Computer-Based Learning in Chemistry Classes

Verena Pietzner

doi:10.12973/eurasia.2014.1084a

Full Text (PDF)

Verena Pietzner ¹ ^*

More Detail

¹ University of Oldenburg, GERMANY^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

Currently not many people would doubt that computers play an essential role in both public and private life in many countries. However, somewhat surprisingly, evidence of computer use is difficult to find in German state schools although other countries have managed to implement computer-based teaching and learning in their schools. This paper attempts to understand the reasons for this phenomenon and to show that more research and development on computer-based teaching and learning should be done. It starts with some comments on the importance of computer-based learning, followed by a description of the development of ICT in education since the 1990s in Germany and the general situation at public schools. After focusing on the frame of educational policy in Germany, the situation in schools, including the person of the teacher, is then reflected upon and compared to the situation in other countries. Finally, current developments of computer-based learning in chemistry education in Germany are discussed and a frame of further research is proposed.

Keywords

STEM
secondary students
assessments
gender
school category

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, Volume 10, Issue 4, 2014, 297-311

https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1084a

Publication date: 15 Dec 2014

Article Views: 3093

Article Downloads: 1615

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139-148.
Anderson, R. E., & Ronnkvist, A. (1999). The presence of computers in American schools. Teaching, Learning and Computing Suvey 1998. Report #2. Center of Research on Information Technology and Organizations. Irvine: University of California. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED430548)
Autorengruppe Bildungsberichterstattung (2012). Bildung in Deutschland 2012 [Education in Germany 2012]. Bielefeld: Bertelsmann. Retrieved October 25, 2013, from http://www.bildungsbericht.de/daten2012 /bb_2012.pdf.
Bard, A. J., & King, D. M. (1965). General digital computer program for chemical equilibrium calculations. Journal of Chemical Education, 42, 127.
Barnea, N., & Dori, Y. (1996). Computerized molecular modelling as a tool to improve chemistry teaching. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Science, 36, 629-636.
Barnea, N., & Dori, Y. (1999). High-school chemistry students’ performance and gender differences in a computerized molecular modelling learning environment. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8, 257-271.
Barnea, N., Dori, Y., & Hofstein, A. (2010). Development and implementation of inquiry-based and computerized-based laboratories: reforming high school chemistry in Israel. Chemical Education Research and Practice, 11, 218–228.
Barnea, N., & Dori, Y. (2000). Computerized molecular modelling – the new technology for enhancing model perception among chemistry educators and learners. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 1, 109-120.
Barwinski, C. (2013). Nutzungsprofile und Einstellungen von Chemielehrkräften zum Computereinsatz im Chemieunterricht [Chemistry teachers‘ usage profiles and attitudes towards computer usage in chemistry classes]. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Hildesheim, Hildesheim, Germany.
Beckers, J. J., & Schmidt, H. G. (2003). Computer experience and computer anxiety. Computers in Human Behaviour, 19, 785–797.
Bell, T., Urhahne, D., Schanze, S., & Ploetzner, R. (2010). Collaborative inquiry learning: models, tools, and challenges. International Journal of Science Education, 32, 349-377.
Bingimlas, K. A. (2009). Barriers to the successful integration of ITC in teaching and learning environments: A review of the literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 5, 235-245.
Brydon-Miller, M., Greenwood, D., & Maguire, P. (2003). Why action research? Action Research, 1, 9-28.
Casanova, J., & Weaver, E. R. (1965). Introduction to computer use: Programs for first order rate constants. Journal of Chemical Education, 42, 137.
