Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Agnoli, F., & Krantz, D. H. (1989). Suppressing natural heuristics by formal instruction: The case of the conjunction fallacy. Cognitive Psychology, 21(4), 515–550. Doi:10.1016/0010-0285(89)90017-0
• Agus, M., Peró-Cebollero, M., Guàrdia-Olmos, J., & Penna, M. P. (2013). The measurement of statistical reasoning in verbal-numerical and graphical forms: a pilot study. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 459(1), 012023. http://doi.org/10.1088/1742- 6596/459/1/012023
• Agus, M., Peró-Cebollero, M., Penna, M. P., & Guàrdia-Olmos, J. (2014). Towards the development of problems comparing verbal-numerical and graphical formats in statistical reasoning. Quality & Quantity, 49(2), 691–709. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0018-7
• Agus, M., Peró-Cebollero, M., Penna, M. P., & Guàrdia-Olmos, J. (2015). Comparing Psychology Undergraduates’ Performance in Probabilistic Reasoning under Verbal-Numerical and Graphical-Pictorial Problem Presentation Format: What is the Role of Individual and Contextual Dimensions? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(4), 735–750. http://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1382a
• Baker, F. B. (2001). The basics of item response theory. In ERIC clearinghouse on assessment and evaluation. College Park, MD: University of Maryland. Available http://ericae.net/irt/baker.
• Barbey, A. K., & Sloman, S. A. (2007). Base-rate respect: From ecological rationality to dual processes. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30(3), 241–254; http://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X07001653
• Batanero, C., & Sánchez, E. (2005). What is the nature of high school students’ conceptions and misconceptions about probability? In G. A. Jones (Ed.), Exploring probability in school (pp. 241–266). Springer. Doi:10.1007/0-387-24530-8_11
• Ben-Zvi, D., & Garfield, J. (2004). The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning, and thinking. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Pub.
• Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual (Encino, CA., Vol. Multivariate). Multivariate Software.
• Bishop, A. (2008). Spatial abilities and mathematics education – A review. In P. Clarkson & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Critical issues in mathematics education SE - 5 (pp. 71–81). Springer US. Doi:10.1007/978-0-387-09673-5_5
• Braithwaite, D. W., & Goldstone, R. L. (2013a). Flexibility in data interpretation: Effects of representational format. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(DEC), 980. Doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00980
• Braithwaite, D. W., & Goldstone, R. L. (2013b). Integrating formal and grounded representations in combinatorics learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 666–682. Doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0032095
• Brase, G. L. (2008). Frequency interpretation of ambiguous statistical information facilitates Bayesian reasoning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(2), 284–289. Doi:10.3758/PBR.15.2.284
• Brase, G. L. (2009). Pictorial representations in statistical reasoning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(3), 369–381. Doi:10.1002/acp.1460
• Brase, G. L., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1998). Individuation, counting, and statistical inference: The role of frequency and whole-object representations in judgment under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127(1), 3. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.127.1.3
• Brase, G. L., & Hill, W. T. (2015). Good fences make for good neighbors but bad science: a review of what improves Bayesian reasoning and why. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 340. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00340
• Cai, L., Thissen, D., & du Toit, S. H. C. (2011). IRTPRO for Windows [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International (Scientific.). Lincolnwood, IL.
• Castañeda, L. E. G., & Knauff, M. (2013). Individual differences, imagery and the visual impedance effect. In M. Knauff, N. Sebanz, M. Pauen, I. Wachsmuth, (Eds.), Cooperative minds: Social interaction and group dynamics. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society Berlin, Germany, July 31-August 3, 2013 (pp. 2374–9). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society. ISBN: 978-0-9768318-9-1
• Chan, S. W., & Ismail, Z. (2014). A technology-based statistical reasoning assessment tool in descriptive statistics for secondary school students. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(1), 29–46. Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0- 84891655563&partnerID=tZOtx3y1
• Chance, B. L. (2002). Components of statistical thinking and implications for instruction and assessment. Journal of Statistics Education, 10(3), 1–18.
• Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. Doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
• Chiesi, F., & Primi, C. (2009). Un modello sul rendimento nelle materie quantitative degli studenti di psicologia. Giornale Italiano Di Psicologia, 36(1), 161–184.
