Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Ahire, S. L., & Dreyfus, P. (2000). The impact of design management and process management on quality: an empirical investigation. Journal of Operations Management, 18(5), 549-575.
• Altshuller, G., Shulyak, L., & Rodman, S. (1997). 40 Principles: TRIZ keys to innovation (Vol. 1): Technical Innovation Center, Inc.
• Amabile, T. (1996). Creativity in context: Westview press.
• Amabile, T. M. (1997). Motivating creativity in organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you do. California management review, 40(1), 39-58.
• Andrews, J., & Smith, D. C. (1996). In search of the marketing imagination: Factors affecting the creativity of marketing programs for mature products. Journal of Marketing Research, 174-187.
• Büyüközkan, G., Feyzioğlu, O., & Ruan, D. (2007). Fuzzy group decision-making to multiple preference formats in quality function deployment. Computers in Industry, 58(5), 392-402.
• Baer, J., Kaufman, J. C., & Gentile, C. A. (2004). Extension of the consensual assessment technique to nonparallel creative products. Creativity Research Journal, 16(1), 113-117.
• Barczak, G., Griffin, A., & Kahn, K. B. (2009). Perspective: trends and drivers of success in NPD practices: results of the 2003 PDMA best practices study*. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(1), 3-23.
• Barker, A. T. (1999). Benchmarks of successful salesforce performance. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, 16(2), 95-104.
• Barron, F., & Harrington, D. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual review of psychology, 32(1), 439-476.
• Baskinger, M., & Nam, K.-C. (2006). Visual narratives: the essential role of imagination in the visualization process. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2006 Asia-Pacific Symposium on Information Visualisation-Volume 60.
• Beaney, M. (2005). Imagination and creativity: Open University Milton Keynes, UK.
• Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S., & Jones, T. M. (1999). Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management journal, 42(5), 488-506.
• Betts, G. H. (1916). The mind and its education: Appleton.
• Bossert, J. L. (1991). Quality function deployment: a practitioner's approach: ASQC Quality Press.
• Brady, E. (1998). Imagination and the aesthetic appreciation of nature. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 56(2), 139-147.
• Calantone, R., Di Benedetto, C. A., & Rubera, G. (2012). Launch timing and launch activities proficiency as antecedents to new product performance. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 22(4), 290-309.
• Cartwright, P., & Noone, L. (2006). Critical Imagination: A Pedagogy for Engaging Pre-Service Teachers in the University Classroom. College Quarterly, 9(4), n4.
• Chai, K.-H., Zhang, J., & Tan, K.-C. (2005). A TRIZ-based method for new service design. Journal of Service Research, 8(1), 48-66.
• Chen, M.-H., Chang, Y.-Y., & Chang, Y.-C. (2015). Exploring individual-work context fit in affecting employee creativity in technology-based companies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 98, 1-12.
• Chu, S., & Quek, F. (2013). Maia: A methodology for assessing imagination in action. Paper presented at the CHI 2013 Workshop on Evaluation Methods for Creativity Support Environments.
• Clark, K. B., & Fujimoto, T. (1991). Product Development Performance: Strategy, Organization, and Management in the World Auto Industry: Harvard Business School Press.
• Clarkson, A. (2003). A curriculum for the creative imagination. Creativity and music education, 52-76.
• Colello, S. M. G. (2007). Imagination in children’s writing: How high can fiction fly. Notandum, 10(14), 5-15.
• Cooper, R. G., Edgett, S. J., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (2001). Portfolio management for new products: Basic Books.
• Craft, A., Chappell, K., & Twining, P. (2008). Learners reconceptualising education: widening participation through creative engagement? Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(3), 235-245.
• Dalkey, N., & Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management Science, 9(3), 458-467.
• Deng, J. (1986). Grey prediction and decision. Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
• DeVries, W. (1988). Hegel's theory of mental activity.
• Dewey, J. (1910). The influence of Darwin on philosophy. The influence of Darwin on philosophy and other essays, 1-19.
• Dewey, J. (2005). Art as experience: Penguin.
• Doiron, R., & Egan, K. (1993). Imagination in teaching and learning: The middle school years: JSTOR.
• Eberle, B. (1996). Scamper on: Games for imagination development: Prufrock Press Inc.
• Eberle, B., & Weber, J. K. (1990). Scamper on: For Creative Imagination Development: Hawker Brownlow Education.
• Egan, K. (2005). An imaginative approach to teaching. San Francisco.
• El-Murad, J., & West, D. C. (2004). The definition and measurement of creativity: what do we know? Journal of Advertising Research, 44(02), 188-201.
• Enkel, E., & Gassmann, O. (2010). Creative imitation: exploring the case of cross‐industry innovation. R&d Management, 40(3), 256-270.
• Ermer, D. S. (1995). Using QFD becomes an educational experience for students and faculty. Quality Progress, 28(5), 131.
• Fettes, M., & Judson, G. (2010). Imagination and the cognitive tools of place-making. The Journal of Environmental Education, 42(2), 123-135.
