A refined framework for qualitative content analysis of mathematics textbooks
Full Text (PDF)
More Detail
1 Organization for Educational Research and Planning, Research Institute for Education, Tehran, IRAN2 Ministry of National Education, Ankara, TÜRKİYE3 Institute for Educational Development, Aga Khan University, Karachi, PAKISTAN* Corresponding Author
Abstract
Within the realm of mathematics education, the examination of textbooks has emerged as a focal point of scholarly investigation. This endeavor necessitates the development of a comprehensive instrument capable of facilitating both qualitative and quantitative textbook analysis. To address this need, we draw upon a corpus of seminal studies, and supplement our analysis with local research reports that assess the quality of mathematics textbooks through a qualitative content analysis approach. Content analysis was utilized to examine the documents and identify the themes relevant to the analysis of mathematics textbooks. Our data analysis revealed the identification of six overarching themes for the systematic evaluation of mathematics textbooks: (1) language and communication, (2) content analysis, (3) pedagogical approach, (4) cultural sensitivity and inclusivity, (5) assessment and exercises, and (6) visual aids and presentation. Each of these themes is meticulously expounded upon, shedding light on their significance in shaping the intricacies of mathematics textbook authorship. This proposed analytical framework presents an invaluable resource for enhancing the quality of mathematics textbooks at the school level. The themes elucidated herein offer a structured approach to textbook assessment, ultimately fostering the advancement of mathematical education by improving the instructional materials that are integral to the teaching and learning process.
License
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Article Type: Research Article
EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, Volume 20, Issue 3, March 2024, Article No: em2412
https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14284
Publication date: 01 Mar 2024
Online publication date: 26 Feb 2024
Article Views: 1576
Article Downloads: 981
Open Access References How to cite this articleReferences
- Aineamani, B., & Naicker, S. (2014). Mathematics textbook analysis: A guide to choosing the appropriate mathematics textbook. AMESA: Demystifying Mathematics, 1(7), 11.
- Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 183-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001
- Aljami, A. H. (2012). How do elementary textbooks address fractions? a review of mathematics textbooks in the USA, Japan, and Kuwait. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(2), 239-261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9342-1
- Ata, A., & Yaman, H. (2021). Comparison of Turkey, Singapore and USA mathematics textbooks in terms of content and visuality according to 8th grade mathematics topics. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Abant Izzet Baysal University Faculty of Education Journal], 21(4), 1359-1377. https://doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2021..-955650
- Aydin, M. Z., & Akyol Gurler, S. (2012). Okulda değerler eğitimi [Values education in schools]. Nobel Publications.
- Baker, D., Knipe, H., Collins, J., Leon, J., Cummings, E., Blair, C., & Gamson, D. (2010). One hundred years of elementary school mathematics in the United States: A content analysis and cognitive assessment of textbooks from 1900 to 2000. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(4), 383-423. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.41.4.0383
- Bakirci, D., & Biber, A. (2022). Values of mathematics education in Turkish high school mathematics textbooks. International Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics, 9(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.17278/ijesim.1002710
- Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is–or might be–the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, 25(9), 6-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X025009006
- Baumann, J. F., & Graves, M. F. (2010). What is academic vocabulary? Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 54(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.54.1.1
- Berisha, V. (2015). The general characteristics of mathematics textbooks for lower secondary school in Kosovo. International Journal of Novel Research in Education and Learning, 2(2), 19-23. https://doi.org/10.5176/2345-7163_2.2.55
- Berisha, V., Ferizi-Miftari, J., & Klinaku, J. (2021). Features of tasks in teacher-made mathematics tests for classroom assessment. International Journal of Assessment & Evaluation, 28(1), 33-49. https:// doi.org/10.18848/2327-7920/CGP/v28i01/33-49
- Bishop, A. J., Clarkson, P., FitzSimons, G., & Seah, W. T. (2000). Why study values in mathematics teaching: Contextualizing the VAMP project. In W. Horng, & F. Lin (Eds.), History in mathematics education: Challenges for a new millennium (pp. 147-154).
- Bishop, A. J., Fitzsimons, G., Seah, W. T., & Clarkson, P. (1999). Values in mathematics education: Making values teaching explicit in the mathematics classroom [Paper presentation]. The Combined Annual Meeting of the Australian 230 Association for Research in Education and the New Zealand Association for Research in Education.