• Chiesi, F., Primi, C., & Morsanyi, K. (2011). Developmental changes in probabilistic reasoning: The role of cognitive capacity, instructions, thinking styles, and relevant knowledge. Thinking & Reasoning, 17(3), 315–350. Doi:10.1080/13546783.2011.598401
• Clements, M. (2014). Fifty years of thinking about visualization and visualizing in mathematics education: A historical overview. In M. N. Fried & T. Dreyfus (Eds.), Mathematics & mathematics education: Searching for common ground SE - 11 (pp. 177– 192). Springer Netherlands. Doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7473-5_11
• Cokely, E. T., Galesic, M., Schulz, E., Ghazal, S., & Garcia-Retamero, R. (2012). Measuring risk literacy: The Berlin Numeracy Test. Judgment & Decision Making, 7(1). Retrieved from http://journal.sjdm.org/11/11808/jdm11808.html
• Corter, J. E., & Zahner, D. C. (2007). Use of external visual representations in probability problem solving. Statistics Education Research Journal, 6(1), 22–50. Retrieved from https://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase/serj/SERJ6(1)_Corter_Zahner.pdf
• Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1996). Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertainty. Cognition, 58(1), 1–73. Doi:10.1016/0010-0277(95)00664-8
• Del Mas, R. (2004). A Comparison of Mathematical and Statistical Reasoning. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The Challenge of Developing Statistical Literacy, Reasoning and Thinking SE - 4 (pp. 79–95). Springer Netherlands. http://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020- 2278-6_4
• De Ayala, R. J. (2009). Theory and practice of item response theory. Guilford Publications.
• De Hevia, M. D., Vallar, G., & Girelli, L. (2008). Visualizing numbers in the mind’s eye: the role of visuo-spatial processes in numerical abilities. Neuroscience and Bio-behavioral Reviews, 32(8), 1361–72. Doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.05.015
• Díaz, C., & De La Fuente, I. (2006). Assessing psychology students’ difficulties with conditional probability and bayesian reasoning. In A. R. & B. Chance (Ed.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Teaching Statistics. Retrieved from https://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase/publications/17/5E3_DIAZ.pdf
• Ebel, R., & Frisbie, D. (1991). Essentials of educational measurement (5th ed., p. 383). Englewood Cliffs, NJ. P: Prentice-Hall.
• Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Evans, J. S. B. T., Handley, S. J., Neilens, H., & Over, D. (2010). The influence of cognitive ability and instructional set on causal conditional inference. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(5), 892–909. Doi:10.1080/17470210903111821
• Evans, J. S. B. T., Handley, S. J., Perham, N., Over, D. E., & Thompson, V. A. (2000). Frequency versus probability formats in statistical word problems. Cognition, 77(3), 197–213. Doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00098-6
• Evans, J. S. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-Process Theories of higher cognition: advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 223–241. http://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460685
• Fan, X. (1998). Item Response Theory and Classical Test Theory: An empirical comparison of their Item/Person statistics. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58(3), 357– 381. Doi:10.1177/0013164498058003001
• Franklin, C., Kader, G., Mewborn, D., Moreno, J., Peck, R., Perry, M., & Scheaffer, R. (2007). Guidelines for assessment and instruction in statistics education (GAISE). Report. Alexandria: American Statistical Association. Retrieved from http://www.amstat.org/Education/gaise/GAISEPreK-12_Full.pdf
• Frey, A., & Seitz, N.N. (2009). Multidimensional adaptive testing in educational and psychological measurement: Current state and future challenges. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 35(2–3), 89–94. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2009.10.007
• Furlan, S., & Agnoli, F. (2010). The dark side of statistics: Numeracy and luck in the development of probabilistic reasoning. In ICOTS8 - Data and context in statistics education: Towards an evidence-based society. Retrieved from http://icots.info/8/cd/pdfs/posters/ICOTS8_P11_FURLAN.pdf
• Gal, I. (2002). Adults’ statistical literacy: Meanings, components, responsibilities. International Statistical Review, 70(1), 1–25. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751- 5823.2002.tb00336.x
• Gal, I. (2005). Towards “probability literacy” for all citizens: Building blocks and instructional dilemmas. In G. A. Jones (Ed.), Exploring probability in school (pp. 39–63). Springer. Doi: 10.1007/0-387-24530-8_3
• Galli, S., Chiesi, F., & Primi, C. (2011). Measuring mathematical ability needed for “nonmathematical” majors: The construction of a scale applying IRT and differential item functioning across educational contexts. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(4), 392–402. Doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2011.04.005