• Finke, R. A. (1996). Imagery, creativity, and emergent structure. Consciousness and cognition, 5(3), 381-393.
• Folkmann, M. N. (2010). Enabling creativity. Imagination in design processes. Paper presented at the DS 66-2: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Design Creativity (ICDC 2010).
• Gabus, A., & Fontela, E. (1972). World Problems, an Invitation to Further Thought Within the Framework of DEMATEL. Geneva, Switzerland: Batelle Geneva Research Center.
• Gajdamaschko*, N. (2005). Vygotsky on imagination: Why an understanding of the imagination is an important issue for schoolteachers. Teaching Education, 16(1), 13-22.
• Gao, C., Huang, K., & Ma, F. (2005). Comparison of innovation methodologies and TRIZ. The TRIZ Journal.
• Garcia, M. L., & Bray, O. H. (1997). Fundamentals of technology roadmapping: Citeseer.
• Garvin, D. A. (1985). Building a learning organization. Org Dev & Trng, 6E (Iae), 274.
• Gattiker, U. (1984). Managing computer-based office information technology: a process model for management. Human Factors in Organizational Design, North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1, 395-403.
• Gaut, B. (2003). Creativity and imagination. The creation of art, 148-173.
• Gladding, S. T., & Henderson, D. A. (2000). Creativity and family counseling: The SCAMPER model as a template for promoting creative processes. The Family Journal, 8(3), 245-249.
• Green, P. E., & Srinivasan, V. (1978). Conjoint analysis in consumer research: issues and outlook. Journal of consumer research, 103-123.
• Griffin, A., & Hauser, J. R. (1993). The voice of the customer. Marketing science, 12(1), 1-27.
• Griffin, A., & Page, A. L. (1993). An interim report on measuring product development success and failure. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 10(4), 291-308.
• Grzesiak, A., Becker, R., & Verl, A. (2011). The bionic handling assistant: a success story of additive manufacturing. Assembly Automation, 31(4), 329-333.
• Heath, G. (2008). Exploring the imagination to establish frameworks for learning. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27(2-3), 115-123.
• Hoidn, S., & Kärkkäinen, K. (2014). Promoting skills for innovation in higher education: A literature review on the effectiveness of problem-based learning and of teaching behaviours: OECD Publishing.
• Howard, T. J., Culley, S. J., & Dekoninck, E. (2008). Describing the creative design process by the integration of engineering design and cognitive psychology literature. Design studies, 29(2), 160-180.
• Hsu, Y., Liang, C., & Chang, C.-C. (2014). The mediating effects of generative cognition on imagination stimulation. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51(5), 544-555.
• Huang, C.-Y., & Shyu, J. Z. (2006). Developing e-commerce business models for enabling silicon intellectual property transactions. International Journal of Information Technology and Management, 5(2/3), 114-133.
• Huang, C.-Y., Shyu, J. Z., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2007). Reconfiguring the innovation policy portfolios for Taiwan's SIP Mall industry. Technovation, 27(12), 744-765. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2007.04.002.
• Huang, C.-Y., Shyu, J. Z., & Tzeng, G. H. (2007). Reconfiguring the Innovation Policy Portfolios for Taiwan 's SIP Mall Industry. Technovation, 27(12), 744-765.
• Huang, C.-Y., Tzeng, G. H., & Ho, W. R. (2010). System on Chip Design Service e-Business Value Maximization Through a Novel MCDM Framework. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(7), 7947-7962.
• Ilevbare, I. M., Probert, D., & Phaal, R. (2013). A review of TRIZ, and its benefits and challenges in practice. Technovation, 33(2), 30-37.
• Im, S., & Workman Jr, J. P. (2004). Market orientation, creativity, and new product performance in high-technology firms. Journal of marketing, 68(2), 114-132.
• Juan, Y.-K., Perng, Y.-H., Castro-Lacouture, D., & Lu, K.-S. (2009). Housing refurbishment contractors selection based on a hybrid fuzzy-QFD approach. Automation in Construction, 18(2), 139-144.
• Julong, D. (1989). Introduction to grey system theory. The Journal of grey system, 1(1), 1-24.
• Kangas, M. (2010). Creative and playful learning: Learning through game co-creation and games in a playful learning environment. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 5(1), 1-15.
• Karsak, E. E., Sozer, S., & Alptekin, S. E. (2003). Product planning in quality function deployment using a combined analytic network process and goal programming approach. Computers & industrial engineering, 44(1), 171-190.
• Kelly, J., Male, S., & Graham, D. (2014). Value management of construction projects: John Wiley & Sons.
• Kimori, Y. (2013). Morphological image processing for quantitative shape analysis of biomedical structures: effective contrast enhancement. Journal of synchrotron radiation, 20(6), 848-853.
• Klukken, P. G., Parsons, J. R., & Columbus, P. J. (1997). The creative experience in engineering practice: Implications for engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 86(2), 133-138.
• Kunzendorf, R. G. (1982). Mental images, appreciation of grammatical patterns, and creativity. Journal of Mental Imagery.
• Kwatra, S., & Salamatov, Y. (2012). Trimming, Miniaturization and Ideality Via Convolution Technique of TRIZ: A Guide to Lean and High-level Inventive Design: Springer Science & Business Media.