- Bråting, K., Madej, L., & Hemmi, K. (2019). Development of algebraic thinking: Opportunities offered by the Swedish curriculum and elementary mathematics textbooks. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 24(1), 27-49.
- Cai, J., Lo, J. J., & Watanabe, T. (2002). Intended treatments of arithmetic average in US and Asian school mathematics textbooks. School Science and Mathematics, 102(8), 391-404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2002.tb17891.x
- Cao, Z., Seah, W. T., & Bishop, A. J. (2006). A comparison of mathematical values conveyed in mathematics textbooks in China and Australia. In Proceedings of the Mathematics Education in Different Cultural Traditions–A Comparative Study of East Asia and the West (pp. 483-493). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-29723-5_29
- Castillo-Céspedes, M. J., & Burgos Navarro, M. (2022). Developing reflective competence in prospective mathematics teachers by analyzing textbooks lessons. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(6), em2121. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12092
- Cetin, I., Mutluoglu, A., Yazlik, D. O., & Erdogan, A. (2021). Ortaöğretim dokuzuncu sınıf matematik ders kitaplarının kök değerler çerçevesinde incelenmesi [Examination of secondary school ninth grade mathematics textbooks within the framework of root values]. Yaşadıkça Eğitim [Education As You Live], 35(2), 715-732. https://doi.org/10.33308/26674874.2021352297
- Chan, J. Y. C., Linnell, L. B. D., Trac, C., Drzewiecki, K. C., & Ottmar, E. (2023). Test of times new roman: Effects of font type on mathematical performance. Educational Research for Policy and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-023-09333-8
- Chang, B. L., Cromley, J. G., & Tran, N. (2016). Coordinating multiple representations in a reform calculus textbook. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(8), 1475-1497. https://doi.org/10 .1007/s10763-015-9652-3
- Charalambous, C. Y., Delaney, S., Hsu, H. Y., & Mesa, V. (2010). A comparative analysis of the addition and subtraction of fractions in textbooks from three countries. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12(2), 117-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060903460070
- Chin, C., & Lin, F. L. (2001). Value-loaded activities in mathematics classroom. In Proceedings of the 25th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 249-256).
- Choy, B. H., Lee, M. Y., & Mizzi, A. (2020). Insights into the teaching of gradient from an exploratory study of mathematics textbooks from Germany, Singapore, and South Korea. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(3), em0592. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/8273
- Dede, Y. (2015). Comparing primary and secondary mathematics teachers’ preferences regarding values about mathematics teaching in turkey and Germany. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13, 227-255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9483-z
- Erbas, A. K., Alacaci, C., & Bulut, M. (2012). A comparison of mathematics textbooks from Turkey, Singapore, and the United States of America. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 12(3), 2324-2329.
- Fan, L., & Kaeley, G. S. (2000). The influence of textbooks on teaching strategies: An empirical study. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 13, 2-9.
- Fan, L., Zhu, Y., & Miao, Z. (2013). Textbook research in mathematics education: Development status and directions. ZDM, 45, 633-646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0539-x
- Foster, C., Barichello, L., Bustang, B., Najjuma, R., & Saralar-Aras, I. (2022). Decolonizing educational design for school mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 42(2), 9-14.
- Frankel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2000). How to evaluate & design research in education. McGraw-Hill.
- Fuson, K. C., Stigler, J. W., & Bartsch, K. (1988). Grade placement of addition and subtraction topics in Japan, mainland China, the Soviet Union, Taiwan, and the United States. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19(5), 449-456. https://doi.org/10.2307/749177
- Gene, K. (2018). An analysis of school mathematics textbooks in terms of their pedagogical orientation. Open Journal for Educational Research, 2(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojer.0201.01001g
- Grootenboer, P. J., & Marshman, M. (2016). Mathematics, affect and learning. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-679-9
- Grouws, D. A., Tarr, J. E., Chávez, Ó., Sears, R., Soria, V. M., & Taylan, R. D. (2013). Curriculum and implementation effects on high school students’ mathematics learning from curricula representing subject-specific and integrated content organizations. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(2), 416-463. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.44.2.0416
- Hadar, L. L., & Ruby, T. L. (2019). Cognitive opportunities in textbooks: The cases of grade four and eight textbooks in Israel. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 21(1), 54-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2019.1564968
- Haggarty, L., & Pepin, B. (2002). An investigation of mathematics textbooks and their use in English, French and German classrooms: Who gets an opportunity to learn what?. British Educational Research Journal, 28(4), 567-590. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192022000005832
- Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A. (2007). From intended curriculum to written curriculum: Examining the voice of a mathematics textbook. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(4), 344-369.
