An Analysis of Sustainable Activities in Japanese, Korean, and Singaporean Elementary Mathematics Textbooks

JeongWon Kim; JeongSuk Pang

doi:10.29333/ejmste/11651

Full Text (PDF)

JeongWon Kim ¹ , JeongSuk Pang ² ^*

More Detail

¹ Sintanjin Elementary School, SOUTH KOREA² Department of Elementary Education, Korea National University of Education, SOUTH KOREA^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to explore how contents related to sustainable development were presented in Japanese, Korean, and Singaporean elementary mathematics textbooks. For this purpose, the contents in the textbooks were analyzed at both macro and micro levels through a mixed method research. The results showed that the sustainability-related contents were included from the third or fourth grade in all the textbooks. The related contents were involved to mathematics content domains of Numbers and Operations, Pattern, and Data and Possibilities. The sustainability-related contents were used both to introduce and to apply mathematical concepts or principles. Most of the sustainable development activities led students to solve problems by using the mathematical contents they had learned, while some other activities induced students to consider sustainability as well as to solve problems. This study is expected to give implications for textbook developers and teachers to connect sustainable development meaningfully to elementary mathematics education.

Keywords

comparative study
education for sustainable development
elementary mathematics textbooks
sustainable activity

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, Volume 18, Issue 2, February 2022, Article No: em2080

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11651

Publication date: 01 Feb 2022

Article Views: 1756

Article Downloads: 1097

Open Access Disclosures References How to cite this article

Disclosure

Declaration of Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest is declared by author(s).

Data sharing statement: Data supporting the findings and conclusions are available upon request from the corresponding author(s).