• Lee, S., & Sai On Ko, A. (2000). Building balanced scorecard with SWOT analysis, and implementing “Sun Tzu's The Art of Business Management Strategies” on QFD methodology. Managerial Auditing Journal, 15(1/2), 68-76.
• Lee, Y. S., Huang., J. C., & Hsu, Y. S. (2008). Using Modified Delphi Method to Explore the Competition Strategy for Software Companies of Taiwan. Journal of Informatics & Electronics, 13(1), 39-50.
• Levitt, T. (1986). Marketing Imagination: New: Simon and Schuster.
• Liang, C., Chi-Cheng, C., Chang, Y., & Li-Jhong, L. (2012). The exploration of indicators of imagination. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(3).
• Liao, S., Wu, M.-J., Huang, C.-Y., Kao, Y.-S., & Lee, T.-H. (2014). Evaluating and Enhancing Three-Dimensional Printing Service Providers for Rapid Prototyping Using the DEMATEL Based Network Process and VIKOR. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2014.
• Lin, C.-L., Hong, J.-C., Hwang, M.-Y., & Lin, Y.-L. (2006). A Study of the Applicability of Idea Generation Techniques. Paper presented at the The XVII ISPIM Conference, Athens, Greece.
• Lin, J.-S., Liang, C.-T., Chang, W.-S., & Liang, C. (2015). Relation between Personality Traits and Imaginative Capability of Engineering Students. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 31(1), 23-32.
• Lin, W.-S., Hsu, Y., & Liang, C. (2014). The mediator effects of conceiving imagination on academic performance of design students. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 24(1), 73-89.
• Liu, E., & Noppe-Brandon, S. (2009). Imagination first: Unlocking the power of possibility: John Wiley & Sons.
• Lu, M.-T., Lin, S.-W., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2013). Improving RFID adoption in Taiwan's healthcare industry based on a DEMATEL technique with a hybrid MCDM model. Decision Support Systems, 56, 259-269.
• Luttropp, C., & Lagerstedt, J. (2006). EcoDesign and The Ten Golden Rules: generic advice for merging environmental aspects into product development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(15), 1396-1408.
• March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization science, 2(1), 71-87.
• Marginson, S., Tytler, R., Freeman, B., & Roberts, K. (2013). STEM: country comparisons: international comparisons of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education. Final report: Australian Council of Learned Academies.
• McFadden, D. (1986). The choice theory approach to market research. Marketing science, 5(4), 275-297.
• McGraw, D. (2004). Expanding the mind. ASEE Prism, 13(9), 30.
• Mijares-Colmenares, B. E., Masten, W. G., & Underwood, J. R. (1993). Effects of trait anxiety and the scamper technique on creative thinking of intellectually gifted students. Psychological reports, 72(3), 907-912.
• Morosini, P. (2010). Seven keys to imagination: Creating the future by imagining the unthinkable and delivering it: Marshall Cavendish International Asia Pte Ltd.
• Mumford, M. D., & Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological bulletin, 103(1), 27.
• Murry, J. W., & Hammons, J. O. (1995). Delphi: A versatile methodology for conducting qualitative research. The Review of Higher Education, 18(4), 423-436.
• Norton, J. L. (1994). Creative Thinking and Locus of Control as Predictors of Reflective Thinking in Preservice Teachers.
• Ogot, M., & Okudan, G. E. (2006). Integrating systematic creativity into first-year engineering design curriculum. International Journal of Engineering and Education, 22(1), 109.
• Okudan, G. l. E., Ogot, M., & Shirwaiker, R. (2006). An investigation on the effectiveness of design ideation using TRIZ. Paper presented at the ASME 2006 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference.
• Osborn, A. F. (1953). Applied imagination.
• Osteras, T., Murthy, D., & Rausand, M. (2006). Product performance and specification in new product development. Journal of Engineering Design, 17(2), 177-192.
• Pahl, G., & Beitz, W. (1988). Engineering design: a systematic approach. NASA STI/Recon Technical Report A, 89, 47350.
• Perdue, K. (2003). Imagination. The Chicago school of media theory. Retrieved October, 16, 2011.
• Phillips-Wren, G., Jain, L. C., Nakamatsu, K., & Howlett, R. J. (2010). Advances in Intelligent Decision Technologies: Proceedings of the Second Kes International Symposium Idt 2010: Springer.
• Politis, J. D. (2005). QFD, organisational creativity and productivity. International journal of Quality & Reliability management, 22(1), 59-71.
• Project Management Institute. (2008). Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® GUIDE). New Squares, P.A.: Project Management Institute.
• Rangaswamy, A., & Lilien, G. L. (1997). Software tools for new product development. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(1), 177-184.
• Reichling, M. J. (1990). Images of imagination. Journal of Research in Music Education, 38(4), 282-293.
• Reiner, M., & Gilbert, J. (2000). Epistemological resources for thought experimentation in science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 22(5), 489-506.
• Ribot, T. (1906). Essay on the creative imagination: Open Court.
• Ruchti, B., & Livotov, P. (2001). TRIZ-based innovation principles and a process for problem solving in business and management. The TRIZ Journal, 1, 677-687.
• Rutitsky, D. (2010). Using TRIZ as an entrepreneurship tool. Journal of management, 17(1), 39-44.
• Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation: McGraw-Hill International Book Co.
• Sapuan, S., Maleque, M., Hameedullah, M., Suddin, M., & Ismail, N. (2005). A note on the conceptual design of polymeric composite automotive bumper system. Journal of materials processing technology, 159(2), 145-151.
• Savransky, S. D. (2000). Engineering of creativity: Introduction to TRIZ methodology of inventive problem solving: CRC Press.
• Scheffler, I. (2010). In Praise of the Cognitive Emotions (Routledge Revivals): And Other Essays in the Philosophy of Education: Routledge.
• Schoemaker, P. J. (1995). Scenario planning: a tool for strategic thinking. Sloan management review, 36(2), 25.
• Schweizer, T. P. (2002). Integrating TRIZ into the Curriculum: An Educational Imperative. TRIZ Journal.
• Serrat, O. (2009). The SCAMPER technique.
• Silvia, P. J., Winterstein, B. P., Willse, J. T., Barona, C. M., Cram, J. T., Hess, K. I., . . . Richard, C. A. (2008). Assessing creativity with divergent thinking tasks: Exploring the reliability and validity of new subjective scoring methods. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2(2), 68.
• Souchkov, V. (2007). Breakthrough thinking with TRIZ for business and management: An overview. ICG Training & Consulting, 3-12.
• Stevens, G., Burley, J., & Divine, R. (1999). Creativity business discipline= higher profits faster from new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 16(5), 455-468.
• Sung, W. C. (2001). Application of Delphi method, a qualitative and quantitative analysis, to the healthcare management. Journal of Healthcare Management, 2(2), 11-19.
• Takahashi, M. (1993). Dictionary of creativity: Tokyo: Mo To Publishing.
• Tamer Cavusgil, S., Calantone, R. J., & Zhao, Y. (2003). Tacit knowledge transfer and firm innovation capability. Journal of business & industrial marketing, 18(1), 6-21.
• Tamura, M., Nagata, H., & Akazawa, K. (2002). Extraction and systems analysis of factors that prevent safety and security by structural models Proceedings of the 41st SICE Annual Conference, Volume 3. (pp. 1752-1759). Osaka, Japan. (Reprinted from: IN FILE).
• Tan, R., Ma, L., Yang, B., & Sun, J. (2008). Systematic method to generate new ideas in fuzzy front end using TRIZ. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering-English Edition, 21(2), 114.
• Taylor, M. (2013). The Oxford handbook of the development of imagination: Oxford University Press.
• Thomas, N. J. (1999). Are theories of imagery theories of imagination?: An active perception approach to conscious mental content. Cognitive science, 23(2), 207-245.
• Thompson, G., & Lordan, M. (1999). A review of creativity principles applied to engineering design. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering, 213(1), 17-31.
• Townsend, D. (2003). Cohen on Kant's aesthetic judgements. The British Journal of Aesthetics, 43(1), 75-79.
• Trotman, D. (2006). Interpreting imaginative lifeworlds: Phenomenological approaches in imagination and the evaluation of educational practice. Qualitative Research, 6(2), 245-265.
• Tzeng, G.-H., & Huang, C.-Y. (2012). Combined DEMATEL technique with hybrid MCDM methods for creating the aspired intelligent global manufacturing & logistics systems. Annals of Operations Research, 197(1), 159-190.
• Tzeng, G.-H., & Tasur, S. (1994). The multiple criteria evaluation of grey relation model. The Journal of grey system, 6(2), 87-108.
• Udwadia, F. E. (1990). Creativity and innovation in organizations: Two models and managerial implications. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 38(1), 65-80.
• Ulrich, K. T. (2003). Product design and development: Tata McGraw-Hill Education.
• Valett, R. E. (1983). Strategies for Developing Creative Imagination & Thinking Skills.
• Van Boeijen, A., Daalhuizen, J., Van Der Schoor, R., & Zijlstra, J. (2014). Delft Design Guide: Design Strategies and Methods: Bis B.V., Uitgeverij (BIS Publishers).
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1980). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes: Harvard university press.
• Vygotsky, L. S. (2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 42(1), 7-97.
• Vygotsky, L. S., & Luria, A. (1994). Tool and symbol in child development. The vygotsky reader, 99-174.
• Wallace, L., Keil, M., & Rai, A. (2004). Understanding software project risk: a cluster analysis. Information & Management, 42(1), 115-125.
• Wysocki, R. K. (2013). Effective Project Management: Traditional, Agile, Extreme: Wiley.
• Yang, Y. Q., Wang, S. Q., Dulaimi, M., & Low, S. P. (2003). A fuzzy quality function deployment system for buildable design decision-makings. Automation in construction, 12(4), 381-393.
• Zhang, Q., & Doll, W. J. (2001). The fuzzy front end and success of new product development: a causal model. European Journal of Innovation Management, 4(2), 95-112.
• Zittoun, T., & Gillespie, A. (2015). Imagination in human and cultural development: Routledge.
• Zivkovic, Z., Nikolic, S. T., Doroslovacki, R., Lalic, B., Stankovic, J., & Zivkovic, T. (2015). Fostering creativity by a specially designed Doris tool. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 17, 132-148.
• Zlotin, B., Zusman, A., Kaplan, L., Visnepolschi, S., Proseanic, V., & Malkin, S. (1999). TRIZ beyond technology: The theory and practice of applying TRIZ to nontechnical areas. Detroit: Ideation. Retrieved June, 2, 2005.

