Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Adams, D., Nelson, R., & Todd, P. (1992). Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: A replication. MIS Quarterly, 16(2), 227-247. doi: 10.2307/249577
• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
• Ajzen, I. & Fishein, M. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behaviour. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
• Allen, I. E. & Seaman, J. (2007). Online nation: Five years of growth in online learning. Survey report, The Sloan Consortium, USA. Retrieved from http://www.sloanc.org/publications/survey/online_nation.
• Bandalos, D. & Benson, J. (1990). Testing the factor structure invariance of a computer attitude scale over two grouping conditions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 50(1), 49-60. doi: 10.1177/0013164490501005
• Bull, J. & McKenna, C. (2004). Blueprint for computer-assisted assessment. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
• Chen, J. & Chang, C. (2006). Using computers in early childhood classrooms: Teachers' attitudes, skills and practices. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 4(2), 169-188. doi: 10.1177/1476718X06063535
• Chen, N-S., Wei, C-W., & Huang, I-F. (2009). Design and implementation of synchronous cyber assessment and its potential issues. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computers in Education, Hong Kong: Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education.
• Cheung, W. & Huang, W. (2005). Proposing a framework to assess internet usage in university education: an empirical investigation from a student’s perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 237–253. doi: 10.1111/j.1467- 8535.2005.00455.x
• Cigdem, H. & Tan, S. (2014). Students’ opinions on administering optional online quizzes in a two-year college Mathematics course. Journal of Computer and Educational Research, 2(4), 51-73.
• Dasgupta, S., Granger, M., & Mcgarry, N. (2002). User acceptance of e-collaboration technology: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. Group Decision and Negotiation, 11, 87-100. doi: 10.1023/A:1015221710638
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. doi:10.2307/249008
• Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35, 982–1003. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
• Dermo, J. (2009). E-assessment and the student learning experience: A survey of student perceptions of e-assessment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), 203-214. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00915.x
• Field, A. (2000). Discovering statistics using SPSS for windows. London, UK: Sage.
• Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D.W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: an integrated model. MIS Quarterly 27(1), 51-90.
• Gikandi, J. W., Morrow, D., & Davis, N. E. (2011). Online formative assessment in higher education: a review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2333–2351. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.004
• Gyambrah, M. K. (2007). E-learning technologies and its applications in higher education: A descriptive comparison of Germany, United Kingdom and United States. PhD dissertation. Faculty for Psychology and Pedagogy. Munich, Germany: Ludwig Maximilians University.
• Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., & Black, W.C. (2008). Multivariate Data Analysis, (7th ed.). Prentice Hall Publisher, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey
• Harwood, I. & Warburton., B. (2004). Thinking the unthinkable: Using project risk management when introducing computer-assisted assessments. Proceedings of the 8th International Computer Assisted Assessment Conference, July 6–7, in Loughborough. Retrieved from http://www.caaconference.com/pastConferences/2004/proceedings/Harwood_Warb urton.pdf.
• Hasan, B. (2006). Delineating the effects of general and system-specific computer selfefficacy beliefs on IS acceptance. Information & Management, 43, 565-571. doi:10.1016/j.im.2005.11.005
• Koufaris, M. (2002). Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior. Information Systems Research, 13(2), 205-223. doi:10.1287/isre.13.2.205.83
• Kutluca, T. (2010). Investigation of teachers’ computer usage profiles and attitudes toward computers. International Online Journal of Science, 2(1), 81-97.
• Landry, B., Griffeth, R., & Hartman, S. (2006). Measuring student perceptions of Blackboard using the technology acceptance model. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4(1), 87-99. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4609.2006.00103.x
• Lederer, A. L., Maupin, D. J., Sens, M. P., & Zhuang, Y. (2000). The technology acceptance model and the World Wide Web. Decision Support Systems, 29, 269–282. doi:10.1016/S0167-9236(00)00076-2
• Llamas-Nistal, M., Fernández-Iglesias, M. J., González-Tato, J., & Mikic-Fonte, F. A. (2013). Blended e-assessment: Migrating classical exams to the digital world. Computers & Education, 62, 72-87. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.021
• Marriott, P. (2009). Students’ evaluation of the use of online summative assessment on an undergraduate financial accounting module. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40, 237–254. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00924.x
• McCausland, W.D. (2003). Extended case study: Computer aided assessment and independent learning in macroeconomics. Bristol: University of Bristol. Retrieved from http://www.economicsnetwork.ac.uk/showcase/ext_causland.htm.
• Morris, D. (2008). Economics of scale and scope in e-learning. Teaching in Higher Education, 33(3), 331–343. doi:10.1080/03075070802066164
• Ngai, E. W. T., Poon, J. K. L., & Chan, Y. H. C. (2007). Empirical examination of the adoption of WebCT using TAM. Computers and Education, 48(2), 250–267. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2004.11.007
• Nicol, D. (2007). Laying a foundation for lifelong learning: case studies of e-assessment in large 1st-year classes. British Journal of Educational Technology 38(4): 668–678. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00657.x
• Ozden, Y., Erturk, I., & Sanli, R. (2004). Student perceptions of online assessment: A case study. Journal of Distance Education, 19(2), 66-92.
• Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. (2006). Code of practice for the assurance of academic quality and standards in higher education. Section 6: Assessment of students.
• Ricketts, C. & Zakrzewski, S. (2004). How do the risks of a web-based CAA system differ from those of a closed network system? Proceedings of the 8th International Computer Assisted Assessment Conference, July 6–7, in Loughborough. Retrieved from http://www.caaconference.com/past- Conferences/2004/proceedings/Ricketts2.pdf .
