Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Adler, M., & Flihan, S. (1997). The interdisciplinary continuum: Reconciling theory, research, and practice (Report Series No. 2.36). Albany, NY: Center on English Learning and Achievement.
• Alexander, J., Walsh, P., Jarman, R., McClune, B. (2008).From rhetoric to reality: Advancing literacy by cross-curricular means. The Curriculum Journal, 19 (1), 23- 35.
• American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1993). Benchmarks for scientific literacy. Washington D.C.: AAAS.
• Applebee, A., Adler, M., Flihan, S. (2007). Interdisciplinary curricula in middle and high school classrooms: case studies of approaches to curriculum and instruction. American Educational Research Journal, 44 (4), 1002-1039.
• Beane, J. (1997). Curriculum integration: Designing the core of democratic education. New York: Teachers College Press.
• Berlin, D.F., Lee, H. (2005). Integrating Science and Mathematics Education: Historical Analysis. Retrieved from http://www.redorbit.com/news/science/ 119259 /integrating_science_and_mathematics_education_hist orical_analysis/index.html.
• Bybee, R. (1997). Achieving science literacy: from purposes to practices. Portsmouth, N.H.: Heinemann publishers.
• Cohen, H. and Staley, F. (1982). Integrating with science: One way to bring science back into the elementary school day. School Science and Mathematics, 82 (7), 565-572.
• Colomb, J. (1999). School knowledge and didactic analysis: A research perspective in comparative didactics. Instructional Science, 27, 53-71.
• Czerniak, C.M., Weber, W.B., Sandmann, A., Ahern, J., (1999). A literature review of science and mathematics integration. Science and Mathematics, 99 (8), 421-430.
• Fang, Z., Lamme, L., Pringle, R., Patrick, J., Sanders, J., Zmach, C., Charbonnet, S., Henkel, M. (2008). Integrating reading into middle school science: What we did, found, and learned. International Journal of Science Education, 30 (15), 2067-2089.
• Hurley, M. M. (2001). Reviewing integrated science and mathematics: The search for evidence and definitions from new perspectives. School Science & Mathematics, 101(5), 259-270.
• Jacob, S. (2008). Cross-Disciplinarization: A new talisman for evaluation? American Journal of Evaluation, 29 (2), 175- 194.
• McComas, W. (2009). Thinking, teaching, and learning science outside the boxes. The Science Teacher, 76 (2), 24- 28.
• National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
• National Research Council. (2012). A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Committee on a Conceptual Framework for New K-12 Science Education Standards. Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
• Newell, W. (1994). Designing interdisciplinary courses. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1994 (58), 35–51.
• Prain, V. & Hand, B. (1996). Writing for learning in secondary science: Rethinking practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12 (6), 609-626.
• Richards, J. & Shea, K. (2006). Moving from separate subject to interdisciplinary teaching: The complexity of change in a preservice teacher K-1 early field experience. Qualitative Report, 11 (1), 1-19.
• Schwartz, A. (1999). Creating a context for chemistry. Science and Education, 8, 605-618.
• Stevenson, C., & Carr, J. (Eds.). (1993). Integrative studies in the middle grades: Dancing through walls. New York: Teachers College Press.
• Vardeman, S. & Jobe, J. (2001), Basic Engineering Data Collection and Analysis, Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury.

APA

Yarker, M. B., & Park, S. (2012). Analysis of Teaching Resources for Implementing an Interdisciplinary Approach in the K-12 Classroom. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 8(4), 223-232. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2012.841a

Vancouver

Yarker MB, Park S. Analysis of Teaching Resources for Implementing an Interdisciplinary Approach in the K-12 Classroom. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2012;8(4):223-32. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2012.841a

AMA

Yarker MB, Park S. Analysis of Teaching Resources for Implementing an Interdisciplinary Approach in the K-12 Classroom. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2012;8(4), 223-232. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2012.841a

Chicago

Yarker, Morgan B., and Soonhye Park. "Analysis of Teaching Resources for Implementing an Interdisciplinary Approach in the K-12 Classroom". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2012 8 no. 4 (2012): 223-232. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2012.841a

Harvard

Yarker, M. B., and Park, S. (2012). Analysis of Teaching Resources for Implementing an Interdisciplinary Approach in the K-12 Classroom. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 8(4), pp. 223-232. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2012.841a

MLA

Yarker, Morgan B. et al. "Analysis of Teaching Resources for Implementing an Interdisciplinary Approach in the K-12 Classroom". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 8, no. 4, 2012, pp. 223-232. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2012.841a