Exploring In-Service Mathematics Teachers’ Perceived Professional Development Needs Related to the Strands of Mathematical Proficiency (SMP)

Areej Isam Barham

doi:10.29333/ejmste/8399

Full Text (PDF)

Areej Isam Barham ¹ ^*

More Detail

¹ Qatar University, QATAR^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

The National Research Council developed the concept of mathematical proficiency as being described by five strands: conceptual understanding, procedural fluency, strategic competency, adaptive reasoning, and productive disposition. The purpose of this study is to explore in-service mathematics teachers’ perceptions of professional development needs related to the five strands of mathematical proficiency and to investigate the effect of teachers’ demographic factors on their perceived needs. Participants included 342 teachers with varying qualifications and years of experience teaching at multiple grade levels (elementary, preparatory, and secondary) in Qatar’s government schools. The study uses a 35-item questionnaire to evaluate teachers’ professional development needs within the five strands.

Keywords

in-service mathematics teachers
professional development needs
strands of mathematical proficiency

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, Volume 16, Issue 10, October 2020, Article No: em1882

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8399

Publication date: 19 Jul 2020

Article Views: 3949

Article Downloads: 3228

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Australian Curriculum and Assessment Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2014). Australian curriculum: Senior secondary mathematics, general mathematics (rationale/aims). Retrieved from http://australiancurriculum.org/seniorsecondary/mathematics/generalmathematics/rationaleaims
Ball, D., Thames, M., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it so special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
Barham, A., & Al-Khateeb, M. (2012). Students’ levels in the mathematical thinking skills for classroom teachers at the Hashemite University and its relation to their achievement in mathematics. The Educational Journal, 26(103), 277-312.
Bednarz, N., Fiorentini, D., & Huang, R. (2011). International approaches to professional development of mathematics teachers. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.
Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences. (2012). The mathematical education of teachers II. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society and Mathematical Association of America.
Council of Chief State School Initiatives (CCSSI). (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: Council Chief State Officers.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Davis, B. & Simmt, E. (2006). Mathematics-for-teaching: An ongoing investigation of mathematics that teachers (need to) know. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(3), 293-319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-2372-4
Evans, B. R. (2012). Editor’s perspective article: Problem solving abilities and perceptions in alternative certification mathematics teachers. JNAAC, 7(2), 34-43.
Evans, B. R. (2014). Editor’s perspective article: Mathematics and science teaching for new alternative certificate teachers. JNAAC, 9(2), 44-48.
Fang, Q. (2012). A study on high school mathematics teachers’ mathematics professional literacy: What does high quality mathematics teaching need? Journal of Mathematics Education, 5(1), 136-158.
Fuson, K. C. (1990). Conceptual structures for multiunit numbers: Implications for learning and teaching multidigit addition, subtraction, and place value. Cognition and Instruction, 7(4), 343-403. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0704_4
General Secretariat for Development Planning. (2008). Qatar National Vision 2030. Doha: GSDP.
Hiebert, J., Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Fuson, K. C., Wearne, D., Murray, H., … Human, P. (1997). Making sense: Teaching and learning mathematics with understanding. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Hill, H., & Ball, D. (2004). Learning mathematics for teaching: Results from California’s mathematics professional development institutes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(5), 330-351. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034819
Kaiser, G., Blömeke, S., König, J., Busse, A., Döhrmann, M., & Hoth, G. (2017). Professional competencies of (prospective) mathematics teachers—Cognitive versus situated approaches. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 94(2), 161-182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9713-8
Loucks-Horsley, S., & Matsumoto, C. (1999). Research on professional development for teachers of mathematics and science: The state of the scene. School Science and Mathematics, 99(5), 258-271. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1999.tb17484.x
Mundry, S. (2005). What experience has taught us about professional development. National Network of Eisenhower Regional Consortia and Clearinghouse Network. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.520.4079&rep=rep1&type=pdf
National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). Highlights from TIMSS 2011. Mathematics and science achievement of U.S. fourth- and eighth-grade students in an international context. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2016). Highlights from TIMSS 2015. Mathematics and science achievement of U.S. fourth- and eighth-grade students in an international context. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Staff Development Council (1995). National staff development council’s standards for staff development. Oxford, OH: National Staff Development Council.
Pisa 2012 results: Which country does best at reading, maths and science?. (2012). The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2013/dec/03/pisa-results-country-best-reading-maths-science
Polly, D. (2011). Examining teachers’ enactment of technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) in their mathematics teaching after technology integration professional development. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 30(1), 37-59.
Robinson, J., Shaver, P., & Wrightsman, L. (1991). Criteria for scale selection and evaluation in measures of personality and social psychological attitudes. New York: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-590241-0.50005-8
Rowan, B., Correnti, R., & Miller, R. J. (2002). What large-scale survey research tells us about teacher effects on student achievement: Insights from the prospects study of elementary schools. Teachers College Record, 104, 1525-1567. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9620.00212
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1988). Problem solving in context(s). In R. I. Charles, & E. A. Silver (Eds.), The teaching and assessing of mathematical problem solving (Research Agenda for Mathematics Education, Vol. 3, pp. 82-92). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
SEC [Supreme Education Council] (2014). Education and training sector strategy 2011-2016: Executive summary. Doha: SEC Press.
Shriki, A., & Lavy, I. (2011). Perceptions of Israeli mathematics teachers regarding their professional development needs. Professional Development in Education, 38(3), 411-433. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2011.626062
Shriki, A., & Patkin, D. (2016). Elementary school mathematics teachers’ perception of their professional needs. Teacher Development, 20(3), 329-347. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2016.1155476
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
Shulman, L. S. (2015). PCK: Its genesis and exodus. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 13-23). New York: Routledge.
Steele, M. D., & Rogers, K. C. (2012). Relationship between mathematical knowledge for teaching and teaching practice: The case of proof. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 15(2), 159-180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-012-9204-5
Superfine, A. C., & Li, W. (2014). Developing mathematical knowledge for teaching teachers: A model for the professional development of teacher educators. Issues in Teacher Education, 23(1), 113-132.
Villegas-Reimers, E. (2003). Teacher professional development: An international review of the literature. UNESCO: International Institution for Educational Planning.
Wood, L. N., Vu, T., Bower, M., Brown, N., Skalicky, J., Donovan, D., … Bloom, W. (2011). Professional development for teaching in higher education. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 42(7), 997-1009. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2011.608864