CHEMnet (2013). Homepage: http://www.chemievorlesung.ipn.uni-kiel.de. Retrieved October 11, 2013.
ChiLe (2013): Homepage: http://www.chemieunterrichtinteraktiv.de. Retrieved October 11, 2013.
Collis, B., & Carleer, G. (1993). The effects of technologyenriched school interventions: A multiple case study analysis. Computers & Education, 21, 151-162.
Cummins, J.D., & Wartell, M.A. (1973). A mini-computer generated freshman kinetics experiment. Journal of Chemical Education, 50, 544.
DChemLit (2013). Homepage: http://www.dchemlit.de. Retrieved October 11, 2013.
Dori, Y., & Belcher, J. (2005). How does technology-enabled active learning affect students’ understanding of scientific concepts? The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14, 243-279.
Dori, Y., Rodriguez, S., & Schanze, S. (2013). How to promote chemistry learning through the use of ICT. In I. Eilks & A. Hofstein (Eds.), Teaching chemistry – a studybook. Rotterdam: Sense, 213-240.
Dori, Y., & Sasson, I. (2008). Chemical understanding and graphing skills in an honors case-based computerized chemistry laboratory environment: The value of bidirectional visual and textual representations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 219-250.
Eilks, I., Witteck, T., & Pietzner, V. (2009). A critical discussion of the efficacy of using visual learning aids from the internet to promote understanding, illustrated with examples explaining the Daniell voltaic cell. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 5, 145-152.
Eilks, I., Witteck, T., & Pietzner, V. (2012). The role and potential dangers of visualisation when learning about sub-microscopic explanations in chemistry education. Centre of Educational Policy Studies Journal, 2(1), 125-145.
Elks, I. (2013). Homepage. http://www.chemiedidaktik.unibremen.de/multimedia. Retrieved October 11, 2013.
Emery, A. R. (1965). Computer program for the calculation of acid-base titration curves. Journal of Chemical Education, 42, 131.
Fernandez, C. (2002). Learning from Japanese approaches to professional development: The case of lesson study. Journal of Teacher Education, 53, 393-405.
Flintjer, B. (2011). Computer im Chemieunterricht – ein kurzer Rück- und Ausblick [Computer in chemistry classes – a short retrospective and outlook]. Chemie konkret, 18, 57-58.
FU Berlin (2013). Homepage of the IBE experiments. http://didaktik.physik.fu-berlin.de/projekte /ibe/index.html. Retrieved October 11, 2013.
Henrich, S., Hundertmark, S., & Schanze, S. (2013). "proCMap 2" - Der Einfluss computerbasierter Reflexionsmethoden auf das Konzeptverständnis [proCMap2 – The influence of computer-based reflection methods on the understanding of a concept]. In S. Bernholt (Ed), Inquiry-based Learning - Forschendes Lernen (pp. 764-766). Kiel: IPN.
Hiller, A. (2912). Das Schulbuch zwischen Internet und Bildungspolitik - Konsequenzen für das Schulbuch als Leitmedium und die Rolle des Staates in der Schulbildung [The text book between internet and education policy – consequences for the text book as leading media and the role of the state in school education] (p. 201). Marburg: Techum.
Ihlenfeldt, W.-D., & Gasteiger, J. (1995). Chemie auf dem Internet [Chemstry on the internet]. Chemie in unserer Zeit, 29, 249-259.
ISTE (2007). Competencies of Technology Literate Students. Retrieved October 2, 2013, from http://www.iste.org/docs/pdfs/nets-s-standards. pdf?sfvrsn=2.
ISTE (2009). Profiles for Technology (ICT) Literate Students. Retrieved October 2, 2013, from http://www.iste.org/docs/pdfs/nets-s-2007-studentprofiles-en.pdf?sfvrsn=4 .
Kappenberg (2013). Homepage: http://www.kappenberg.com/pages/start/start.htm. Retrieved October 11, 2013.
Kirstein, J. (1999). Interaktive Bildschirmexperimente; Technik und Didaktik einer neuartigen Methode zur multimedialen Abbildung physikalischer Experimente [Interactive monitor experiments; technics and didactic of a new method for multimedia representations of physical experiments]. Dissertation, Technische Universität Berlin.
