doi.org/10.6861/TANET.201810.0464
Innocenti, E. D., Geronazzo, M., Vescovia, D., Nordahlb, R., Serafinb, S., Ludovicoc, L. A., & Avanzinic, F. (2019). Mobile virtual reality for musical genre learning in primary education. Computers & Education, 139, 102-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.010
Jang, S., Vitale, J. M., Jyung, R. W., & Black, J. B. (2017). Direct manipulation is better than passive viewing for learning anatomy in a three-dimensional virtual reality environment. Computers & Education, 106, 150-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.009
Kaufmann, H. (2006). The potential of augmented reality in dynamic geometry education [Paper presentation]. 12th International Conference on Geometry and Graphics, Salvador, Brazil.
Kebritchi, M., Hirumi, A., & Bai, H. (2010). The effects of modern mathematics computer games on mathematics achievement and class motivation. Computers & Education, 55(2), 427-443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.007
Kickmeier-Rust M.D., Hann P., & Leitner M. (2019). Increasing learning motivation: An empirical study of VR effects on the vocational training of bank clerks. In E. van der Spek, S. Göbel, E. L. Do, E. Clua, & J. Baalsrud Hauge (Eds.), Entertainment Computing and Serious Games. ICEC-JCSG 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (vol. 11863). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34644-7_9
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: an overview. Journal of Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212-219. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
Lee, E. A., Wong, K. W., & Fung, C. C. (2010). How does desktop virtual reality enhance learning outcomes? A structural equation modeling approach. Computers & Education, 55, 1424-1442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.006
Lee, S. H., Sergueeva, K., Catangui, M., & Kandaurova, M. (2017). Assessing google cardboard virtual reality as a content delivery system in business classrooms. Journal of Education for Business, 92(4), 153-160, https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2017.1308308
Lim, D. H., Han, S. J., Oh, J., & Jang, C. S. (2019). Application of virtual and augmented reality for training and mentoring of higher education instructors. Handbook of research on virtual training and mentoring of online instructors (pp. 325-344). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-6322-8.ch015
Liu, T. Y. (2009). A context-aware ubiquitous learning environment for language listening and speaking. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(6), 515-527. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00329.x
Looi, C. K., Zhang, B., Chen, W., Seow, P., Chia, G., Norris, C., & Soloway, E. (2011). 1: 1 mobile inquiry learning experience for primary science students: a study of learning effectiveness. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(3), 269-287. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00390.x
Manseur, R. (2005- October). Virtual reality in science and engineering education. 35th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Indianapolis, IN.
Martin, G., Gollan, P. J., & Grigg, K. (2011). Is there a bigger and better future for employer branding? Facing up to innovation, corporate reputations and wicked problems in SHRM. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(17), 3618-3637. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.560880
McKnight, K., O’Malley, K., Ruzic, R., Horsley, M. K., Franey, J. J., & Bassett, K. (2016). Teaching in a digital age: How educators use technology to improve student learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(3), 194-211. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2016.1175856
McLellan, H. (1994). Situated learning: Continuing the conversation. Educational Technology, 34(10), 7-8.
Merchant, Z., Goetz, E., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., Kwok, O., Cifuentes, L., & Davis, T. J. (2012). The learner characteristics, features of desktop 3D virtual reality environments, and college chemistry instruction: a structural equation modeling analysis. Computers & Education, 59, 551-568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.004
Moody, D. L., & Sindre, G. (2003). Evaluating the effectiveness of learning interventions: An information systems case study. ECIS 2003 Proceedings. 80.
Moro, C., Štromberga, Z., Raikos, A., & Stirling, A. (2017). Virtualisation Devices for Student Learning: Comparison between Desktop-Based (Oculus Rift) and Mobile-Based (Gear VR) Virtual Reality in Medical and Health Science Education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(6), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3840