- Herbel-Eisenmann, B., & Wagner, D. (2007). A framework for uncovering the way a textbook may position the mathematics learner. For the Learning of Mathematics, 27(2), 8-14.
- Hickey, G., & Kipping, C. (1996). A multi-stage approach to the coding of data from open-ended questions. Nurse Researcher, 4(1), 81-91. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.4.1.81.s9
- Ho, K. J. (2002). Analysis of strategies for problem solving presented in elementary school mathematics textbooks. School Math, 4(4), 565-580.
- Horzum, T., & Yildiz, E. (2023). Examination of middle school mathematics textbooks in terms of values. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 18(2), em0731. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/12908
- Houang, R. T., & Schmidt, W. H. (2008). TIMSS international curriculum analysis and measuring educational opportunities. In Proceedings of the 3rd IEA International Research Conference.
- Howson, G. (1995). Mathematics textbooks: A comparative study of grade 8 texts. Pacific Educational Press.
- Howson, G. (2013). The development of mathematics textbooks: Historical reflections from a personal perspective. ZDM, 45, 647-658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0511-9
- Howson, G., & Rogers, L. (2014). Mathematics education in the United Kingdom. In A. Karp, & G. Schubring (Eds.), Handbook on the history of mathematics education (pp. 257-282). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9155-2_13
- Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
- Huang, Z., Liu, S., Yang, Z., & Zou, Y. (2022). Similarities and differences of gender stereotypes in elementary school textbooks. In Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Sport Science, Education and Social Development (pp. 487-494). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-13-8_58
- Johansson, M. (2006). Teaching mathematics with textbooks: A classroom and curricular perspective [Doctoral dissertation, Luleå University of Technology].
- Johnston-Wilder, S., & Mason, J. (2004). Fundamental constructs in mathematics education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203465387
- Joseph, C. M. (2012). Communication and academic vocabulary in mathematics: A content analysis of prompts eliciting written responses in two elementary mathematics textbooks [PhD thesis, University of South Florida]. https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/etd/4344/
- Kalmus, V. (2004). What do pupils and textbooks do with each other? Methodological problems of research on socialization through educational media. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(4), 469-485. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270310001630670
- Karaca, D., & Uzunkol, E. (2019). Investigation of primary school mathematics textbooks in terms of the values they contain. International Journal of Field Education, 5(2), 55-71.
- Kilcan, T. (2020). Investigation of the root values in mathematics textbooks of middle school and Imam Hatip secondary schools. International Journal of New Approaches in Social Studies, 4(2), 248-266. https://doi.org/10.38015/sbyy.816641
- Kochagina, M. (2021). Math textbook in teaching a modern schoolchild. ARPHA Proceedings, 4, 485-501. https://doi.org/10.3897/ap.e4.e0485
- Kress, G., & Bezemer, J. (2009). Writing in a multimodal world of representation. In R. Beard, D. Myhill, J. Riley, & M. Nystrand (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of writing development (pp. 167-181). https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857021069.n12
- Krippendorff, K. (2004). Measuring the reliability of qualitative text analysis data. Quality and Quantity, 38, 787-800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-004-8107-7
- Kristanto, Y. D., & Santoso, E. B. (2020). Towards a mathematics textbook for supporting 21st century learning: The student perspective. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1657, 012037. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1657/1/012037
- Kurtdede Fidan, N., & Ulu, H. (2021). An analysis of the studies on “the values in children’s literature products” in Turkey. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 8(3), 103-118. https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.881495
- Li, Y. (2000). A comparison of problems that follow selected content presentations in American and Chinese mathematics textbooks. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(2), 234–241. https://doi.org/10.2307/749754
- Lithner, J. (2004). Mathematical reasoning in calculus textbook exercises. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23(4), 405-427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2004.09.003
- Macintyre, T., & Hamilton, S. (2010). Mathematics learners and mathematics textbooks: A question of identity? Whose curriculum? Whose mathematics? The Curriculum Journal, 21(1), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585170903558224
- Mahmood, K. (2009). Indicators for a quality textbook evaluation process in Pakistan. Journal of Research and Reflections in Education, 3(2), 158 -176.