KMK (1995). Medienpädagogik in der Schule - Erklärung der Kultusministerkonferenz vom 12.05.1995 [Media pedagogy at schools – declaration of the KMK from May 12, 1995]. Retrieved September 7, 2013, from http://www.nibis.de/nli1/chaplin/portal%20neu/porta l_start/start_grundsaetze/materialien_grundsaetze/3km k95.pdf.
KMK (1998). Zur Rolle der Medienpädagogik, insbesondere der neuen Medien und der Telekommunikation in der Lehrerbildung - Bericht des Schulausschusses vom 11.12.1998 [The role of media pedagogy, especially the new media, and telecommunication in teacher education – Report of the school committee from December 11, 1998]. Retrieved September 7, 2013, from http://www.kmk.org/fileadmin/pdf/PresseUndAktuell es/Beschluesse_Veroeffentlichungen/neuemed.pdf.
KMK (2003). Bildungsbericht für Deutschland - Erste Befunde [Education report for Germany – First results]. Opladen: Leseke + Budrich, pp. 117-121.
KMK (2004). Bildungsstandards im Fach Chemie für den Mittleren Schulabschluss. Beschluss der Kultusministerkonferenz vom 16.12.2004 [Education standards in Chemistry for the intermediate school leaving certificate]. Retrieved September 7, 2013, from http://www.kmk.org/fileadmin/ veroeffentlichungen_beschluesse/2004/2004_12_16- Bildungsstandards-Chemie.pdf .
KMK (2012). Medienbildung in der Schule [Media education at school]. Retrieved September 7, 2013, from http://www.kmk.org/fileadmin/veroeffentlichungen_b eschluesse/2012/2012_03_08_Medienbildung.pdf.
Kotrlik, J., & Smith, M. (1989). Computer anxiety levels of vocational agriculture teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education, 30, 41-48.
Krause, M., Kienast, S., Witteck, T., & Eilks, I. (2013). On the development of a computer-based learning and assessment environment for the transition from lower to upper secondary chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14, 345-353.
Krause, M., Ostersehlt, D., Mehrwald, T., Runden, H.-J., Mroske, S., & Eilks, I. (2014). Using PREZI-technology to promote inquiry-based learning on ‚bionics’ In C. Bolte, J. Holbrook, R. Mamlok-Naaman & F. Rauch (eds.), Science teachers‘ continuous professional development in Europe (pp. 141-150). Berlin: FU Berlin.
Lawless, K., & Brown, S. (1997). Multimedia learning environments: Issues of learner control and navigation. Instructional Science, 25, 117-131.
Lawless, K., Mills, R., & Brown, S. (2003). Children’s hypertext navigation strategies. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34, 274-284.
Lawless, K., & Pellgrino, J. (2010). Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research, 77, 575-614.
Martens, B., & Hallstein, H. (1976). Einsatzmöglichkeiten der EDV im Chemieunterricht anhand der Untersuchung der Dampfdruckkurve - Teil II [Application of electronic data processing on the basis of the investigation of the vapor pressure curve – Part II]. Praxis der Naturwissenschaften – Chemie in der Schule, 10, 253-263.
Mayer, R.E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 43–52.
Mayer, R. E. (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: Using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and Instruction, 13, 125-140.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teacher College Record, 108, 1017-1054.
Ministry of Education of Lower Saxony (2007). Kerncurriculum für das Gymnasium, Schuljahrgänge 5 -10, Naturwissenschaften. Retrieved September 7, 2013, from http://db2.nibis.de/1db/cuvo/datei/kc_gym_nws_07_ nib.pdf.
Mumtaz, S. (2000). Factors affecting teachers’ use of information and communications technology: a review of the literature. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 9, 319-341.
Nick, S., & Andresen, J. (2005). CHEMnet: Eine OnlineChemievorlesung (nicht nur) zum selbstgesteuerten Lernen [CHEMnet: An online chemistry lecture (not only) for self regulated learning]. Naturwissenschaften im Unterricht - Chemie, 90, 9-11.
Pietzner, V. (2009). Computer im naturwissenschaftlichen Unterricht – Ergebnisse einer Umfrage unter Lehrkräften [Computer in science classes – results of a study among teachers]. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 15, 47-67.
Pietzner, V. (2007). Computerunterstütztes Problemlösen im Chemieunterricht [Computer-based problem solving in chemistry classes]. Der Mathematische und Naturwissenschaftliche Unterricht, 60, 52-58.
