Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Bantwini, B. (2017). Analysis of teaching and learning of natural and technology in selected Eastern Cape Province primary schools, South Africa. Journal of Education, 67, 40-63.
• Bodner, G. M., & Herron, J. D. (2002). Problem-solving in chemistry. In J. K. Gilbert (Ed.), Chemical education: Research-based practice (pp. 235-266). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47977-X_11
• Booi, K. (2023). Physical science educators’ teaching approaches for facilitating conceptual understanding of stoichiometry. In Proceedings of the 15^th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (pp. 902-905). https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2023.0332
• Celikkiran, A. T. (2020). Examination of secondary school students’ ability to transform among chemistry representations levels related to stoichiometry. International Journal of Progressive Education, 16(2), 42-55. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2020.241.4
• Chi, M. T., Adams, J., Bogusch, E. B., Bruchok, C., Kang, S., Lancaster, M., Levy, R., Li, N., McEldoon, K. L., Stump, G. S., Wylie, R., Xu, D., & Yaghmourian, D. L. (2018). Translating ICAP theory of cognitive engagement into practice. Cognitive Science, 42(6), 1777-1832. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12626
• Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. SAGE.
• Dahsah, C., & Coll, R. K. (2007). Thai grade 10 and 11 students’ conceptual understanding and ability to solve stoichiometry problems. Research in Science and Technological Education, 25(2), 227-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140701250808
• Davidowitz, B., Chittleborough, G., & Murray, E. (2010). Student-generated sub micro diagrams: A useful tool for teaching and learning chemical equations and stoichiometry. Chemical Education Research and Practice, 11, 154-164. https://doi.org/10.1039/C005464J
• DoBE. (2012). Grades 10-12 physical sciences, national curriculum statement. Government Printing Works. www.info.gov.za
• DoBE. (2019). National senior certificate diagnostic report. Government Printing Works. www.info.gov.za
• DoBE. (2020). National senior certificate examination: School subject report. Government Printing Works. www.info.gov.za
• Douglas, E. P. (2011). Student construction of knowledge in an active learning classroom. In Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 1-22). https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--18479
• Dudu, W. T. (2014). The changing roles of South African natural sciences teachers in an era of introducing a “refined and repackaged” curriculum. Journal of Science Education, 7(3), 547-558. https://doi.org/10.1080/09751122.2014.11890216
• Govender, S. (2015). Students’ perceptions of teaching methods used at South African higher education institutions. South African Journal of Higher Education, 29(3), 23-41. https://doi.org/10.20853/29-3-486
• Hu, H. H., Kussmaul, C., Knaeble, B., Mayfield, C., & Yadav, A. (2016). Results from a survey of faculty adoption of process oriented guided inquiry learning (POGIL) in computer science. In Proceedings of the Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (pp. 186-191). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2899415.2899471
• John, M. (2019). Physical sciences teaching and learning in Eastern Cape rural schools: Reflections of pre-service teachers. South African Journal of Education, 39, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v39ns1a1660
• Kibirige, I., & Mamashela, D. (2022). Learners’ prevalent misconceptions about force and experiences of flipped classes. Journal of the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 10(1), 109. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.1058677
• Kibirige, I., Osodo, J., & Tlala, K. M. (2014). The effect of predict-observe-explain strategy on learners’ misconceptions about dissolved salts. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(4), 300-300. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n4p300
• Lawson, A. E. (1988). A better way to teach biology. The American Biology Teacher, 50(5), 266-278. https://doi.org/10.2307/4448733
• Lotlikar, P. C., & Wagh, R. (2016). Using POGIL to teach and learn design patterns–A constructionist based incremental, collaborative approach. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 8^th International Conference on Technology for Education (pp. 46-49). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/T4E.2016.018
• Makhechane, M., & Qhobela, M. (2019). Understanding how chemistry teachers transform stoichiometry concepts at secondary level in Lesotho. South African Journal of Chemistry, 72, 59-66. https://doi.org/10.17159/0379-4350/2019/v72a9
• Malcolm, S. A., Mavhunga, E., & Rollnick, M. (2019). The validity and reliability of an instrument to measure physical science teachers’ topic specific pedagogical content knowledge in stoichiometry. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 23(2), 181-194. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2019.1633080
• Mamombe, C., Mathabathe, K. C., & Gaigher, E. (2021). Teachers’ and learners’ perceptions of stoichiometry using POGIL: A cases study in South Africa. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(9), em2003. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11140
• Mandina, S., & Ochonogor, C. E. (2018). Recurrent difficulties: Stoichiometry problem-solving. African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Science, 14, 25-31. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/95125
