Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Aiginger, K. (1998). A Framework for Evaluating the Dynamic Competitiveness of Countries. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 9, 159–188.
• Blanke, J., Paua, F., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (2003). The Growth Competitiveness Index: Analyzing Key Underpinnings of Sustained Economic Growth. The Global Competitiveness Yearbook 2003–2004, pp. 3-28, World Economic Forum, Lausanne, Switzerland.
• Chang, T.-C., & Wang, H. (2016). A Multi Criteria Group Decision-making Model for Teacher Evaluation in Higher Education Based on Cloud Model and Decision Tree. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(5), 1243-1262.
• Garelli, S. (2000). Competitiveness of Nations: the Fundamentals. World Competitiveness Yearbook. pp. 43–49. International Institute for Management Development, Lausanne, Switzerland.
• Garelli, S. (2003). Competitiveness of Nations: the Fundamentals. The IMD World Competitiveness Yearbook 2003, Lausanne, Switzerland, pp. 702–713. International Institute for Management Development, Lausanne, Switzerland.
• Harrison, E. F. (1999). Theory and Policy of International Competitiveness. Westport, Connecticut, London.
• Hsieh, M.-Y. (2016). Online Learning Era: Exploring the Most Decisive Determinants of MOOCs in Taiwanese Higher Education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(5), 1163-1188.
• Ishikawa, A. (1993). The Max-Min Delphi Method and Fuzzy Delphi Method via Fuzzy Integration. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 55, 241-253.
• Lin, Y. H. (1998). A Study on The Evaluating Factors of River Basin for The Development of Tourism/Recreation Area (Master’s Thesis), Department of Land Management, Feng Chia University, Taiwan.
• Murray, T. J., Pipino, L., & Van Gigch, J. P. (1985). A pilot study of fuzzy set modification of Delphi, Human Systems Management, 5, 76-80.
• Porter, M. E. (2002). Enhancing the Microeconomic Foundations of Prosperity: The Current Competitiveness Index. The Global Competitiveness Report 2001–2002. World Economic Forum. PP. 52–76. Oxford University Press.
• Yang, M. L., & Hsieh, H. N. (2016). Territory Development Innovation Strategy of the Intelligent Science Park: Developing the Intelligent Park. ICIC Express Letters, Part B: Applications, 7(4), 933-938.
• Zheng, X. L., & Huang, G. G. (2005). Government-funded innovation activities in industries: the program specialist of Industrial Technology Research Institute as an example. Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, 17(3), 459-489.

APA

Yang, M.-L. (2018). A Study of Evaluation Mechanism through the Experience of French and Taiwan’s Innovation Strategies. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(5), 1859-1865. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/86060

Vancouver

Yang ML. A Study of Evaluation Mechanism through the Experience of French and Taiwan’s Innovation Strategies. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2018;14(5):1859-65. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/86060

AMA

Yang ML. A Study of Evaluation Mechanism through the Experience of French and Taiwan’s Innovation Strategies. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2018;14(5), 1859-1865. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/86060

Chicago

Yang, Ming-Ling. "A Study of Evaluation Mechanism through the Experience of French and Taiwan’s Innovation Strategies". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2018 14 no. 5 (2018): 1859-1865. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/86060

Harvard

Yang, M.-L. (2018). A Study of Evaluation Mechanism through the Experience of French and Taiwan’s Innovation Strategies. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(5), pp. 1859-1865. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/86060

MLA

Yang, Ming-Ling "A Study of Evaluation Mechanism through the Experience of French and Taiwan’s Innovation Strategies". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 14, no. 5, 2018, pp. 1859-1865. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/86060