Pietzner, V. (2006). Eine schlechte Verbindung? - Computergestützter Chemieunterricht unter Genderaspekten [A bad connection? - Computer-based chemistry classes from the gender aspect]. Computer und Unterricht, 16(61), 30-32.
Pietzner, V. (2005). Alternative Übungsaufgaben zu Atombau und Periodensystem [Alternative excercises for the structure of matter and the periodic system]. In Höner, K., Looß, M., Müller, R. (Hrsg.): Naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht - handlungsorientiert und fächerübergreifend (pp. 27- 34). Münster: LIT.
Recker, M., Walker, A., & Lawless, K. (2003). What do you recommend? Implementation and analyses of collaborative filtering of web resources for education. Instructional Science, 31, 299-316.
Reid, K., Wheatley, R. J., Horton, J. C., & Brydges, S. W. (2000). Using computer assisted learning to teach moleclar reaction dynamics. Journal of Chemical Education, 77, 407-409.
Rosen, L., & Weil, M. (1995) Computer availability, computer experience and technophobia among public school teachers. Computers in Human Behavior, 11, 9-31.
Russel, G., & Bradley, G. (1997a) Teachers’ computer anxiety: implications for professional development. Education and Information Technologies, 2, 17–30.
Russel, G., & Bradley, G. (1997b). Computer experience, school support and computer anxieties. Educational Psychology, 17, 267-284.
Sanger, M. J., & Greenbowe, T. J. (2000). Addressing student misconceptions concerning electron flow in electrolyte solutions with instruction including computer animations and conceptual change strategies. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 521-537.
Schanze, S., & Sieve, B. (2013). IWB-Einsatz im naturwissenschaftlichen Unterricht? Ja, aber wie? [Inceractive Whiteboards in science classes? Yes, but how?]. In Bernholt, S. (Ed.), Inquiry-based Learning - Forschendes Lernen (pp. 446-448). Kiel: IPN.
Schaumburg, H. (2003). Konstruktivistischer Unterricht mit Laptops? Eine Fallstudie zum Einfluss mobiler Computer auf die Methodik des Unterrichts [Constructivistic teaching with laptops? A case study investigating the influence of mobile computers on the teaching method]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Freie Universität Berlin. Retrieved October 25, 2013, from http://www.diss.fuberlin.de/diss/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/FUDISS _derivate_000000000914/00_autor.pdf?hosts=
Schrader, F., & Schanze, S. (2012). Digitale Messwerterfassungsgeräte - Ein kriterienorientierter Überblick [Digital data logger – an overview according to specific criteria]. Praxis der Naturwissenschaften – Chemie in der Schule, 61(4), 42-48.
Schulz-Zander, R., Dalmer, R., Petzel, T., Büchter, A., Beer, D., & Stadermann, M. (2003). Nationale Ergebnisse der internationalen IEA-Studie SITES Modul 2 - Second Information Technology in Education Study [National Results of the international IEA study SITES Module 2]. Retrieved October 25, 2013 from http://www.eteachingplus.de /files/abschlussbericht.pdf.
Schulz-Zander, R. (2005). Veränderung der Lernkultur mit digitalen Medien im Unterricht [Changing learning culture with digital media in class]. In H. Kleber (ed.), Perspektiven der Medienpädagogik in Wissenschaft und Bildungspraxis (pp. 125-140). Munic: kopaed.
Shimahara, N. K. (1998). The japanese model of professional development: Teaching as craft. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14, 451-462.
Sieve, B., & Schanze, S. (2013). Was denken MINT-Lehrer über ihren Umgang mit dem interaktiven Whiteboard? [What do STEM teachers think about their use of interactive Whiteboards?] In Bernholt, S. (Ed), Inquirybased Learning - Forschendes Lernen (pp. 449-451). Kiel: IPN.
Smolin, L., & Lawless, K. (2003). Becoming literate in the technological age: New responsibilities and tools for teachers. The Reading Teacher, 56, 570-577.
Steiner, D. (2013). Homepage. Retrieved October 2, 2013 from http://www.multimediachemieunterricht.unierlangen.de.
Steiner, D., & Lehnerer, M. (1992). Reaktionsgeschwindigkeiten mit einer Waage aufgezeichnet [Reaction rates recorded with a scale]. Naturwissenschaften im Unterricht – Chemie, 11, 34-36.
