Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Ahn, W.-K., & Medin, D. L. (1992). A two-stage model of category construction. Cognitive Science, 16(1), 81-121.
• Babintsev, V. P., & Segedin N. N. (2008). Management of innovation processes in the regional education system. Belgorod: Cooperative education.
• Baidlikh, V. (2004). Sociodynamics. A Systematic Approach to Mathematical Modeling in the Social Sciences. Moscow: Librocom.
• Bakhtin, M. M. (2000). The author and the hero: To the philosophical foundations of the humanities. St. Petersburg: ABC.
• Cao, Y., Kurbanova, A. T., & Salikhova N. R. (2017). Development of Classification Thinking in Future Teachers: Technologies of Reflective Discussion, EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 1865-1879.
• Ginis, L. A. (2015). Cognitive modeling of decision support in problem-oriented systems. Scientific Review, 8, 219-224.
• Gorelova, G. V. (2013). Cognitive approach to simulation of complex systems. Proceedings of the Southern Federal University. Series of Engineering Sciences, 3, 239-250.
• Gostev, A. G., & Kipriyanova, E. V. (2008). Innovative educational and professional environment as a factor in the introduction of modern teaching technologies. Ekaterinburg: Ural center for academic services.
• Hannan, A., & Silver, H. (2000). Innovation in Higher Education: Teaching, Learning and Institutional Cultures Text. Philadelphia: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
• Il'ina, N. F. (2012). Criteria of readiness of teachers to innovative activities. Pedagogics, 7, 82.
• Khutorskoy, A. V. (2005). Pedagogical innovations: methodology, theory, practice. Moscow: Publishing house UNC DO.
• Khutorskoy, A. V. (2007). Modern didactics. Moscow: High School.
• Kokhanovsky, V. P. (2005). Philosophical problems of social and humanitarian sciences (formation, features and methodology of social cognition). Rostov-on-Don: Phoenix.
• Kravchuk, L. F., Kamenskiy E. G., & Battle, E. I. (2010). Integration features the innovative potential of the personality. News of Kursk state technical University, 2, 116-121.
• Krayevsky, V. V. (2003). Philosophy of education in the system of scientific knowledge. Bulletin of the Peoples' Friendship University of Russia. Series: Philosophy, 2, 21-30.
• Künsting, J., Kempf, J., & Wirth, J. (2013). Enhancing scientific discovery learning through metacognitive support. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(4), 349–360.
• Levina, E. Yu. (2013). Formalization of social and pedagogical processes. Kazan Pedagogical Journal, 1, 134-140.
• Martyshenko, S. N., & Stepanenko, A. A. (2017). Automation of multidimensional data processing in cognitive modeling problems. Fundamental research, 1, 86-93.
• Mukhina, T. G. (2013). Active and interactive educational technologies (forms of conducting classes) in higher education. Nizhny Novgorod: NNGASU.
• Němec, M., Krišťák, L., Hockicko, P., Danihelová, Z., & Velmovská, K. (2017). Application of Innovative. P&E Method at Technical Universities in Slovakia. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 2329-2349.
• Oliveira, P. C., & Oliveira, C. G. (2013). Using Conceptual Questions to Promote Motivation and Learning in Physics Lectures. European Journal of Engineering Education, 38(4), 417–424.
• Osmolovskaya, I. M. (2010). Innovation and pedagogical practice. Public education, 6, 182-188.
• Podlasay, I. P. (2013). Theoretical and Practical Pedagogy. Moscow: Publishing House Yurayt.
• Postalyuk, N. Y. (2004). Designing innovative educational systems: a regional perspective. Samara: Samara training center, from http://psycology.narod.ru/121.html.
• Prokofieva E. N., Shirnin A. Y., Smotrin K. A., Tuisina G. R., Pavlov I. V., Tenyukova G. G., & Filina N. A. (2015). Integrative games as the technique of technical university students’ professional competences formation in the field of health and safety. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 2(6), 3-9.
• Putjato, M. M. (2010). Development of methods and algorithms of intellectual support of decision-making based on fuzzy cognitive maps. PhD Thesis. Krasnodar: Kuban state technological University.
• Safronova, V. M. (2002). Forecasting and modeling in social work. Moscow: Publishing Center "Academy".
• Salso, R. L. (2002). Cognitive psychology. St. Petersburg: Peter.
• Sezginsoy, B., & Akkoyunlu, B. (2011). Effectiveness of systematic instruction on the achievement of history consciousness in social sciences course. H.U. Journal of Education, 41, 411-422.
• Tsvyk, V. A. (2007). The role of social and human sciences in the formation of a professional. Bulletin of the Peoples' Friendship University of Russia. Series of Sociology, 1(11), 34-44.
• Van Dijk, L. A., Van Der Berg, G. C., & Van Keulen, H. (2001). Interactive Lectures in Engineering Education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 26(1), 15–28.
• Zaitsev, V. S. (2012). Modern pedagogical technologies: educational practice. (Book 2). Chelyabinsk, CSPU.
• Zarukina, E. V., Loginova, N. A., & Novik, M. M. (2010). Active methods of teaching: recommendations for development and application. St. Petersburg: SPbGIEW.

APA

Masalimova, A. R., Levina, E. Y., Platonova, R. I., Yakubenko, K. Y., Mamitova, N. V., Arzumanova, L. L., Grebennikov, V. V., & Marchuk, N. N. (2017). Cognitive Simulation as Integrated Innovative Technology in Teaching of Social and Humanitarian Disciplines. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(8), 4915-4928. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00973a

Vancouver

Masalimova AR, Levina EY, Platonova RI, Yakubenko KY, Mamitova NV, Arzumanova LL, et al. Cognitive Simulation as Integrated Innovative Technology in Teaching of Social and Humanitarian Disciplines. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2017;13(8):4915-28. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00973a

AMA

Masalimova AR, Levina EY, Platonova RI, et al. Cognitive Simulation as Integrated Innovative Technology in Teaching of Social and Humanitarian Disciplines. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2017;13(8), 4915-4928. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00973a

Chicago

Masalimova, Alfiya R., Elena Y. Levina, Raisa I. Platonova, Konstantin Yu. Yakubenko, Natalia V. Mamitova, Lana L. Arzumanova, Valery V. Grebennikov, and Nikolay N. Marchuk. "Cognitive Simulation as Integrated Innovative Technology in Teaching of Social and Humanitarian Disciplines". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2017 13 no. 8 (2017): 4915-4928. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00973a

Harvard

Masalimova, A. R., Levina, E. Y., Platonova, R. I., Yakubenko, K. Y., Mamitova, N. V., Arzumanova, L. L., . . . Marchuk, N. N. (2017). Cognitive Simulation as Integrated Innovative Technology in Teaching of Social and Humanitarian Disciplines. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(8), pp. 4915-4928. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00973a

MLA

Masalimova, Alfiya R. et al. "Cognitive Simulation as Integrated Innovative Technology in Teaching of Social and Humanitarian Disciplines". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 13, no. 8, 2017, pp. 4915-4928. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00973a