• Marais, F., & Combrinck, S. (2009). An approach to dealing with difficulties undergraduate chemistry students experience with stoichiometry. South African Journal of Chemistry, 62, 88-96.
• McGuire, Z. S. Y., & McGuire, S. (2015). Teach students how to learn. Stylus Publication.
• Miheso, J. M., & Mavhunga, E. (2020). The retention of topic specific PCK: A longitudinal study with beginning chemistry teachers. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21, 789-805. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RP00008F
• Miller, C. J., McNear, J., & Metz, M. J. (2013). A comparison of traditional and engaging lecture methods in a large, professional-level course. Advances in Physiology Education, 37(4), 347-355. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00050.2013
• Mohafa, L. G., Qhobela, M., & George, M. J. (2022). Evaluating the influence of interactive simulations on learners’ academic performance in stoichiometry. South African Journal of Chemistry, 76, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.17159/0379-4350/2022/v76a01
• Moog, R., & Spencer, J. (2008). POGIL: Process oriented guided inquiry learning. In Proceedings of the ACS Symposium. American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2008-0994
• Omoniyi, A. O., & Torru, T. E. (2019). Effectiveness of process oriented guided inquiry teaching strategy on students’ performance in chemistry in secondary schools in Ondo State Nigeria. American International Journal of Education and Linguistics Research, 2(1), 34-38. https://doi.org/10.46545/aijelr.v2i1.73
• Owoyemi, T. E., & Amahwe, S. E. (2020). Mathematical problem-solving skill and conceptual understanding as correlates of senior secondary school students’ achievement in stoichiometric aspect of chemistry. Nigerian Online Journal of Educational Sciences and Technology, 2(1), 71-79.
• Saadah, N., Haryani, S., & Mahatmanti, W. (2022). Analysis of chemical misconceptions of stoichiometry materials using certainty of response index. International Journal of Active Learning, 7(1), 94-102.
• Santoso, A., Sumari, S., & Setiadi, A. D. (2023). The effect of POGIL classroom on students’ achievement and motivation on acid-based topics. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2569, 030006. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0112292
• Simonson, S. R. (2019). An introduction to process oriented guided inquiry learning for those who want to empower learners. Stylus Publishing.
• Simonson, S. R., & Shadle, S. E. (2013). Implementing process oriented guided inquiry learning (POGIL) in undergraduate biomechanics: Lessons learned by a novice. Journal of STEM Education, 14(1), 56-63.
• Stott, A. E. (2020). Influence of context on stoichiometry conceptual and algorithmic subject matter knowledge among South African physical sciences teachers. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(5), 1239-1246. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b01056
• Stott, A. E. (2021). South African physical sciences teachers’ use of formulae and proportion when answering reaction-based stoichiometry calculation questions. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 22(2), 443-456. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RP00291G
• Strachan, R., & Liyanage, L. (2015). Active student engagement: The heart of effective learning. In P. L. Layne (Ed.), Global innovation of teaching and learning in higher education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10482-9_16
• Sunday, E. I., Ibemenji, K. A. G., & Alamina, J. I. (2019). Effect of problem-solving teaching technique on students’ stoichiometry academic performance in senior secondary school chemistry in Nigeria. Asian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports, 4(3), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajarr/2019/v4i330110

APA

Mamombe, C., & Mathabathe, K. C. (2024). Active versus passive learning: Comparative case study of problem-solving competencies in stoichiometry. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(6), em2455. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14594

Vancouver

Mamombe C, Mathabathe KC. Active versus passive learning: Comparative case study of problem-solving competencies in stoichiometry. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2024;20(6):em2455. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14594

AMA

Mamombe C, Mathabathe KC. Active versus passive learning: Comparative case study of problem-solving competencies in stoichiometry. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2024;20(6), em2455. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14594

Chicago

Mamombe, Charles, and Kgadi C. Mathabathe. "Active versus passive learning: Comparative case study of problem-solving competencies in stoichiometry". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2024 20 no. 6 (2024): em2455. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14594

Harvard

Mamombe, C., and Mathabathe, K. C. (2024). Active versus passive learning: Comparative case study of problem-solving competencies in stoichiometry. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(6), em2455. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14594

MLA

Mamombe, Charles et al. "Active versus passive learning: Comparative case study of problem-solving competencies in stoichiometry". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 20, no. 6, 2024, em2455. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14594