• García-Retamero, R., Galesic, M., & Gigerenzer, G. (2011). Cómo favorecer la comprensión y la comunicación de los riesgos sobre la salud. Psicothema, 23(4), 599–605.
• Garfield, J. (2003). Assessing statistical reasoning. Statistics Education Research Journal, 2(1), 22–38. Retrieved from http://iase-web.org/documents/SERJ/SERJ2(1).pdf#page=24
• Garfield, J., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2008). Developing students’ statistical reasoning: Connecting research and teaching practice. New York: Springer Verlag.
• Gigerenzer, G. (2008). Rationality for mortals: How people cope with uncertainty. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Gigerenzer, G., & Hoffrage, U. (1995). How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats. Psychological Review, 102(4), 684–704. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.4.684
• Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. (2002). Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge University Press.
• Girotto, V., & Gonzalez, M. (2001). Solving probabilistic and statistical problems: A matter of information structure and question form. Cognition, 78(3), 247–276. Doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00133-5
• Girotto, V., & Gonzalez, M. (2008). Children’s understanding of posterior probability. Cognition, 106(1), 325–344. Doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.02.005
• Glas, C. A. W. (2001). Differential item functioning depending on general covariates. In Essays on item response theory (pp. 131–148). Berlin / Heidelberg: Springer.
• González M.A., Campos A., Perez M. J. (1997). Mental imagery and creative thinking. The Journal of Psychology, 131(4), 357–364. Doi:10.1080/00223989709603521
• Guàrdia-Olmos, J., Freixa-Blanxart, M., Peró-Cebollero, M., Turbany, J., Cosculluela, A., Barrios, M., & Rifà, X. (2006). Factors related to the academic performance of students in the statistics course in psychology. Quality & Quantity, 40(4), 661–674. Doi:10.1007/s11135-005-2072-7
• Hays, R. D., Brown, J., Brown, L. U., Spritzer, K. L., & Crall, J. J. (2006). Classical test theory and item response theory analyses of multi-item scales assessing parents’ perceptions of their children's dental care. Med Care, 44, S60–S68. Doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000245144.90229.d0
• Hartig, J., & Höhler, J. (2009). Multidimensional IRT models for the assessment of competencies. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 35(2–3), 57–63. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2009.10.002
• Hoffrage, U., Gigerenzer, G., Krauss, S., & Martignon, L. (2002). Representation facilitates reasoning: What natural frequencies are and what they are not. Cognition, 84(3), 343– 352. Doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00050-1
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. Doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
• Huggins, A. C. (2012). The Effect of Differential Item Functioning on Population Invariance of Item Response Theory True Score Equating. University of Miami.
• Huggins, A. C. (2014). The Effect of Differential Item Functioning in Anchor Items on Population Invariance of Equating. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74 (4), 627–658. Doi:10.1177/0013164413506222
• Johnson, E. D., & Tubau, E. (2013). Words, numbers, & numeracy: Diminishing individual differences in Bayesian reasoning. Learning and Individual Differences, 28, 34–40. Doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2013.09.004
• Johnson, M. E., Pierce, C. A., Baldwin, K., Harris, A., & Brondmo, A. K. (1996). Presentation Format in Analogue Studies: Effects on Participants Evaluations. The Journal of Psychology, 130(3), 341–349. Doi:10.1080/00223980.1996.9915015
• Jones, G. A. (2006). Exploring probability in school: Challenges for teaching and learning (Vol. 40). Springer.
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
• Kellen, V., Chan, S., & Fang, X. (2006). Individual Differences in Spatial Abilities and the Visualization of Conditional Probabilities. Retrieved from http://www.kellen.net/visualization_wp.htm
• Kellen, V., Chan, S., & Fang, X. (2007). Facilitating Conditional Probability Problems with Visuals. In J. Jacko (Ed.), Human-Computer Interaction. Interaction Platforms and Techniques (Vol. 4551, pp. 63–71). Berlin / Heidelberg: Springer. Doi:10.1007/978-3- 540-73107-8_8
• Kellen, V., Chan, S., & Fang, X. (2013). Improving user performance in conditional probability problems with computer-generated diagrams. In Human-Computer Interaction. Users and Contexts of Use (pp. 183–192). Springer
• Klaczynski, P. A. (2014). Heuristics and biases: interactions among numeracy, ability, and reflectiveness predict normative responding. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 665. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00665
• Kline, P. (2000). Handbook of psychological testing. Routledge.
• Knauff, M., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2002). Visual imagery can impede reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 30(3), 363–371. Doi:10.3758/BF03194937
• Konold, C., Higgins, T., Russell, S. J., & Khalil, K. (2014). Data seen through different lenses. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 1–21. Doi:10.1007/s10649-013-9529-8