- Mahmood, K. (2011). Conformity to quality characteristics of textbooks: The illusion of textbook evaluation in Pakistan. Journal of Research and Reflections in Education, 5(2), 170-190.
- Mazana, M. Y., Montero, C. S., & Casmir, R. O. (2020). Assessing students’ performance in mathematics in Tanzania: The teacher’s perspective. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(3), em0589. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/7994
- Murphy, M. M., Sullivan, M., Chaillou, A. L., & Ross, K. (2011). Measuring up: What teachers know about mathematics. Perspectives on Language and Literacy, 37(2), 36.
- National Center for Education Statistics. (2010). The national assessment of educational progress (NAEP) glossary of terms. NAEP.
- NCTM. (2000), Principles and standards for school mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
- Newall, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition. Harvard University Press.
- O’Connell, S. R., Beamon, C., Beyea, J. M., Denvir, S. S., Dowdall, L. A., Friedland, N. G., & Ward, J. D. (2005). Aiming for understanding: Lessons learned about writing in mathematics: Reflect and discuss. Teaching Children Mathematics, 12(4), 192-199. https://doi.org/10.5951/TCM.12.4.0192
- O’Halloran, K. (2005). Mathematical discourse, language, symbolism and visual images. Continuum.
- O’Keeffe, L. (2013). A framework for textbook analysis. International Review of Contemporary Learning Research, 2(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.12785/irclr/020101
- O’Keeffe, L., & O’Donoghue, J. (2015). A role for language analysis in mathematics textbook analysis. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13, 605-630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9463-3
- OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework: Mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264190511-en
- Ozkaya, F., & Duru, A. (2020). Examination of the status of inclusion of values within the scope of values education in middle school mathematics textbooks. Usak University Journal of Educational Research, 6(3), 43-67.
- Pepin, B. (2018). Enhancing teacher learning with curriculum resources. In L. Fan, L. Trouche, C. Qi, S. Rezat, & J. Visnovska (Eds.), Research on mathematics textbooks and teachers’ resources: Advances and issues (pp. 359-374). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73253-4_17
- Pepin, B., & Haggarty, L. (2001). Mathematics textbooks and their use in English, French and German classrooms: A way to understand teaching and learning cultures. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik [Central Journal for Mathematics Didactics], 33, 158-175. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02656616
- Rahimah, A., & Visnovska, J. (2021). Analysis of mathematics textbook use: An argument for combining horizontal, vertical, and contextual analyses. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1731, 012048. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1731/1/012048
- Reese, W. J. (2011). America’s public schools: From the common school to” no child left behind”. JHU Press.
- Rezat, S., & Sträßer, R. (2015). Methodological issues and challenges in research on mathematics textbooks. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 20(3-4), 247-266.
- Sahin, A. (2021). Eleştirel medya okuryazarlığı [Critical media literacy]. Ani Publications.
- Sahin, O. & Basgul, M. (2019). Mathematics textbooks research trends in Turkey. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(1), 90-104. https://doi.org/10.14582/DUZGEF.1890
- Sayin, V., Orbay, K., & Sam, E. A. (2019). Research of 5th grade mathematics textbook in terms of our values. IBAD Journal of Social Sciences, Special Issue, 161-171. https://doi.org/10.21733/ibad.605040
- Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C., Houang, R. T., Wang, H., Wiley, D. E., Cogan, L. S., & Wolfe, R. G. (2001). Why schools matter: A cross-national comparison of curriculum and learning. The Jossey-bass education series. ERIC.
- Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C., Valverde, G., Houang, R. T., & Wiley, D. E. (1997). Many visions, many aims: A cross-national investigation of curricular intentions in school mathematics. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5786-5
- Seah, W. T., & Bishop, A. J. (2000). Values in mathematics textbooks: A view through two Australasian regions. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED440870.pdf
- Seah, W. T., Andersson, A., Bishop, A., & Clarkson, P. (2016). What would the mathematics curriculum look like if values were the focus?. For the Learning of Mathematics, 36(1), 14-20.
- Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
- Silver, E. A. (1990). Thinking through mathematics: Fostering inquiry and communication in mathematics classrooms. The thinking series. College Board Publications.
- Son, J. W., & Diletti, J. (2017). What can we learn from textbook analysis? In J. W. Son, T. Watanabe, & J. J. Lo (Eds.), What matters? Research trends in international comparative studies in mathematics education (pp. 3-32). Springer.