Steiner, D., & Lutz, B. (1995). Computereinsatz im Chemieunterricht [Computer usage in chemistry classes]. Naturwissenschaften im Unterricht – Chemie, 28, 4-9.
Steiner, D. (1997). Molecular Modeling im Unterricht – eine ergänzende Spielerei oder eine didaktische Herausforderung [Molecular modeling in class – an additional gimmick or a educational challenge]? Naturwissenschaften im Unterricht – Chemie, 38, 18-23.
Steiner, D. (1999) Molecular Modelling mittels Elektronendichteoberflächen – ein neuer Weg zu einem besseren Chemieverständnis [Molecular modeling using electron density surfaces – a new way to an improved unterstanding of chemistry]. Praxis der Naturwissenschaften – Chemie, 6, 38-42.
Steiner, D. (2001). Molecular Modeling als multimediales Lehrmaterial – Filme zu Reaktionsmechanismen [Molecular modeling als multimedia-based teaching material – films of reaction mechanisms]. Praxis der Naturwissenschaften – Chemie in der Schule, 7, 17-20.
Stracke, I. (2004). Einsatz computerbasierter concept maps zur Wissensdiagnose in der Chemie. Empirische Untersuchungen am Beispiel des chemischen Gleichgewichts [Use of computer based concept maps for the evaluation of the knowledge in chemistry. Empirical studies taking the chemical equilibrim as example]. Münster: Waxmann.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257-285.
The Design-Based Research Collective (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32, 5-8.
Ulrich, N., & Schanze, S. (2013). Formative Entwicklung eines interaktiven, digitalen Chemieschulbuchs - EBook = Schulbuch der Zukunft? [Formative development of an interactive, digital chemistry textbook – ebook = textbook of the future?] In Bernholt, S. (Ed.), Inquiry-based Learning - Forschendes Lernen (pp. 449-451). Kiel: IPN.
Urhahne, D., Schanze, S., Bell, T., Mansfield, A., & Holmes, J. (2010): Role of the teacher in computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning. International Journal of Science Education, 32, 221-243.
Veen, W. (1993). How teachers use computers in instructional practice - Four case studies in a Dutch secondary school. Computers & Education, 21(1/2), 1–8.
Wikipedia (2013). Schulen ans Netz e.V. Retrieved October 2, 2013 from http://de.wikipedia.org/w/ index.php? title=Schulen_ans_Netz&oldid=119682750 (permanent link)
Wirth, J., & Klieme, E. (2002). Computer literacy im Vergleich zwischen Nationen, Schulformen und Geschlechtern [Computer literacy in comparison between nations, school forms, and gender]. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 30, 136-157.
Yaghi, H., & Abu-Saba, M. (1998). Teachers' computer anxiety: An international perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 14, 321-336.
Zajicek, O. T. (1965). A computer program for use in teaching chemical equilibrium. Journal of Chemical Education, 42, 622.

How to cite this article

APA

Pietzner, V. (2014). Computer-Based Learning in Chemistry Classes. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(4), 297-311. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1084a

Vancouver

Pietzner V. Computer-Based Learning in Chemistry Classes. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2014;10(4):297-311. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1084a

AMA

Pietzner V. Computer-Based Learning in Chemistry Classes. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2014;10(4), 297-311. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1084a

Chicago

Pietzner, Verena. "Computer-Based Learning in Chemistry Classes". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2014 10 no. 4 (2014): 297-311. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1084a

Harvard

Pietzner, V. (2014). Computer-Based Learning in Chemistry Classes. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(4), pp. 297-311. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1084a

MLA

Pietzner, Verena "Computer-Based Learning in Chemistry Classes". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 10, no. 4, 2014, pp. 297-311. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1084a