Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Boscardin, C., & Penuel, W. (2012). Exploring benefits of audience-response systems on learning: A review of the literature. Academic Psychiatry, 36(5), 401-407.
• Caldwell, J. E. (2007). Clickers in the large classroom: Current research and best-practice tips. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 6(1), 9-20.
• Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. Alexandria, VA : ASCD.
• Chien, Y. T., & Chang, C. Y. (in press). Supporting socio-scientific argumentation in the classroom through automatic group formation based on students’ real-time responses. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Science education in East Asia: Pedagogical innovations and research-informed practices. Berlin: Springer.
• Chien, Y. T., Chang, Y. H., & Chang, C. Y. (in revision). Do we click in the right way? A meta-analytic review of clicker-integrated instruction. Educational Research Review.
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciencies (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69(9), 970-977.
• Deslauriers, L., Schelew, E., & Wieman, C. (2011). Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class. Science, 332(6031), 862-864.
• Duncan, D. (2005). Clickers in the classroom: How to enhance science teaching using classroom response systems. San Francisco, CA: Pearson.
• Fies, C., & Marshall, J. (2006). Classroom response systems: A review of the literature. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(1), 101-109.
• Gilbert, A. (2005). New for back-to-school: 'Clickers'. Retrieved May 1, 2015 http://news.cnet.com/New-for-back-to-school-Clickers/2100-1041_3-5819171.html
• Hestenes, D., Wells, M., & Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force concept inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30(3), 141-158.
• Hoekstra, A. (2008). Vibrant student voices: Exploring effects of the use of clickers in large college courses. Learning, Media and Technology, 33(4), 329-341.
• Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2014). NMC horizon report: 2014 K-12 edition. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium.
• Kay, R. H., & LeSage, A. (2009). Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response systems: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 53(3), 819-827.
• Lantz, M. E. (2010). The use of ‘Clickers’ in the classroom: Teaching innovation or merely an amusing novelty? Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 556-561.
• Lo, H. W., & Wu, J. (2014). Taiwan has world's biggest smartphone craze: Yahoo survey. Retrieved May 1, 2015 http://focustaiwan.tw/news/aeco/201408130034.aspx
• MacArthur, J. R., & Jones, L. L. (2008). A review of literature reports of clickers applicable to college chemistry classrooms. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 9(3), 187-195.
• Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: A user's manual. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Perez, K. E., Strauss, E. A., Downey, N., Galbraith, A., Jeanne, R., & Cooper, S. (2010). Does displaying the class results affect student discussion during peer instruction? CBE-Life Sciences Education, 9(2), 133-140.
• Smith, M. K., Wood, W. B., Adams, W. K., Wieman, C., Knight, J. K., Guild, N., & Su, T. T. (2009). Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions. Science, 323(5910), 122-124.
• Smith, M. K., Wood, W. B., Krauter, K., & Knight, J. K. (2011). Combining peer discussion with instructor explanation increases student learning from in-class concept questions. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 10(1), 55-63.
• Van Meter, P., & Garner, J. (2005). The promise and practice of learner-generated drawing: Literature review and synthesis. Educational Psychology Review, 17(4), 285-325.

APA

Chien, Y.-T., Lee, Y.-H., Li, T.-Y., & Chang, C.-Y. (2015). Examining the Effects of Displaying Clicker Voting Results on High School Students’ Voting Behaviors, Discussion Processes, and Learning Outcomes. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(5), 1089-1104. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1414a

Vancouver

Chien YT, Lee YH, Li TY, Chang CY. Examining the Effects of Displaying Clicker Voting Results on High School Students’ Voting Behaviors, Discussion Processes, and Learning Outcomes. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2015;11(5):1089-104. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1414a

AMA

Chien YT, Lee YH, Li TY, Chang CY. Examining the Effects of Displaying Clicker Voting Results on High School Students’ Voting Behaviors, Discussion Processes, and Learning Outcomes. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2015;11(5), 1089-1104. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1414a

Chicago

Chien, Yu-Ta, Yu-Hsien Lee, Tsung-Yen Li, and Chun-Yen Chang. "Examining the Effects of Displaying Clicker Voting Results on High School Students’ Voting Behaviors, Discussion Processes, and Learning Outcomes". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2015 11 no. 5 (2015): 1089-1104. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1414a

Harvard

Chien, Y.-T., Lee, Y.-H., Li, T.-Y., and Chang, C.-Y. (2015). Examining the Effects of Displaying Clicker Voting Results on High School Students’ Voting Behaviors, Discussion Processes, and Learning Outcomes. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(5), pp. 1089-1104. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1414a

MLA

Chien, Yu-Ta et al. "Examining the Effects of Displaying Clicker Voting Results on High School Students’ Voting Behaviors, Discussion Processes, and Learning Outcomes". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 11, no. 5, 2015, pp. 1089-1104. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1414a