• Kubiszyn, T., & Borich, G. (1990). Educational testing and measurement. Harper Collins Publishers.
• Kunina-Habenicht, O., Rupp, A. A., & Wilhelm, O. (2009). A practical illustration of multidimensional diagnostic skills profiling: Comparing results from confirmatory factor analysis and diagnostic classification models. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 35(2–3), 64–70. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2009.10.003
• Lalonde, R. N., & Gardner, R. C. (1993). Statistics as a second language? A model for predicting performance in psychology students. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement, 25(1), 108–125. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0078792
• Langrall, C. W., & Mooney, E. S. (2005). Characteristics of Elementary School Students’ Probabilistic Reasoning. In G. A. Jones (Ed.), Exploring Probability in School (pp. 95– 119). Springer. http://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24530-8_5
• Laverdière, O., Morin, A. J. S., & St-Hilaire, F. (2013). Factor structure and measurement invariance of a short measure of the Big Five personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(7), 739–743. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.06.008
• Lean, G., & Clements, M. A. (1981). Spatial ability, visual imagery, and mathematical performance. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12(3), 267–299. Doi:10.1007/BF00311060
• Lim, S., & Chapman, E. (2013). Development of a short form of the attitudes toward mathematics inventory. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82(1), 145–164. Doi:10.1007/s10649-012-9414-x
• Manor, H., Ben-Zvi, D., & Aridor, K. (2014). Student’s reasoning about uncertainty while making informal statistical inferences in an “Integrated Pedagogic Approach.” In & R. G. Makar, B. de Sousa (Ed.), Sustainability in statistics education. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Teaching Statistics (ICOTS9, July, 2014), Flagstaff, Arizona, USA. Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistic. International Statistical Institute.
• Mandel, D. R. (2014). The psychology of Bayesian reasoning. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01144
• Mandel, D. R. (2015). Instruction in information structuring improves Bayesian judgment in intelligence analysts. Frontiers in Psychology. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00387
• Maule, A. J., Hockey, G. R. J., & Bdzola, L. (2000). Effects of time-pressure on decision-making under uncertainty: changes in affective state and information processing strategy. Acta Psychologica, 104(3), 283–301. Doi:10.1016/S0001-6918(00)00033-0
• Messick, S. (1996). Validity and washback in language testing. Language Testing , 13 (3 ), 241–256. Doi:10.1177/026553229601300302
• Moore, D. S. (1990). Uncertainty. On the Shoulders of Giants: New Approaches to Numeracy, 95–137.
• Moro, R., & Bodanza, G. A. (2010). El debate acerca del efecto facilitador en problemas de probabilidad condicional: ¿Un caso de experimentación crucial? Interdisciplinaria, 27(1), 163–174.
• Moro, R., Bodanza, G. A., & Freidin, E. (2011). Sets or frequencies? How to help people solve conditional probability problems. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23(7), 843–857. Doi:10.1080/20445911.2011.579072
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Seaman, M. A. (1995). The effect of time constraints and statistics test anxiety on test performance in a statistics course. The Journal of Experimental Education, 63(2), 115–124. Doi: 10.1080/00220973.1995.9943816
• Paek, I., & Han, K. T. (2013). IRTPRO 2.1 for Windows (Item Response Theory for PatientReported Outcomes). Applied Psychological Measurement, 37(3), 242–252. Doi:10.1177/0146621612468223
• Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
• Pastore, M., & Lombardi, L. (2014). The impact of faking on Cronbach’s alpha for dichotomous and ordered rating scores. Quality & Quantity, 48(3), 1191–1211. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-013-9829-1
• Penna, M. P., Agus, M., Peró-Cebollero, M., Guàrdia-Olmos, J., & Pessa, E. (2014). The use of imagery in statistical reasoning by university undergraduate students: a preliminary study. Quality & Quantity, 48(1), 173–187. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-012-9757-5
• Pessa, E., & Penna, M. P. (2000). Manuale di scienza cognitiva. Intelligenza artificiale classica e psicologia cognitiva. Roma - Bari: Editori Laterza.
• Pollard, B., Dixon, D., Dieppe, P., & Johnston, M. (2009). Measuring the ICF components of impairment, activity limitation and participation restriction: an item analysis using classical test theory and item response theory. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 7(1), 41. Doi:10.1186/1477-7525-7-41
• Reeve, B. B., & Fayers, P. (2005). Applying item response theory modelling for evaluating questionnaire item and scale properties. Assessing Quality of Life in Clinical Trial: Methods and Practice, 55–74. Doi: 10.1007/s11136-007-9198-0