- Sosniak, L. A., & Perlman, C. L. (1990). Secondary education by the book. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 22(5), 427-442. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027900220502
- Stein, M., Remillard, J., & Smith M. (2007). How curriculum influences student learning. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 319-369). Information Age.
- Sullivan, P., Clarke, D., & Clarke, B. (2012). Teaching with tasks for effective mathematics learning. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4681-1
- Tan, J. P., Lane, J., & Coustere, P. (1997). Putting inputs to work in elementary schools: What can be done in the Philippines? Economic Development and Cultural Change, 45(4), 857-879. https://doi.org/10.1086/452310
- Tan-Sisman, G., & Kirez, B. (2018). History of mathematics in the Turkish middle school mathematics curriculum and textbooks. History, 9. https://doi.org/10.14812/cuefd.361176
- Tárraga-Mínguez, R., Tarín-Ibáñez, J., & Lacruz-Pérez, I. (2021). Analysis of word problems in primary education mathematics textbooks in Spain. Mathematics, 9(17), 2123. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9172123
- Usiskin, Z. (2018). Electronic vs. paper textbook presentations of the various aspects of mathematics. ZDM, 50, 849-861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0936-2
- Valverde, G. A., Bianchi, L. J., Wolfe, R. G., Schmidt, W. H., & Houang, R. T. (2002). Textbooks and educational opportunity. In G. A. Valverde , L. J. Bianchi , R. G. Wolfe , W. H. Schmidt , & R. T. Houang (Eds.), According to the book: Using TIMSS to investigate the translation of policy into practice through the world of textbooks (pp. 1-20). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0844-0_1
- van den Ham, A. K., & Heinze, A. (2018). Does the textbook matter? Longitudinal effects of textbook choice on primary school students’ achievement in mathematics. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 59, 133-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.07.005
- Van Steenbrugge, H., Valcke, M., & Desoete, A. (2013). Teachers’ views of mathematics textbook series in Flanders: Does it (not) matter which mathematics textbook series schools choose? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(3), 322. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.713995
- van Zanten, M. A. (2020). Opportunities to learn offered by primary school mathematics textbooks in the Netherlands [PhD dissertation, Utrecht University].
- Westbury, I. (2008). Making curricula. In The SAGE handbook of curriculum and instruction (pp. 45-65). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412976572.n3
- Yancey, K. B. (2004). Using multiple technologies to teach writing. Educational Leadership, 62(2), 38-41.
- Yang, D. C., & Sianturi, I. A. J. (2022). Analysis of algebraic problems intended for elementary graders in Finland, Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, and Taiwan. Educational Studies, 48(1), 75-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1740977
- Yazlik, D. O. (2022). Use of concrete teaching materials in teaching mathematics: Textbook analysis. International Journal of Eurasian Education and Culture, 7(18), 1984-2027. https://doi.org/10.35826/ijoecc.571
- Yeap, B. H. (2005). Building foundations and developing creativity: An analysis of Singapore mathematics textbooks. In Proceedings of the 3rd East Asia regional Conference on Mathematics Education in Shanghai, China.
- Zhu, Y., & Fan, L. (2006). Focus on the representation of problem types in intended curriculum: A comparison of selected mathematics textbooks from Mainland China and the United States. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4, 609-626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-006-9036-9
How to cite this article
APA
Zeynivandnezhad, F., Saralar-Aras, I., & Halai, A. (2024). A refined framework for qualitative content analysis of mathematics textbooks. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(3), em2412. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14284
Vancouver
Zeynivandnezhad F, Saralar-Aras I, Halai A. A refined framework for qualitative content analysis of mathematics textbooks. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2024;20(3):em2412. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14284
AMA
Zeynivandnezhad F, Saralar-Aras I, Halai A. A refined framework for qualitative content analysis of mathematics textbooks. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2024;20(3), em2412. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14284
Chicago
Zeynivandnezhad, Fereshteh, Ipek Saralar-Aras, and Anjum Halai. "A refined framework for qualitative content analysis of mathematics textbooks". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2024 20 no. 3 (2024): em2412. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14284
Harvard
Zeynivandnezhad, F., Saralar-Aras, I., and Halai, A. (2024). A refined framework for qualitative content analysis of mathematics textbooks. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(3), em2412. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14284
MLA
Zeynivandnezhad, Fereshteh et al. "A refined framework for qualitative content analysis of mathematics textbooks". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 20, no. 3, 2024, em2412. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14284