APA

Huang, C.-Y., Kao, Y.-S., Lu, H.-H., & Wu, M.-J. (2017). Curriculum Development for Enhancing the Imagination in the Technology Commercialization Process. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(9), 6249-6283. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01062a

Vancouver

Huang CY, Kao YS, Lu HH, Wu MJ. Curriculum Development for Enhancing the Imagination in the Technology Commercialization Process. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2017;13(9):6249-83. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01062a

AMA

Huang CY, Kao YS, Lu HH, Wu MJ. Curriculum Development for Enhancing the Imagination in the Technology Commercialization Process. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2017;13(9), 6249-6283. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01062a

Chicago

Huang, Chi-Yo, Yu-Sheng Kao, Hsueh-Hsin Lu, and Ming-Jenn Wu. "Curriculum Development for Enhancing the Imagination in the Technology Commercialization Process". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2017 13 no. 9 (2017): 6249-6283. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01062a

Harvard

Huang, C.-Y., Kao, Y.-S., Lu, H.-H., and Wu, M.-J. (2017). Curriculum Development for Enhancing the Imagination in the Technology Commercialization Process. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(9), pp. 6249-6283. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01062a

MLA

Huang, Chi-Yo et al. "Curriculum Development for Enhancing the Imagination in the Technology Commercialization Process". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 13, no. 9, 2017, pp. 6249-6283. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01062a