How to cite this article

APA

Barham, A. I. (2020). Exploring In-Service Mathematics Teachers’ Perceived Professional Development Needs Related to the Strands of Mathematical Proficiency (SMP). Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(10), em1882. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8399

Vancouver

Barham AI. Exploring In-Service Mathematics Teachers’ Perceived Professional Development Needs Related to the Strands of Mathematical Proficiency (SMP). EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2020;16(10):em1882. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8399

AMA

Barham AI. Exploring In-Service Mathematics Teachers’ Perceived Professional Development Needs Related to the Strands of Mathematical Proficiency (SMP). EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2020;16(10), em1882. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8399

Chicago

Barham, Areej Isam. "Exploring In-Service Mathematics Teachers’ Perceived Professional Development Needs Related to the Strands of Mathematical Proficiency (SMP)". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2020 16 no. 10 (2020): em1882. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8399

Harvard

Barham, A. I. (2020). Exploring In-Service Mathematics Teachers’ Perceived Professional Development Needs Related to the Strands of Mathematical Proficiency (SMP). Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(10), em1882. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8399

MLA

Barham, Areej Isam "Exploring In-Service Mathematics Teachers’ Perceived Professional Development Needs Related to the Strands of Mathematical Proficiency (SMP)". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 16, no. 10, 2020, em1882. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8399