Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Afolabi, S. O. (1999). The philosophy of supervision in education. Nigerian Education Digestive, 1, 39-48.
• Agricola, B. T., Prims, F. J., & Suluijsmans, D. M. A. (2019). Impact of feedback request form and verbal feedbacks on higher education students and students’ feedback perception, self-efficacy, motivation. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 27(1), 6-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2019.1688764
• Akkoc, I., & Yesildere, A. (2010). The effects of an in-service training program on pre-service teachers' pedagogical content knowledge of fractions and their teaching strategies. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 10(4), 1079-1091. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2010.4.1079
• Al-Wadi, H. M. (2018). Facilitating in-service English language teacher trainees’ supervision through written feedback: Action research. International Education Studies, 11(9), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v11n9p1
• Braun, V., & Clark, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
• Braun, V., & Clark, V. (2022). Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be(com)ing a knowing researcher. International Journal of Transgender Health, 24(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2022.2129597
• Burns, R. W., Jacobs, J., & Yendol- Hoppey, D. (2016). The changing nature of the role of the university supervisor and function of pre-service teacher supervision in an era of clinically rich practice. Action in Teacher Education, 38(4), 410-425. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2016.1226203
• Carlson, J., & Daehler, K. R. (2019). The refined consensus model of pedagogical content knowledge in science education. In A. Hume, R. Cooper, & A. Borowski (Eds.), Reposition pedagogical content knowledge in teachers’ knowledge for teaching science. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5898-2_2
• Chan, K. K. H., & Hume, A. (2019). Towards a consensus model: Literature review of how science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge is investigated in empirical studies. In A. Hume, R. Cooper, & A. Borowski (Eds.), Reposition pedagogical content knowledge in teachers’ knowledge for teaching science. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5898-2_1
• Clarke, A., Triggs, V., & Nielsen, W. (2014). Cooperating teacher participation in teacher education: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 84(2), 163-202. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313499618
• Clift, R., & Brady, P. (2005). Research on methods courses and field experiences. In M. Cochran-Smith, & K. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education (pp. 309-424). American Educational Research Association and Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). Teacher education and the American future. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 35-47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109348024
• Depaepe, F., Verschaffel, L., & Kelchtermans, G. (2013). Pedagogical content knowledge: A systematic review of the way in which the concept has pervaded mathematics educational research. Teaching and Teacher Education, 34, 12-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.03.001
• Fazio, X., & Volante, L. (2011). Pre-service science teachers’ perception of their practicum classrooms. Teacher Educator, 46(2), 126-144. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2011.553028
• Gess-Newsome, J. R. (1999). Toward a comprehensive conception of pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15(2), 127-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(99)00003-3
• Gess-Newsome, J. R. (2015). Toward a comprehensive conception of pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 46, 15-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.09.004
• Gess-Newsome, J., Carlson,j., Gardner, A., & Taylor, J. (2010). Impact of educative materials and professional development on teachers’ professional knowledge, practice, and student achievement. http://bses.org/primepapers
• Glenwright, P. D. L. (1999). The discourse of written teaching practice supervision reports: Linking language and methodology. Asia Pacific Journal of Language in Education, 2(2), 57-87.
• Gurken, J. (2018). The impact of immediate and delayed corrective-confirmatory feedback on student learning in a computer-based learning environment. Computers & Education, 122, 22-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.007
• Holand, P. (1988). Implicit assumptions about the supervisory conference: A review and analysis of the literature. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 4(4), 362-379.
• Kadushin, A. (1976). The supervisor: Teaching and supervision. (10.7312/kadu7623). Columbia University Press.
• Koc, I. (2012). Pre-service science teachers reflect on their practicum experiences. Educational Studies, 38(1), 31-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2011.567030
• Kurtoglu-Hooton, N. (2004). Post-observation feedback as an instigator of teacher learning and change: Exploring the effect of feedback through student teachers’ self-reports [PhD thesis, Aston University].
• Kurtoglu-Hooton, N. (2008). The design of post-observation feedback and its impact on student teachers. In S. Garton, & K. Richards (Eds.), Professional encounters in TESOL: Discourses of teachers in training (pp. 24-41). Palgrave Macmillan. Https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230594173-2
• Lawal, F., Maduekwe, A., Ikonta, N., & Adeosun, O. (2010). ESL pre-service teachers’ view of teaching practice supervision and assessment in Nigeria. Sino-U English Teaching, 7(4), 15-28.
• Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2015). The status of pre-service science teacher education: A global perspective. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-015-9422-7