References

Australian Curriculum. (2015). Sustainability. https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/cross-curriculum-priorities/sustainability/
Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2015). Sustainability. https://www.acara.edu.au/curriculum/foundation-year-10/cross-curriculum-priorities/sustainability-ccp
Bartusevica, A., & Cedere, D. (2003). Eco-team formation in Latvia and their role in environmental education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 2(4), 5-11.
Barwell, R. (2018). Some thoughts on a mathematics education for environmental sustainability. In P. Ernest (Ed.), The philosophy of mathematics education today (pp. 145-160). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77760-3_9
Bayda, N. I., & Sutliff, G. (2020). Comparing extracted and stipulated definitions in Algebra 1 textbooks and Khan Academy. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(2), em0579. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/7601
Board of Studies New South Wales (2012). NSW syllabus for the Australian curriculum: Mathematics K–10 syllabus. https://educationstandards.nsw.edu.au/wps/portal/nesa/k-10/learning-areas/mathematics/mathematics-k-10/version-log
Charalambous, C. Y., Delaney, S., Hsu, H., & Mesa, V. (2010). A comparative analysis of the addition and subtraction of fractions in textbooks from three countries. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12(2), 117-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060903460070
Choy, B. H., Lee, M. Y., & Mizzi, A. (2020). Insights into the teaching of gradient from an exploratory study of mathematics textbooks from Germany, Singapore, and South Korea. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(3), em0592. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/8273
Collars, C., Koay, P. L., Lee, N. H., Ong, B. L., & Tan, C. S. (2014a). Shaping maths coursebook 3A. Marshall Cavendish.
Collars, C., Koay, P. L., Lee, N. H., Ong, B. L., & Tan, C. S. (2014b). Shaping maths coursebook 5A. Marshall Cavendish.
Collars, C., Koay, P. L., Lee, N. H., Ong, B. L., & Tan, C. S. (2014c). Shaping maths coursebook 5B. Marshall Cavendish.
Collars, C., Koay, P. L., Lee, N. H., Ong, B. L., & Tan, C. S. (2014d). Shaping maths coursebook 6A. Marshall Cavendish.
Collars, C., Koay, P. L., Lee, N. H., Ong, B. L., & Tan, C. S. (2014e). Shaping maths coursebook 6B. Marshall Cavendish.
Elliott, S., & Davis, J. (2009). Exploring the resistance: An Australian perspective on educating for sustainability in early childhood. International Journal of Early Childhood, 41(2), 65-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03168879
Fan, L., & Zhu, Y. (2007). Representation of problem-solving procedures: A comparative look at China, Singapore, and US mathematics textbooks. Educational studies in Mathematics, 66(1), 61-75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9069-6
Fan, L., Zhu, Y., & Miao, Z. (2013). Textbook research in mathematics education: development status and directions. ZDM, 45(5), 633-646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0539-x
Hedefalk, M., Almqvist, J., & Östman, L. (2015). Education for sustainable development in early childhood education: A review of the research literature. Environmental Education Research, 21(7), 975-990. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2014.971716
Hesse-Biber, S. N. (2010). Mixed methods research: Merging theory with practice. The Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325011433761b
Joutsenlahti, J., & Perkkilä, P. (2019). Sustainability development in mathematics education: A case study of what kind of meanings do prospective class teachers find for the mathematical symbol “2/3”?. Sustainability, 11(2), 457. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020457
Kang, W. (2010). A content analysis of education for sustainable development in 2007 revised middle school environment textbooks. Korea Association of Geographic and Environmental Education, 18(3), 339-354. https://doi.org/10.17279/jkagee.2010.18.3.339
Kennelly, J., Taylor, N., & Serow, P. (2011). Education for sustainability and the Australian curriculum. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 27(2), 209-218. https://doi.org/10.1375/ajee.27.2.209
Levin, S. (2015). What mathematics can do for sustainability. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 77(2), 251-253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-014-0038-4
Li, Y. (2000). A comparison of problems that follow selected content presentations in American and Chinese mathematics textbooks. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31, 234-241. https://doi.org/10.2307/749754
Li, Y., Chen, X., & An, S. (2009). Conceptualizing and organizing content for teaching and learning in selected Chinese, Japanese and US mathematics textbooks: The case of fraction division. ZDM, 41(6), 809-826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-009-0177-5
Liu, Z., Yang, H. C., & Shiau, Y. C. (2020). Investigation on evaluation framework of elementary school teaching materials for sustainable development. Sustainability, 12(9), 3736. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093736
Martínez-Medina, R., & Arrebola, J. C. (2019). Analysis of sustainability activities in Spanish elementary education textbooks. Sustainability, 11(19), 5182. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195182
McKeown, R., Hopkins, C. A., Rizi, R., & Chrystalbridge, M. (2002). Education for sustainable development toolkit. Energy, Environment and Resources Center, University of Tennessee. https://www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/library/esd_toolkit_version_2.pdf
Miedijensky, S., & Abramovich, A. (2019). Implementation of “education for sustainability” in three elementary schools-what can we learn about a change process? EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(10), 1754. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/109145
Ministry of Education (2020a). 3-2 Mathematics textbook. Visang.
Ministry of Education (2020b). 4-1 Mathematics textbook. Visang.
Ministry of Education (2020c). 4-2 Mathematics textbook. Visang.
Ministry of Education (2020d). 5-2 Mathematics textbook. Visang.
Ministry of Education (2020e). 6-1 Mathematics textbook. Visang.
Ministry of Education (2020f). 6-2 Mathematics textbook. Visang.
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., Kelly, D. L., & Fishbein, B. (2020). TIMSS 2019 International results in mathematics and science. Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2019/international-results/
Prince, C. (2010). Sowing the seeds: Education for sustainability within the early years curriculum. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 18(3), 423-434. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293x.2010.500082
Renert, M. (2011). Mathematics for life: Sustainable mathematics education. For the Learning of Mathematics, 31(1), 20-26.
Rezat, S., Fan, L., & Pepin, B. (2021). Mathematics textbooks and curriculum resources as instruments for change. ZDM, 53(6), 1189-1206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01309-3
Rode, H., & Michelsen, G. (2008). Levels of indicator development for education for sustainable development. Environmental Education Research, 14(1), 19-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620701843327
Roe, J., deForest, R., & Jamshidi, S. (2018). Mathematics for sustainability. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76660-7
Serow, P. (2015). Education for sustainability in primary mathematics education. In N. Taylor., F. Quinn., & C. Eames. (Eds.), Educating for sustainability in primary schools: Teaching for the future (pp. 177-194). Sense Publisher. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-046-8_9
Stein, M. K., Remillard, J., & Smith, M. S. (2007). How curriculum influences student learning. Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 319-370.
Summers, M., & Kruger, C. (2003). Teaching sustainable development in primary schools: Theory into practice. Curriculum Journal, 14(2), 157-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585170302836
The World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/2621529
Tokyo Shoseki. (2011a). Atarashi sansuu 3-1. Tokyo Shoseki Publishing.
Tokyo Shoseki. (2011b). Atarashi sansuu 4-1. Tokyo Shoseki Publishing.
Tokyo Shoseki. (2011c). Atarashi sansuu 4-2. Tokyo Shoseki Publishing.
Tokyo Shoseki. (2011d). Atarashi sansuu 5-1. Tokyo Shoseki Publishing.
Tokyo Shoseki. (2011e). Atarashi sansuu 5-2. Tokyo Shoseki Publishing.
Tokyo Shoseki. (2011f). Atarashi sansuu 6-1. Tokyo Shoseki Publishing.
Tokyo Shoseki. (2011g). Atarashi sansuu 6-2. Tokyo Shoseki Publishing.
Törnroos, J. (2005). Mathematics textbooks, opportunity to learn and student achievement. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 31(4), 315-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2005.11.005
UN. (2015). United nations sustainable development summit 2015. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/summit
UNESCO. (2012). Education for sustainable development sourcebook. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000216383.locale=en
Woo, Y. L., Mokhtar, M., Komoo, I., & Azman, N. (2012). Education for sustainable development: a review of characteristics of sustainability curriculum. OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development, 3(8), 33-44.
Yuniarti, Y. S., Hasan, R., & Ali, M. (2019). Competencies of education for sustainable development related to mathematics education in senior high school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1179(2019), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1179/1/012075
Zehetmeier, S., & Krainer, K. (2011). Ways of promoting the sustainability of mathematics teachers’ professional development. ZDM, 43(6-7), 875-887. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-011-0358-x

How to cite this article

APA

Kim, J., & Pang, J. (2022). An Analysis of Sustainable Activities in Japanese, Korean, and Singaporean Elementary Mathematics Textbooks. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(2), em2080. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11651

Vancouver

Kim J, Pang J. An Analysis of Sustainable Activities in Japanese, Korean, and Singaporean Elementary Mathematics Textbooks. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2022;18(2):em2080. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11651

AMA

Kim J, Pang J. An Analysis of Sustainable Activities in Japanese, Korean, and Singaporean Elementary Mathematics Textbooks. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2022;18(2), em2080. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11651

Chicago

Kim, JeongWon, and JeongSuk Pang. "An Analysis of Sustainable Activities in Japanese, Korean, and Singaporean Elementary Mathematics Textbooks". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2022 18 no. 2 (2022): em2080. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11651

Harvard

Kim, J., and Pang, J. (2022). An Analysis of Sustainable Activities in Japanese, Korean, and Singaporean Elementary Mathematics Textbooks. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(2), em2080. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11651

MLA

Kim, JeongWon et al. "An Analysis of Sustainable Activities in Japanese, Korean, and Singaporean Elementary Mathematics Textbooks". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 18, no. 2, 2022, em2080. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11651