• Rogers, E.M. & Shoemaker, F.F. (1971).Communication of innovations: A cross-cultural approach. New York: The Free Press.
• Schwartz, P.L. & Webb, G.eds. (2002). Assessment: Case studies, experience and practice from higher education. London: Kogan Page.
• Sorensen, E. (2013). Implementation and student perceptions of e-assessment in a Chemical Engineering module. European Journal of Engineering Education, 38(2), 172-185. doi: 10.1080/03043797.2012.760533
• Stödberg, U. (2012). A research review of e-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(5), 591-604. doi:10.1080/02602938.2011.557496
• Straub, D., Limayem, M., & Karahanna-Evaristo, E. (1995). Measuring system usage: implications for is theory testing. Management Science 41(8), 1328-1342. doi:10.1287/mnsc.41.8.1328
• Szajna, B. (1996). Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Management Science 42(1), 85-92. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.42.1.85
• Taylor, S. & Todd, P. (1995). Assessing it usage: the role of prior experience. MIS Quarterly 19(4), 561-570. doi:10.2307/249633
• Teo, T. (2008). Assessing the computer attitudes of students: an Asian perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(4), 1634–1642. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2007.06.004
• Terzis, V. & Economides, A. A. (2011a). The acceptance and use of computer based assessment. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1032–1044. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.11.017
• Terzis, V. & Economides, A. A. (2011b). Computer-based assessment: gender differences in perceptions and acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2108–2122. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.06.005
• Thompson, R. L., Higgins, C. A., & Howell, J. M. (1991). Personal computing: Toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Quarterly, 15(1), 124–143. doi:10.2307/249443
• Venkatesh, V. & Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences, 27, 451–481. doi: 10.1111/j.1540- 5915.1996.tb00860.x
• Venkatesh, V. & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46, 186–204. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
• Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. doi:10.2307/30036540
• Walker, D., Topping, K., & Rodrigues, S. (2008). Student reflections on formative eassessment: expectations and perceptions. Learning, Media and Technology, 33(3), 221- 234. doi:10.1080/17439880802324178
• Wang, T. H. (2007). What strategies are effective for formative assessment in an e-Learning environment? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(3), 171–186. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00211.x
• Wang, T. H. (2010). Web-based dynamic assessment: Taking assessment as teaching and learning strategy for improving students' e-Learning effectiveness. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1157–1166. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.001
• Wang, T. H. (2011). Implementation of Web-based dynamic assessment in facilitating junior high school students to learn mathematics. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1062–1071. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.014
• Wang, T. H., Wang, K. H., Wang, W. L., Huang, S. C., & Chen, S. Y. (2004). Web-based Assessment and Test Analyses (WATA) system: development and evaluation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(1), 59–71. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00066.x
• Wang, Y. (2003). Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems. Information and Management, 41(1), 75–86. doi:10.1016/S0378- 7206(03)00028-4
• Warburton, B. & Conole, G. (2003). CAA in UK HEIs – The state of the art. Proceedings of the 7th International Computer Assisted Assessment Conference, July 8–9, in Loughborough. Retrieved from http://www.caaconference.com/pastConferences/2003/proceedings/warburton.pdf
• Warshaw, P. & Davis, F. (1985). Disentangling behavioral intention and behavioral expectation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 213- 228. doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(85)90017-4
• Whitelock, D. & Watt, S. (2008). Reframing e-assessment: Adopting new media and adapting old frameworks. Learning, Media and Technology 33(3), 151–154. doi: 10.1080/17439880802447391
• Yusoff, Y.M., Muhammad, Z., Zahari, M.S.M., Pasah, E.S., & Robert, A. (2009). Individual differences, perceived ease of use, and perceived usefulness in the e-library usage. Computer and Information Science 2(1). 76-83.
• Zakrzewski, S. & Bull, J. (1998). The mass implementation and evaluation of computer-based assessments. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 23(2), 141–152. doi:10.1080/0260293980230203 Zakrzewski, S. &
• Steven, C. (2000). A model for computer-based assessment: The catherine wheel principle. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 25(2), 201–15. doi:10.1080/713611427
• Zhang, X. & Prybutok, V. R. (2004). An empirical study of online shopping: A service perspective. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, 5(1), 1–13. doi: 10.1504/IJSTM.2004.004022

APA

Cigdem, H., & Oncu, S. (2015). E-Assessment Adaptation at a Military Vocational College: Student Perceptions. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(5), 971-988. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1368a

Vancouver

Cigdem H, Oncu S. E-Assessment Adaptation at a Military Vocational College: Student Perceptions. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2015;11(5):971-88. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1368a

AMA

Cigdem H, Oncu S. E-Assessment Adaptation at a Military Vocational College: Student Perceptions. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2015;11(5), 971-988. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1368a

Chicago

Cigdem, Harun, and Semiral Oncu. "E-Assessment Adaptation at a Military Vocational College: Student Perceptions". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2015 11 no. 5 (2015): 971-988. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1368a

Harvard

Cigdem, H., and Oncu, S. (2015). E-Assessment Adaptation at a Military Vocational College: Student Perceptions. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(5), pp. 971-988. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1368a

MLA

Cigdem, Harun et al. "E-Assessment Adaptation at a Military Vocational College: Student Perceptions". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 11, no. 5, 2015, pp. 971-988. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1368a