• Martin, A. K., & Russell, T. (2018) Supervising the teacher education practicum: A self-study with a critical friend. Studying Teacher Education, 14(3), 331-342. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2018.1541286
• Morton, T. D., & Kurtz, P. D. (1980). Educational supervision: A learning theory approach. Social Casework, 61(4), 240-246. https://doi.org/10.1177/104438948006100406
• Nghia, T. H., & Tai, H. N. (2019). Pre-service teachers’ experiences with internship-related challenges in regional schools and their career intention: Implications for teacher education programs. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 40(2), 156-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2018.1536902
• Parkison, P. T. (2008). Field placement treatments: A comparative study. The Teacher Educator, 43(1), 29-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730701728879
• Pollard, A., Anderson, J., Maddock, M., Swaffield, S., Warin, J., & Warwick, P. (2008). Reflective teaching. Continuum International Publishing Group.
• Rollnick, M., & Mavhunga, E. (2016). Can the principles of topic specific PCK be applied across science topics? Teaching PCK in a pre-service program. In N. Papadouris, A. Hadjigeorgiou, & C. P. Constantinou (Eds), Insights from research in science teaching and learning (pp. 56-72). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20074-3_5
• Sadler, R. (1998). Formative assessment: Revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 77-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050104
• Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reforms. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
• Soslau, E. (2012). Opportunities to develop adaptive teaching expertise during supervisory conferences. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 768-779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.02.009
• Spiteri, D. (2017). Using corpus linguistics to analyze post lesson observation feedback. International Journal of Teaching and Education, 5(1), 67-84. https://doi.org/10.20472/TE.2017.5.1.006
• Tang, S. Y. F., Cheng M. M. H., & So, W. W. M. (2006). Supporting student teachers’ professional learning with standards‐referenced assessment. Asia Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 34(2), 223-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598660600720629
• van Driel, J. H., & Berry, A. K. (2019). Developing pre-service teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. In D. Jean Clandinin, & J. Husu (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of research in teacher education. SAGE.
• van Driel, J. H. (2014). Developing science teachers professional knowledge. In C. Bruguiere, A. Tiberghien, & P. Clement (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9^th ESERA Conference on Topics and Trends in Current Science Education. Springer.
• Veal, M. L., & MaKinster, J. G. (1999). Pedagogical content knowledge in science teaching: Perspectives from an elementary science methods course. Science Education, 83(3), 307-324.
• Voss, T., Kunter, M., & Baumert, J. (2011). Assessing teacher candidates’ general pedagogical/psychological knowledge: Test construction and validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(4), 952-969. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025125
• Waite, D. (1992). Supervisors’ talk: making sense of conferences from an anthropological linguistic perspective. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, Summer, 7(4), 349-371.
• Weitzel, H., & Blank, R. (2019). Pedagogical content knowledge in peer dialogues between pre-service biology teachers in the planning of science lessons. results of an intervention study. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 31(1), 75-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2019.1664874

APA

Omilani, N. A., & Ogbonna, S. N. (2023). Analysis of supervisor’s written feedback addressing pre-service science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge during teaching practice. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(9), em2329. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13525

Vancouver

Omilani NA, Ogbonna SN. Analysis of supervisor’s written feedback addressing pre-service science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge during teaching practice. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2023;19(9):em2329. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13525

AMA

Omilani NA, Ogbonna SN. Analysis of supervisor’s written feedback addressing pre-service science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge during teaching practice. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2023;19(9), em2329. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13525

Chicago

Omilani, Nathaniel Ayodeji, and Stella Nneka Ogbonna. "Analysis of supervisor’s written feedback addressing pre-service science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge during teaching practice". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2023 19 no. 9 (2023): em2329. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13525

Harvard

Omilani, N. A., and Ogbonna, S. N. (2023). Analysis of supervisor’s written feedback addressing pre-service science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge during teaching practice. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(9), em2329. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13525

MLA

Omilani, Nathaniel Ayodeji et al. "Analysis of supervisor’s written feedback addressing pre-service science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge during teaching practice". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 19, no. 9, 2023, em2329. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13525