• Rieskamp, J., & Hoffrage, U. (2008). Inferences under time pressure: How opportunity costs affect strategy selection. Acta Psychologica, 127(2), 258–276. Doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.05.004
• Rumsey, D. J. (2002). Statistical literacy as a goal for introductory statistics courses. Journal of Statistics Education, 10(3), 6–13. Retrieved from http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v10n3/rumsey2.html
• Salehi, B., Cordero, M. I., & Sandi, C. (2010). Learning under stress: the inverted-U-shape function revisited. Learning & Memory, 17(10), 522–530. Doi:10.1101/lm.1914110
• Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23–74.
• Schinka, J. A., & Velicer, W. F. (2003). Handbook of Psychology - vol. 2 - Research methods in psychology. (I. B. Weiner, Ed.) (p. 738). Wiley.
• Schonlau, M., & Peters, E. (2012). Comprehension of graphs and tables depend on the task: empirical evidence from two web-based studies. Statistics, Politics, and Policy, 3(2). Doi:10.1515/2151-7509.1054
• Sharps, M. J., Hess, A. B., Price-Sharps, J. L., & Teh, J. (2008). Heuristic and algorithmic processing in English, Mathematics, and Science Education. The Journal of Psychology, 142(1), 71–88. Doi:10.3200/JRLP.142.1.71-88
• Sijtsma, K. (2009a). Reliability beyond theory and into practice. Psychometrika, 74(1), 169– 173. Doi:10.1007/s11336-008-9103-y
• Sijtsma, K. (2009b). On the Use, the Misuse, and the Very Limited Usefulness of Cronbach’s Alpha. Psychometrika, 74(1), 107–120. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9101-0
• Singh, J. (2004). Tackling measurement problems with Item Response Theory: Principles, characteristics, and assessment, with an illustrative example. Journal of Business Research, 57, 184–208. Doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00302-2
• Sirota, M., & Juanchich, M. (2011). Role of numeracy and cognitive reflection in Bayesian reasoning with natural frequencies. Studia Psychologica, 53(2), 151–161. Retrieved from http://yadda.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element.defbace5-44e3-3d1b8464-09dde16918e3
• Sirota, M., Kostovičová, L., & Juanchich, M. (2014). The effect of iconicity of visual displays on statistical reasoning: evidence in favor of the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 961–968. http://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0555-4
• Sirota, M., Kostovičová, L., & Vallée-Tourangeau, F. (2015). Now you Bayes, now you don’t: effects of set-problem and frequency-format mental representations on statistical reasoning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1–9. http://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015- 0810-y
• Sloman, S. A., Over, D., Slovak, L., & Stibel, J. M. (2003). Frequency illusions and other fallacies. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91(2), 296–309. Doi:10.1016/S0749-5978(03)00021-9
• Thurstone, L. L., & Thurstone, T. G. (1981). PMA - abilità mentali primarie: manuale di istruzioni Livello intermedio (11-17)(Batteria fattoriale delle abilità mentali primarie). Firenze: Organizzazioni Speciali.
• Thurstone, L. L., & Thurstone, T. G. (1987). TEA: tests de aptitudes escolares [niveles 1, 2 y 3]Manual. Madrid: Tea.
• Tubau, E. (2008). Enhancing probabilistic reasoning: The role of causal graphs, statistical format and numerical skills. Learning and Individual Differences, 18(2), 187–196. Doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2007.08.006
• Tufte, E. R. (2001). The visual display of quantitative information. Visual Explanations (pp. 194–195). Cheshire, Connecticut: Graphics Press
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1983). Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychological Review, 90(4), 293–315. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.90.4.293
• Wang, M., & Russell, S. S. (2005). Measurement Equivalence of the Job Descriptive Index Across Chinese and American Workers: Results from Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Item Response Theory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65 (4), 709–732. Doi:10.1177/0013164404272494
• Watson, J. M., & Moritz, J. B. (2003). Fairness of dice: A longitudinal study of students’ beliefs and strategies for making judgments. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 270–304.
• Wild, C. J., & Pfannkuch, M. (1999). Statistical thinking in empirical enquiry. International Statistical Review, 67(3), 223–248. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751- 5823.1999.tb00442.x
• Yamagishi, K. (2003). Facilitating normative judgments of conditional probability: Frequency or nested sets? Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift Für Experimentelle Psychologie), 50(2), 97–106. Doi:10.1026//1618-3169.50.2.97
• Zahner, D., & Corter, J. E. (2010). The process of probability problem solving: Use of external visual representations. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12(2), 177–204. Doi:10.1080/10986061003654240
• Zhu, L., & Gigerenzer, G. (2006). Children can solve Bayesian problems: The role of representation in mental computation. Cognition, 98(3), 287–308. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.12.003