Pasqualotti, A., & Freitas, C. M. D. S. (2002). MAT3D: a virtual reality modeling language environment for the teaching and learning of mathematics. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 5(5), 409-422. https://doi.org/10.1089/109493102761022832
Pelargos, P. E., Nagasawa, D. T., Lagman, C., Tenn, S., Demos, J. V., Lee, S. J., Bui, T. T., Barnette, N. E., Bhatt, N. S., Ung, N., Bari, A., Martin, N. A., & Yang, I. (2017). Utilizing virtual and augmented reality for educational and clinical enhancements in neurosurgery. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, 35, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2016.09.002
Ruchter, M., Klar, B., & Geiger, W. (2010). Comparing the effects of mobile computers and traditional approaches in environmental education. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1054-1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.10.010
Ruijten, P. A. M., Kruyt-Beursken, E., & IJsselsteijn, W. A. (2018). Towards the simplicity of complex interfaces: Applying ephemeral adaptation to enhance user performance and satisfaction. In J. Ham, A. Spagnolli, B. Blankertz, L. Gamberini, & G. Jacucci (Eds.), Symbiotic interaction (pp. 86-97). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91593-7_10
Sherman, W. R., & Craig, A. B. (2003). Understanding virtual reality. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
Simsek, I. (2016). The effect of 3D virtual learning environment on secondary school third grade students’ attitudes toward mathematics. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology (TOJET), 15(3), 162-168.
Tibaldi, A., Bonali, F.L., Vitello, F., Delage, E., Nomikou, P., Antoniou, V., Becciani, U., Van Wyk de Vries, B., Krokos, M., & Whitworth, M. (2020). Real world–based immersive virtual reality for research, teaching and communication in volcanology. Bulletin of Volcanology, 82(5), 36-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-020-01376-6
Tseng, A. (2018, January 3). VR will be liberated from computers and mobile phones, and HTC and Oculus will take the lead in ushering in virtual reality 2.0. https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/47674/2018-would-be-the-year-for-standalone-vr
Wexelblat, A. (Ed.). (2014). Virtual reality: Applications and explorations. Academic Press.
Wu, H. (2017, December 15). HTC Vive Focus pre-order hot sale. https://m.ctee.com.tw/focus/kjmd/170021
Yildirim, B., Sahin-Topalcengiz, E., Arikan, G., & Timur, S., (2020). Using virtual reality in the classroom: Reflections of STEM teachers on the use of teaching and learning tools. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health, 6(3), 231-245. https://doi.org/10.21891/jeseh.711779
Yüksel, İ., & Adıgüzel, A. (2012). Evaluation of teachers’ instructional technologies integration skills: a qualitative need analysis for new pedagogical approaches. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(1), 265-286.
Zhou, Y., Ji, S., Xu, T., & Wang, Z. (2018). Promoting knowledge construction: a model for using virtual reality interaction to enhance learning. Procedia Computer Science, 130(2018), 239-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.04.035

How to cite this article

APA

Hsu, Y. C. (2021). Exploring the Effectiveness of Two Types of Virtual Reality Headsets for Teaching High School Mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(8), em1986. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/10996

Vancouver

Hsu YC. Exploring the Effectiveness of Two Types of Virtual Reality Headsets for Teaching High School Mathematics. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2021;17(8):em1986. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/10996

AMA

Hsu YC. Exploring the Effectiveness of Two Types of Virtual Reality Headsets for Teaching High School Mathematics. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2021;17(8), em1986. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/10996

Chicago

Hsu, Yi Chen. "Exploring the Effectiveness of Two Types of Virtual Reality Headsets for Teaching High School Mathematics". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2021 17 no. 8 (2021): em1986. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/10996

Harvard

Hsu, Y. C. (2021). Exploring the Effectiveness of Two Types of Virtual Reality Headsets for Teaching High School Mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(8), em1986. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/10996

MLA

Hsu, Yi Chen "Exploring the Effectiveness of Two Types of Virtual Reality Headsets for Teaching High School Mathematics". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 17, no. 8, 2021, em1986. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/10996