APA

Agus, M., Penna, M. P., Peró-Cebollero, M., & Guàrdia-Olmos, J. (2016). Assessing Probabilistic Reasoning in Verbal-Numerical and Graphical-Pictorial Formats: An Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of an Instrument. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(8), 2013-2038. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1265a

Vancouver

Agus M, Penna MP, Peró-Cebollero M, Guàrdia-Olmos J. Assessing Probabilistic Reasoning in Verbal-Numerical and Graphical-Pictorial Formats: An Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of an Instrument. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2016;12(8):2013-38. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1265a

AMA

Agus M, Penna MP, Peró-Cebollero M, Guàrdia-Olmos J. Assessing Probabilistic Reasoning in Verbal-Numerical and Graphical-Pictorial Formats: An Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of an Instrument. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2016;12(8), 2013-2038. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1265a

Chicago

Agus, Mirian, Maria Pietronilla Penna, Maribel Peró-Cebollero, and Joan Guàrdia-Olmos. "Assessing Probabilistic Reasoning in Verbal-Numerical and Graphical-Pictorial Formats: An Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of an Instrument". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2016 12 no. 8 (2016): 2013-2038. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1265a

Harvard

Agus, M., Penna, M. P., Peró-Cebollero, M., and Guàrdia-Olmos, J. (2016). Assessing Probabilistic Reasoning in Verbal-Numerical and Graphical-Pictorial Formats: An Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of an Instrument. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(8), pp. 2013-2038. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1265a

MLA

Agus, Mirian et al. "Assessing Probabilistic Reasoning in Verbal-Numerical and Graphical-Pictorial Formats: An Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of an Instrument". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 12, no. 8, 2016, pp. 2013-2038. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1265a